Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of short incompatible practice on the Simon effect: transfer along the vertical dimension and across vertical and horizontal dimensions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In spatial compatibility and Simon tasks, the response is faster when stimulus and response locations are on the same side than when they are on opposite sides. It has been shown that a spatial incompatible practice leads to a subsequent modulation of the Simon effect along the horizontal dimension. It has also been reported that this modulation occurs both along and across vertical and horizontal dimensions, but only after intensive incompatible training (600 trials). In this work, we show that this modulatory effect can be obtained with a smaller number of incompatible trials, changing the spatial arrangement of the vertical response keys to obtain a stronger dimensional overlap between the spatial codes of stimuli and response keys. The results of Experiment 1 showed that 80 incompatible vertical trials abolished the Simon effect in the same dimension. Experiment 2 showed that a modulation of the vertical Simon effect could be obtained after 80 horizontal incompatible trials. Experiment 3 explored whether the transfer effect can also occur in a horizontal Simon task after a brief vertical spatial incompatibility task, and results were similar to the previous experiments. In conclusion, we suggest that the spatial arrangement between response key and stimulus locations may be critical to establish the short-term memory links that enable the transfer of learning between brief incompatible practices and the Simon effects, both along the vertical dimension and across vertical and horizontal dimensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambrosecchia M, Marino BF, Gawryszewski LG, Riggio L (2015) Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and affordance effects are not ruled by the same mechanisms. Front Human Neurosci. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00283

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroni G, Yamaguchi M, Chen J, Proctor RW (2013) Mechanisms underlying transfer of task-defined rules across feature dimensions. Exp Psychol. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000214

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Creekmur B, Vu KP (2011) Effect of prior practice on the stimulus-response compatibility effect in a mixed mapping environment. Am J Psychol 125(3):335–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawryszewski LG, Riggio L, Rizzolatti G, Umiltà C (1987) Movements of attention in the three spatial dimensions and the meaning of “neutral” cues. Neuropsychologia 25(IA):19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel B (2011) The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. Acta Psychol 136(2):189–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornblum S, Hasbroucq T, Osman A (1990) Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—A model and taxonomy. Psychol Rev 97(2):253–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Park Y, Gu X, Fan J (2010) Dimensional overlap accounts for independence and integration of stimulus—response compatibility effects. Atten Percept Psychophys 72(6):1710–1720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marini M, Iani C, Nicoletti R, Rubichi S (2011) Between-task transfer of learning from spatial compatibility to a color Stroop task. Exp Psychol. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ottoboni G, Iani C, Tessari A, Rubichi S (2013) Modulation of the affordance effect through transfer of learning. Q J Exp Psychol 66(12):2295–2302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor RW (2013) Stimulus affect valence may influence mapping-rule selection but does not reverse the spatial compatibility effect: reinterpretation of Conde et al. (2011). Psychol Neurosci 6(1):3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor RW, Lu CH (1999) Processing irrelevant location information: practice and transfer effects in choice-reaction tasks. Mem Cognit 27(1):63–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor RW, Vu KPL (2006) Stimulus-response compatibility principles: data, theory, and application. CRC Press, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigon J, Massaccesi S, Umiltà C (2011) A Simon effect for depth in three-dimensional displays. Am J Psychol 124(4): 395–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soetens E, Maetens K, Zeischka P (2010) Practice-induced and sequential modulations of the Simon effect. Atten Percept Psychophys 72(4):895–911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tagliabue M, Zorzi M, Umiltà C, Bassignani F (2000) The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 26(2):648–670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tagliabue M, Vidotto G, Umiltà C, Altoè G, Treccani B, Spera P (2007) The measurement of left-right asymmetries in the Simon effect: a fine-grained analysis. Behav Res Methods 39(1):50–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Treccani B, Milanese N, Umiltà C (2010) Influence on Simon and SNARC effects of a nonspatial stimulus-response mapping: between-task logical recoding. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 36:1239–1254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Umiltà C, Zorzi M (1997) Commentary on Barber and O’Leary: learning and attention in S–R compatibility. In: Hommel B, Prinz W (eds) Theoretical issues in stimulus–response compatibility. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 173–178

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Lubbe RH, Abrahamse EL (2011) The premotor theory of attention and the Simon effect. Acta Psychol 136(2):259–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Lubbe RH, Abrahamse EL, De Kleine E (2012) The premotor theory of attention as an account for the Simon effect. Acta Psychol 140(1):25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vu KPL (2007) Influences on the Simon effect of prior practice with spatially incompatible mappings: transfer within and between horizontal and vertical dimensions. Mem Cognit 35(6):1463–1471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research financially supported by: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq): Proc. 450588/2009-2, Proc. 309544/2009-2, Proc. 483611/2009-3, Proc. 455353/2012-3, Proc. 312189/2012-5, Proc. 478834/2013-6, PIBIC/UFF/CNPq, PIBITI/UFF/CNPq. Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES): Proc. AEX 1249/13-4, PROAP/CAPES/UFF. Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ): Edital FAPERJ no. 06/2013 (Pró-idoso)—Proc. 110.079/2013, E-26/101.958/2010, E-26/101.061/2011, E-26/100.661/2013, E-26/102.160/2013. Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa, Pós-graduação e Inovação da Universidade Federal Fluminense: FOPESQ/PROPPi/UFF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allan Pablo Lameira.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have not conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Conde, E.F.Q., Fraga-Filho, R.S., Lameira, A.P. et al. Influence of short incompatible practice on the Simon effect: transfer along the vertical dimension and across vertical and horizontal dimensions. Exp Brain Res 233, 3313–3321 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4399-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4399-1

Keywords

Navigation