Abstract
When participants control periodic isometric force cycling between two target forces, they more accurately control force in a joint action than in an individual action. In some other studies, however, individuals tend to outperform dyads in joint action. The present study thus examined experimental conditions in which dyads outperformed individuals in a task of force produced by two people. This study consisted of two tasks with two target conditions and three force production conditions. The individual task was performed by one participant, and the joint task was performed by two participants. In absolute and relative target conditions, the participants made continuous, discrete, and periodic isometric pressing movements with the index finger. Although no difference was seen in force error between tasks in the continuous condition, the joint task had a smaller error than the individual task in the two other conditions. The joint task had a smaller variable force than the individual task in the periodic conditions, but no difference was seen in force variability between tasks in the two other conditions. Participants mainly controlled force in both tasks in the continuous condition. In the periodic or discrete condition at a prescribed interval, however, participants had to control both force and timing in the individual task, and muscle force must be mainly controlled to compensate for force errors by synchronizing interpersonal force outputs in the joint task. Thus, dyads can reduce the dimensionality of the control problem because they can synchronize their action which provides timing information.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barhrami B, Olsen K, Latham PE, Roepstorff A, Rees G, Frith CD (2010) Optimally interacting minds. Science 329:1081–1085
Bosga J, Meulenbroek RGJ (2007) Joint-action coordination of redundant force contributions in a virtual lifting task. Mot Control 11:235–258
Diedrichsen J, Hazeltine E, Nurss EK, Ivry RB (2003) The role of the corpus callosum in the coupling of bimanual isometric force pulses. J Neurophysiol 90:2409–2418
Ganesh G, Takagi A, Osu R, Yoshioka T, Kawato M, Burdet E (2014) Two is better than one: physical interactions improve motor performance in humans. Sci Rep 4:3824
Helmuth LL, Ivry RB (1996) When two hands are better than one: reduced timing variability during bimanual movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22:278–293
Knoblich G, Jordan JS (2003) Action coordination in groups and individuals: learning anticipatory control. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 29:1006–1016
Knoblich G, Butterfill S, Sebanz N (2011) Psychological research on joint action: theory and data. In: Burlington RB (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation, vol 54. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 59–101
Koriat A (2012) When are two heads better than one and why? Science 336:360–362
Masumoto J, Inui N (2012) Effects of force levels on error compensation in periodic bimanual isometric force control. J Mot Behav 44:261–266
Masumoto J, Inui N (2013) Two heads are better than one: both complementary and synchronous strategies facilitate joint action. J Neurophysiol 109:1307–1314
Masumoto J, Inui N (2014a) A leader–follower relationship in joint action on a discrete force production task. Exp Brain Res 232:3525–3533
Masumoto J, Inui N (2014b) Effects of speech on both complementary and synchronous strategies in joint action. Exp Brain Res 232:2421–2429
Masumoto J, Inui N (2015) Motor control hierarchy in joint action that involves bimanual force production. J Neurophysiol 113:3736–3743
Masumoto J, Inui N (2017) Bidirectional transfer between joint and individual actions in a task of discrete force production. Exp Brain Res 235:2259–2265
Masumoto J, Inui N (2019a) Force asymmetry deteriorates complementary force production during joint action. Exp Brain Res 237:1833–1839
Masumoto J, Inui N (2019b) Load perturbation facilitates interpersonal error compensation in a dyadic force production task. J Mot Behav 51:59–67
Nalepka P, Kallen RW, Chemero A, Saltzman E, Richardson MJ (2017) Herd those sheep: emergent multiagent coordination and behavioral mode switching. Psychol Sci 28:630–650
Newman-Norlund RD, van Schie HT, van Zuijlen AM, Bekkering H (2007) The mirror system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nature Neurosci 10:817–818
Newman-Norlund RD, Bosga J, Meulenbroek RG, Bekkering H (2008) Anatomical substrates of cooperative joint-action in a continuous motor task: virtual lifting and balancing. Neuroimage 41:169–177
Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113
Reed K, Peshkin M, Hartmann MJ, Grabowecky M, Patton J, Vishton PM (2006) Haptically linked dyads: are two motor-control systems better than one? Psychol Sci 17:365–366
Rosenblum M, Kurths J (1998) Analyzing synchronization phenomena from bivariate data by means of the Hilbert transform. In: Kantz H, Kurths J, Mayer-Kress G (eds) Nonlinear analysis of physiological data. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 91–99
Schmidt RC, Richardson MJ (2008) Dynamics of interpersonal coordination. In: Fuchs A, Jirsa VK (eds) Coordination: neural, behavioral and social dynamics. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 281–308
Takagi A, Ganesh G, Yoshioka T, Kawato M, Burdet E (2017) Physically interacting individuals estimate the partner’s goal to enhance their movements. Nat Hum Behav 1:0054
van der Wel RPRD, Knoblich G, Sebanz N (2011) Let the force be with us: dyads exploit haptic coupling for coordination. J Exp Psychol Hum Percep Perform 37:1420–1431
Wahn B, Karlinsky A, Schmitz L, König P (2018) Let’s move it together: a review of group benefits in joint object control. Front Psychol 9:918
Wolpert DM, Doya K, Kawato MA (2003) Unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358:593–602
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21K17631).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Francesco Lacquaniti.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Masumoto, J., Inui, N. Experimental conditions in which dyads outperform individuals in a task of force produced by two people. Exp Brain Res 240, 2999–3009 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06469-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06469-6