Skip to main content
Log in

Force asymmetry deteriorates complementary force production during joint action

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aimed to determine the effects of force asymmetry on interpersonal force production. This study consisted of an individual task executed by one participant at a time in a pair, and three joint tasks executed by two participants simultaneously under conditions of 1:1, 1:0.75, and 1:0.5. Two individuals produced discrete forces at the same time so that the sum of forces they produced was the target force in the joint task. Under the 1:1 condition, the target force was the sum of the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) produced by the index finger of each participant × 0.1 (10% MVC). Under the 1:0.75 condition, the investigators manipulated the force produced by only one of the pair, for example, B, but not A. The feedback was also scaled as a result. The target force was the MVC of participant A + the MVC of participant B × 0.75 × 0.1. Similarly, the target force under the 1:0.5 condition was the MVC of participant A + the MVC of participant B × 0.5 × 0.1. The present study found that forces produced by pairs were negatively correlated and the correlation value was higher under the 1:1 condition than the 1:0.75 and 1:0.5 conditions. The absolute error was smaller under the 1:1 condition than the 1:0.5 condition. Complementary force production was attenuated and the error increased as differences between forces produced by two participants increased. Thus, asymmetry of forces produced by pairs deteriorated complementary force production and interpersonal performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bosga J, Meulenbroek RGJ (2007) Joint-action coordination of redundant force contributions in a virtual lifting task. Mot Control 11:235–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark H (1996) Using language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 83

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ganesh G, Takagi A, Osu R, Yoshioka T, Kawato M, Burdet E (2014) Two is better than one: physical interactions improve motor performance in humans. Sci Rep 4:3824

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Knoblich G, Jordan JS (2003) Action coordination in groups and individuals: learning anticipatory control. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 29:1006–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Konvalinka I, Vuust P, Roepstorff A, Frith CD (2010) Follow you, follow me: continuous mutual prediction and adaptation in joint tapping. Q J Exp Psychol 63:2220–2230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loehr DJ, Vesper C (2016) The sound of you and me: novices represent shared goals in joint action. Quart J Exp Psychol 69:536–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loehr JD, Kourtis D, Vesper C, Sebanz N, Knoblich G (2013) Monitoring individual and joint action outcomes in duet music performance. J Cogn Neurosci 25:1049–1061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masumoto J, Inui N (2013) Two heads are better than one: both complementary and synchronous strategies facilitate joint action. J Neurophysiol 109:1307–1314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masumoto J, Inui N (2014a) A leader–follower relationship in joint action on a discrete force production task. Exp Brain Res 232:3525–3533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masumoto J, Inui N (2014b) Effects of speech on both complementary and synchronous strategies in joint action. Exp Brain Res 232:2421–2429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masumoto J, Inui N (2015) Motor control hierarchy in joint action that involves bimanual force production. J Neurophysiol 113:3736–3743

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Masumoto J, Inui N (2019) Load perturbation facilitates interpersonal error compensation in a dyadic force production task. J Mot Behav 51:59–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noy L, Dekel E, Alon U (2011) The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two people improvising motion together. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:20947–20952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reed K, Peshkin M, Hartmann MJ, Graboweeky M, Patton J, Vishton PM (2006) Haptically linked dyads are two motor-control systems better than one? Psychol Sci 17:365–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt RA, Zelaznik H, Hawkins B, Frank JS, Quinn JT (1979) Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychol Rev 86:415–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebanz N, Knoblich G (2009) Prediction in joint action: what, when, and where. Top Cogn Sci 1:353–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sebanz N, Bekkering H, Knoblich G (2006) Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends Cogn Sci 10:70–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Wel RPRD, Knoblich G, Sebanz N (2011) Let the force be with us: dyads exploit haptic coupling for coordination. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 37:1420–1431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wahn B, Karlinsky A, Schmitz L, Konig P (2018) Let’s move it together: a review of group benefits in joint object control. Front Psychol 9:918

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DM, Doya K, Kawato M (2003) A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358:593–602

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18K17911).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junya Masumoto.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Masumoto, J., Inui, N. Force asymmetry deteriorates complementary force production during joint action. Exp Brain Res 237, 1833–1839 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05555-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05555-6

Keywords

Navigation