Skip to main content
Log in

Intermittent nicotine access is as effective as continuous access in promoting nicotine seeking and taking in rats

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

Nicotine is a principal psychoactive agent in tobacco, contributing to tobacco’s addictive potential. Preclinical studies on the effects of voluntary nicotine intake typically use self-administration procedures that provide continuous nicotine access during each self-administration session. However, many smokers consume cigarettes intermittently rather than continuously throughout each day. For drugs including cocaine and opioids, research in laboratory rats shows that intermittent intake can be more effective than continuous intake in producing patterns of drug use relevant to addiction.

Objective

We determined how intermittent versus continuous nicotine self-administration influences nicotine seeking and taking behaviours.

Methods

Female and male rats had continuous (i.e., Long Access; LgA, 6 h/day) or intermittent (IntA; 12 min ON, 60 min OFF, for 6 h/day) access to intravenous nicotine (15 µg/kg/infusion), for 12 daily sessions. We then assessed intake, responding for nicotine under a progressive ratio schedule of drug reinforcement and cue- and nicotine-induced reinstatement of drug seeking. We also estimated nicotine pharmacokinetic parameters during LgA and IntA self-administration.

Results

Overall, LgA rats took twice more nicotine than did IntA rats, yielding more sustained increases in estimated brain concentrations of the drug. However, the two groups showed similar motivation to seek and take nicotine, as measured using reinstatement and progressive ratio procedures, respectively.

Conclusions

Intermittent nicotine use is just as effective as continuous use in producing addiction-relevant behaviours, despite significantly less nicotine exposure. This has implications for modeling nicotine self-administration patterns in human smokers and resulting effects on brain and behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Paul Clarke for reading and commenting an earlier version of this manuscript. A version of this manuscript is posted on the preprint server, bioRxiv (BIORXIV/2023/563876).

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant number 157572) to ANS. HEA was supported by a PhD scholarship from the Libyan-North American Scholarship Program of the Ministry of Higher Education in Libya.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HEA and ANS designed the research. HEA performed all experiments and analyzed all data with guidance from ANS. VJ modelled nicotine concentrations. HEA and ANS wrote the article with revisions from VJ.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne-Noël Samaha.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 34 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Algallal, H.E., Jacquemet, V. & Samaha, AN. Intermittent nicotine access is as effective as continuous access in promoting nicotine seeking and taking in rats. Psychopharmacology (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-024-06546-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-024-06546-4

Keywords

Navigation