Skip to main content
Log in

A Multiplicative Ergodic Theorem for von Neumann Algebra Valued Cocycles

  • Published:
Communications in Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The classical Multiplicative Ergodic Theorem of Oseledets is generalized here to cocycles taking values in a semi-finite von Neumann algebra. This allows for a continuous Lyapunov distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andruchow, E., Larotonda, G.: Nonpositively curved metric in the positive cone of a finite von Neumann algebra. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 74(1), 205–218 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Anantharaman, C., Popa, S.: An introduction to \(II_1\) factors. Book in progress (2016)

  3. Bridson, M.R., Haefliger, A.: Metric spaces of non-positive curvature. In: Wissenschaften, M. (ed.) Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 319. Springer, Berlin (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, L.G., Kosaki, H.: Jensen’s inequality in semi-finite von Neumann algebras. J. Oper. Theory 23(1), 3–19 (1990)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Blumenthal, A.: A volume-based approach to the multiplicative ergodic theorem on Banach spaces. Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst. 36(5), 2377–2403 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Conde, C., Larotonda, G.: Spaces of nonpositive curvature arising from a finite algebra. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 368(2), 636–649 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Connes, A.: Classification of injective factors. Cases \(II_{1},\)\(II_{\infty },\)\(III_{\lambda },\)\(\lambda \ne 1\). Ann. Math. (2) 104(1), 73–115 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Conway, J.B.: A Course in Functional Analysis. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 96, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Conway, J.B.: A Course in Operator Theory. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 21. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dixmier, J.: von Neumann Algebras. North-Holland Mathematical Library, vol. 27. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam (1981). With a preface by E. C. Lance, Translated from the second French edition by F. Jellett

  11. Fuglede, B., Kadison, R.V.: Determinant theory in finite factors. Ann. Math. 2(55), 520–530 (1952)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Fack, T., Kosaki, H.: Generalized \(s\)-numbers of \(\tau \)-measurable operators. Pac. J. Math. 123(2), 269–300 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Folland, G.B.: Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications. Pure and Applied Mathematics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. González-Tokman, C., Quas, A.: A concise proof of the multiplicative ergodic theorem on Banach spaces. J. Mod. Dyn. 9, 237–255 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Haagerup, U., Schultz, H.: Brown measures of unbounded operators affiliated with a finite von Neumann algebra. Math. Scand. 100(2), 209–263 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Haagerup, U., Schultz, H.: Invariant subspaces for operators in a general \({{\rm II}}_1\)-factor. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 109, 19–111 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson, G.W.: The product of strong operator measurable functions is strong operator measurable. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 117(4), 1097–1104 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaplansky, I.: A theorem on rings of operators. Pac. J. Math. 1, 227–232 (1951)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Kauımanovich, V.A.: Lyapunov exponents, symmetric spaces and a multiplicative ergodic theorem for semisimple Lie groups. Zap. Nauchn. Sem. Leningrad. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. (LOMI). 164(Differentsial’ naya Geom. Gruppy Li i Mekh. IX:29–46, 196–197 (1987)

  20. Karlsson, A., Margulis, G.A.: A multiplicative ergodic theorem and nonpositively curved spaces. Commun. Math. Phys. 208(1), 107–123 (1999)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Kadison, R.V., Ringrose, J.R.: Fundamentals of the theory of operator algebras, vol. II. Volume 16 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence. Corrected reprint of the 1986 original (1997)

  22. Lian, Z., Lu, K.: Lyapunov exponents and invariant manifolds for random dynamical systems in a Banach space. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 206(967), vi+106 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Lück, W.: \(L^2\)-invariants: theory and applications to geometry and \(K\)-theory, vol 44. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin (2002)

  24. Mañé, R.: Lyapounov exponents and stable manifolds for compact transformations. In: Geometric dynamics (Rio de Janeiro, 1981). Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1007, pp. 522–577. Springer, Berlin (1983)

  25. Padmanabhan, A.R.: Convergence in measure and related results in finite rings of operators. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 128, 359–378 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Reed, M., Simon, B.: Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics I. Functional Analysis, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Ruelle, D.: Characteristic exponents and invariant manifolds in Hilbert space. Ann. Math. (2) 115(2), 243–290 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Schaumlöffel, K.-U.: Multiplicative ergodic theorems in infinite dimensions. In: Lyapunov Exponents (Oberwolfach, 1990). Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1486, pp. 187–195. Springer, Berlin (1991)

  29. Segal, I.E.: A non-commutative extension of abstract integration. Ann. Math. 2(57), 401–457 (1953)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Stinespring, W.F.: Integration theorems for gages and duality for unimodular groups. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 90, 15–56 (1959)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Takesaki, M.: Theory of Operator Algebras. I. Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 124. Springer, Berlin (2002) Reprint of the first (1979) edition. Operator Algebras and Non-commutative Geometry, 5

  32. Takesaki, M.: Theory of Operator Algebras II. Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 125. Springer, Berlin (2003). Operator Algebras and Non-commutative Geometry, 6

  33. Thieullen, P.: Fibrés dynamiques asymptotiquement compacts. Exposants de Lyapounov. Entropie. Dimension. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 4(1), 49–97 (1987)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Tikhonov, O.E.: Continuity of operator functions in topologies connected with a trace on a von Neumann algebra. Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Mat. 1, 77–79 (1987)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

L. Bowen would like thank IPAM and UCLA for their hospitality. The initial ideas for this projects were obtained while L. Bowen was attending the Quantitative Linear Algebra semester at IPAM.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lewis Bowen.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Liverani.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Lewis Bowen acknowledges support from NSF Grant DMS-1900386 and a Simons Fellowship. Ben Hayes acknowledges support from NSF Grants DMS-1827376 and DMS-2000105. Yuqing Lin acknowledges support from NSF Grant DMS-1900386..

Appendices

Diffuse Finite von Neumann Algebras

We recall some definitions from the introduction.

Definition 13

Let \(M\subseteq B(\mathcal {H}),\) \(N\subseteq B(\mathcal {K})\) be von Neumann algebras. A linear map \(\theta :M\rightarrow N\) is normal if \(\theta \big |_{\{x\in M:\Vert x\Vert \le 1\}}\) is weak operator topology-weak operator topology continuous.

For linear functionals, this agrees with our previous notion of normality introduced in Sect. 1.3. See [KR97, Theorem 7.1.12].

It can be shown that a \(C^{*}\)-algebra is a von Neumann algebra if and only if M has a predual (i.e. is isometrically isomorphic to the dual of a Banach space), and that moreover this predual is unique [Tak02, Theorem III.3.5 and Corollary III.3.9]. It is also known that a linear map is normal if and only if it is weak\(^{*}\)-weak\(^{*}\) continuous. This explains why normality is the correct continuity condition for maps between von Neumann algebras: it is intrinsic to the algebra and does not depend upon how it is represented.

Suppose that \((M,\tau )\) is a finite tracial von Neumann algebra. We leave it as an exercise to verify that a sequence (or more generally a net) \(x_{n}\in M\) with \(\Vert x_{n}\Vert \le 1\) tends to x in the weak operator topology acting on \(\text {L}^{2}(M,\tau )\) if and only if

$$\begin{aligned} \tau (x_{n}a)\rightarrow _{n\rightarrow \infty }\tau (xa)\text { for all }a\in M. \end{aligned}$$
(17)

In particular, normality of the trace implies that the regular representation of M on \(\text {L}^{2}(M,\tau )\) is normal. It follows from the fact that (17) characterizes convergence in the WOT on the unit ball of M that a trace-preserving \(*\)-homomorphism between tracial finite von Neumann algebras is normal.

Definition 14

Let M be a von Neumann algebra. A projection \(p\in M\) is a minimal projection if whenever \(q\in M\) is a projection with \(q\le p\) we have either \(q=p\) or \(q=0\). We say that M is diffuse if it has no nonzero minimal projections.

Proposition A.1

Let \((M,\tau )\) be a finite tracial von Neumann algebra. The following are equivalent:

  1. 1.

    M is diffuse,

  2. 2.

    there is an atomless standard probability space \((X,\mu )\) and an injective, trace-preserving \(*\)-homomorphism \(\iota :\text {L}^{\infty }(X,\mu )\rightarrow M\), (here \(\text {L}^{\infty }(X,\mu )\) is equipped with the trace \(\int \cdot \,d\mu \)),

  3. 3.

    there is a sequence \(u_{n}\) of unitaries in M with \(u_{n}\rightarrow 0\) in the weak operator topology.

Proof

(1) implies (2): Let \(A\subseteq M\) be a unital, abelian von Neumann algebra which is maximal under inclusion among all abelian von Neumann subalgebras of M. The existence of such an A follows from Zorn’s Lemma. We start with the following claim.

Claim: A is diffuse.

To prove the claim suppose, for contradiction, that \(p\in A\) is a nonzero minimal projection. Since every von Neumann algebra is the norm closed linear span of its projections by [Con90, Proposition IX.4.8], it follows that the von Neumann algebra Ap is 1-dimensional. Since M is diffuse, there exists a nonzero projection \(q\in M\) so that \(q\le p\) and \(q\ne p\). We claim that q commutes with A. To see this, let \(a\in A\). Since Ap is 1-dimensional, there is a \(\lambda \in {{\mathbb {C}}}\) so that \(ap=\lambda p.\) So

$$\begin{aligned}aq=(ap+a(1-p))q=(\lambda p+a(1-p))q=\lambda q,\end{aligned}$$

the last equation following as \(q\le p\) implies that \(pq=q\) and \((1-p)q=0\). Similarly,

$$\begin{aligned}qa=q(ap+a(1-p))=q(\lambda p+(1-p)a)=\lambda q,\end{aligned}$$

where in the second equality we are using that A is abelian and that \(p\in A\). So q commutes with A. Now set

$$\begin{aligned}B=\overline{{\text {span}}(A\cup \{qa:a\in A\})}^{WOT}.\end{aligned}$$

Because q commutes with A, we know that \({\text {span}}(A\cup \{qa:a\in A\})\) is an abelian \(*\)-algebra. So B is an abelian von Neumann algebra containing A. By maximality, this forces \(B=A\) and so \(q\in A\). But then p is not a minimal projection in A, which gives a contradiction. This proves the claim.

Having shown the claim, note that by [Tak02, Theorem III.1.18] we have that \((A,\tau )\cong (\text {L}^{\infty }(Y,\nu ),\int \cdot \,d\nu )\) where Y is a compact Hausdorff space and \(\nu \) is a probability measure on Y (we can choose Y to be metrizable if and only if \(\text {L}^{2}(Y,\nu )\) is separable). Saying that \(\text {L}^{\infty }(Y,\nu )\) is diffuse is equivalent to saying that for every measurable \(E\subseteq Y\) with \(\nu (E)>0\) there is a measurable \(F\subseteq E\) with \(\nu (F)<\nu (E)\). By a standard measure theory exercise this forces \(\{\nu (F):F\subseteq E \text { is measurable}\}=[0,\nu (E)]\) for every measurable \(E\subseteq Y\). By a recursive construction, this implies that for every \(n\in {{\mathbb {N}}}\) and for every \(\sigma \in \{0,1\}^{n}\) there is a measurable \(E_{\sigma }\subseteq Y\) which satisfy the following properties:

  • \(\nu (E_{\sigma })=2^{-n}\) for every \(n\in {{\mathbb {N}}}\) and every \(\sigma \in \{0,1\}^{n}\),

  • for every \(n\in {{\mathbb {N}}}\) and every \(\sigma ,\omega \in \{0,1\}^{n}\) with \(\sigma \ne \omega \) we have \(E_{\sigma }\cap E_{\omega }=\varnothing \),

  • \(X=E_{0}\cup E_{1},\)

  • for every \(\sigma \in \{0,1\}^{n}\) we have \(E_{\sigma }=E_{\sigma 0}\cup E_{\sigma 1}\) where \(\sigma 0=(\sigma _{1},\ldots ,\sigma _{n},0)\), \(\sigma 1=(\sigma _{1},\ldots ,\sigma _{n},1)\in \{0,1\}^{n+1}\).

It follows from the above properties that there is a unique map \(\pi :Y\rightarrow \{0,1\}^{{{\mathbb {N}}}}\) with the property that for all \(y\in Y,n\in {{\mathbb {N}}}\) we have that \((\pi (y)_{1},\cdots ,\pi (y)_{n})=\sigma \) if and only if \(y\in E_{\sigma }\). Moreover, the above properties imply that \(\mu =\pi _{*}\nu \) is the infinite power of the uniform measure on \(\{0,1\}\). The map \(\pi \) induces a trace-preserving \(*\)-homomorphism

$$\begin{aligned}\theta :\text {L}^{\infty }(\{0,1\}^{{{\mathbb {N}}}},\mu )\rightarrow \text {L}^{\infty }(Y,\nu )\cong A\end{aligned}$$

by \(\theta (f)=f\circ \pi \). Combining with the inclusion of A into M we have a trace-preserving \(*\)-homomorphism \(\text {L}^{\infty }(\{0,1\}^{{{\mathbb {N}}}},\mu )\rightarrow M\). Since \((\{0,1\}^{{{\mathbb {N}}}},\mu )\) is an atomless standard probability space, we are done.

(2) implies (3): By [Tak02, Theorem V.1.22] we may, and will, assume that \((X,\mu )=([0,1],m)\) where m is Lebesgue measure. Define unitaries \(v_{n}\) in \(\text {L}^{\infty }([0,1],m)\) by \(v_{n}(x)=e^{2\pi i nx}\). Let \(\iota :\text {L}^{\infty }([0,1],m) \rightarrow B(\text {L}^{2}([0,1],m))\) be the inclusion map. So for \(\theta \in \text {L}^{\infty }([0,1],m)\) and \(f \in \text {L}^{2}([0,1],m)\), \(\iota (\theta )(f)(x) = \theta (x)f(x).\)

It follows from the Riemann-Lebesgue Lemma that \(\iota (v_{n})\rightarrow 0\) in the weak operator topology (as \(n\rightarrow \infty \)). By normality, we have that \(v_{n}\rightarrow 0\) in the weak operator topology as well.

(3) implies (1): Suppose that \(p\in M\) is a minimal projection. Let z be the central support of M, namely the smallest projection in the center of M which dominates p. Since M is a minimal projection, it follows by [KR97, Proposition 6.4.3 and Corollary 6.5.3] that we have a normal isomorphism of von Neumann algebras \(Mz\cong B(\mathcal {K})\) for some Hilbert space \(\mathcal {K}\). Since Mz (and thus \(B(\mathcal {K})\)) has a faithful, finite, normal tracial state it follows that \(\mathcal {K}\) is finite-dimensional. So Mz is finite-dimensional. Note that \(u_{n}z\rightarrow 0\) in the weak operator topology. Since there is only one Hausdorff vector space topology on a finite-dimensional space, we know that \(\Vert u_{n}z\Vert \rightarrow 0\). But by unitarity we know that \(\Vert z\Vert =\Vert u_{n}z\Vert \). So \(z=0\), and the fact that \(p\le z\) implies that \(p=0\). So M has no nonzero minimal projection, and thus M is diffuse. \(\quad \square \)

As we remarked in the introduction, for most of the tracial von Neumann algebras we are interested in, the limiting operator in our Multiplicative Ergodic Theorem cannot be compact (unless it is zero). This is because of the following result.

Proposition A.2

Let \(M\subseteq B(\mathcal {H})\) be a diffuse von Neumann algebra. Then M does not contain any nonzero compact operators.

Proof

Suppose that \(x\in M\) is a nonzero compact operator. Then \(x^{*}x\) is also a nonzero compact operator, and is self-adjoint. By the spectral theorem for compact normal operators, there is a \(\lambda \in (0,\infty )\) which is a eigenvalue for \(x^{*}x\) with finite dimensional eigenspace. Let p be the projection onto the kernel of \(\lambda I-x^{*}x\). By functional calculus, we know that \(p=1_{\{\lambda \}}(x^{*}x)\). So it follows by [Con90, Proposition IX.8.1] that \(p\in M.\) Since \(p\mathcal {H}\) is finite-dimensional, we may choose a nonzero projection \(q\le p\) so that \(\dim (q\mathcal {H})\le \dim (e\mathcal {H})\) whenever \(e\in M\) is a nonzero projection with \(e\le p.\) It is direct to see that q is a minimal projection in M, and this contradicts our assumption that M is diffuse. \(\quad \square \)

We close with some facts about \(\text {L}^{2}(M,\tau )\) and \({{\text {GL}}}^{2}(M,\tau )\) when M is diffuse. We need a few preliminaries. Suppose that \((N,\widetilde{\tau })\), \((M,\tau )\) are tracial-von Neumann algebras and that \(\iota :N\rightarrow M\) is a trace-preserving \(*\)-homomorphism. Then \(\mu _{|\iota (x)|}=\mu _{|x|}\) for all \(x\in N\) and thus \(\iota \) is uniformly continuous for the measure topology (with respect to the unique translation-invariant uniform structure on a topological vector space). By [Tak03, Lemma 2.3 and Theorem 2.5], we may regard \(\text {L}^{0}(M,\tau )\) and \(\text {L}^{0}(N,\widetilde{\tau })\) as the measure topology completions of M and N, and so there is a unique measure topology continuous extension \(\text {L}^{0}(N,\widetilde{\tau })\rightarrow \text {L}^{0}(M,\tau )\) of \(\iota \). We will still use \(\iota \) for this extension. Since \(\text {L}^{0}(M,\tau )\), \(\text {L}^{0}(N,\widetilde{\tau })\) are \(*\)-algebras extending MN, the map \(\iota :\text {L}^{0}(N,\widetilde{\tau })\rightarrow \text {L}^{0}(M,\tau )\) is a \(*\)-homomorphism. By measure topology continuity of \(\iota \), density of N in \(\text {L}^{0}(N,\widetilde{\tau })\), and Proposition 5.7 we have \(\iota (f(|x|))=f(\iota (|x|))\) for all continuous, compactly supported \(f:[0,\infty )\rightarrow {{\mathbb {R}}}\). In particular

$$\begin{aligned}\int f\,d\mu _{|\iota (x)|}=\tau (f(|\iota (x)|))=\widetilde{\tau }(f(|x|))=\int f\,d\mu _{|x|},\end{aligned}$$

for all continuous, compactly supported \(f:[0,\infty )\rightarrow {{\mathbb {R}}}\). Thus \(\mu _{|\iota (x)|}=\mu _{|x|}\).

Proposition A.3

Let \((M,\tau )\) be a semifinite tracial von Neumann algebra and suppose that M is diffuse. Then:

  1. 1.

    \(\text {L}^{2}(M,\tau )\) is not closed under products,

  2. 2.

    there is an unbounded operator in \(\text {L}^{2}(M,\tau )\),

  3. 3.

    \(\mathcal {P}^{\infty }(M,\tau )\) is not complete in the metric \(d_{\mathcal {P}}\).

Proof

By Proposition A.1 and [Tak02, Proposition V.1.40] there is a nonempty set J and a trace-preserving map \(\iota \) of \((\text {L}^{\infty }([0,1]\times J),\int \cdot \,d(m\otimes \eta ))\) into \((M,\tau )\) where m is Lebesgue measure and \(\eta \) is counting measure on the set J.

(1) Let \(g:[0,1]\rightarrow {{\mathbb {C}}}\) be a measurable function so that \(g\in \text {L}^{2}([0,1])\) but \(g\notin \text {L}^{4}([0,1])\). E.g. we can take \(g(x)=1_{(0,1]}(x)x^{-1/4}\). Fix \(j_{0}\in J\) and define \(f:X\times J\rightarrow {{\mathbb {C}}}\) by \(f(x,j)=1_{\{j_{0}\}}(j)g(x)\). Since \(\iota \) is trace-preserving, we have that

$$\begin{aligned}\mu _{|\iota (f)|}=\mu _{|f|}=|g|_{*}(m).\end{aligned}$$

So \(\Vert \iota (f)\Vert _{2}=\Vert g\Vert _{2}<\infty \) and similarly \(\Vert \iota (f)^{2}\Vert _{2}=\Vert \iota (f^{2})\Vert _{2}=\Vert g\Vert _{4}=\infty \). So \(\iota (f)\in \text {L}^{2}(M,\tau )\) and \(\iota (f)^{2}\notin \text {L}^{2}(M,\tau )\). So \(\text {L}^{2}(M,\tau )\) is not closed under products.

(2) Let \(f\in \text {L}^{2}([0,1]\times J)\) with \(f\notin \text {L}^{\infty }([0,1]\times J)\). As in (1) we have that \(\iota (f)\in \text {L}^{2}(M,\tau )\) and \(\Vert \iota (f)\Vert _{\infty }=\Vert f\Vert _{\infty }=\infty \), so \(\iota (f)\) is not bounded.

(3) Let \(g\in \text {L}^{2}([0,1]\times J)\) with \(g\notin \text {L}^{\infty }([0,1]\times J)\). Let \(f=\exp (|g|)\). Since \(\mu _{|\iota (f)|}=\mu _{|f|}\), we have that \(\log |\iota (f)|\in \text {L}^{2}(M,\tau )\) but \(\log |\iota (f)|\notin M\). Thus \(\mathcal {P}(M,\tau )\ne \mathcal {P}^{\infty }(M,\tau )\). So \(\mathcal {P}^{\infty }(M,\tau )\) is a proper dense subspace of a complete metric space, and is thus not complete. \(\quad \square \)

More Examples

1.1 Example: the hyperfinite factor

Let \(M_n({{\mathbb {C}}})\) denote the algebra of \(n\times n\) square matrices with entries in \({{\mathbb {C}}}\). Let \(\phi _n:M_n({{\mathbb {C}}}) \rightarrow M_{2n}({{\mathbb {C}}})\) be the homomorphism

$$\begin{aligned} A \mapsto \left( \begin{array}{cc} A &{} 0 \\ 0 &{} A \end{array}\right) . \end{aligned}$$

Let \(\tau _n:M_n({{\mathbb {C}}}) \rightarrow {{\mathbb {C}}}\) be the normalized trace defined by \(\tau _n(A) = \frac{1}{n} \sum _{i=1}^n A_{ii}\). Note that \(\phi _n\) preserves normalized traces in the sense that \(\tau _n(A) = \tau _{2n}(\phi _n(A))\).

Let \({{\mathcal {A}}}:=\cup _n M_{2^n}({{\mathbb {C}}})\) be the direct limit of the matrix algebras \(M_{2^n}({{\mathbb {C}}})\) under the family of maps \(\phi _n\) (in other words, \({{\mathcal {A}}}\) is the disjoint union of \(M_{2^n}({{\mathbb {C}}})\) after quotienting out by the equivalence relation generated by \(A \sim \phi _{2^n}(A)\) for all \(A \in M_{2^n}({{\mathbb {C}}})\)). Because the maps \(\phi _n\) preserve normalized traces, there is a trace \(\tau :{{\mathcal {A}}}\rightarrow {{\mathbb {C}}}\) satisfying \(\tau (A) = \tau _{2^n}(A)\) for all \(A \in M_{2^n}({{\mathbb {C}}})\).

Define the inner product \(\langle A, B \rangle := \tau (A^*B)\) for all \(A,B \in {{\mathcal {A}}}\). The Hilbert space completion of this inner product is a Hilbert space, denoted by \(\text {L}^2({{\mathcal {A}}},\tau )\). Moreover, each operator \(A \in {{\mathcal {A}}}\) acts on \(\text {L}^2({{\mathcal {A}}},\tau )\) by left-composition. Thus we have embedded \({{\mathcal {A}}}\) into the algebra \(B(\text {L}^2({{\mathcal {A}}},\tau ))\) of bounded operators. Let R denote the weak operator closure of \({{\mathcal {A}}}\) in \(B(\text {L}^2({{\mathcal {A}}},\tau ))\). The trace \(\tau \) admits a unique normal extension to R. The pair \((R,\tau )\) is called the hyperfinite II\(_1\)-factor. For more details, see [AP16, Theorem 11.2.2].

1.2 Example: infinite tensor powers

Let \((M,\tau )\) be a finite tracial von Neumann algebra with \(M \subset B({\mathcal {H}})\) SOT-closed. Then there is a natural embedding of \(B(\ell ^2({{\mathbb {N}}}))\otimes M \rightarrow B(\ell ^2({{\mathbb {N}}}) \otimes {\mathcal {H}})\). Let \(M_\infty :=B(\ell ^2({{\mathbb {N}}})) {\bar{\otimes }}M\) be the SOT-closure of \(B(\ell ^2({{\mathbb {N}}}))\otimes M\) in \(B(\ell ^2({{\mathbb {N}}}) \otimes {\mathcal {H}})\). We can think of elements of \(M_\infty \) as \({{\mathbb {N}}}\times {{\mathbb {N}}}\) matrices with entries in M. Define a trace \(\tau _\infty \) on \(M_\infty \) by

$$\begin{aligned} \tau _\infty (x)=\sum _{i\in {{\mathbb {N}}}} \tau (x_{ii}). \end{aligned}$$

Equipped with this trace, \(M_\infty \) is a semi-finite tracial von Neumann algebra. Moreover, this is the typical example of a non-finite semi-finite tracial von Neumann algebra. See [AP16, Chapter 8] for details.

Glossary

Let \({\mathcal {H}}\) be a separable Hilbert space and \(B({\mathcal {H}})\) be the algebra of all bounded linear operators on \({\mathcal {H}}\).

  • A von Neumann algebra M is a sub-algebra of \(B({\mathcal {H}})\) satisfying: \(1 \in M\), M is WOT-closed and \(*\)-closed.

  • A tracial von Neumann algebra is a pair \((M,\tau )\) where M is a von Neumann algebra and \(\tau \) is a faithful, normal, semi-finite trace. If \(\tau ({\text {I}})<\infty \) then \((M,\tau )\) is a finite tracial von Neumann algebra.

  • An operator \(x \in B({\mathcal {H}})\) is positive if \(\langle x\xi ,\xi \rangle \ge 0\) \(\forall \xi \in {\mathcal {H}}\).

  • \(x \ge y\) iff \(x-y\) is positive.

  • \(M_+ =\{x \in M:~x \ge 0\}\).

  • \(M^\times = {{\text {GL}}}^\infty (M,\tau )\) is the group of operators \(x\in M\) with \(x^{-1}\in M\).

  • \(M_{sa} = \{x \in M:~ x=x^*\}\).

  • \({\mathcal {P}}^\infty = M_+ \cap M^\times =\exp (M_{sa})={\mathcal {P}}\cap M^\times \).

  • \({\mathcal {N}}=\{x \in M:~ \tau (x^*x)<\infty \}\).

  • \(\text {L}^2(M,\tau )\) is the Hilbert space completion of \({\mathcal {N}}\) with respect to the inner product \(\langle x,y \rangle = \tau (x^*y)\). Also \(\text {L}^2(M,\tau ) = \{x \in \text {L}^0(M,\tau ):~ \tau (x^*x)<\infty \}\).

  • \(\text {L}^2(M,\tau )_{sa} = \{x \in \text {L}^2(M,\tau ):~x =x^*\}\).

  • \(\text {L}^0(M,\tau )\) is the algebra of \(\tau \)-measurable operators affiliated with M.

  • \(\text {L}^0(M,\tau )_+ = \{x \in \text {L}^0(M,\tau ):~x \ge 0\}\).

  • \(\text {L}^0(M,\tau )^\times \) is the group of operators \(x\in \text {L}^0(M,\tau )\) with \(x^{-1}\in \text {L}^0(M,\tau )\).

  • \(\text {L}^0(M,\tau )_{sa} = \{x \in \text {L}^0(M,\tau ):~x =x^*\}\).

  • \({{\text {GL}}}^2(M,\tau ) = \{x\in \text {L}^0(M,\tau )^\times :~ \log |x| \in \text {L}^2(M,\tau )\}\).

  • \({\mathcal {P}}= \text {L}^0(M,\tau )_+ \cap {{\text {GL}}}^2(M,\tau ) = \exp (\text {L}^2(M,\tau )_{sa})\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bowen, L., Hayes, B. & Lin, Y.F. A Multiplicative Ergodic Theorem for von Neumann Algebra Valued Cocycles. Commun. Math. Phys. 384, 1291–1350 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-021-04043-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-021-04043-9

Navigation