Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
We evaluated the effect of adding pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) to a structured lifestyle advice program.
Methods
This was a single-blinded randomized trial of women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) stage ≥ II. Participants were randomized to a structured lifestyle advice program with or without PFMT. Both groups received similar lifestyle advice in six separate group sessions. The combined group performed group PFMT after an individual assessment. Primary outcome was a global improvement scale at six-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were the global scale and objective POP at three-month follow-up, symptoms and quality of life including sexuality, at three and six-month follow-up. A clinically relevant change of symptoms was defined as ≥15 %.
Results
We included 109 women. Eighty-nine women (82 %) completed three months follow-up; 85 (78 %) completed six-month follow-up. At both follow-ups, significantly more women in the combined group reported improvement in the global scale. At the three-month follow-up, the combined group only had significant improvement of POP symptoms while only the lifestyle advice group had significant improvement of quality of life. Change in objective POP and sexuality was nonsignificant. The symptom score improved 17 % in the combined group and 14 % in the lifestyle advice group (P = 0.57). Significantly more women in the lifestyle advice group had sought further treatment at the six-month follow-up.
Conclusion
Adding PFMT to a structured lifestyle advice program gave superior results in a global scale and for POP symptoms. Overall effect of either intervention barely reached clinical relevance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- POP:
-
Pelvic organ prolapse
- HRQoL:
-
Health-related quality of life
- POP-Q:
-
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system
- PFDI-20:
-
Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Short Form 20
- POPDI-6:
-
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6
- CRADI-8:
-
Colorectal–Anal Distress Inventory-8
- UDI-6:
-
Urinary Distress Inventory-6
- PFIQ-7:
-
Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire Short Form-7
- UIQ-7:
-
Urinary Impact Questionnaire-7
- CRAIQ-7:
-
Colorectal–Anal Impact Questionnaire-7
- POPIQ-7:
-
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire-7
- PISQ-12:
-
Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12
- PGI-I:
-
Patient Global Index of Improvement Scale
- NRS:
-
Numeric Rating Scale
- PFMT:
-
Pelvic floor muscle training
- LG:
-
Lifestyle advice group
- TLG:
-
Combined pelvic floor muscle training and lifestyle advice group
- ITT:
-
Intention-to-treat analysis
- RR:
-
Relative risk
References
Nygaard I et al (2008) Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 300(11):1311–6
Slieker-ten Hove MC et al (2009) The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and signs and their relation with bladder and bowel disorders in a general female population. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(9):1037–45
Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J (2003) Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(2):372–7, discussion 377–9
Dietz HP, Mann KP (2014) What is clinically relevant prolapse? An attempt at defining cutoffs for the clinical assessment of pelvic organ descent. Int Urogynecol J 25(4):451–5
Haylen BT et al (2010) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 29(1):4–20
Hall AF et al (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(6):1467–70, discussion 1470–1
Bradley CS, Nygaard IE (2005) Vaginal wall descensus and pelvic floor symptoms in older women. Obstet Gynecol 106(4):759–66
Mouritsen L, Larsen JP (2003) Symptoms, bother and POPQ in women referred with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14(2):122–7
Wu JM et al (2014) Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol 123(6):1201–6
Miedel A et al (2011) Short-term natural history in women with symptoms indicative of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 22(4):461–8
Basu M, Wise B, Duckett J (2011) A qualitative study of women’s preferences for treatment of pelvic floor disorders. BJOG 118(3):338–44
Kapoor DS et al (2009) Conservative versus surgical management of prolapse: what dictates patient choice? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(10):1157–61
Hagen S et al (2014) Individualised pelvic floor muscle training in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POPPY): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 383(9919):796–806
Kashyap R, Jain V, Singh A (2013) Comparative effect of 2 packages of pelvic floor muscle training on the clinical course of stage I-III pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 121(1):69–73
Hagen S et al (2009) A randomized controlled trial of pelvic floor muscle training for stages I and II pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(1):45–51
Braekken IH et al (2010) Can pelvic floor muscle training reverse pelvic organ prolapse and reduce prolapse symptoms? An assessor-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(2):170 e1-7
Stupp L et al (2011) Pelvic floor muscle training for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J 22(10):1233–9
Yalcin I, Bump RC (2003) Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(1):98–101
Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L (2010) Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21(5):523–8
Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC (2005) Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(1):103–13
Rogers RG et al (2003) A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14(3):164–8, discussion 168
Jelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD (2007) Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet 369(9566):1027–38
Miller JM (1998) The impact of specimen management in microbiology. MLO Med Lab Obs 30(5):28–30, 32, 34; quiz 35–6
Bo K (2006) Can pelvic floor muscle training prevent and treat pelvic organ prolapse? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85(3):263–8
Dumoulin C, Glazener C, Jenkinson D (2011) Determining the optimal pelvic floor muscle training regimen for women with stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 30(5):746–53
Utomo E et al (2014) Validation of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) in a Dutch population. Int Urogynecol J 25(4):531–44
Wiegersma M et al (2014) Effect of pelvic floor muscle training compared with watchful waiting in older women with symptomatic mild pelvic organ prolapse: randomised controlled trial in primary care. BMJ 349:g7378
Terwee CB et al (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60(1):34–42
Due U, Brostrom S, Lose G (2013) Validation of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 in Danish women with pelvic organ prolapse. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92(9):1041–8
Acknowledgments
We thank physical therapists Dorthe Svarre Petersen, Katrin Jacobæus, Therese Simonsen, Annette Sørensen, and Marie Thorsager for their help with the two interventions; Tobias Wirenfeldt Clausen, statistician at the Department of Hematology, Herlev Hospital for help with statistical analyses; research nurse Berit Sejersen Larsen, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Herlev Hospital, for her tremendous work with the randomization and follow-up of participants; the Department of Physical therapy, Herlev Hospital, for allowing us to use all their facilities.
Conflicts of interest
Ulla Due has been paid as a consultant for Astellas Pharma, Coloplast, and SCA and was partly funded with a research grant from the Association of Danish Physiotherapists; the funding source had no involvement in the study
Søren Brostrøm has no financial disclosures
Gunnar Lose has received grants from Astellas Pharma and Coloplast, and has been paid as consultant for Contura
Preliminary data from this paper was presented at the 29th Biannual Meeting of the Nordic Urogynaecological Association (NUGA) in Stockholm, Sweden, 29–31 January 2015 Ulla Due
The study was approved by the Danish Scientific Ethical Committee (H-4-2011-072) 24 August 2011
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Due, U., Brostrøm, S. & Lose, G. Lifestyle advice with or without pelvic floor muscle training for pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J 27, 555–563 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2852-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2852-0