Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improved height correction model for hydrostatic mapping functions in GNSS data processing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In precise global navigation satellite system (GNSS) data processing, the mapping function is a key factor in troposphere delay modelling. Currently, site-dependent troposphere mapping functions are only provided for specific sites, while for other sites, other mapping functions, such as the gridded Vienna Mapping Function (VMF1/VMF3), are recommended, in which a height correction is always required to convert the hydrostatic mapping function from model height to site height. In this analysis, an improved height correction model is proposed based on the fifth-generation European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts reanalysis (ERA5). Compared to the commonly used Niell model, the coefficients in the improved model are no longer constants but are provided in a global \(5^\circ \times 5^\circ \) grid on a monthly basis, with the significant difference that the coefficient \(a\) of the Niell model is modelled as quadratically varying with height. To evaluate its performance, we applied the improved model to VMF1 (\(2^\circ \times 2.5^\circ\)) and VMF3 (\(5^\circ \times 5^\circ\) and \(1^\circ \times 1^\circ\)) gridded data for all of 2015 and then compared them with site-dependent data at 402 VMF1 sites and 505 VMF3 sites, respectively. It was shown that the improved model outperformed the Niell model at most stations, and the improvement of the slant path delay (SPD) became better with increasing height difference. The maximum improvement of the SPD at a \(3^\circ\) elevation angle is 29.5 mm at SANT for the VMF1 \(2^\circ \times 2.5^\circ\) grid and 18.7 mm and 16.4 mm for the VMF3 \(5^\circ \times 5^\circ\) and \(1^\circ \times 1^\circ\) grids, respectively, both achieved at NAMA. For all height difference intervals, the average and maximum improvements of the SPD can reach approximately 30% and 50% for both the VMF1 \(2^\circ \times 2.5^\circ\) and VMF3 \(1^\circ \times 1^\circ\) grids, respectively, while only approximately 14% and 30% improvements for the VMF3 \(5^\circ \times 5^\circ\) grid, respectively, due to the coarse resolution of the mapping function. Therefore, we can benefit significantly from the improved model, which becomes even more important when stations with large height differences, i.e. in mountainous areas or on mid-ocean islands, are included in precise GNSS data processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The NWM products are available at https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/. The VMF1/VMF3 data are available in the repository https://vmf.geo.tuwien.ac.at/trop_products/GNSS/.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) for providing numerical weather model (NWM) products and the Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation, TU Wien for providing the Vienna Mapping Function (VMF1/VMF3) data. This research is funded by the National Key Research Program of China ‘Collaborative Precision Positioning Project’ (No. 2016YFB0501900), the Key Research and Development Plan of Hubei Province (No. 2021EHB001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42171141, No. 42104019) and the Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment and Geodesy, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University (20-01-10). The corresponding author is supported by the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WD proposed the idea, and wrote the manuscript; XQ developed the software, and designed the experiment; FT and YY contributed to discussion of the idea and helped with writing; TT, YZ and SL processed the data and analysed the results. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenwu Ding.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 198 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qu, X., Ding, W., Teferle, F.N. et al. Improved height correction model for hydrostatic mapping functions in GNSS data processing. J Geod 96, 99 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-022-01677-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-022-01677-y

Keywords

Navigation