Abstract
Nicotine, a pervasive global environmental pollutant, is released throughout every phase of the tobacco’s life cycle. This study examined the probable ameliorative role of Chlorella vulgaris (ChV) extract against nicotine (NIC)-induced hepatic injury in Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) bearing female Swiss mice. Sixty female Swiss mice were assigned to four equal groups orally gavaged 2% saccharin 0.2 mL/mouse (control group), orally intubated 100 mg ChV /kg (ChV group), orally intubated 100 µg/mL NIC in 2% saccharin (NIC group), and orally intubated NIC + ChV as in group 3 and 2 (NIC+ChV group). The dosing was daily for 4 weeks. Mice from all experimental groups were then inoculated intraperitoneally with viable tumor cells 2.5 × 106 (0.2 mL/mouse) in the fourth week, and the treatments were extended for another 2 weeks. The results have shown that NIC exposure significantly altered the serum levels of liver function indices, lipid profile, LDH, and ALP in the NIC-exposed group. NIC administration significantly increased hepatic inflammation, lipid peroxidation, and DNA damage-related biomarkers but reduced antioxidant enzyme activities. NIC exposure downregulated SOD1, SOD2, CAT, GPX1, and GPX2 but upregulated NF-κB hepatic gene expression. Notably, the presence of the EAC cells outside the liver was common in all mice groups. Liver tissue of the NIC-exposed group showed multifocal expansion of hepatic sinusoids by neoplastic cells. However, with no evidence of considerable infiltration of EAC cells inside the sinusoids or in periportal areas in the NIC + ChV groups. NIC significantly altered caspase-3, Bax, and BcL2 hepatic immune expression. Interestingly, ChV administration significantly mitigates NIC-induced alterations in hepatic function indices, lipid profile, and the mRNA expression of antioxidant and NF-κB genes and regulates the caspase-3, Bax, and BcL2 immunostaining. Finally, the in vivo protective outcomes of ChV against NIC-induced hepatic injury combined with EAC in female Swiss mice could suggest their helpful role for cancer patients who are directly or indirectly exposed to NIC daily.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Environmental risk factors, such as exposure to pollutants, contribute to the initiation, progression, and increase of the cancer severity (Esterhuizen et al. 2023). In terms of global public health, tobacco smoke is now at the top of the list of hazardous environmental pollutants (Zhou 2019). According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, smoking is the greatest cause of mortality in Egypt and the United States, with more than 34,000 and 480,000 deaths each year, respectively (Abdel-Hady and El-Gilany 2020). Persistent tobacco smoking in cancer patients has several negative outcomes, including treatment failure, worse quality of life, lower survival rates, and an increased chance of second primary tumors (Warren et al. 2014; Jassem 2019). Aside from cancer type, stage, and site, persistent smoking is regarded as the best negative predictor of survival in cancer patients (Jassem 2019). The effects of nicotine (NIC) and cigarette smoke on several organ systems’ stem cell-associated pathways that are important for carcinogenesis are becoming more clear (Thong et al. 2019).
NIC is a major alkaloid that accounts for about 95% of the total alkaloid content in commercial tobacco (Nwosu and Krasowski 2023). Various stages of the tobacco life cycle contribute to environmental contamination with NIC. These stages include tobacco cultivation, cigarette production, combustion of cigarettes, and the release of NIC and its metabolites into human wastewater streams (Beutel et al. 2021). The toxic effects of NIC are most pronounced in the liver since it is responsible for most of NIC’s metabolism and biotransformation (Ateyya et al. 2017). Chronic NIC administration promotes activation of cytochrome P-450 and increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation (Yue et al. 2009). NIC promotes ROS production by activating the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate-oxidase enzyme (NADPH oxidase/NOX1) (Asano et al. 2012). NIC has further been implicated in hepatic oxidative stress, apoptosis, and lipid dysmetabolism (Chen et al. 2018; Hasan et al. 2019; Dangana et al. 2020). NIC exposure resulted in hepatic tissue inflammation chiefly via augmented expression of NADPH oxidase enzyme, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) (Khaled et al. 2020). Thus, based on the information obtained from these studies, we have designed this experiment to appraise the impact of NIC exposure on cancer progression and liver function in an in vivo mice model bearing Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC). Because of its similarities to human tumors, EAC is often used to assess the anticancer activity of different drugs or natural products using its ascetic forms (Hashem et al. 2020; Oraby et al. 2023).
Research on microalgae has garnered significant interest because of the potential health benefits they may offer (Lozoya-Pérez et al. 2024). Chlorella vulgaris (ChV) is a single-celled microalgae that grows in fresh water and is considered a safe dietary supplement by the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) (Silva et al. 2019; Elif 2023). ChV is a high-nutrient dietary source comprising 61.6% proteins, 12.5% fat, and 13.7% carbs and consists of more than 20 minerals and vitamins (Perveen et al. 2022). Furthermore, ChV contains numerous antioxidants such as chlorophyll, carotenoids, tocopherol, ascorbic acid, omega-6, and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, polysaccharides, essential amino acids, α- and β-carotene, and vitamins (Panahi et al. 2016). In ChV, alpha and β-carotene interact with different ROS and consequently suppress the oxidation processes in cellular and lipid compartments (Nass et al. 2022). Besides, chlorophylls found in ChV aid in lowering oxidative DNA damage and lipid peroxidation (LPO) through decreasing chelating ROS and metal ions (Queiroz et al. 2011). According to a study compromising 32 different microalgae species, ChV has great antioxidant activity (Goiris et al. 2012). ChV has been shown to provide multiple potential benefits to human health such as antidiabetic (Ebrahimi-Mameghani et al. 2017), hypo-cholesterolemic (Sherafati et al. 2022), cardio-protective (Barghchi et al. 2023), and antiparasitic (Melo et al. 2024). Besides, ChV has been shown to possess antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antipapoptotic activities (Abdel-Aziem et al. 2018; Mohamed et al. 2023). In patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, ChV has been suggested as an adjunctive therapy to improve liver function (Ebrahimi-Mameghani et al. 2017). ChV regulated antioxidant enzyme activity and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and decreased tumor numbers in ethionine-induced liver cancer in rats (Sulaiman et al. 2006). Supplementation with ChV for 6 weeks in Iranian chronic cigarette smokers significantly improved antioxidant status and reduced LPO (Panahi et al. 2013). ChV also exhibited its antioxidant competencies in the liver in numerous modes: from suppression of ROS release to augmentation of antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT)) activities and upregulation of main antioxidant genes (Sikiru et al. 2019). Furthermore, ChV supplementation in carbon tetra chloride (CCL4)-exposed rats slows liver fibrosis development by blocking the TGF signaling pathway (Mohseni et al. 2021).
Although many studies on ChV have been undertaken, there is still insufficient knowledge concerning the hepatoprotective effect of ChV against NIC. Therefore, the present trial aimed to evaluate the possible ameliorating role of ChV against hepatotoxicity induced by NIC oral intoxication in female Swiss mice combined with EAC induction through biochemical, molecular, histopathological, and immunohistochemical analyses.
Material and methods
Tested compounds
NIC and saccharin were provided from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH and (CAS Name: 54–11-5; 81–07-2) and product numbers N3876-5ML and 109,185, respectively. The ChV ethanolic extract 80% used in this investigation was a kind gift of Dr. Mohamed A.A.R., Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, which was prepared according to Elsawi et al. (2018), and evaluated using HPLC (Agilent 1100, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). The extract contains numerous flavonoids, phenolic, and polysaccharide compounds, including quercetin, rutin, hesperidin, 7-OH flavone, ellagic, cinnamic, glucuronic acid, catechol, and Rhamnose (Mohamed et al. 2022). The EAC parent line was graciously given by Egypt’s National Cancer Institute at Cairo University. The viability of the parent EAC line was investigated according to Scheid et al. (1972). EAC was maintained in Swiss mice by serialized intraperitoneal transplantations of EAC 2.5 × 106 tumor cells/0.2 mL in female Swiss albino mice.
Animals and experimental design
A total of sixty Swiss female mice (24 ± 2 g average body weight) were provided from the veterinary medicine laboratory animal farm at Zagazig University (El-Sharkia, Egypt). Mice complied with conventional laboratory hygiene settings, including a temperature range of 22–28 °C, a 12-h light/dark cycle, and a relative humidity range of 50–60%. The animals were accustomed to the laboratory conditions for 2 weeks before the trial, freely allowed to obtain water and balanced feed during the acclimatization and experimental periods. The experimental measures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt (ZU-IACUC/2f/ 278/2022). Mice were separated into four groups (n = 15): the first control group (C, orally received 2% saccharin dissolved in distilled water 0.2 mL/mouse), the second ChV group (ChV, orally intubated 100 mg/kg ChV BW dissolved in distilled water according to Justo et al. (2001), the third NIC group (NIC, were orally gavaged with 100 µg/ml NIC in 2% saccharin according to Sparks and Pauly (1999), the fourth NIC + ChV group (orally co-administered NIC and ChV by the same doses and routes in groups 3 and 2). The dosing was orally and daily for the whole experimental period of 4 weeks using a bent stainless steel stomach tube. Then, mice from all experimental groups were inoculated intraperitoneally (i.p) with 2.5 × 106 viable tumor cells in 0.2 mL per mouse. The Trypan blue dye exclusion method was used to determine viability, which was always determined to be at least 95%. Then, mice were dosed daily for another 2 weeks.
Sampling
Blood samples were taken from the retro-orbital plexus of each mouse from all experimental groups. Blood was collected in a plain tube, left for coagulation, and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The serum samples were kept at − 20 °C for the biochemical analysis of hepatic enzymes and lipid profile. Additionally, for the determination of hepatic mRNA expression levels of inflammatory and oxidative stress-related genes, a small portion of liver tissues (30 mg) was dissected from the euthanized mice from all experimental groups and was immersed in about five volumes of RNAlater® solution. The samples were stored at − 80 °C for following RT-PCR procedures. For the assessment of oxidative stress and inflammatory-related biomarkers, hepatic tissue (0.5 g) was dissected and homogenized (WiseTis HG-15D homogenizer, Daihan Scientific Co., Seoul, Korea). Finally, liver specimens were immediately post-fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin for histopathological and immunohistochemical assessment.
Biochemical estimations of serum levels of lipid profile and hepatic enzyme activities
Triglycerides, total cholesterol, low-density lipoproteins (LDL-C), high-density lipoproteins (HDL-C), total proteins, albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level in the serum were determined by colorimetric kits of Bio-diagnostic CO (Dokki, Giza, Egypt) with the following catalog number: TR 20 30, CH 12 20, CH 12 30, CH 12 31, TP 20 20, AB 10 10, AP 10 21, AS 10 61, and AL 10 31, respectively. Serum globulin level was estimated by deducting the albumin level obtained from the total protein. The Spinreact Co. (Santa Coloma, Spain) lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) kit was used to determine LDH levels. Also, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL-C) was calculated according to the method of (Friedewald et al. 1972).
Biochemical assessments of inflammation and oxidative stress-related indices in hepatic tissue
The hepatic levels of reduced glutathione (GSH), nitric oxide (NO), and MDA, together with the activities of glutathione peroxidase (GPX), SOD, and CAT, were measured via using the kit of Bio-diagnostic CO (Dokki, Giza, Egypt) with CAT. No. GR 25 11, NO. 25 33, MD 25 29, GP 2524, SD 25 21, and CA 25 17, respectively. Meanwhile, TNF-α, IL-6, interleukin-1 (IL-1), 8-hydroxy-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), and protein carbonyl (PCO) were determined by specific mouse ELISA kits of MyBioSource Co. (San Diego, CA, USA) with Cat. Nos. MBS825075, MBS2508516, MBS036031, MBS700097, and MBS2600846, respectively.
Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) investigation of hepatic oxidative stress and inflammation-related genes
TRIzolTM (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. Waltham, MA, USA) was used to extract total RNA. cDNA was synthesized using the HiSenScript™ RH (-) cDNA Synthesis Kit (iNtRON Biotechnology Co., South Korea) (Arisha and Moustafa 2019). The RT-PCR was accomplished in an Mx3005P Real-Time PCR System (Agilent Stratagene, USA) by TOPreal™ qPCR 2X PreMIX (SYBR Green with low ROX) following the manufacturer’s guidelines. An initial denaturation at 95 °C for 15 min was followed by 40 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 95 °C under the PCR cycling conditions, annealing at 60 °C for 60 s, and extension for 60 s at 72 °C. The oligonucleotide-specific primers are shown in Table 1 in line with Dong et al. (2008), Nguyen et al. (2016), and Ying et al. (2019). The 2−ΔΔCT comparative technique was used to calculate the relative fold changes in gene expression after normalizing the target genes’ expression levels to Gapdh (Livak and Schmittgen 2001).
Histopathological and immunohistochemical investigations of Bax, caspase-3, and Bcl2
The formalin-fixed liver specimens were rinsed, dehydrated in escalating degrees of ethyl alcohol, clarified in xylene, and further processed for the paraffin technique (Layton et al. 2018). A microtome (Leica RM 2155, England) was used to slice three successive paraffin sections with a thickness of five microns. Before the microscopical examination, the sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin as per protocol, mounted in DPX, and covered with a glass slide (Suvarna and Layton 2013).
For immunohistochemical workup, the previously obtained tissue, ten slides per biomarker per group (5 µm paraffin sections) were managed for immunohistochemical staining following the ABC technique described by Hsu et al. (1981) using the following primary antibodies: (a) for caspase-3, rabbit monoclonal (EPR18297) to anti-mice caspase-3 (Abcam, Cat. no. ab184787, dilution 1;1000); (b) for Bax, rabbit polyclonal anti-Bax antibody (Abcam, Cat. no. ab53154, dilution 1; 50); (c) for BcL-2, rabbit monoclonal (EP10625) to anti-mice BcL-2 (Abcam, cat. no. ab203516, dilution 1;500). (ABCAM Inc., Cambridge, UK). Also, negative sections from the control were obtained by incubating with phosphate buffer saline to replace the primary antibodies.
To measure positive reactivity, images of different sections stained with antibodies were examined under a microscope powered by an Olympus BX-50 in Tokyo, Japan, with a 1/2 × photo adapter and a 40 × objective. The images were captured using an Olympus LC20 digital camera, which was put on an Olympus microscope. The images were analyzed using a computer with an Intel® Core I3® and the Russian program Video Test Morphology 5.2, which has a dedicated method for immunohistochemical analysis and stain quantification. The system determined caspase-3, Bax, and Bcl2 expression percentages in a certain region. For quantitative analysis, we selected five representative areas in total with both positive cell areas and areas without expression. If a tissue section had areas with both low abundance and high abundance of stained cells, both areas were selected as representative areas and included in the analysis. Individual cells were identified by strong brown stain and Image analysis software (JID801D) assessed positive cells. We counted the number of positive expressed cells per mm2 and converted them into area %. The cell counting was repeated three times for each area. All images were analyzed in a blinded fashion.
Statistical method
The statistical data was analyzed using IBM SPSS, version 21, with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Tukey’s multiple range test was used for pairwise comparisons between the experimental groups. The data is displayed as the average with or without the standard error. Statistical significance was defined as a probability level lower than 0.05. GraphPad Prism 8 from GraphPad Software Inc. in San Diego, CA, USA, was used to generate every graph.
Results
Effect of ChV and/or NIC exposure combined with EAC on liver function and lipid profile
The observed changes in liver function and lipid profile in the serum of EAC-bearing female Swiss mice exposed to ChV and/or NIC are shown in Table 2. Administration of ChV resulted in a significant decrease in ALT, AST, ALP, and LDH levels by 30.13%, 21.73%, 12.07%, and 12.45%, respectively, relative to the C group. Besides, ChV exposure significantly decreased TGs, TC, LDL-C, and VLDL-C by 31.48%, 8.79%, 22.75%, and 13.96%, respectively, but resulted in a non-significant increase in HDL-C by 18.84% than the C group. Moreover, ChV exposure induced a significant increase in total proteins, albumin, and A/G ratio by 15.37%, 27.20%, and 22.13%, respectively, while serum levels of globulins and HDL-C were non-significantly increased by 1.24% and 18.84%, respectively, than the C group.
NIC exposure significantly increased ALT, AST, ALP, and LDH serum levels by 93.18%, 34.36%, 50%, and 38.81%, respectively, but significantly reduced the serum content of total proteins, albumin, and globulins by 30.75%, 34.97%, and 25.70%, respectively, while A/G ratio was non-significantly decreased by 9.84% when matched with the C group. Also, NIC exposure significantly increased serum levels of TG, TC, VLDL-C, and LDL-C by 6.17%, 42.58%, 44.17%, and 89.59%, respectively, and significantly decreased HDL-C serum levels by 47.40% than the C group.
ChV oral dosing in the NIC + ChV group significantly reestablished the increased ALT, AST, and ALP serum levels by 23.30%, 16.96%, and 21.26%, respectively, while LDH serum levels non-significantly restored by 15.85% than the C group. Additionally, ChV administration non-significantly regenerated the NIC-induced decrease of serum levels of total protein, albumin, and globulin to (8.89%, 8.03%, and 9.91% decrease) compared with the C group. Also, ChV dosing in the NIC + ChV group significantly restored the increased serum levels of TG, TC, LDL-C, and VLDL-C to 10.29%, 12.89%, 31.58%, and 21.79%, respectively, and significantly reinstated the NIC-induced decrease in HDL-C serum levels to 27.27% than the C group.
Effect of ChV and/or NIC exposure combined with EAC on inflammatory and oxidative stress-associated indices in hepatic tissue
The observed changes in oxidative stress and inflammation-related biomarkers in the liver of EAC-bearing Swiss female mice exposed to ChV and/or NIC are shown in Figs. 1 and 2. The ChV-treated group showed a significant decrease of NO, TNF-α, IL6, IL1, MDA, and 8-OHdG by 18.57%, 6.20%, 16.00%, 20.36%, 36.05%, and 30.56%, respectively, but exhibited a non-significant decrease by 31.53% in the PCO levels than the C group. ChV administration induced a significant increase in CAT, SOD, GSH, and GPx levels by 21.05%, 18.93%, 12.21%, and 9.07%, respectively, compared to the C group.
NIC exposure in the NIC group significantly increased levels of NO, TNF-α, IL6, IL1, MDA, PCO, and 8-OHdG by 45.28%, 39.83%, 39.47%, 77.28, onefold%, twofold, and twofold%, respectively, and produced a significant decrease in CAT, SOD, GSH, and GPX levels by 63.16%, 48.59%, 49.77%, and 30.12%, respectively, than the C group. Yet, ChV dosing in the NIC + ChV group significantly decreased the NIC-induced elevation of NO, TNF-α, IL6, IL1, MDA, PCO, and 8-OHdG hepatic levels to 24.83%, 20.34%, 20.00%, 26.08%, 44.69%, 78.19%, and 93.52%, respectively, than the C group. Also, ChV administration in the NIC + ChV group significantly restored the NIC-induced decrease of SOD, CAT, GSH, and GPX hepatic levels to 31.36%, 23.68%, 17.37%, and 10.64%, respectively, than the C group.
Effect of ChV and/or NIC exposure combined with EAC on hepatic relative mRNA expression levels of oxidative stress-related genes
The effect of ChV and/or NIC exposure on hepatic relative mRNA expression levels of SOD2, SOD1, CAT, GPX2, GPX1, and NF-κB of EAC-bearing female Swiss mice is shown in Fig. 3. The mRNA levels of SOD2, SOD1, CAT, GPX2, and GPX1 were upregulated in the ChV administered group by 65.20%, 39.00%, 94%, 29.10%, and 95%, respectively, the upregulation was significant in the SOD1, CAT, and GPX2 genes expressions. In the meantime, there was a 24% decrease in NF-κB mRNA levels compared to the C group, which was not statistically significant.
The data showed that NIC exposure stimulated a significant downregulation of SOD1, SOD2, CAT, GPX1, and GPX2 expression levels by 62.80%, 65.10%, 61.40%, 72.2%, and 43.6%, respectively. On the contrary, mRNA levels of NF-κB were significantly upregulated by a twofold% increase in the NIC-exposed group if compared with the C group. ChV administration in the NIC + ChV group non-significantly modulated the NIC-induced downregulation of SOD1, SOD2, CAT, and GPX1 to 21.00%, 15.00%, 18.10%, and 24.00% reduction, respectively, while significantly modulated the GPX2 regulation by 21.00% reduction as compared with the C group. Additionally, ChV co-administration significantly triggered a significant modulation of the NIC up-regulated NF-κB mRNA expression levels in the NIC + ChV group to a 67.80% decline compared to the C group.
Histopathological findings
Figure 4A–D shows serial sections from the livers of mice from all experimental groups. Microscopically, it is worth mentioning that the presence of the EAC cells outside the liver was a common finding in all mice groups, either in aggregates or as single cells resting in the liver capsule. The liver sections of the mice from the C group showed aggregates of EAC cells adhered to the hepatic capsule. The neoplastic cells had pleomorphic features with fine fibrin threads among them. Further, there are widely distributed areas of degenerative changes within hepatic cells besides randomly distributed focal necrotic areas that are invaded mostly with leukocytic infiltrates. The noticed inflammatory cells were mostly neutrophils and lymphocytes (Fig. 4A). The liver of mice from the ChV group exhibited few round cells within the hepatic capsule. In addition, degenerated hepatocytes, primarily hydropic and fatty degeneration, were seen. Moreover, scattered minute lymphocyte aggregates within sinusoids or replaced the necrotic cells were also noticed. Aggregates of EAC cells were observed above, but not attached to the liver capsule. Figure 4B displayed large areas of EAC cells attached to the hepatic capsule. The EAC cells were admixed with intense hemorrhages and a marked number of lymphocytes. The latter was also present within hepatic sinusoids of the NIC group with degenerative changes within most hepatic cells (Fig. 4C). The neoplastic cells were also seen inside the blood vessels and infiltrating the periportal triads, sometimes associated with leukocytic infiltration. The NIC + ChV group examined sections of liver tissue that declared a hyalinized hepatic capsule. Moreover, the subcapsular hepatic cells revealed intense degenerative changes that were mixed with accidental cell deaths and programmed cell deaths. However, few possible neoplastic cells were infrequently detected inside the blood vessels (Fig. 4D).
Immunohistochemical findings
The scoring of the positive area of different immune-stained sections of hepatocytes is shown in Table 3. The immunostaining for caspase-3 is shown in Fig. 5A–D for different experimental groups. The examined liver sections of mice from the ChV group revealed mild cytoplasmic staining reactivity reaction for caspase-3% area of 5.33 ± 1.45 (Fig. 5B). On the contrary, examined liver sections of mice from the C and NIC groups revealed a significant increase of % area (12.00 ± 1.73 and 37.33 ± 2.60, respectively) of the hepatocytes exhibiting moderate to strong cytoplasmic staining reactivity for caspase-3 (Fig. 5 A and C). Examined liver sections of mice from the NIC + ChV group revealed that all the hepatocytes were mildly stained for caspase-3, % area (29.00 ± 3.78) (Fig. 5D).
Regarding immunostaining for Bax, as shown in Fig. 6A–D, examined liver sections of mice from the ChV group revealed few positive cytoplasmic staining for Bax in their hepatic tissue with a % area of 9.00 ± 1.73 (Fig. 6B). In contrast, examined liver sections of mice from the from the C and NIC groups revealed a significant increase of % area (14.66 ± 2.40 and 42.00 ± 2.08, respectively) of the hepatocytes exhibiting moderate to strong cytoplasmic reactivity for Bax (Fig. 6 A and C). Examined liver sections of mice from the NIC + ChV group revealed a significant decrease of % area (27.00 ± 4.16) of the hepatocytes exhibiting weak cytoplasmic reactivity for Bax (Fig. 6D).
The immunostaining for Bcl2 is displayed in Fig. 7A–D. Examined liver sections of mice from the ChV group revealed hepatocytes with strong cytoplasmic brownish staining reactivities for Bcl2, with % area of 17.66 ± 2.33 (Fig. 7B). Examined liver sections of mice from the C and NIC groups revealed a significant decrease of % area (10.00 ± 1.15 and 2.66 ± 0.88, respectively) of the hepatocytes exhibiting mild to very weak cytoplasmic reactivity for Bcl2 (Fig. A and C). Examined liver sections of mice from the NIC + ChV group revealed that hepatocytes showed moderate cytoplasmic reactivity for Bcl2% area of 6.33 ± 1.76 (Fig. 7D).
Discussion
The current study aimed to assess the ameliorative role of ChV administration against the detrimental effects induced by sub-chronic oral NIC exposure combined with EAC induction in female Swiss mice. The current research’s findings revealed that ChV significantly regulates the NIC-induced alterations in hepatic function, lipid profile, oxidative and inflammatory status, enhancing the mRNA expression pattern of antioxidant enzymes and pro-inflammatory cytokine-encoding genes and regulating the altered immune expression of caspase-3, Bax, and BcL2. EAC cells outside the liver were common in all mice groups, either in aggregates or as single cells resting on the liver capsule. Aggregates of EAC cells were observed above but not attached to the liver capsule in the ChV group, while multifocal expansion of hepatic sinusoids and inside the blood vessels by neoplastic cells was comparable to EAC cells detected outside the liver in the other mice groups. However, few possible neoplastic cells were infrequently detected inside the blood vessels with no evidence of considerable infiltration of EAC cells inside the sinusoids or in periportal areas in the NIC + ChV administered group, indicating the protective role of ChV.
Serum levels of AST, ALP, ALT, and LDH enzymes were considerably higher in the NIC group compared to the C group. Increased serum enzyme levels appear to reflect cellular leakage, structural damage, and membrane marker performance malfunction in the liver as a result of NIC treatment (Kolure et al. 2024). The observed abnormalities in NIC-treated mice could be explained by NIC-induced oxidative stress. Free radicals produced by NIC metabolism appear to attack polyunsaturated fatty acids and promote LPO. Also, they react with DNA and alkylating groups of membrane proteins and other cellular macromolecules, causing hepatic cell membrane damage, change in membrane permeability, and releases of hepatocyte cytozomal enzymes in serum. On the other hand, the serum levels of these enzymes are linked to liver function (Asante et al. 2016). Thus, free radicals appear to alter the enzymatic function and induce necrosis (Kolure et al. 2024). Moreover, the alterations in biochemical-related indices aligned with the liver histological injuries reported previously by Chen et al. (2016). It is also possible that it is due to hepatic damage caused by cancer cells invading the liver (Sannappa Gowda et al. 2022), which is evidenced in the current study by a multifocal expansion of hepatic sinusoids and inside the blood vessels by neoplastic cells comparable to EAC cells detected outside the liver in the NIC-exposed mice groups. On the contrary, liver function–related enzymes were reduced in the ChV-received groups; which could be suggestive of ChV’s protective effects on the liver because of its antioxidant activities and drop of oxidative stress induced by NIC toxicity. This was achieved by increasing the activity of enzymatic antioxidants and decreasing the hepatic CYP2E1 level. Our results are in line with those of Panahi et al. (2012a), who found that ChV treatment reduced AST, ALT, TG, and body weight in NAFLD patients. Additionally, Elsheikh et al. (2018) found that ChV extracts significantly reduced serum ALT activity by inhibiting deltamethrin-induced hepatotoxicity in rats.
The TC, TG, and LDL-C serum levels of the NIC-exposed group were significantly increased, but HDL-C was decreased considerably reflecting the dyslipidemic effect of NIC. In this respect, NIC augmented lipolysis in adipose tissue by combining with NIC-acetylcholine receptors (Andersson and Arner 2001), releasing free fatty acids. Consecutively, this resulted in an enhanced synthesis of TGs and VLDL-C in the liver. Moreover, the exposure of hepatocytes to generated free fatty acids and dyslipidemia resulted in the injury of mitochondria and ROS overproduction (Tian et al. 2023). Ateyya et al. (2017) reported that NIC has been shown to induce hepatic synthesis of TC, LDL-C, TGs, and VLDL-C, adversely affecting lipid profile, which matched with the current study findings. On the other hand, in the ChV-administered mice, a substantial improvement in the lipid profile was observed. Our results corroborate those of Li et al. (2013), who stated that ChV dosing decreased hepatic lipid accumulation from CCl4 exposure in mice. This may be attributed to hepatic inflammation and lipid metabolism modulation. Similarly, Cherng and Shih (2006) reported that ChV administration in high-fat diet–induced models corrected dyslipidemia via reducing TG, TC, and LDL cholesterol levels in the serum. ChV has been shown to have hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic effects (Barghchi et al. 2023). In rats, chlorella powder consumption resulted in a considerable reduction in serum and liver cholesterol and TG (Lee et al. 2009). Finally, Panahi et al. (2012b) established that 600 mg/day of ChV supplementation lowered TC, LDL-C, and TGs in dyslipidemic patients. TG lowering effects of ChV are possibly related to the lowering effect in plasma non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) level because plasma NEFA is stored as TG in the liver (Barghchi et al. 2023).
Herein, NIC exposure decreased SOD, GPX, CAT, and GSH in liver tissues as well as increased LPO in the liver indicating oxidative stress in the NIC-exposed group. SOD is the first enzyme implicated in the detoxifying process and considered the most sensitive enzyme index in the hepatocellular injury. While CAT’s primary function is to scavenge H2O2 produced by free radicals or by SOD during the elimination of superoxide anions, it also converts H2O2 to H2O and O2. Because of its broad substrate requirements and great affinity for H2O2, the GPX is an effective ROS scavenger. Due to the antioxidant defense’s inefficiency in countering ROS-induced damage, these antioxidant enzymes are drastically reduced in the liver. The increased superoxide generation during NIC metabolism could explain the decrease in SOD activity in NIC-exposed animals (Kolure et al. 2024). The reduction of GPX activity in NIC-treated mice as obtained in this research indicated oxidative injury in the investigated tissues. Previous studies reported ROS production throughout NIC metabolism, such as hydroxyl radical, H2O2, superoxide anion, and NO (Hritcu et al. 2017). Therefore, the antioxidant enzyme inhibition in NIC-treated mice could promote LPO, alter gene expression, and lead to cell death.
Herein, hepatic NO level significantly increases in NIC-exposed mice, while ChV decreases NO. Moreover, the absorption of NIC in the body is accompanied by the triggering of serum NO and oxidative stress levels (Lallemand et al. 2006). Similarly, Khaled et al. (2020) showed that NIC enhanced iNOS protein levels in lung and liver tissues, implying that iNOS mediated the high amounts of NO. Interestingly, in the previous study, the ChV supplementation resulted in a hepatoprotective effect through suppressing the hepatic oxidative stress. In CCl4-induced acute liver damage, Li et al. (2013) found that treating animals with ChV daily for 4 weeks significantly reduced MDA levels. Surprisingly, compared to the control group, the ChV group showed a decrease in total oxidative stress and MDA levels and an increase in TAC. Consequently, under typical circumstances, the oxidative stress status decreased after ChV feeding. Additionally, ChV extracts raised GPx, CAT, and SOD activity in liver tissue while decreasing hepatic MDA and NO levels. Consistent with our results, Elsheikh et al. (2018) observed that administering 50 mg/kg BW of ChV powder to rats for 2 months raised CAT and SOD activity and decreased MDA levels. These results could be attributable to the antioxidants included in the ChV extract, including ascorbic acid, α and b carotenes, tocopherol, and lutein (Mohamed et al. 2022). Furthermore, ChV can directly and indirectly reduce free radical-induced damage via scavenging free radicals or stimulating antioxidant enzyme activity (Abdel-Khalek et al. 2023). ChV has chlorophylls, which reduce ROS production and hence prevent LPO (Pérez-Gálvez et al. 2020). Furthermore, ChV exhibits strong scavenging action for superoxide anion radicals and NO owing to its phytochemical compounds like carotenoids and terpenoids (Safafar et al. 2015). Similarly, ChV protective and antioxidant effects are related to their content of phenolic compounds, which play a crucial role in free radicals scavenging, oxygen inhibition, and peroxide decomposition (Martins et al. 2016; Renugadevi et al. 2018). Additionally, Abu-Serie et al. (2018) found that ChV extracts significantly reduced LPO and TBARS amounts in leukocytes.
Smoking induces oxidative stress linked with LPO, leading to stellate cell activation and fibrosis. Smoking also boosts the pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α) generation, which has been linked to pathophysiological problems, including organ damage (Andersen et al. 2021). TNF-α is a well-known factor that causes liver injury (Chen and Ma 2019). As a result, the higher serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1 and TNF-α in NIC-exposed animals could elucidate the histological changes in hepatic tissue and raised liver function enzyme activity seen in this group. The current study suggests that the increased oxidative stress might influence the elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-1β (Elsherbiny et al. 2017). Measured levels of NFκB in liver homogenates by Khaled et al. (2020) have reported that NIC-induced tissue inflammation primarily by boosted NF-κB and TNF-α cytokine expression. It has been conveyed that NIC initiates α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors on macrophages, which in turn initiate the pro-inflammatory mediators, resulting in the production of free radicals and inflammatory cytokines that are involved in systemic inflammation and tissue damage (Zahran and Emam 2018). NFκB is a crucial transcription factor that stimulates a great gene number accused in inflammation, like TNF-α (Boisson et al. 2020). NIC has been shown to increase NF-κB protein levels in liver, lung, and kidney tissues (Cooper and Magwere 2008; Martins et al. 2016; Zahran and Emam 2018).
According to the findings of this study, giving rodents the ChV caused a drop in TNF-α and IL1-β levels. ChV’s anti-inflammatory properties could explain why it protects against NIC-induced liver damage. This finding is consistent with Abu-Serie et al. (2018), who suggested that ChV’s anti-inflammatory action could be attributed to specific phenolic compounds such as gallates, which are powerful NO and TNF inhibitors. Finally, ChV extract reduced the pathological lesions caused by nitrite in hepatic tissues. These findings resembled those of Abd-Elmoneim and Darwish (2016), who found that giving mice an aqueous extract of ChV at a concentration of 500 mg/kg BW for 28 days improved antioxidant activities and reduced LPO, resulting in hepato-protection against monosodium glutamate.
The toxic effects of NIC are attributable, at least in part, to an increase in the generation of free radicals and ROS (Kolure et al. 2024). Another known mechanism by which NIC damages the system is by inducing inflammation. NF-κB activates over 200 genes that have been found to decrease apoptosis induce cell transformation, invasion, metastasis, chemo-resistance, and radio-resistance (Boisson et al. 2020). Smokeless tobacco extract promotes the expression of NF-κB in oral premalignant and cancer cells (Li et al. 2018). The specific mechanism by which NIC induces NF-κB is unknown. However, previous reports showed that NIC, even at the physiological level of 0.8 µM, increases oxidative stress and the redox-sensitive transcription factor, NF-κB (Crowley-Weber et al. 2003). As far as we know, there is no published data regarding the NIC-induced alterations in the antioxidants and inflammation‐related gene expression levels in different tissues such as the liver, kidneys, and lungs. Our findings, based on an RT-PCR gene expression approach, validated the findings of Ivey et al. (2014), which indicated the involvement of caspase-2 and iNOS-mediated apoptotic pathway in NIC plus high-fat diet–induced hepatocellular apoptosis. They discovered a considerable increase in the amount of active caspase-2 protein. El-Sherbeeny et al. (2016) found that NIC treatment boosted caspase-3 activity and lowered NO levels in liver cells. Furthermore, the presence of NIC created OS, which damaged the arteries and caused inflammation in the liver. NIC and cotinine have been proven to cause apoptosis in the liver either directly or immunologically. NIC-induced ROS generation can enhance caspase-2 activity as well as NO synthesis. NO production, on the other hand, has been linked to cell death and damage (Yeo et al. 2022). NIC can encourage an existing tumor that was started by other variables through its genotoxic effects, as well as by aiding tumor cell survival, growth, metastasis, and resistance to chemotherapy (Grando 2014). NIC can thus be pro or anti-apoptotic, depending on the quantity of the drug, species-specific changes in NIC metabolism, and the target cells.
Members of the Bcl-2 family, pro-apoptotic proteins (Bak, Bid, Bax), and anti-apoptotic proteins (Bcl-XL, Bcl-2) strictly control the balance between cell life and cell death. By binding to Bax, Bcl-2 shields cells against apoptosis prevents oligomerization and translocation to mitochondria, triggers permeability transition, and, as a result, activates the caspase cascade (Elkon and Oberst 2025). Different groups have investigated the unique apoptotic effects of NIC in vitro and in vivo, finding a link between NIC exposure and apoptosis. NIC has been reported to induce apoptosis in some earlier reports (Galitovsky et al. 2004; Zhao and Reece 2005), whereas others found that NIC prevents apoptosis (Wielgus et al. 2004; Copeland et al. 2005; Zhao and Reece 2005). The current investigation examined the apoptotic effect of NIC exposure on the liver of female Swiss mice in light of the conflicting data regarding the consequences of NIC toxicity. The results of real-time PCR demonstrated that the hazardous dose of NIC induced apoptosis in the liver via the caspase-3 apoptotic pathway. Because the liver is the key site of NIC metabolism, apoptosis is triggered in the liver. Assuming that the liver metabolizes the majority of NIC, each transit through the liver extracts roughly 70% of the drug from the blood. Furthermore, ChV treatment reduced caspase-3 activation in hepatic tissues, according to our findings. This could be because of ChV’s antioxidant properties. This outcome is consistent with past research findings (Saberbaghi et al. 2013; Abd-Elmoneim and Darwish 2016).
Our study has some limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. Although our study examined various hepatic function indices, gene expressions, and immunostaining, further studies, such as molecular investigations or pathway analyses, are necessary to elucidate the other probable mechanisms involved in NIC-induced hepatic injury and the ameliorative effects of ChV extract. Moreover, while our findings suggest the potential benefits of ChV extract in mitigating NIC-induced hepatic injury, it is important to note that additional research is needed to determine the therapeutic efficacy and safety of ChV in human cancer patients. Clinical trials and further preclinical studies are required to validate our findings and establish appropriate dosage regimens for human use.
Conclusion
The current study found that ChV protects female Swiss mice livers from the harmful effects of sub-chronic oral NIC exposure combined with EAC induction by regulating NIC-induced changes in hepatic function, lipid profile, oxidative and inflammatory injury, enhancing the mRNA expression pattern of antioxidant enzymes, and pro-inflammatory cytokine-encoding genes, and regulating the altered immunostaining of caspase-3, Bax, and BcL2. Furthermore, ChV protects against EAC cell metastasis, with no indication of significant EAC cell infiltration in the sinusoids or periportal areas of the liver. Overall, the findings of this work highly recommended further human studies to assess the efficacy of ChV in its administration to cancer patients who are consuming NIC daily, whether from smoking or exposure to secondhand smoke.
Data availability
Data is provided within the manuscript or supplementary information files.
Abbreviations
- NIC:
-
Nicotine
- ChV:
-
Chlorella vulgaris
- ROS:
-
Reactive oxygen species
- EAC:
-
Ehrlich ascites carcinoma
- TNF-α:
-
Tumor necrosis factors
- NF-κB :
-
Nuclear factor-kappa B
- NRT:
-
Nicotine replacement therapy
- LPO:
-
Lipid peroxidation
- Caspase-3:
-
Cysteine aspartate specific protease-3
- Bax:
-
Bcl-2-associated X protein
- Bcl-2:
-
B-cell lymphoma-2
- MDA:
-
Malondialdehyde
- PCO:
-
Protein carbonyl
- 8OH2dG:
-
8-Hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine
- GAPDH :
-
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
- SOD1 :
-
Superoxide dismutase 1
- SOD2 :
-
Superoxide dismutase 2
- CAT :
-
Catalase
- GPX1 :
-
Glutathione peroxidase 1
- GPX2 :
-
Glutathione peroxidase 2
References
Abdel-Aziem SH, Abd El-Kader HAM, Ibrahim FM, Sharaf HA, El makawy AI (2018) Evaluation of the alleviative role of Chlorella vulgaris and Spirulina platensis extract against ovarian dysfunctions induced by monosodium glutamate in mice. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 16:653-660
Abdel-Hady D, El-Gilany AH (2020) Tobacco use and its associated factors among older people: a community-based study in Egypt. East Mediterr Health J 26:68–74
Abdel-Khalek AE, El-Maghraby MM, Elbialy ZI, Al wakeel RA, Almadaly EA, Shukry M, El-Badawy AA, Zaghloul HK, Assar DH (2023) Mitigation of endogenous oxidative stress and improving growth, hemato-biochemical parameters, and reproductive performance of Zaraibi goat bucks by dietary supplementation with Chlorella vulgaris or/and vitamin C. Trop Anim Health Prod 55:267
Abd-Elmoneim OM, Darwish AM (2016) Potential modulator role of Chlorella vulgaris and Spirulina platensis on monosodium glutamate oxidative stress, genotoxicity, apoptotic gene expression and histopathological alterations. Int J Pharmtech Res 9:161–177
Abu-Serie MM, Habashy NH, Attia WE (2018) In vitro evaluation of the synergistic antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of the combined extracts from Malaysian Ganoderma lucidum and Egyptian Chlorella vulgaris. BMC Complement Altern Med 18:1–13
Andersen AM, Lei M-K, Beach SRH, Philibert RA (2021) Inflammatory biomarker relationships with helper T cell GPR15 expression and cannabis and tobacco smoking. J Psychosom Res 141:110326
Andersson K, Arner P (2001) Systemic nicotine stimulates human adipose tissue lipolysis through local cholinergic and catecholaminergic receptors. Int J Obes 25:1225–1232
Arisha AH, Moustafa A (2019) Potential inhibitory effect of swimming exercise on the Kisspeptin-GnRH signaling pathway in male rats. Theriogenology 133:87–96
Asano H, Horinouchi T, Mai Y, Sawada O, Fujii S, Nishiya T, Minami M, Katayama T, Iwanaga T, Terada K (2012) Nicotine-and tar-free cigarette smoke induces cell damage through reactive oxygen species newly generated by PKC-dependent activation of NADPH oxidase. J Pharmacol Sci 118:275–287
Asante D-B, Effah-Yeboah E, Barnes P, Abban HA, Ameyaw EO, Boampong JN, Ofori EG, Dadzie JB (2016) Antidiabetic effect of young and old ethanolic leaf extracts of Vernonia amygdalina: a comparative study. J Diabetes Res 2016
Ateyya H, Nader MA, Attia GM, El-Sherbeeny NA (2017) Influence of alpha-lipoic acid on nicotine-induced lung and liver damage in experimental rats. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 95:492–500
Barghchi H, Dehnavi Z, Nattagh-Eshtivani E, Alwaily ER, Almulla AF, Kareem AK, Barati M, Ranjbar G, Mohammadzadeh A, Rahimi P, Pahlavani N (2023) The effects of Chlorella vulgaris on cardiovascular risk factors: a comprehensive review on putative molecular mechanisms. Biomed Pharmacother 162:114624
Beutel MW, Harmon TC, Novotny TE, Mock J, Gilmore ME, Hart SC, Traina S, Duttagupta S, Brooks A, Jerde CL, Hoh E, Van De Werfhorst LC, Butsic V, Wartenberg AC, Holden PA (2021) A review of environmental pollution from the use and disposal of cigarettes and electronic cigarettes: contaminants, sources, and impacts. Sustainability 13:12994
Boisson B, Zhang S-Y, Casanova J-L, Puel A (2020) Chapter 39 - inherited disorders of TLR, IL-1R, and NFκB immunity. In: Sullivan KE, Stiehm ER (eds) Stiehm’s Immune Deficiencies (Second Edition). Academic Press, pp 869–883
Chen Y, Ma K (2019) NLRC4 inflammasome activation regulated by TNF-α promotes inflammatory responses in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 511:524–530
Chen X, Li F, Yan S, Wu X, Tang C (2016) Nicotine alleviates the liver inflammation of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis induced by high-fat and high-fructose in mice. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 48:777–782
Chen X, Owoseni E, Salamat J, Cederbaum AI, Lu Y (2018) Nicotine enhances alcoholic fatty liver in mice: role of CYP2A5. Arch Biochem Biophys 657:65–73
Cherng J-Y, Shih M-F (2006) Improving glycogenesis in streptozocin (STZ) diabetic mice after administration of green algae Chlorella. Life Sci 78:1181–1186
Cooper R, Magwere T (2008) Mini-review article nitric oxide-mediated pathogenesis during nicotine and alcohol consumption. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 52:11–18
Copeland RL, Leggett YA, Kanaan YM, Taylor RE, Tizabi Y (2005) Neuroprotective effects of nicotine against salsolinol-induced cytotoxicity: implications for Parkinson’s disease. Neurotox Res 8:289–293
Crowley-Weber CL, Dvorakova K, Crowley C, Bernstein H, Bernstein C, Garewal H, Payne CM (2003) Nicotine increases oxidative stress, activates NF-κB and GRP78, induces apoptosis and sensitizes cells to genotoxic/xenobiotic stresses by a multiple stress inducer, deoxycholate: relevance to colon carcinogenesis. Chem Biol Interact 145:53–66
Dangana E, Omolekulo T, Areola E, Olaniyi K, Soladoye A, Olatunji L (2020) Sodium acetate protects against nicotine-induced excess hepatic lipid in male rats by suppressing xanthine oxidase activity. Chem Biol Interact 316:108929
Dong J, Sulik KK, Chen S-Y (2008) Nrf2-mediated transcriptional induction of antioxidant response in mouse embryos exposed to ethanol in vivo: implications for the prevention of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Antioxid Redox Signal 10:2023–2033
Ebrahimi-Mameghani M, Sadeghi Z, Abbasalizad Farhangi M, Vaghef-Mehrabany E, Aliashrafi S (2017) Glucose homeostasis, insulin resistance and inflammatory biomarkers in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: beneficial effects of supplementation with microalgae Chlorella vulgaris: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial. Clin Nutr 36:1001–1006
Elif ÇİL (2023) A popular dietary supplement: Chlorella. Versatile Approaches to Engineering and Applied Sciences: Materials and Methods p 37
Elkon KB, Oberst A (2025) 18 - Apoptosis and inflammatory forms of cell death. In: Wallace DJ, Hahn BH, Askanase A, Crow MK, Isenberg DA, Cava AL, McMahon MA, Tsao BP, Venuturupalli S, Weisman MH (eds) Dubois’ lupus erythematosus and related syndromes, 10th edn. Elsevier, New Delhi, pp 265-276.e264
Elsawi SA, Aly HF, Elbatanony MM, Maamoun AA, Mowawad DM (2018) Phytochemical evaluation of Lagerstroemia indica (L.) Pers leaves as anti-Alzheimer’s. J Mater Environ Sci 9:2575–2586
Elsheikh S, Galal AA, Fadil R (2018) Hepatoprotective impact of Chlorella vulgaris powder on deltamethrin intoxicated rats. Zagazig Vet J 46:17–24
El-Sherbeeny NA, Nader MA, Attia GM, Ateyya H (2016) Agmatine protects rat liver from nicotine-induced hepatic damage via antioxidative, antiapoptotic, and antifibrotic pathways. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 389:1341–1351
Elsherbiny NM, Maysarah NM, El-Sherbiny M, Al-Gayyar MM (2017) Renal protective effects of thymoquinone against sodium nitrite-induced chronic toxicity in rats: Impact on inflammation and apoptosis. Life Sci 180:1–8
Esterhuizen M, Park C-B, Kim YJ, Kim T-Y, Yoon H, Andres F, Rodriguez-Rodriguez R, Tanabe S (2023) A perspective on the role of physiological stresses in cancer, diabetes and cognitive disease as environmental diseases. Front Mol Biosci 10:1274221
Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS (1972) Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 18:499–502
Galitovsky V, Chowdhury P, Zharov VP (2004) Photothermal detection of nicotine-induced apoptotic effects in pancreatic cancer cells. Life Sci 75:2677–2687
Goiris K, De Vreese P, De Cooman L, Muylaert K (2012) Rapid screening and guided extraction of antioxidants from microalgae using voltammetric methods. J Agric Food Chem 60:7359–7366
Grando SA (2014) Connections of nicotine to cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 14:419–429
Hasan KM, Friedman TC, Shao X, Parveen M, Sims C, Lee DL, Espinoza-Derout J, Sinha-Hikim I, Sinha-Hikim AP (2019) E-cigarettes and western diet: important metabolic risk factors for hepatic diseases. Hepatology 69:2442–2454
Hashem MA, Shoeeb SBA, Abd-Elhakim YM, Mohamed WAM (2020) The antitumor activity of Arthrospira platensis and/or cisplatin in a murine model of Ehrlich ascites carcinoma with hematinic and hepato-renal protective action. J Funct Foods 66:103831
Hritcu L, Ionita R, Motei DE, Babii C, Stefan M, Mihasan M (2017) Nicotine versus 6-hydroxy-l-nicotine against chlorisondamine induced memory impairment and oxidative stress in the rat hippocampus. Biomed Pharmacother 86:102–108
Hsu S-M, Raine L, Fanger H (1981) Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: a comparison between ABC and unlabeled antibody (PAP) procedures. J Histochem Cytochem 29:577–580
Ivey R, Desai M, Green K, Sinha-Hikim I, Friedman T, Sinha-Hikim A (2014) Additive effects of nicotine and high-fat diet on hepatocellular apoptosis in mice: involvement of caspase 2 and inducible nitric oxide synthase-mediated intrinsic pathway signaling. Horm Metab Res 46:568–573
Jassem J (2019) Tobacco smoking after diagnosis of cancer: clinical aspects. Transl Lung Cancer Res 8:S50–S58
Justo GZ, Silva MR, Queiroz ML (2001) Effects of the green algae Chlorella vulgaris on the response of the host hematopoietic system to intraperitoneal Ehrlich ascites tumor transplantation in mice. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 23:119–132
Khaled S, Makled MN, Nader MA (2020) Tiron protects against nicotine-induced lung and liver injury through antioxidant and anti-inflammatory actions in rats in vivo. Life Sci 260:118426
Kolure R, Nachammai V, Thakur S, Godela R, Manjula SN (2024) Protective effect of enicostemma axillare-swertiamarin on oxidative stress against nicotine-induced liver damage in sd rats. In: Annales Pharmaceutiques Françaises. Elsevier Masson
Lallemand F, Ward RJ, Dravolina O, De Witte P (2006) Nicotine-induced changes of glutamate and arginine in naive and chronically alcoholized rats: an in vivo microdialysis study. Brain Res 1111:48–60
Layton C, Bancroft JD. Suvarna SK (2018) Fixation of tissues. Bancroft’s Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques, 8th ed, Suvarna SK, Layton C, Bancroft JD eds pp 40–63
Lee HJ, Pi SH, Kim Y, Kim HS, Kim SJ, Kim YS, Lee SK, Kim EC (2009) Effects of nicotine on antioxidant defense enzymes and RANKL expression in human periodontal ligament cells. J Periodontol 80:1281–1288
Li L, Li W, Kim Y-h, Lee YW (2013) Chlorella vulgaris extract ameliorates carbon tetrachloride-induced acute hepatic injury in mice. Exp Toxicol Pathol 65:73–80
Li L, Zhou X, Wang Y (2018) Smokeless tobacco extract inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis in oral mucous fibroblasts. Oncol Lett 16:5066–5074
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods (san Diego, Calif) 25:402–408
Lozoya-Pérez NE, Orona-Tamayo D, Paredes-Molina DM, Beltrán-Ramírez FI, Quintana-Rodríguez E (2024) Chapter 28 - microalgae: a potential opportunity for proteins and bioactive compounds destined for food and health industry. In: Nadathur S, Wanasundara JPD, Scanlin L (eds) Sustainable Protein Sources (Second Edition). Academic Press, pp 581–597
Martins N, Barros L, Ferreira IC (2016) In vivo antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds: facts and gaps. Trends Food Sci Technol 48:1–12
Melo MGNd, Reino IBdSM, Vaitkevicius-Antão V, Silva JMd, Júnior JNdS, Andrade AFd, Bezerra RP, Marques DdAV, Silva SdFFd, Araújo PSRd, Lorena VMBd, Morais RCSd, Paiva-Cavalcanti Md (2024) Chlorella vulgaris extract and Imiquimod as new therapeutic targets for leishmaniasis: an immunological approach. Immunobiology 229:152779
Mohamed AA-R, Bohy KME, Moustafa GG, Mohammed HH, Metwally MMM, Mohammed HED, Nassan MA, Saber TM (2022) Sustained functioning impairments and oxidative stress with neurobehavioral dysfunction associated with oral nicotine exposure in the brain of a murine model of ehrlich ascites carcinoma: modifying the antioxidant role of Chlorella vulgaris. Biology 11:279
Mohamed AA-R, Moustafa GG, El Bohy KM, Saber TM, Metwally MMM, El Desoukey MH, El-Far AH, Alotaibi BS, Alosaimi M, Abuzahrah SS, Alqahtani LS (2023) Exploring cardiac impact of oral nicotine exposure in a transplantable neoplasm mice model: insights from biochemical analysis, morphometry, and molecular docking: Chlorella vulgaris green algae support. Toxicology 497–498:153629
Mohseni R, Arab Sadeghabadi Z, Karimi J, Gholami H, Ghasemi H, Ghadimipour HR, Kheiripour N (2021) Chlorella vulgaris supplementation attenuates the progression of liver fibrosis through targeting TGF-β-signaling pathway in the CCl4-induced liver fibrosis in rats. Toxin Reviews 40:1347–1355
Nass PP, do Nascimento TC, Fernandes AS, Caetano PA, de Rosso VV, Jacob-Lopes E, Zepka LQ (2022) Guidance for formulating ingredients/products from Chlorella vulgaris and Arthrospira platensis considering carotenoid and chlorophyll bioaccessibility and cellular uptake. Food Res Int 157:111469
Nguyen A, Duquette N, Mamarbachi M, Thorin E (2016) Epigenetic regulatory effect of exercise on glutathione peroxidase 1 expression in the skeletal muscle of severely dyslipidemic mice. PLoS ONE 11:e0151526
Nwosu A, Krasowski MD (2023) Nicotine and tobacco alkaloid testing and challenges. Arch Pathol Lab Med 147:634–642
Oraby MA, Elazazy O, Karam HM, Fadaly DS, Ibrahim AA (2023) MitoQ combats tumor cell progression in Ehrlich ascites carcinoma mice: a crosstalk between mitochondrial oxidative status, mitophagy, and NF-κB signaling. Life Sci 331:122063
Panahi Y, Ghamarchehreh ME, Beiraghdar F, Zare M, Jalalian HR, Sahebkar A (2012a) Investigation of the effects of Chlorella vulgaris supplementation in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized clinical trial. Hepatogastroenterology 59:2099–2103
Panahi Y, Pishgoo B, Jalalian HR, Mohammadi E, Taghipour HR, Sahebkar A, Abolhasani E (2012b) Investigation of the effects of Chlorella vulgaris as an adjunctive therapy for dyslipidemia: results of a randomised open-label clinical trial. Nutr Diet 69:13–19
Panahi Y, Mostafazadeh B, Abrishami A, Saadat A, Beiraghdar F, Tavana S, Pishgoo B, Parvin S, Sahebkar A (2013) Investigation of the effects of Chlorella vulgaris supplementation on the modulation of oxidative stress in apparently healthy smokers. Clin Lab 59:579–587
Panahi Y, Darvishi B, Jowzi N, Beiraghdar F, Sahebkar A (2016) Chlorella vulgaris: a multifunctional dietary supplement with diverse medicinal properties. Curr Pharm Des 22:164–173
Pérez-Gálvez A, Viera I, Roca M (2020) Carotenoids and chlorophylls as antioxidants. Antioxidants 9(6):505
Perveen K, Bukhari NA, Al Masoudi LM, Alqahtani AN, Alruways MW, Alkhattaf FS (2022) Antifungal potential, chemical composition of Chlorella vulgaris and SEM analysis of morphological changes in Fusarium oxysporum. Saudi J Biol Sci 29:2501–2505
Queiroz MLS, da Rocha MC, Torello CO, de Souza QJ, Bincoletto C, Morgano MA, Romano MR, Paredes-Gamero EJ, Barbosa CMV, Calgarotto AK (2011) Chlorella vulgaris restores bone marrow cellularity and cytokine production in lead-exposed mice. Food Chem Toxicol 49:2934–2941
Renugadevi K, Nachiyar CV, Sowmiya P, Sunkar S (2018) Antioxidant activity of phycocyanin pigment extracted from marine filamentous cyanobacteria Geitlerinema sp TRV57. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 16:237–242
Saberbaghi T, Abbasian F, Mohd Yusof YA. Makpol S (2013) Modulation of cell cycle profile by Chlorella vulgaris prevents replicative senescence of human diploid fibroblasts. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Safafar H, Van Wagenen J, Møller P, Jacobsen C (2015) Carotenoids, phenolic compounds and tocopherols contribute to the antioxidative properties of some microalgae species grown on industrial wastewater. Mar Drugs 13:7339–7356
Sannappa Gowda NG, Shiragannavar VD, Prabhuswamimath SC, Tuladhar S, Chidambaram SB, Santhekadur PK (2022) Ehrlich ascites carcinoma mice model for studying liver inflammation and fibrosis. Adv Cancer Biol Metastasis 4:100029
Scheid M, Boyse EA, Carswell EA, Old LJ (1972) Serologically demonstrable alloantigens of mouse epidermal cells. J Exp Med 135:938
Sherafati N, Bideshki MV, Behzadi M, Mobarak S, Asadi M, Sadeghi O (2022) Effect of supplementation with Chlorella vulgaris on lipid profile in adults: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Complement Ther Med 66:102822
Sikiru AB, Arangasamy A, Alemede IC, Guvvala PR, Egena SSA, Ippala JR, Bhatta R (2019) Chlorella vulgaris supplementation effects on performances, oxidative stress and antioxidant genes expression in liver and ovaries of New Zealand White rabbits. Heliyon 5:e02470
Silva J, Alves C, Pinteus S, Reboleira J, Pedrosa R, Bernardino S (2019) Chapter 3.10 - Chlorella. In: Nabavi SM, Silva AS (eds.) Nonvitamin and nonmineral nutritional supplements. Academic Press, pp. 187–193
Sparks J, Pauly J (1999) Effects of continuous oral nicotine administration on brain nicotinic receptors and responsiveness to nicotine in C57Bl/6 mice. Psychopharmacology 141:145–153
Sulaiman S, Shamaan NA, Ngah WZW, Yusof YAM (2006) Chemopreventive effect of Chlorella vulgaris in choline deficient diet and ethionine induced liver carcinogenesis in rats
Suvarna S, Layton C (2013) Bancroft’s theory and practice of histological techniques. 7th. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier
Thong T, Forté CA, Hill EM, Colacino JA (2019) Environmental exposures, stem cells, and cancer. Pharmacol Ther 204:107398
Tian Z, Wang X, Han T, Sun C (2023) Selegiline ameliorated dyslipidemia and hepatic steatosis in high-fat diet mice. Int Immunopharmacol 117:109901
Warren GW, Sobus S, Gritz ER (2014) The biological and clinical effects of smoking by patients with cancer and strategies to implement evidence-based tobacco cessation support. Lancet Oncol 15:e568-580
Wielgus JJ, Downey LC, Ewald KW, Hatley ME, Wilson KC, Yeilding RH (2004) Exposure to low concentrations of nicotine during cranial nerve development inhibits apoptosis and causes cellular hypertrophy in the ventral oculomotor nuclei of the chick embryo. Brain Res 1000:123–133
Yeo CT, Oleson B, Hansen P, Kropp E, Pereckas M, Naatz A, Stancill J, Ross K, Broniowska K, Gundry R, Corbett J (2022) Inhibition of the DNA damage response (DDR) in β-cells by nitric oxide: an association with mitochondrial oxidative metabolism and glucose metabolism. Free Radical Biol Med 180:s102
Ying R, Zhang Z, Zhu H, Li B, Hou H (2019) The protective effect of mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs) from Porphyra yezoensi s in a mouse model of UV irradiation-induced photoaging. Mar Drugs 17:470
Yue J, Khokhar J, Miksys S, Tyndale RF (2009) Differential induction of ethanol-metabolizing CYP2E1 and nicotine-metabolizing CYP2B1/2 in rat liver by chronic nicotine treatment and voluntary ethanol intake. Eur J Pharmacol 609:88–95
Zahran WE, Emam MA (2018) Renoprotective effect of Spirulina platensis extract against nicotine-induced oxidative stress-mediated inflammation in rats. Phytomedicine 49:106–110
Zhao Z, Reece EA (2005) Nicotine-induced embryonic malformations mediated by apoptosis from increasing intracellular calcium and oxidative stress. Birth Defects Res B 74:383–391
Zhou G (2019) Tobacco, air pollution, environmental carcinogenesis, and thoughts on conquering strategies of lung cancer. Cancer Biol Med 16:700–713
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H. Abu Zeid: conceptualization, methodology, resources, software, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, visualization, writing—original draft. Eman W. El-Hady: conceptualization, methodology, resources, investigation, writing—review and editing. Gehan A. Ahmed: conceptualization, methodology, resources, writing—review and editing. Yasmina M. Abd-Elhakim: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, data curation, writing—review and editing. Doaa Ibrahim: methodology, formal analysis, data curation, writing—review and editing. Noura A. Abd-Allah: methodology, resources, formal analysis, investigation. Ahmed H. Arisha: methodology, formal analysis, data curation, writing—review and editing. Mohammed S. Sobh: methodology and visualization. Azza M.A. Abo-Elmaaty: conceptualization, methodology, resources, writing—review and editing. The authors declare that all data were generated in-house and that no paper mill was used.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
The animal studies detailed afterward were carried out following the National Institutes of Health’s general criteria for the care and use of laboratory animals in scientific investigations and were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Ethics of Animal Use in Research Committee (IACUC), Zagazig University, Egypt, with the reference number (ZU-IACUC/2f/ 278/2022).
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Abu-Zeid, E.H., El-Hady, E.W., Ahmed, G.A. et al. Nicotine exacerbates liver damage in a mice model of Ehrlich ascites carcinoma through shifting SOD/NF-κB/caspase-3 pathways: ameliorating role of Chlorella vulgaris. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-024-03120-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-024-03120-9