Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in cardinal ligament length and curvature with parity and prolapse and their relation to level III hiatus measures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Test the hypotheses that (1) cardinal ligament (CL) straightening and lengthening occur with parity and prolapse, (2) CL straightening occurs before lengthening, and (3) CL length is correlated with level III measures.

Methods

We performed a secondary analysis of MRIs from women in three groups: (1) nulliparous with normal support, (2) parous with normal support, and (3) uterine prolapse (POP-Q point C > − 4 and Ba > 1 cm). The 3D stress MRI images at rest and maximal Valsalva were analyzed. CLs were traced from their origin to cervico-vaginal insertions. Curvature ratio was calculated as curved length/straight length. Level III measures included urogenital hiatus (UGH), levator hiatus (LH), and levator bowl volume (LBV), and their correlations with CL length were calculated.

Results

Ten women were included in each group. Compared to the nulliparous group, CL length was 18% longer in parous controls (p = .04) and 59% longer with prolapse (< .01) at rest, while at Valsalva, CL length was 10% longer in parous controls (p = .21) and 49% longer with prolapse (< .01). Curvature ratios showed 18% more straightening in women with prolapse compared to parous controls (p < .01). Curved CL length and level III measures were moderately to strongly correlated: UGH (rest: R = 0.68, p < .01; Valsalva: R =0.80, p < .01), LH (rest: R = 0.60, p < .01; Valsalva: R = 0.78, p < .01), and LBV (rest: R = 0.71, p < .01; Valsalva: R =0.89, p < .01).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that the CLs undergo three times as much lengthening with prolapse as with parity; however, straightening only occurs with prolapse. Strong correlations exist between level I and level III support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kieserman-Shmokler C, Swenson CW, Chen L, et al. From molecular to macro: the key role of the apical ligaments in uterovaginal support. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(5):427–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berger MB, Kolenic GE, Fenner DE, et al. Structural, functional, and symptomatic differences between women with rectocele versus cystocele and normal support. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(5):510.e1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rooney K, Kenton K, Mueller ER, FitzGerald MP, Brubaker L. Advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse is highly correlated with apical prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(6):1837–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen L, Ashton-Miller JA, Hsu Y, DeLancey JO. Interaction among apical support, levator ani impairment, and anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(2):324–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Luo J, Chen L, Fenner DE, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. A multi-compartment 3-D finite element model of rectocele and its interaction with cystocele. J Biomech. 2015;48(9):1580–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Luo J, Betschart C, Chen L, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. Using stress MRI to analyze the 3D changes in apical ligament geometry from rest to maximal Valsalva: a pilot study. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(2):197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith TM, Luo J, Hsu Y, et al. A novel technique to measure in vivo uterine suspensory ligament stiffness[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(5):484.e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Swenson CW, Masteling M, DeLancey JO, et al. Aging effects on pelvic floor support: a pilot study comparing young versus older nulliparous women[J]. Int Urogynecol J. 2019:1–9.

  9. Chen L, Lisse S, Larson K, et al. Structural failure sites in anterior vaginal wall prolapse: identification of a collinear triad. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(4):853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Betschart C, Chen L, Ashton-Miller JA, et al. On pelvic reference lines and the MR evaluation of genital prolapse: a proposal for standardization using the pelvic inclination correction system. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(9):1421–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. DeLancey JO. Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(6 Pt 1):1717–24; discussion 1724-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(92)91562-o.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nandikanti L, Sammarco AG, Chen L, et al. Levator bowl volume during straining and its relationship to other levator measures. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(9):1457–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lowder JL, Oliphant SS, Shepherd JP, Ghetti C, Sutkin G. Genital hiatus size is associated with and predictive of apical vaginal support loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(6):718 e711–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Handa VL, Blomquist JL, Caroll M, et al. Longitudinal changes in the genital Hiatus preceding the development of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Epidemiol. 2019.

  15. Luo J, Smith TM, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. In vivo properties of uterine suspensory tissue in pelvic organ prolapse. J Biomech Eng. 2014;136(2):021016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ewies AA, Al-Azzawi F, Thompson J. Changes in extracellular matrix proteins in the cardinal ligaments of post-menopausal women with or without prolapse: a computerized immunohistomorphometric analysis. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(10):2189–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg420.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Salman MC, Ozyuncu O, Sargon MF, et al. Light and electron microscopic evaluation of cardinal ligaments in women with or without uterine prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(2):235–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Orlicky DJ, Guess MK, Bales ES, et al. Using the novel pelvic organ prolapse histologic quantification system to identify phenotypes in uterosacral ligaments in women with pelvic organ prolapse[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224(1):67.e1–67.e18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Data used in this study were acquired with funding from the following grants: National Institute on Aging, Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Centers AG024824, Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research UL1TR002240, and National Institute of Child Health and Human Development P50 HD044406.

Investigator support for C.W.S. was provided by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development WRHR Career Development Award # K12 HD065257.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenjin Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(PDF 88 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 143 kb)

ESM 3

(PDF 142 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, W., Thibault, M.D., Chen, L. et al. Changes in cardinal ligament length and curvature with parity and prolapse and their relation to level III hiatus measures. Int Urogynecol J 33, 107–114 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04824-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04824-9

Keywords

Navigation