Abstract
Mosapride (4-amino-5-chloro-2-ethoxy-N-[[4-[(4-fluorophenyl) methyl]-2-morpholinyl]-methyl] benzamide) is a potent agonist at gastrointestinal 5-HT4 receptors. Mosapride is an approved drug to treat several gastric diseases. We tested the hypothesis that mosapride also stimulates 5-HT4 receptors in the heart. Mosapride increased the force of contraction and beating rate in isolated atrial preparations from mice with cardiac overexpression of human 5-HT4-serotonin receptors (5-HT4-TG). However, it is inactive in wild-type mouse hearts (WT). Mosapride was less effective and potent than serotonin in raising the force of contraction or the beating rate in 5-HT4-TG. Only in the presence of cilostamide (1 μM), a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, mosapride, and its primary metabolite time dependently raised the force of contraction under isometric conditions in isolated paced human right atrial preparations (HAP, obtained during open heart surgery). In HAP, mosapride (10 μM) reduced serotonin-induced increases in the force of contraction. Mosapride (10 µM) shifted the concentration–response curves to serotonin in HAP to the right. These data suggest that mosapride is a partial agonist at 5-HT4-serotonin receptors in HAP.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Mosapride (Fig. 1A) was developed by a Japanese company (reviewed in: Katoh et al. 2003) and is approved in patients and mainly sold in Japan and some other Asian countries. Mosapride is intended to treat various gastrointestinal diseases (Curran and Robinson 2008). Mosapride has at least one active metabolite (Katoh et al. 2003), called des-fluorobenzyl-mosapride (Fig. 1A), which we studied for comparison. Mosapride acts functionally as a partial agonist compared to 5-HT at 5-HT4 receptors in ligand-binding studies (Tsubouchi et al. 2018). Like many other benzamides (e.g. zacopride), mosapride is also an antagonist at 5-HT3 receptors (Park and Sung 2019). One had developed mosapride because previous work showed that agonists at 5-HT4 receptors were promising agents for treating gastric diseases (Katoh et al. 2003). However, the authors argued that other drugs that increase gastric motility show agonistic or antagonistic effects at other receptors, in addition to their stimulatory effect on 5-HT4 receptors (Katoh et al. 2003). For example, they gave metoclopramide or cisapride (Katoh et al. 2003). For instance, metoclopramide is not only an agonist at 5-HT4-receptors but also acts as an antagonist at D2-dopamine receptors.
Thus, metoclopramide can lead to Parkinson-like side effects and elevated prolactin levels (Katoh et al. 2003, Athavale et al. 2020). In parallel, soon after cisapride entered the market, cardiac arrhythmias were reported that were explained by the inhibitory action of cisapride on human ventricular potassium channels (Tack et al. 2012). This manifested in prolonging QT interval on surface ECG (e.g. dog: Matsunaga et al. 2011). At least in isolated perfused rabbit hearts, mosapride concentration dependently increased the duration of the QT interval and increased the incidence of early after-depolarisation (Kii and Ito 2002). Prolongation of QT intervals sometimes leads to torsade de pointes and deadly ventricular fibrillation. Mosapride has the advantage of being about three orders of magnitude less potent than cisapride to inhibit ventricular potassium channels and, thus, less likely to prolong the QT interval and induce arrhythmias by this electrophysiological mechanism (rabbit: Carlsson et al. 1997; rat: Kii et al. 2001, dog: Matsunaga et al. 2011). However, another potassium channel that is expressed in the heart, Kv4.3, is also inhibited by mosapride (Sung and Hahn 2013). This may result in a propensity for arrhythmias in vulnerable patients. Indeed, a clinical registry study noted an increased incidence of arrhythmias in patients taking mosapride compared to non-users (Song et al. 2020).
Moreover, the cardiac effects of mosapride might be beneficial. For instance, doxorubicin is an important anti-cancer drug. Its use is limited by the cardiotoxic effects of doxorubicin. For example, doxorubicin leads to arrhythmia and heart failure in humans (Nishiuchi et al. 2022). Interestingly, in mice treated with doxorubicin as a model of human heart failure, an improvement in cardiac contractility was observed when mosapride was given together with doxorubicin (Nishiuchi et al. 2022). This raises the option of starting a clinical trial with mosapride in cancer patients who need chemotherapy that includes doxorubicin. In this regard, it is crucial to study mosapride in the human heart before such trials can be initiated in earnest.
The data in rabbits, rats and dogs are consistent with an inhibitory action of mosapride on potassium channels but tell nothing about the involvement of 5-HT4 receptors (Fig. 1B) because 5-HT4 receptors are not functionally present in rabbit cardiomyocytes (review: Neumann et al. 2017, 2023a). However, stimulation of 5-HT4 receptors in the heart can lead to cardiac arrhythmias (Neumann et al. 2017, 2023a, Keller et al. 2018). Mosapride has never been studied for its functional effects on human 5-HT4 receptors in the heart. This fact motivated us to initiate the present study.
All inotropic and chronotropic effects of serotonin are mediated via 5-HT4 receptors on human cardiomyocytes (reviews: Kaumann and Levy 2006, Neumann et al. 2017, Neumann et al. 2023a, Fig. 1B). These 5-HT4 receptors are lacking in a functional manner in mouse hearts: serotonin does not increase the force of contraction in isolated mouse cardiac preparations from wild-type mice (WT, Gergs et al. 2010, 2013). To facilitate the study of human 5-HT4 receptors, we previously established a transgenic mouse with overexpression of this receptor (5-HT4-TG) only in the heart, which responds with positive inotropic and positive chronotropic effects to serotonin and other 5-HT4 receptor agonists (Gergs et al. 2010; review: Neumann et al. 2017, 2023a, 2023b). Hence, we decided to test whether mosapride would exert positive inotropic and chronotropic effects in this 5-HT4-TG and not in littermate WT. If that were the case, one would also expect mosapride to stimulate the 5-HT4 receptors in the human heart and thereby increase the force of contraction (Fig. 1B). We used this reasoning with some success in the past. For instance, we found that metoclopramide, cisapride, bufotenin and prucalopride stimulated 5-HT4 receptors in the atrium of 5-HT4-TG as well as the human atrial preparations (HAP) in vitro (e.g. Keller et al. 2018, Neumann et al. 2021a, 2023b).
Hence, we tested the following hypotheses:
-
1.
Mosapride increases the force of contraction and spontaneous beating rate in atrial preparations from 5-HT4-TG (and not WT).
-
2.
Mosapride and des-fluorobenzyl-mosapride increase the force of contraction in HAP via 5-HT4 receptors.
A progress report has been published in abstract form (Neumann et al. 2023c).
Materials and methods
Contractile studies in mice
Mice in this study included transgenic mice (CD1 background), where the full-length human 5-HT4 receptor is overexpressed in the heart driven by α-myosin heavy-chain promoter (5-HT4-TG). The generation and initial characterisation of these mice at biochemical and functional levels was reported some years ago (Gergs et al. 2010). The initial founder was then crossed in mice of the strain CD-1. For comparison, we used littermate wild-type animals (WT). We used mice of random sex about 130 days of age.
In brief, the right or left atrial preparations in the mice were isolated and mounted in organ baths, as previously described (Gergs et al. 2013; Neumann et al. 1998). The bathing solution of the organ baths contained 119.8 mM NaCI, 5.4 mM KCI, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 1.05 mM MgCl2, 0.42 mM NaH2PO4, 22.6 mM NaHCO3, 0.05 mM Na2EDTA, 0.28 mM ascorbic acid and 5.05 mM glucose. The solution was continuously gassed with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 and maintained at 37 °C and pH 7.4 (Neumann et al. 1998). The force of contraction was quantified in electrically paced isolated left atrial preparations. The duration of electrical stimulation with a rectangular impulse of direct current was 5 ms. The voltage was 10% higher than necessary to initiate contraction and the stimulation rate was one beat per second (1 Hz). Muscles were stretched such that the maximum basal force was generated and then allowed to stabilise for 30 min before drug application. Spontaneously beating right atrial preparations in mice were used to study any chronotropic effects. The drug application was as follows: After equilibration was reached, mosapride was added cumulatively to the left or right atrial preparations to establish concentration–response curves.
Next, where indicated, serotonin was cumulatively applied to the preparations to compare the efficacy of mosapride and serotonin. We studied WT (n = 5) and 5-HT4-TG (n = 6) from both genders. The average age was 144 days.
Contractile studies on human preparations
Contractile studies on human preparations were done using the same setup and buffer used in the mouse studies. In brief, the force of contraction was quantified in electrically paced isolated left atrial preparations. The duration of electrical stimulation with a rectangular impulse of direct current was 5 ms. The voltage was 10% higher than necessary to initiate contraction. Muscles were stretched such that the maximum basal force was generated and then allowed to stabilise for 30 min before drug application started. Basal developed force can be seen in the relevant diagrams in this paper labelled with millinewton (mN) in the ordinates under the condition labelled control conditions (Ctr). The samples were obtained from ten male and four female patients aged 45–83. The patients suffered from coronary diseases (two- and three-vessel diseases), atrial fibrillation and hypertension. Drug therapy included metoprolol, furosemide, apixaban, statins and acetylsalicylic acid. The methods used for atrial contraction studies in human samples have been previously published and were not altered in this study (Gergs et al. 2009, 2017). Informed written consent was obtained from all patients.
The drug application was as follows: After equilibration was reached, mosapride was cumulatively added to HAP to establish concentration–response curves. In separate experiments, the first 1 μM cilostamide was given. We waited until a positive inotropic effect on cilostamide had developed and reached a plateau. Then, we constructed a concentration–response curve for mosapride. In some preparations, an antagonist was added (either tropisetron or GR 125487). Then, where indicated, serotonin was cumulatively applied to the preparations. In other experiments, 10 µM mosapride alone was added, and then serotonin was cumulatively applied. These results were compared with separate preparations in which only a concentration response to serotonin was constructed.
Data analysis
Data shown are the means ± standard error of the mean. Statistical significance was estimated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni’s t-test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Drugs and materials
( −)-Isoprenaline-( +)-bitartrate, des-4-fluorobenzyl-mosapride (4-amino-5-chloro-2-ethoxy-N-(2-morpholinylmethyl)-benzamide, mosapride (4-amino-5-chloro-2-ethoxy-N-[[4-[(4-fluorophenyl)methyl]-2-morpholinyl]methyl]-benzamide) citrate, serotonin hydrochloride, GR 125487 [1-[2-(methanesulfonamido)ethyl]piperidin-4-yl]methyl 5-fluoro-2-methoxy-1H-indole-3-carboxylate) sulfamate, tropisetron (ICS 205–930, [(1R,5S)-8-methyl-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-3-yl] 1H-indole-3-carboxylate) hydrochloride and cilostamide (N-cyclohexyl-N-methyl-4-(1,2-dihydro-2-oxo-6-quinolyloxy) butyramide) were purchased from Cayman (via Biomol, Hamburg, Germany), Selleckchem (Cologne, Germany), Tocris (Wiesbaden-Nordenstadt, Germany) or Sigma-Aldrich (now: Merck, Derieich, Germany), respectively. All other chemicals were of the highest purity grade commercially available. Deionised water was used throughout the experiments. Stock solutions were prepared fresh daily.
Results
As seen in this original recording, mosapride exerted a concentration- and time-dependent positive inotropic effect in the left atrial preparations from 5-HT4-TG (Fig. 2B). In contrast, mosapride failed to raise the force of contraction in the left atrial preparations from WT (Fig. 2A). The latter finding is consistent with our previous research. 5-HT cannot raise force in the atrium from WT (Gergs et al. 2010). The expression of the 5-HT4 receptor or the coupling of the 5-HT4 receptor is too small to affect contractility in the mouse heart (discussed in Gergs et al. 2010). If mosapride behaves like 5-HT, mosapride should affect the beating rate in right atrial preparations of 5-HT4-TG. Furthermore, we noticed a small time- and concentration-dependent positive chronotropic effect of mosapride in right atrial preparations from 5-HT4-TG (Fig. 2D), which is plotted in Fig. 3D in an original recording.
In contrast, we detected no positive inotropic effect in the right atrial preparations from WT (Figs. 2C and 3C). We also assessed muscle tension parameters in the left atrium. Several such experiments are summarised regarding the force of contraction measured as the percent of pre-drug value or mN in the left atrium, as seen in Fig. 3A and B. This effect gained statistical significance at 1 µM mosapride. Furthermore, the rate of tension development and the rate of relaxation were not changed in absolute values by mosapride (Fig. 3C). Moreover, we were interested in the effect of mosapride on the times of contraction. It turned out that mosapride did not reduce the time to peak to tension (T1 in Fig. 3D) or the time of relaxation (T2 in Fig. 3D). Finally, mosapride tended to increase the beating rate (Fig. 3E).
In the original recordings, we depicted that in separate experiments, first applying mosapride and then subsequently applying 5-HT increased the force of contraction further in left atrial preparations from 5-HT4-TG (Figs. 4B, 5A and 5B). In contrast, the subsequent application of 5-HT did not increase the force of contraction in WT (Fig. 4A, Gergs et al. 2010, 2013).
Likewise, following mosapride, additionally applied 5-HT increased the beating rate further in 5-HT4-TG, suggesting that mosapride is not a full agonist in relation to the beating rate (Figs. 4D and 5E). In contrast, neither mosapride nor serotonin augmented the beating rate in the right atrial preparations from WT (Fig. 4C, Gergs et al. 2010, 2013).
We also assessed muscle tension parameters in the left atrium under these conditions (i.e. Fig. 4B). Several such experiments are summarised regarding the force of contraction measured as the percent of pre-drug value or mN in the left atrium (Fig. 5A, B). This effect gained statistical significance at 0.3 µM serotonin. Furthermore, the rate of tension development and the rate of relaxation were not augmented in absolute values by mosapride, but by subsequent serotonin (Fig. 5C). Moreover, we were interested in the effect of mosapride on the times of contraction. The result was that mosapride did not reduce the time to peak tension (Fig. 5D) or the time of relaxation (T2, Fig. 3D). Finally, serotonin after mosapride further increased the beating rate (Fig. 5E).
Next, we wanted to test the effects of mosapride in the human heart similarly to those in mice, as shown in Fig. 4. To that end, we constructed concentration–response relationships for cumulatively applied serotonin alone or in the presence of increasing concentrations of mosapride. As seen in the original recording, while serotonin concentration-dependently increased (Fig. 6A), mosapride (1 µM: Fig. 6C; or 10 µM: Fig. 6B) alone did not increase but reduced the force of contraction. However, the concentration-dependent mosapride shifted the concentration-dependent effect of serotonin to the right (Fig. 6C, B). Several such experiments are summarised in Fig. 7. Mosapride shifted the effect of serotonin on the force of contraction in a concentration-dependent manner, as shown in mN (Fig. 7A) or % of the pre-drug value (Fig. 7B). Similarly, while serotonin alone raised the rate of tension development or rate of relaxation, these effects were concentration dependently reduced by mosapride (Fig. 7C). A similar pattern was seen at the time of relaxation (T2, Fig. 7D).
Next, we reversed the application of serotonin and mosapride. First, we established a concentration–response curve for serotonin, saturating cardiac 5-HT4 receptors (Fig. 8A). After that, increasing concentrations of mosapride were added (Fig. 8A). Here, we noted a negative inotropic effect of mosapride, displacing serotonin from receptors due to high concentrations of mosapride. This was seen in an original experiment (Fig. 8A). Data from several experiments are depicted in Fig. 8. Similar inotropic effects of mosapride were noted in absolute values for the force of contraction expressed in mN or % of the pre-drug value (Fig. 8B, C), for the rate of tension development and for the rate of relaxation (Fig. 8D). Moreover, we were interested in the effect of mosapride on the times of contraction. It turned out that mosapride reversed the effect of serotonin on the time of relaxation (T2, Fig. 8E).
While mosapride alone failed to raise the force of contraction but reduced the force of contraction (Fig. 6), when force had been raised by cilostamide, a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor (which we have used before to raise force in HAP: e.g. Gergs et al. 2024), then additionally applied mosapride exerted a positive inotropic effect that could be reduced by receptor antagonists. The original recording is depicted in Fig. 9A. Data from several experiments are depicted in Fig. 9. Cilostamide increased force, and this effect was amplified by mosapride and antagonised by tropisetron, here used as an inhibitor of human 5-HT4 serotonin receptors, in HAP used before by others (Kaumann et al. 1990) (Fig. 9C). Similar inotropic effects of mosapride were noted in absolute values for the rate of tension development and the rate of relaxation (Fig. 9D).
Moreover, we were interested in the effect of mosapride on the times of contraction. Cilostamide and additional mosapride did not alter the time to peak tension (Fig. 9F). Cilostamide itself reduced the time of relaxation (T2, Fig. 9G); this effect was accentuated by mosapride, but was not reversed by additional tropisetron (Fig. 9G). Finally, we calculated the percent increase in the rate of tension development and the rate of relaxation. In other words, pre-drug values before cilostamide (Fig. 8A) were arbitrarily set to 100%. If this normalisation procedure is used, it becomes more apparent that cilostamide alone increased the rate of tension development and this was accentuated by mosapride (Fig. 9H). Likewise, cilostamide alone increased the rate of tension relaxation and this was accentuated by mosapride (Fig. 9I).
Finally, the question arose of how the primary metabolite of mosapride would affect the force of contraction in HAP. We observed the same pattern as with the mother compound, mosapride. Specifically, as seen in the original recording, cilostamide slowly increased the force of contraction (Fig. 10A). After that, mosapride concentration dependently increased the force of contraction; this increase could be antagonised by GR125487, an antagonist at human cardiac 5-HT4 serotonin receptors (e.g. Gergs et al. 2010, 2013) (Fig. 10A). Several similar experiments were then summarised. We report similar positive inotropic effects of des-mosapride for the force of contraction expressed in mN or % of the maximum value (Fig. 10B, C) for the rate of tension development and the rate of relaxation (Fig. 10D) in absolute values by mosapride (Fig. 10E). Moreover, we were interested in the effect of mosapride on the times of contraction. It turned out that mosapride reversed the effect of serotonin not on time to peak tension (T1, Fig. 10F) but on time of relaxation (T2, Fig. 10G).
Discussion
Main new findings
The primary new finding is that mosapride can function as a partial functional agonist at 5-HT4 receptors in transgenic mouse hearts and HAP.
Mechanism of mosapride
We suggest that mosapride increased force and beating rate as an agonist at cardiac human 5-HT4 receptors because mosapride only increased the force of contraction in the left atrium from 5-HT4-TG and not in WT. Because the maximum inotropic effect of mosapride in atrial preparations of 5-HT4-TG could be further stimulated by additional serotonin, we tentatively conclude that mosapride acts here as a partial agonist. Likewise in HAP, mosapride could act as an agonist and could increase force of contraction via 5-HT4 receptors. However, this positive inotropic effect of mosapride was only seen in the presence of cilostamide, a phosphodiesterase III inhibitory drug. In contrast, in the absence of cilostamide (Fig. 6), mosapride reduced force of contraction. This could mean that mosapride can also reduce force of contraction via 5-HT4 receptors. Conceivably, mosapride might in this case act as an inverse agonist at 5-HT4 receptors.
Role of phosphorylation of regulatory proteins
The general assumption is that 5-HT4 receptor stimulation increases the phosphorylation of protein substrates for cAMP-dependent protein kinase (Fig. 1B). We and others described that serotonin via 5-HT4 receptors can increase the phosphorylation state of phospholamban (Gergs et al. 2009, Neumann et al. 2019, 2023b). These phosphorylations can partly explain why mosapride increased the force in atrial preparations from 5-HT4-TG.
Mosapride functioned as an agonist at 5-HT4 receptors in the isolated HAP. We conclude this because the positive inotropic effect of mosapride (in the presence of cilostamide) is antagonised by 5-HT4 antagonists like tropisetron and GR 125487. Moreover, mosapride, as in 5-HT4-TG, acts as a partial agonist. Mosapride shifted the concentration–response curve (on the force of contraction) of serotonin to the right in HAP, which was expected from a 5-HT4 antagonist. Moreover, mosapride attenuated the positive inotropic effect of serotonin. Such partial agonisms in the human heart are not without precedence for 5-HT4 receptor agonists. For inotropy, cisapride and metoclopramide are partial agonists in 5-HT4-TG but also in HAP (Chai et al. 2012, Keller et al. 2018, Neumann et al. 2021b). Of note, cisapride and metoclopramide are structurally similar to mosapride, further supporting our conclusion.
Species differences
A significant merit of this study is that we used a small animal model (5-HT4-TG) to test for the inotropic effects of mosapride. In previous papers, rats, rabbits or dogs were used to study the cardiac effects of mosapride. While these studies are well suited to investigate the effects of mosapride via potassium channels (notably hERG), they are not useful to study the effects of mosapride or its metabolites on 5-HT4 receptors; dog, rabbit and rat hearts (and WT mouse hearts) do not contain functional 5-HT4 receptors that couple to force of contraction (reviewed in Neumann et al. 2017, 2023a). One could study mosapride in porcine hearts, but pigs are more expensive than mice; the sequence of the 5-HT4 receptor is similar, but not identical, in pigs and humans. In 5-HT4-TG, we encountered the same sequence as in human hearts because we chose to overexpress the human 5-HT4 receptor.
Moreover, our comparative study on 5-HT4-TG and HAP showed another intriguing species difference. Whereas mosapride alone was an agonist in the atrial preparations of 5-HT4-TG, mosapride alone was ineffective in raising the force of contraction in HAP. At least two reasons could explain these differences between mice and humans, which are not mutually exclusive. First, the overexpression of 5-HT4 receptor is so high in 5-HT4-TG that even an inverse agonist can stimulate the receptor. Alternatively, the signal transduction proteins (e.g. Gs, AC, PKA, Fig. 1A) are so different between mice and humans that stimulation of mosapride leads to different steps in signal transduction. It would be interesting to address this issue in subsequent work. There is also evidence in the gastroenterological tract that mosapride can act as a partial agonist (Yoshida and Ito 1994).
Notably, mosapride acted more potently to raise force in transgenic mice than in the human atrium. This is consistent with our previous work on cisapride, prucalopride or metoclopramide (Keller et al. 2018, Neumann et al. 2021b). We assume this is due to the much higher level of expression of 5-HT4 receptors in mouse hearts than in human hearts (Neumann et al. 2021a). We argue that the 5-HT4-TG offer the possibility of amplifying any effect of agonists at 5-HT4 receptors. On the other hand, if a putative 5-HT4-agonist does not act in 5-HT4-TG, it is unlikely to work as an agonist in human tissue. In isolated rabbit hearts, 10 μM of mosapride prolonged the QT interval (Kii and Ito 2002). This was explained by the inhibition of potassium currents.
In this study (Fig. 3D), we did not detect a reduction in time of relaxation, which is typical of 5-HT4-mediated effects by serotonin alone (Gergs et al. 2009, 2010). We speculate that any shortening via 5-HT4 receptor stimulation is offset by the inhibition of potassium channels that prolong the duration of the contraction. In HAP, we did not observe a further reduction in the time of relaxation (Fig. 9G) compared to cilostamide. We assume that cilostamide had already maximally reduced the time of relaxation, and thus no additional shortening by mosapride was detectable. Alternatively, one might speculate that in the human atrium, some degree of inhibition of the potassium channels might have led to the mixed effect of mosapride.
On the other hand, as seen in Fig. 10G, Des-Mosa reduced the time of relaxation, even in the additional presence of cilostamide. A potential explanation for the different effects of mosapride and De-Mosa on the time of relaxation might reside in the following: De-Mosa might not be able to inhibit potassium channels in human hearts and might solely act on 5-HT4 receptors, therefore reducing the time parameters. However, one would need to know how Des-Mosa acts on the action potential in HAP to confirm this assumption.
Effects on the beating rate
We assume that, like 5-HT, mosapride stimulated 5-HT4 receptors in the right atrium of 5-HT4-TG. This conclusion is based on the observation that the effect is absent in the right atrium from the WT. Mosapride acted like various other agonists (cisapride, prucalopride, metoclopramide) as a partial agonist compared to the chronotropic effect of 5-HT (Keller et al. 2018, Neumann et al. 2021b). The data on the beating rate might have clinical relevance because it is rarely possible to obtain sinus node cells from patients and to test mosapride in such spontaneously beating cells. However, our data predict that mosapride can lead to tachycardia in human hearts. In contrast, we cannot rule out from our contraction data in the HAP that mosapride might act as an antagonist in the human sinus node. This should result in bradycardia, because serotonin is present in the human atrium in thrombocytes and continuously forms in the human atrium.
Clinical relevance
To our knowledge, this is the first study on the effects of mosapride on the force of contraction in isolated HAP. Hence, this is the first report of any effect of mosapride in the human heart and its mediation via the 5-HT4 receptor, which adds to the clinical knowledge about mosapride.
We predict that tachycardia after treatment with mosapride in patients could be blocked by tropisetron, an approved drug. However, this prediction must be confirmed in a clinical study. On the other hand, if mosapride mainly acts as an antagonist, mosapride should reduce the beating rate. In a study of healthy volunteers, 10 mg mosapride per os changed the spectral form of the ECG. The QT was shorter after the mosapride, but not significantly different. The heart rate was lower with mosapride, but this was also not significant (Endo et al. 2002). Peak therapeutic plasma levels of mosapride when taking 40 mg per mouth in healthy volunteers amounted to 282 ng/ml (0.67 µM). Hence, the concentrations tested here in vitro for mosapride might be achieved in humans. Moreover, in intoxications, much higher plasma levels of mosapride are expected. Mosapride is degraded mainly by CYP3A4 (Katoh et al. 2003). This enzyme is inhibited by antifungal azoles and some antibiotics, such as erythromycin.
A Japanese study found that the metabolism of mosapride in healthy volunteers was impaired by erythromycin (Katoh et al. 2003). This drug–drug interaction increased plasma concentrations of mosapride from about 42 to about 67 ng/ml and prolonged the half-life of mosapride (Katoh et al. 2003). In contrast to cisapride, which blocks ventricular potassium ion channels in humans, mosapride is 400–1000-fold less potent than cisapride in inhibiting these channels (Katoh et al. 2003).
Mosapride and its metabolites are primarily eliminated by the kidneys (Katoh et al. 2003). As kidney function declines with ageing, the elimination half-life of mosapride is probably augmented in the elderly. This kinetic behaviour is problematic, as the cumulation of mosapride and an increase in plasma mosapride concentration are expected. Seniors are also more likely to develop atrial fibrillation in the first place. Moreover, many drugs would inhibit the metabolism of mosapride, further increasing plasma concentrations and potential cardiac side effects of mosapride. One could question the relevance of our findings regarding cilostamide and mosapride. Usually, patients take mosapride in the absence of a phosphodiesterase inhibitor. However, in heart failure patients, the phosphodiesterase inhibitors pimobendan, milrinone or levosimendan are sometimes given. Moreover, many patients drink coffee, which contains the phosphodiesterase inhibitor caffeine.
Finally, our work adds to our knowledge by showing that the primary metabolite of mosapride is active at 5-HT4 receptors. From this, one might predict that the cardiac action of mosapride may last longer than predicted from the half-life of mosapride because, after that, the metabolite might still be active in humans.
Limitations of the study
One can argue that we have not tested the effects on the sinus node of man directly. Such a study would require access to a human pacemaker. Such studies were beyond the scope of this initial study. Furthermore, due to a lack of access to that tissue, we did not have the opportunity to study contractility in human ventricle tissue.
Figure 6 shows that mosapride alone could decrease the force of contraction in the HAP. The reasons for this negative inotropic effect have not been studied here. An attractive hypothesis is that mosapride might act as an inverse agonist at the 5-HT4 serotonin receptors in HAP. We have shown that in human HAP, serotonin can be produced (Gergs et al. 2017). This serotonin might continuously stimulate HAP, which may be antagonised by mosapride.
In summary, we can now address the hypotheses raised in the ‘Introduction.’ First, mosapride raised the force of contraction and beating rate in atrial preparations from 5-HT4-TG but not from WT. Second, mosapride and its primary metabolite elevated the force of contraction in the HAP via 5-HT4 receptors.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Athavale A, Athavale T, Roberts DM (2020) Antiemetic drugs: what to prescribe and when. Aust Prescr 43(2):49–56. https://doi.org/10.18773/austprescr.2020.011
Carlsson L, Amos GJ, Andersson B, Drews L, Duker G, Wadstedt G (1997) Electrophysiological characterisation of the prokinetic agents cisapride and mosapride in vivo and in vitro: implications for proarrhythmic potential? J Pharmacol Exp Ther 282(1):220–227
Chai W, Chan KY, de Vries R, van den Bogeardt AJ, de Maeyer JH, Schuurkes JA, Villalón CM, Saxena PR, Danser AH, MaassenVanDenBrink A (2012) Inotropic effects of prokinetic agents with 5-HT(4) receptor agonist actions on human isolated myocardial trabeculae. Life Sci 90(13–14):538–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2012.01.009
Curran MP, Robinson DM (2008) Mosapride in gastrointestinal disorders. Drugs 68:981–991
Endo J, Nomura M, Morishita S, Uemura N, Inoue S, Kishi S, Kawaguchi R, Iga A, Ito S, Nakaya Y (2002) Influence of mosapride citrate on gastric motility and autonomic nervous function: evaluation by spectral analyses of heart rate and blood pressure variabilities, and by electrogastrography. J Gastroenterol 37(11):888–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005350200150
Gergs U, Neumann J, Simm A, Silber RE, Remmers FO, Läer S (2009) Phosphorylation of phospholamban and troponin I through 5-HT4 receptors in the isolated human atrium. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 379(4):349–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-008-0371-y
Gergs U, Baumann M, Böckler A, Buchwalow IB, Ebelt H, Fabritz L, Hauptmann S, Keller N, Kirchhof P, Klöckner U, Pönicke K, Rueckschloss U, Schmitz W, Werner F, Neumann J (2010) Cardiac overexpression of the human 5-HT4 receptor in mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 299(3):H788–H798. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00691.2009
Gergs U, Böckler A, Ebelt H, Hauptmann S, Keller N, Otto V, Pönicke K, Schmitz W, Neumann J (2013) Human 5-HT4receptor stimulation in atria of transgenic mice. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 386(5):357–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-013-0831-x
Gergs U, Jung F, Buchwalow IB, Hofmann B, Simm A, Treede H, Neumann J (2017) Pharmacological and physiological assessment of serotonin formation and degradation in isolated preparations from mouse and human hearts. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 313(6):H1087–H1097. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00350.2017
Gergs U, Jacob H, Braekow P, Hofmann B, Pockes S, Humphrys LJ, Kirchhefer U, Fehse C, Neumann J (2024) Lysergic acid diethylamide stimulates cardiac human H2 histamine and cardiac human 5-HT4-serotonin receptors. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 397(1):221–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-023-02591-6
Katoh T, Saitoh H, Ohno N, Tateno M, Nakamura T, Dendo I, Kobayashi S, Nagasawa K (2003) Drug interaction between mosapride and erythromycin without electrocardiographic changes. Jpn Heart J 44(2):225–234. https://doi.org/10.1536/jhj.44.225
Kaumann AJ, Levy FO (2006) 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors in the human cardiovascular system. Pharmacol Ther 111(3):674–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2005.12.004
Kaumann AJ, Sanders L, Brown AM, Murray KJ, Brown MJ (1990) A 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor in human atrium. Br J Pharmacol 100(4):879–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1990.tb14108.x
Keller N, Dhein S, Neumann J, Gergs U (2018) Cardiovascular effects of cisapride and prucalopride on human 5-HT4 receptors in transgenic mice. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 391(9):975–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-018-1519-z
Kii Y, Ito T (2002) Drug-induced ventricular tachyarrhythmia in isolated rabbit hearts with atrioventricular block. Pharmacol Toxicol 90(5):246–253. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0773.2002.900504.x
Kii Y, Nakatsuji K, Nose I, Yabuuchi M, Mizuki Y, Ito T (2001) Effects of 5-HT(4) receptor agonists, cisapride and mosapride citrate on electrocardiogram in anaesthetised rats and guinea-pigs and conscious cats. Pharmacol Toxicol 89(2):96–103. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0773.2001.d01-142.x
Matsunaga Y, Tanaka T, Yoshinaga K, Ueki S, Hori Y, Eta R, Kawabata Y, Yoshii K, Yoshida K, Matsumura T, Furuta S, Takei M, Tack J, Itoh Z (2011) Acotiamide hydrochloride (Z-338), a new selective acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, enhances gastric motility without prolonging QT interval in dogs: comparison with cisapride, itopride, and mosapride. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 336(3):791–800. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.110.174847
National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals: Eighth Edition. The National Academies Press,2011; Washington, DC
Neumann J, Boknik P, DePaoli-Roach AA, Field LJ, Rockman HA, Kobayashi YM, Kelley JS, Jones LR (1998) Targeted overexpression of phospholamban to mouse atrium depresses Ca2+ transport and contractility. J Mol Cell Cardiol 30(10):1991–2002. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmcc.1998.0760
Neumann J, Käufler B, Gergs U (2019) Which phosphodiesterase can decrease cardiac effects of 5-HT4 receptor activation in transgenic mice? Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 392(8):991–1004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-019-01653-y
Neumann J, Schwarzer D, Fehse C, Schwarz R, Marusakova M, Kirchhefer U, Hofmann B, Gergs U (2021a) Functional interaction of H2-receptors and 5HT4-receptors in atrial tissues isolated from double transgenic mice and from human patients. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 394(12):2401–2418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-021-02145-8
Neumann J, Seidler T, Fehse C, Marušáková M, Hofmann B, Gergs U (2021b) Cardiovascular effects of metoclopramide and domperidone on human 5-HT4-serotonin-receptors in transgenic mice and in human atrial preparations. Eur J Pharmacol 15(901):174074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.174074
Neumann J, Hofmann B, Dhein S, Gergs U (2023a) Cardiac roles of serotonin (5-HT) and 5-HT-receptors in health and disease. Int J Mol Sci 24(5):4765. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24054765
Neumann J, Schulz N, Fehse C, Azatsian K, Čináková A, Marušáková M, Hofmann B, Gergs U (2023b) Cardiovascular effects of bufotenin on human 5-HT4 serotonin receptors in cardiac preparations of transgenic mice and in human atrial preparations. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 396(7):1471–1485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-023-02414-8
Neumann J, Hofmann B, Gergs U. Production and function of serotonin in cardiac cells. "Serotonin - A Chemical Messenger Between All Types of Living Cells", 2017 Chapter 13; 271–305 ISBN 978–953–51–3361–2 Kaneez Fatima Shad (ed.)
Neumann J, Hofmann B, Gergs U (2023c) Effects of zacopride and mosapride on human cardiac 5-HT4 receptors. ACS Chemical Neuroscience Symposium Serotonin 20 Years After 30.06.2023 - 01.07.2023 Berlin (in press)
Nishiuchi S, Yagi K, Saito H, Zamami Y, Niimura T, Miyata K, Sakamoto Y, Fukunaga K, Ishida S, Hamano H, Aizawa F, Goda M, Chuma M, Izawa-Ishizawa Y, Nawa H, Yanagawa H, Kanda Y, Ishizawa K (2022) Investigation of drugs for the prevention of doxorubicin-induced cardiac events using big data analysis. Eur J Pharmacol 928:175083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2022.175083
Park YS, Sung K-W (2019) Korean J Physiol Pharmacol 23(5):419-426. https://doi.org/10.4196/kjpp.2019.23.5.419
Song BG, Lee YC, Min YW, Kim K, Lee H, Son HJ, Rhee PL (2020) Risk of domperidone induced severe ventricular arrhythmia. Sci Rep 10(1):12158. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69053-4
Sung KW, Hahn SJ (2013) Effect of mosapride on Kv4.3 potassium channels expressed in CHO cells. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 386(10):905–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-013-0896-6
Tack J, Camilleri M, Chang L, Chey WD, Galligan JJ, Lacy BE, Müller-Lissner S, Quigley EM, Schuurkes J, De Maeyer JH, Stanghellini V (2012) Systematic review: cardiovascular safety profile of 5-HT(4) agonists developed for gastrointestinal disorders. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 35(7):745–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05011.x
Tsubouchi T, Kunimatsu T, Tsujimoto S, Kiyoshi A, Katsura Y, Oku S, Chihara K, Mine Y, Yamada T, Shimizu I, Bando K (2018) The in vitro pharmacology and non-clinical cardiovascular safety studies of a novel 5-HT4 receptor agonist, DSP-6952. Eur J Pharmacol 5(826):96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.02.037
Yoshida N, Ito T (1994) Mosapride citrate (AS-4370), a new gastroprokinetic agent, is a partial 5-HT4 receptor agonist in the gut. Neurogastroenterol Motil 6:197–204
Acknowledgements
We thank P. Willmy and F. Schemel for their technical assistance.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JN and UG conceived and designed the research. BH supplied reagents and clinical data. JN and CH performed the experiments. CH and UG analysed and plotted the data. JN and UG wrote the initial draft and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript. The authors declare that all data were generated in-house and that no paper mill was used.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Animals: The investigation conformed to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Research Council (2011). The animals were handled and maintained according to the approved protocols of the Animal Welfare Committee of the University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany. Humans: This study in patients complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by the local ethics committee (hm-bü 04.08.2005).
Consent to participate
Informed written consent was obtained from all patients included in the study.
Consent to publish
All authors declare that they have seen and approved the submitted version of this manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Neumann, J., Hesse, C., Hofmann, B. et al. Mosapride stimulates human 5-HT4-serotonin receptors in the heart. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-024-03047-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-024-03047-1