Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Factors Associated with Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury During Vacuum-Assisted Vaginal Delivery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and Hypothesis

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is a major complication associated with vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery (VAVD). The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors related to vacuum extraction that are associated with OASI.

Methods

This was a case–control study performed at a tertiary university teaching hospital. Included were patients aged 18–45 years who had a singleton pregnancy resulting in a live, term, VAVD. The study group consisted of women diagnosed with OASI following vacuum extraction. The control group included women following VAVD without OASI. Matching at a ratio of 1:2 was performed. Groups were compared regarding demographic, obstetric. and labor-related parameters, specifically focusing on variables related to the vacuum procedure itself.

Results

One hundred and ten patients within the study group and 212 within the control group were included in the final analysis. Patients in the OASI group were more likely to undergo induction of labor, use of oxytocin during labor, increased second stage of labor, higher likelihood of the operator being a resident, increased number of pulls, procedure lasting under 10 min, occipito-posterior head position at vacuum initiation, episiotomy, increased neonatal head circumference, and birthweight. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that increased week of gestation (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.25–2.22, p < 0.001), unsupervised resident performing the procedure (OR 4.63, 95% CI 2.17–9.90), p < 0.001), indication of VAVD being fetal distress (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.04–7.10, p = 0.041), and length of procedure under 10 min (OR 4.75, 95% CI 1.53–14.68, p = 0.007) were associated with OASI. Increased maternal age was associated with lower risk of OASI (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.84–0.98, p = 0.012).

Conclusions

When performing VAVD, increased week of gestation, unsupervised resident performing the procedure, fetal distress as vacuum indication, and vacuum procedure under 10 min were associated with OASI. In contrast, increased maternal age was shown to be a protective factor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Poignant M, Hjelmstedt A, Ekeus C. Indications for operative delivery between 1999–2010 and induction of labor and epidural analgesia on the risk of operative delivery—a population based Swedish register study. Sex Reprod Health. 2012;3:129–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mola GD, Kuk J. Operative vaginal delivery at Port Moresby General Hospital from 1977 to 2010. P N G Med J. 2011;54(3–4):174–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cammu H, Martens G, Keirse MJ. Mothers’ level of education and childbirth interventions: a population-based study in Flanders, Northern Belgium. Birth. 2011;38(3):191–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kramer MS, Berg C, Abenhaim H, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and temporal trends in severe postpartum hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(5):449.e1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sheiner E, Sarid L, Levy A, Seidman DS, Hallak M. Obstetric risk factors and outcome of pregnancies complicated with early postpartum hemorrhage: a population-based study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;18:149–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hildingsson I, Karlstrom A, Nystedt A. Parents’ experiences of an instrumental vaginal birth findings from a regional survey in Sweden. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2013;4:3–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ekéus C, Nilsson E, Gottvall K. Increasing incidence of anal sphincter tears among primiparas in Sweden: a population-based register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87:564–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Leeuw JW, Struijk PC, Vierhout ME, Wallenburg HC. Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. BJOG. 2001;108:383–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Handa VL, Danielsen BH, Gilbert WM. Obstetric anal sphincter lacerations. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:225–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Christianson LM, Bovbjerg VE, McDavitt EC, Hullfish KL. Risk factors for perineal injury during delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:255–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jango H, Langhoff-Roos J, Rosthoj S, Sakse A. Modifiable risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;210(1):59.e1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013;120:1516–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bergendahl S, Lindberg P, Brismar WS. Operator experience affects the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in vacuum extraction deliveries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98:787–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ryman P, Ahlberg M, Ekeus C. Risk factors for anal sphincter tears in vacuum-assisted delivery. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2015;6(3):151–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Waldman R. ACOG practice bulletin No. 198: prevention and management of obstetric lacerations at vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(1):185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chill HH, Guedalia J, Lipschuetz M, et al. Prediction model for obstetric anal sphincter injury using machine learning. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(9):2393–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakai A, Yoshida A, Yamaguchi S, et al. Incidence and risk factors for severe perineal laceration after vaginal delivery in Japanese patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006;274(4):222–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Meister MR, Cahill AG, Conner SN, et al. Predicting obstetric anal sphincter injuries in a modern obstetric population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(3):310.e1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Segal D, Baumfeld Y, Yahav L, et al. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) during vacuum extraction delivery in a university affiliated maternity hospital. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(6):999–1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Levin G, Friedman T, Shai D, Alcalay M, Ram E, Meyer R. The association between vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery and anal sphincter injury. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(7):1771–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bligard KH, Lipsey KL, Young OM. Simulation training for operative vaginal delivery among obstetrics and gynecology residents: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(Suppl 1):16S–21S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mannella P, Giordano M, Guevara MMM, et al. Simulation training program for vacuum application to improve technical skills in vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):338.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Celentano C, Prefumo F, Matarrelli B, Mastracchio J, Mauri S, Rosati M. Comparison of practice vs theory model training for vacuum-assisted delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023;290:109–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chill HH, Lipschuetz M, Atias E, et al. Obstetric anal sphincter injury in adolescent mothers. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):564.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Levin G, Rottenstreich A, Tsur A, et al. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury among parous women. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;303(3):709–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dey T, Mukherjee A, Chakraborty S. A practical overview of case-control studies in clinical practice. Chest. 2020;158(1S):S57–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Henry H. Chill and Aharon Dick contributed equally to this manuscript

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS), Division of Urogynecology, University of Chicago, Northshore University Health System, 9650 Gross Point Road, Suite 3900, Skokie, IL, USA

    Henry H. Chill

  2. Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

    Henry H. Chill & David Shveiky

  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

    Aharon Dick, Naama Vilk Ayalon, Joshua I. Rosenbloom, David Shveiky & Gilad Karavani

  4. Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

    Wajdy Zarka

Authors
  1. Henry H. Chill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aharon Dick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wajdy Zarka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Naama Vilk Ayalon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joshua I. Rosenbloom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. David Shveiky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gilad Karavani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.H.C.: project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing and editing; A.D.: data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing; W.Z.: data collection, data analysis, manuscript editing; N.V.A.: data collection, data analysis; J.I.R.: data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing; D.S.: project development, data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing; G.K.: project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry H. Chill.

Ethics declarations

Financial Support

None.

Ethics Statement

This study was approved by the Human Investigation Review Board of Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IRB# 0586-22-HMO).

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Gin-Den Chen

Editor in Chief: Maria A. Bortolini

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chill, H.H., Dick, A., Zarka, W. et al. Factors Associated with Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury During Vacuum-Assisted Vaginal Delivery. Int Urogynecol J (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05785-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05785-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation