Abstract
Evading apoptosis and chemo-resistance are considered as very important factors which help tumour progression and metastasis. Hence, to overcome chemo-resistance, there is an urgent requirement for emergence of more effective treatment options. Myricetin, a naturally occurring flavonoid, is present in various plant-derived foods and shows antitumour potential in different cancers. In the present in vitro study, results from the comet assay demonstrated that myricetin bulk (10 µM) and nano (20 µM) forms exhibited a non-significant level of genotoxicity in lymphocytes from multiple myeloma patients when compared to those from healthy individuals. Western blot results showed a decrease in Bcl-2/Bax ratio and an increase in P53 protein levels in lymphocytes from myeloma patients, but not in lymphocytes from healthy individuals. A significant increase in intracellular reactive oxygen species level was also observed, suggesting that regulation of apoptotic proteins triggered by myricetin exposure in lymphocytes from myeloma patients occurred through P53 and oxidative stress-dependent pathways. The potency of myricetin against lymphocytes from myeloma patients marks it a potential candidate to be considered as an alternative to overcome chemo-resistance in cancer therapies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cancer is a serious threat to human health and life at present that is constantly increasing (Yang et al. 2011). Chemotherapy, steroids, biological therapies and possibly stem cell transplant are the treatment methods currently being utilised for the therapy of multiple myeloma (MM) cancer. Initially, chemotherapy combined with other treatment works effectively, but myeloma patients usually always have a relapse and these drugs also cause various side effects including alopecia, nausea, neuropathy, etc.; therefore, more careful drugs and novel therapies are required for human cancers (Huang et al. 2015).
Cell cycle ensures the homeostasis in an organ, while a dysregulation in any of its steps or components could lead to cancer development. The molecular targets involved in the cell cycle regulatory mechanisms are the main focus of investigational anticancer drugs (Diaz-Moralli et al. 2013).
The maintenance of apoptosis balance is highly essential for normal cellular growth, as excessive apoptosis causes atrophy, whereas faulty apoptosis leads to uncontrolled cellular growth which is implicated in various illnesses including cancer. Hence, inducing apoptosis may be a promising strategy to overcome various problems related to cancer therapies (Hall et al. 2008). Various processes are involved in the inhibition of apoptosis in cancer cells such as P53 mutations and the expression of P-glycoprotein (Brunelle and Letai 2009). Mitochondria play a key role in apoptosis and other cellular metabolic processes. When apoptosis is induced, a variety of metabolic signals produced by mitochondria, cytosol and the membrane are triggered by stimuli. These signals can disrupt the energy metabolisms and modify the expression of Bcl-2 family proteins (Seo et al. 2003). Reactive oxygen species (ROS), mainly produced by mitochondria intracellularly, are considered to be the second messenger to participate in cellular mechanisms such as apoptosis and proliferation. The anticancer drugs including Taxol induce apoptosis in cancer cell mediated by increasing intracellular ROS levels (Perkins et al. 2000; Varbiro et al. 2001; Kim et al. 2013).
Myricetin belongs to a class of flavonoids called flavonols, which exhibit antioxidant properties (Ong and Khoo 1997; Semwal et al. 2016) and mainly occur in fruits, nuts, berries, vegetables and red wine (Basli et al. 2012; Pérez-Cano and Castell 2016). Many past studies have demonstrated that myricetin induces apoptosis in various cancer cell lines comprising hepatoma, colon carcinoma cells, oesophageal, ovarian and pancreatic cancer (Phillips et al. 2011; Zhang et al. 2013; Zang et al. 2014; Xu et al. 2016). In the literature, there is no evidence of research on the mechanism of action of myricetin bulk and nanoparticles in lymphocytes of multiple myeloma patients. As MM originates from the plasma cells which are a type of B lymphocytes (Ghosh and Matsui 2009), in our current study we used surrogate cells, lymphocytes, as model cells to examine the in vitro effects of different particle sizes of myricetin, i.e. the bulk (MYR B) and nanoparticle form (MYR N) and also investigated the molecular mechanisms involved in their effects. We further investigate the effects of myricetin on intracellular ROS levels in lymphocytes.
Materials and methods
Blood sample collection and ethics
The current project involving the use of human peripheral lymphocytes was granted ethical approval by Leeds East Ethics Committee (IRAS Reference No.:12/YH/0464) and the University of Bradford’s Sub-Committee for Ethics in Research involving healthy Human Subjects (Reference No.: 0405/8). All peripheral blood samples (Tables 1 and 2) were collected after informed consent from patients and healthy individuals. The research support and governance office of Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation also agreed to the research (REDA number 1202). Normally for this sort of study if a comet assay is involved, 20 individual patients are compared with a healthy individual group of 20. However, for the current study involving the Western blot technique, three individual patients were compared with three healthy individuals. These numbers are considered statistically acceptable, but we used six individual patients which were available at the time of study.
Cell culture and reagent
Lymphocytes from all the samples were isolated and maintained in RPMI-1640 medium (Sigma Aldrich, UK), supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum FBS (Invitrogen, UK) and 1% penicillin streptomycin (Invitrogen, UK) in a humidified incubator at 5% CO2 and at 37 °C. Myricetin was purchased from Sigma Aldrich, UK, and was dissolved in excipient mixture to produce its bulk and nano forms. The particle size of myricetin, stability and constitution of excipient mixture are provided in our previous study (Akhtar et al. 2020a, b). The primary antibodies against P53, Bcl-2, Bax and GAPDH were purchased from Abcam, Cambridge, UK.
Cell viability
Cytotoxicity was determined by measuring 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazoliumbromide (MTT) dye (Sigma Aldrich, UK) absorbance. Lymphocytes (1 × 104) were seeded in 96-well plates and incubated overnight to get attached to the bottom of plates at 37 °C in the presence of CO2 5%. Then cells were treated with different treatment groups for 1, 24 and 48 h. After that media were removed, 10 µl of MTT dye (5 mg/ml) was added to the wells and incubated for 4 h under the same conditions in the dark. Then, formazan crystals were dissolved in 200 µl of DMSO and absorbance was read at 590 nm.
Determination of ROS production
Cellular ROS was monitored by cellular ROS detection kit using 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFDA) dye (Abcam, UK). Briefly, isolated lymphocytes were seeded overnight in 96-well plates and then treated with chemicals for 1 h. Cells were then washed followed by addition of DCFDA dye into each well and incubated for another 45 min at 37 °C in the presence of 5% CO2. Dye was washed off and fluorescence was measured at 485/535 nm.
DNA damage assessment using the Comet assay
Lymphocytes were treated with MYR B (10 µM) and MYR N (20 µM) for 1 h and the cell suspension was centrifuged at 3000 rpm (1000g). The supernatant was removed and the pelleted cells were subjected for the Comet assay as previously defined with minor changes (Singh et al. 1988; Tice et al. 2000; OECD 2016; Anderson et al. 2014; Azqueta and Dusinska 2015).
Western blot analysis
Lymphocytes were seeded in six-well plates at a concentration of 106cells/well, incubated overnight and treated with chemicals for 24 h. Then cells were lysed and total protein levels were determined using the Bio-Rad Bradford assay kit (Bio-Rad, UK). The cell lysates were separated using protein electrophoresis and blotted on nitrocellulose membrane (Abcam, UK). The membranes were blocked overnight in 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) diluted in Tris-buffered saline supplemented with 0.1% Tween 20 at 4 °C. The membranes were then incubated with primary and secondary antibody dilutions, overnight at cold and for 1 h at room temperature, respectively.
Statistical analysis
Results were expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). GraphPad prism was used to perform statistical calculation. The results were analysed using t tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to test differences between each treatment and control. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results and discussion
MTT assay
The effects of MYR B and MYR N on the viability of healthy lymphocytes were compared to those of the untreated group. Neither of the concentrations of MYR B and MYR N reduced viability less than 80% in the healthy group (Akhtar et al. 2020a, b). However, MYR B and MYR N at 40 µM reduced the viability to 68% and 51%, respectively, after 48 h of treatment in lymphocytes from multiple myeloma patients (shown in Fig. 1). Results indicated that cancer cells are more sensitive to myricetin bulk and nanoparticles than the healthy ones, possibly due to the compromised defence and repair mechanisms owing to the disease state. Lower concentrations (10 and 20 µM) of both forms of myricetin did not reduce the viability less than 80% in lymphocytes from the patient group. The effects of the excipient mixture (the vehicle mixture for chemical preparation) were also considered to exclude any errors. Hence, the current study was conducted using the non-toxic concentrations of MYR B and MYR N so that any of the results obtained are not due to the artefact of toxicity. The concentrations of MYR B (10 µM) and MYR N (20 µM) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (50 µM) used throughout the current in vitro study were determined by dose response studies using the comet assay in our previous study (Akhtar et al. 2020a, b).
The comet assay
In our previous study (Akhtar et al. 2020a, b), we found no relationship among the confounding factors (age, ethnicity, smoking) regardless of the treatment groups and these factors also do not seem to be contributing in this study towards DNA damage.
DNA damage and strand break formation caused by MYR B and MYR N in lymphocytes from healthy individuals and myeloma cancer patients were assessed using the comet assay and data were analysed presenting two parameters: % tail DNA and Olive tail moment (OTM). However, due to similar results, only OTM data arew shown. Figure 2 shows no significant effect on DNA damage induced by MYR B and MYR N in healthy lymphocytes. Results from the patient group (Fig. 3) showed a high level of basal DNA damage due to the disease condition and a non-significant genotoxicity induction by MYR B and MYR N treatment.
Analysis of apoptosis-related proteins using Western blot technique
An investigation was carried out to find whether the mitochondrial dependent intrinsic pathway was involved in apoptosis induction potential of myricetin. The protein expression of major pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic protein levels, Bax and Bcl-2, respectively, were analysed using Western blotting.
Results showed (Fig. 4a, b) that Bcl-2 levels were increased by 3.4-fold with MYR B and 2.1-fold with MYR N in lymphocytes from healthy individuals. However, Bax seemed to be down-regulated by 0.6-fold after exposing to MYR B and 0.4-fold with MYR N treatment. In patient lymphocytes, Bax levels were significantly increased by threefold with MYR B and 3.1-fold with MYR N. However, Bcl-2 seemed to be down-regulated, by 0.6-fold after exposing to MYR B and 0.9-fold with MYR N treatment (Fig. 5a, b). These results from Western blot analysis indicated that MYR B and MYR N can potentially induce apoptosis in lymphocytes from myeloma patients by altering the Bcl-2 family proteins expression, but this effect was not evident in lymphocytes from healthy individuals. This might be due to the differential effects of myricetin on healthy and patient lymphocytes. Our results are consistent with a previous study where myricetin induced apoptosis in colon cancer cells by increasing the ratio between Bax and Bcl-2 protein levels (Kim et al. 2014).
P53 is a tumour-suppressor protein which plays a vital role in several cellular processes including apoptosis and angiogenesis (Darcy et al. 2008). In the presence of DNA damage, P53 inhibits the proliferation of damaged cells by different regulatory processes (Haupt et al. 2003; Haupt and haupt 2017). In a number of human cancers, this house-keeper gene is inactivated by mutation leading to unmonitored cell growth. The alterations in the P53 gene are connected with failure in chemotherapy and radiotherapy in various human cancers (Kong et al. 2012). Reintroduction of wild-type P53 into cancer cells, which possess its mutant form, leads to either apoptosis or cell cycle arrest (Martinez et al. 1991; Kim et al. 2013). Increasing the amount of P53 may be a new strategy for treating cancer, as it regulates the intrinsic apoptosis pathway such as Bax (Kuo et al. 2006).
Therefore, we examined P53 protein to verify if myricetin bulk and nanoparticles mediated effects in lymphocytes of myeloma patients through this protein. We found (Fig. 4a, b) that the P53 protein was up-regulated in the lymphocytes of both investigative groups. However its induction was higher in lymphocytes from myeloma patients to 2.2-fold and 3.2-fold after treatment with MYR B and MYR N, respectively. Increased in vitro expression of P53 in lymphocytes, when exposed to myricetin, indicates that myricetin exhibits apoptotic potential.
Myricetin and ROS production
A variety of stimuli trigger cytochrome C release and apoptosis through ROS production. However, ROS also play a mitogenic role by inducing proliferation and protecting cells against oxidative stress-induced apoptosis (Kim et al. 2001; Kops et al. 2002; Kim 2017). Hence, data suggest a dual function of ROS. In our study, the mitochondrial-dependent regulation of apoptotic proteins in lymphocytes from myeloma patients was also dependent on ROS production, as ROS levels increased with myricetin bulk and nano-treatment to a significant level when compared to the untreated control and healthy control group (Fig. 6).
Conclusion
In conclusion, myricetin bulk and nano forms have exhibited anticancer potential and pro-oxidant activities in vitro in lymphocytes from MM cancer patients. It up-regulated the expression of Bax protein while down-regulating Bcl-2 expression. These effects were mediated by P53 and somehow dependent on ROS production.
This is indicative of the potential of myricetin as an anticancer drug for MM. Moreover, MYR N has collectively shown more effective responses than its larger particles (i.e. MYR B) in lymphocytes from both investigated groups.
References
Akhtar S, Najafzadeh M, Isreb M, Newton L, Gopalan RC, Anderson D (2020a) ROS-induced oxidative damage in lymphocytes ex vivo/in vitro from healthy individuals and MGUS patients: protection by myricetin bulk and nanoforms. Arch Toxicol 94(4):1229–1239
Akhtar S, Najafzadeh M, Isreb M, Newton L, Gopalan RC, Anderson D (2020b) An in vitro investigation into the protective and genotoxic effects of myricetin bulk and nano forms in lymphocytes of MGUS patients and healthy individuals. Toxicol Lett 327:33–40
Anderson D et al (2014) Sensitivity and specificity of the empirical lymphocyte genome sensitivity (LGS) assay: implications for improving cancer diagnostics. FASEB J 28(10):4563–4570
Azqueta A, Dusinska M (2015) The use of the comet assay for the evaluation of the genotoxicity of nanomaterials. Front Genet 6:239
Basli A, Soulet S, Chaher N, Mérillon JM, Chibane M, Monti JP, Richard T (2012) Wine polyphenols: potential agents in neuroprotection. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2012:805762
Brunelle JK, Letai A (2009) Control of mitochondrial apoptosis by the Bcl-2 family. J Cell Sci 122:437–441
Darcy KM, Brady WE, McBroom JW, Bell JG, Young RC, McGuire WP, Linnoila RI, Hendricks D, Bonome T, Farley JH (2008) Gynecologic Oncology Group: associations between p53 overexpression and multiple measures of clinical outcome in high-risk, early stage or suboptimally-resected, advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancers A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 111:487–495
Diaz-Moralli S, Tarrado-Castellarnau M, Miranda A, Cascante M (2013) Targeting cell cycle regulation in cancer therapy. Pharmacol Ther 138:255–271
Ghosh N, Matsui W (2009) Cancer stem cells in multiple myeloma. Cancer Lett 277(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2008.08.005
Hall MD, Okabe M, Shen DW, Liang XJ, Gottesman MM (2008) The role of cellular accumulation in determining sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 48:495–535
Haupt S, Haupt Y (2017) P53 at the start of the 21st century: lessons from elephants [version 1; referees: 3 approved]. F1000Research 6:2041
Haupt S, Berger M, Goldberg Z, Haupt Y (2003) Apoptosis—the p53 network. J Cell Biol 116:4077–4085
Huang H et al (2015) Myricetin inhibits proliferation of cisplatin-resistant cancer cells through a p53-dependent apoptotic pathway. Int J Oncol 47(4):1494–1502
Kim GD (2017) Myricetin inhibits angiogenesis by inducing apoptosis and suppressing PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling in endothelial cells. J Cancer Prevent 22(4):219–227. https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2017.22.4.219
Kim BY, Han MJ, Chung AS (2001) Effects of reactive oxygen species on proliferation of Chinese hamster lung fibroblast (V79) cells. Free Radic Biol Med 30:686–698
Kim JH, Yoon EK, Chung HJ et al (2013) p53 acetylation enhances Taxol-induced apoptosis in human cancer cells. Apoptosis 18(1):110–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10495-012-0772-8
Kim ME, Ha TK, Yoon JH, Lee JS (2014) Myricetin induces cell death of human colon cancer cells via BAX/BCL2-dependent pathway. Anticancer Res 34:701–706
Kong D, Ma S, Liang B, Yi H, Zhao Y, Xin R, Cui L, Jia L, Liu X, Liu X (2012) The different regulatory effects of p53 status on multidrug resistance are determined by autophagy in ovarian cancer cells. Biomed Pharmacother 66:271–278
Kops GJ, Dansen TB, Polderman PE, Saarloos I, Wirtz KW, Coffer PJ et al (2002) Forkhead transcription factor FOXO3a protects quiescent cells from oxidative stress. Nature 419:316–321
Kuo YC, Kuo PL, Hsu YL, Cho CY, Lin CC (2006) Ellipticine induces apoptosis through p53-dependent pathway in human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells. Life Sci 78:2550–2557
Martinez J, Georgoff I, Levine AJ (1991) Cellular localization and cell cycle regulation by a temperature-sensitive p53 protein. Genes Dev 5:151
OECD (2016) Test No 489: in vivo mammalian alkaline comet assay. OECD Publishing, Paris
Ong KC, Khoo HE (1997) Biological Effects of Myricetin. Gen Pharmacol 29(2):121–126
Pérez-Cano FJ, Castell M (2016) Flavonoids, inflammation and immune system. Nutrients 8:10
Perkins CL, Fang G, Kim CN, Bhalla KN (2000) The role of Apaf-1, caspase- 9, and bid proteins in etoposide- or paclitaxel-induced mitochondrial events during apoptosis. Cancer Res 60:1645–1653
Phillips PA et al (2011) Myricetin induces pancreatic cancer cell death via the induction of apoptosis and inhibition of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway. Cancer Lett 308(2):181–188
Semwal DK, Semwal RB, Combrinck S, Viljoen A (2016) Myricetin: a dietary molecule with diverse biological activities. Nutrients 8(2):90. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8020090
Seo YW, Shin JN, Ko KH, Cha JH, Park JY, Lee BR et al (2003) The molecular mechanism of Noxa-induced mitochondrial dysfunction in p53-mediated cell death. J Biol Chem 278:48292–48299
Singh NP et al (1988) A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res 175(1):184–191
Tice RR, Agurell E, Anderson D, Burlinson B, Hartmann A, Kobayashi H, Miyamae Y, Rojas E, Ryu JC, Sasaki YF (2000) Single cell gel/comet assay: guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing. Environ Mol Mutagen 35:206–221
Varbiro G et al (2001) Direct effect of Taxol on free radical formation and mitochondrial permeability transition. Free Radical Biol Med 31(4):548–558
Xu Y, Xie Q, Wu S, Yi D, Yu Y, Liu S, Li S, Li Z (2016) Myricetin induces apoptosis via endoplasmic reticulum stress and DNA double-strand breaks in human ovarian cancer cells. Mol Med Rep 13(3):2094–2100. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.4763
Yang YI, Kim JH, Lee KT, Choi JH (2011) Costunolide induces apoptosis in platinum-resistant human ovarian cancer cells by generating reactive oxygen species. Gynecol Oncol 123:588–596
Zang W, Wang T, Wang Y, Li M, Xuan X, Ma Y, Du Y, Liu K, Dong Z, Zhao G (2014) Myricetin exerts anti-proliferative, antiinvasive, and pro-apoptotic effects on esophageal carcinoma EC9706 and KYSE30 cells via RSK2. Tumour Biol 35:12583–12592
Zhang XH, Chen SY, Tang L, Shen YZ, Luo L, Xu CW, Liu Q, Li D (2013) Myricetin induces apoptosis in HepG2 cells through Akt/p70S6K/bad signaling and mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 13:1575–1581
Acknowledgements
This study was kindly funded by Mr Nasir Qayyum, Bradford, UK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Akhtar, S., Najafzadeh, M., Isreb, M. et al. Anticancer potential of myricetin bulk and nano forms in vitro in lymphocytes from myeloma patients. Arch Toxicol 95, 337–343 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-020-02938-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-020-02938-5