Skip to main content

Uterosacral Ligament Vaginal Vault Suspension

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Native Tissue Repair for Incontinence and Prolapse

Abstract

Uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension is an elegant reconstructive procedure for apical prolapse which restores the natural vaginal axis using solely native tissue supports. It is suited to women with moderate apical prolapse in which the uterosacral ligaments are likely to be preserved. It can be employed in combination with hysterectomy or in the case of moderate post-hysterectomy vault prolapse. Important points are highlighted, including avoidance of nerve and ureteric injury (see also Chapter 1). Uterosacral ligament suspension can be performed concurrent with other repairs and is one of several options for addressing apical prolapse. In the event that the uterosacral ligaments are unsatisfactory, the surgeon should be prepared to offer alternative repairs to address apical prolapse (see also Chapters 8, 10, 11 and 14).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

FIGO:

International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Pdet:

Detrusor pressure

POP-Q:

Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification

Qmax:

Maximum urinary flow rate

SSL:

Sacrospinous Ligament

USL:

Uterosacral Ligament

References

  1. Betschart, C, Cervigni, M, Contreras Ortiz, O, Doumouchtsis, S.K, Koyama, M, Medina, C, Zanni, G. Management of apical compartment prolapse (uterine and vault prolapse): A FIGO Working Group report. Neurourology and Urodynamics. (2015) doi: “http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.22916”10.1002/nau.22916.

    Google Scholar 

  2. van Geelen JM, Dwyer PL. Where to for pelvic organ prolapse treatment after the FDA pronouncements? A systematic review of the recent literature. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(5):707–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barber MD, Brubaker L, Burgio KL, Richter HE, Nygaard I, Weidner AC, et al. Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial. JAMA. 2014;311(10):1023–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Unger CA, Walters MD, Ridgeway B, Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Paraiso MFR. Incidence of adverse events after uterosacral colpopexy for uterovaginal and posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(5):603.e1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Laterza RM, Sievert K-D, de Ridder D, Vierhout ME, Haab F, Cardozo L, et al. Bladder function after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(4):309–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Siddiqui NY, Mitchell TRT, Bentley RC, Weidner AC. Neural entrapment during uterosacral ligament suspension: an anatomic study of female cadavers. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(3):708–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Margulies RU, Rogers MAM, Morgan DM. Outcomes of transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(2):124–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;4, CD004014.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Osborn DJ, Reynolds WS, Dmochowski R. Vaginal approaches to pelvic organ prolapse repair. Curr Opin Urol. 2013;23(4):299–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Turner LC, Lavelle ES, Shepherd JP. Comparison of complications and prolapse recurrence between laparoscopic and vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for the treatment of vaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(5):797–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chung CP, Miskimins R, Kuehl TJ, Yandell PM, Shull BL. Permanent suture used in uterosacral ligament suspension offers better anatomical support than delayed absorbable suture. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(2):223–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kasturi S, Bentley-Taylor M, Woodman PJ, Terry CL, Hale DS. High uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension: comparison of absorbable vs. permanent suture for apical fixation. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(7):941–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in relation to the content of the manuscript.

Funding Support

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy D. Dobberfuhl MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(MP4 0 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dobberfuhl, A.D., De, E.J.B. (2017). Uterosacral Ligament Vaginal Vault Suspension. In: Zimmern, P., De, E. (eds) Native Tissue Repair for Incontinence and Prolapse. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45268-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45268-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45266-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45268-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics