Skip to main content
Log in

Video of uterovaginal procidentia repair incorporating a high extraperitoneal uterosacral vault suspension

  • IUJ Video
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Women with high-grade uterovaginal prolapse have a higher incidence of levator injury, larger levator hiatal defects, and are at a greater risk of recurrent prolapse after pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. RCOG guidelines have recommended prophylactic sacrospinous suspension at the time of vaginal hysterectomy, whenever there is a marked uterovaginal prolapse. The aim of the video is to describe our surgical approach at the time of surgery for advanced POP, and describe the technique for modified McCall high extraperitoneal vault suspension.

Methods

We have modified the McCall culdoplasty by extending the dissection of the middle portion of the uterosacral/cardinal ligaments so that the sutures can be placed higher and more laterally extraperitoneally to re-support the vaginal cuff at the time of a vaginal hysterectomy.

Results

The video highlights the surgical technique used for apical support at the time of surgery for advanced POP.

Conclusions

This video demonstrates our modified McCall technique for vault suspension at the time of vaginal surgery for advanced POP. This technique could be considered an alternative technique to other modes of apical support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Symmonds RE, Pratt JH. Vaginal prolapse following hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1960;79:899–909.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Toozs-Hobson P, Boos K, Cardozo L. Management of vaginal vault prolapse. BJOG. 1998;105:13–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09343.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrington JW, Edwards G. Posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2000;11:241–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001920070033.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marchionni M, Bracco GL, Checcucci V, et al. True incidence of vaginal vault prolapse. Thirteen years of experience. J Reprod Med. 1999;44:679–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. DeLancey JO. The anatomy of the pelvic floor. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1994;6:313–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rahn DD, Stone RJ, Vu AK, et al. Abdominal hysterectomy with or without angle stitch: correlation with subsequent vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:669.e1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Margulies RU, Rogers MAM, Morgan DM. Outcomes of transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:124–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.052.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cruikshank SH, Cox DW. Sacrospinous ligament fixation at the time of transvaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162:1611–5; discussion 1615. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(90)90927-Y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barber MD, Brubaker L, Burgio KL, et al. Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial. JAMA. 2014;311:1023–34. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.1719.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. De Boer TA, Milani AL, Kluivers KB, et al. The effectiveness of surgical correction of uterine prolapse: cervical amputation with uterosacral ligament plication (modified Manchester) versus vaginal hysterectomy with high uterosacral ligament plication. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20:1313–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0945-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Pal M, Bandyopadhyay S. Modified extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension for prevention of vault prolapse after vaginal hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30:633–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3669-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chene G, Tardieu A-S, Savary D, et al. Anatomical and functional results of McCall culdoplasty in the prevention of enteroceles and vaginal vault prolapse after vaginal hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19:1007–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0549-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Robinson D, Thiagamoorthy G, Cardozo L. Post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. Maturitas. 2018;107:39–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.07.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee RA. Vaginal hysterectomy with repair of enterocele, cystocele, and rectocele. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993;36:967–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003081-199312000-00021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ariel Zilberlicht.

Ethics declarations

Financial disclaimer/conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(MP4 29,065 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zilberlicht, A., Dwyer, P.L., Rajamaheswari, N. et al. Video of uterovaginal procidentia repair incorporating a high extraperitoneal uterosacral vault suspension. Int Urogynecol J 31, 2173–2175 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04300-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04300-w

Keywords

Navigation