Skip to main content
Log in

PI-PD controllers for controlling stable processes with inverse response and dead time

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many tuning methods for controlling stable processes with dead time can be found in the literature. Usually, proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers are used for this purpose. In practice, stable processes with inverse response characteristics can also be encountered. Addition of inverse response characteristic makes the control of a process more troublesome. Therefore, the use of PID controllers for tuning inverse response processes may lead to unsatisfactory closed loop responses. On the other hand, PI-PD controllers have been shown to perform in very good closed loop responses where PID controllers cannot result in satisfactory closed loop responses. Therefore, this paper adopts the structure previously suggested by the author for controlling processes without inverse response. This adaptation, in conjunction with a simple but powerful factorization, eliminates the affect of the inverse response term in the closed loop transfer function, hence resulting in a simplified design procedure. Tuning parameters of the PI-PD controller used in the control structure are found using standard forms, which is a simple algebraic approach and proven to be resulting in very satisfactory closed loop responses. Simulation examples are provided to illustrate the superiority of the proposed method over some existing ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaya I, Tan N, Atherton DP (2006) A refinement procedure for PID controllers. Electr Eng 88:215–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Atherton DP, Boz AF (1998) Using standard forms for controller design. In: Proceedings of UKACC Control’98, pp. 1066-1071

  3. Kaya I (2003) A PI-PD controller design for control of unstable and integrating processes. ISA Trans 42:111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaya I (2003) A new smith predictor and controller for control of processes with long dead time. ISA Trans 42:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaya I, Tan N, Atherton DP (2007) Improved cascade control structure for enhanced performance. J Process Control 17:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaya I, Atherton DP (2008) Use of Smith predictor in the outer loop for cascaded control of unstable and integrating processes. Ind Eng Chem Res 47:1981–1987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shamsuzzoha M, Skogestad S (2010) The setpoint overshoot method: a simple and fast closed-loop approach for PID tuning. J Process Control 20:1220–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Matausek MR, Sekara TB (2011) PID controller frequency-domain tuning for stable, integrating and unstable processes, including dead-time. J Process Control 2:17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shamsuzzoha M (2013) Closed-loop PI/PID controller tuning for stable and integrating process with time delay. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:12973–12992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li K (2013) PID tuning for optimal closed-loop performance with specified gain and phase margins. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 21:1024–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee J, Cho W, Edgar TF (2014) Simple analytic PID controller tuning rules revisited. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:5038–5047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pavkovic D, Polak S, Zorc D (2014) PID controller auto-tuning based on process step response and damping optimum criterion. ISA Trans 53:85–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cho W, Lee J, Edgar TF (2014) Simple analytic proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller tuning rules for unstable processes. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:5048–5054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ali A, Majhi S (2011) Integral criteria for optimal tuning of PI/PID controllers for integrating processes. Asaian J Control 13:328–337

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Ogunnaike BA, Ray WH (1994) Process dynamics, modelling and control. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stephanopoulos G (1984) Chemical process control: an introduction to theory and practice. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  17. Waller KVT, Nygardas CG (1975) On inverse response in process control. Ind Eng Chem Fundam 14:221–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Luyben WL (2000) Tuning Proportional-Integral controllers for processes with both inverse response and dead time. Ind Eng Chem Res 39:973–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chien IL, Chung YC, Chen BS, Chuang CY (2003) Simple PID controller tuning method for processes with inverse response plus dead time or large overshoot response plus dead time. Ind Eng Chem Res 42:4461–4477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Camacho O, Rojas R, Garcia W (1999) Variable structure control applied to chemical processes with inverse response. ISA Trans 38:55–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Balaguer P, Alfaro V, Arrieta O (2011) Second order inverse response process identification from transient step response. ISA Trans 50:231–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jeng JC, Lin SW (2012) Robust proportional-integral-derivative controller design for stable/integrating processes with inverse response and time delay. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:2652–2665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith OJ (1959) A controller to overcome dead time. ISA J 6:28–33

    Google Scholar 

  24. Barlett AC, Hollot CV, Lin H (1988) Root locations of an entire polytope of polynomials: it suffices to check the edge. Math Control Signal Syst 1:61–71

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Bhattacharyya SP, Chapellat H, Keel LH (1995) Robust control: the parametric approach. Prentice Hall

  26. Tan N (2002) Computation of the frequency response of multilinear affine systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 47:1691–1696

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Skogestad S (2003) Simple analytic rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning. J Process Control 13:291–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ibrahim Kaya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaya, I. PI-PD controllers for controlling stable processes with inverse response and dead time. Electr Eng 98, 55–65 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-015-0352-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-015-0352-3

Keywords

Navigation