Abstract
In precise global navigation satellite system (GNSS) data processing, the mapping function is a key factor in troposphere delay modelling. Currently, site-dependent troposphere mapping functions are only provided for specific sites, while for other sites, other mapping functions, such as the gridded Vienna Mapping Function (VMF1/VMF3), are recommended, in which a height correction is always required to convert the hydrostatic mapping function from model height to site height. In this analysis, an improved height correction model is proposed based on the fifth-generation European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts reanalysis (ERA5). Compared to the commonly used Niell model, the coefficients in the improved model are no longer constants but are provided in a global \(5^\circ \times 5^\circ \) grid on a monthly basis, with the significant difference that the coefficient \(a\) of the Niell model is modelled as quadratically varying with height. To evaluate its performance, we applied the improved model to VMF1 (\(2^\circ \times 2.5^\circ\)) and VMF3 (\(5^\circ \times 5^\circ\) and \(1^\circ \times 1^\circ\)) gridded data for all of 2015 and then compared them with site-dependent data at 402 VMF1 sites and 505 VMF3 sites, respectively. It was shown that the improved model outperformed the Niell model at most stations, and the improvement of the slant path delay (SPD) became better with increasing height difference. The maximum improvement of the SPD at a \(3^\circ\) elevation angle is 29.5 mm at SANT for the VMF1 \(2^\circ \times 2.5^\circ\) grid and 18.7 mm and 16.4 mm for the VMF3 \(5^\circ \times 5^\circ\) and \(1^\circ \times 1^\circ\) grids, respectively, both achieved at NAMA. For all height difference intervals, the average and maximum improvements of the SPD can reach approximately 30% and 50% for both the VMF1 \(2^\circ \times 2.5^\circ\) and VMF3 \(1^\circ \times 1^\circ\) grids, respectively, while only approximately 14% and 30% improvements for the VMF3 \(5^\circ \times 5^\circ\) grid, respectively, due to the coarse resolution of the mapping function. Therefore, we can benefit significantly from the improved model, which becomes even more important when stations with large height differences, i.e. in mountainous areas or on mid-ocean islands, are included in precise GNSS data processing.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The NWM products are available at https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/. The VMF1/VMF3 data are available in the repository https://vmf.geo.tuwien.ac.at/trop_products/GNSS/.
References
Altamimi Z, Rebischung P, Métivier L, Collilieux X (2016) ITRF2014: a new release of the international terrestrial reference Frame modeling nonlinear station motions. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 121(8):6109–6131. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013098
Blewitt G, Altamimi Z, Davis J, Gross R, Kuo CY, Lemoine FG, Moore AW, Neilan RE, Plag HP, Rothacher M, Shum CK, Sideris MG, Schöne T, Tregoning P, Zerbini S (2010) Geodetic observations and global reference frame contributions to understanding sea-level rise and variability. In: Church JA, Woodworth PL, Aarup P, Wilson WL (eds) Understanding sea-level rise and variability. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 256–284
Boehm J, Schuh H (2004) Vienna mapping functions in VLBI analyses. Geophys Res Lett 31:1603. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018984
Boehm J, Niell A, Tregoning P, Schuh H (2006a) Global mapping function (GMF): a new empirical mapping function based on numerical weather model data. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025546
Boehm J, Werl B, Schuh H (2006b) Troposphere mapping functions for GPS and very long baseline interferometry from European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts operational analysis data. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB003629
Boehm J, Kouba J, Schuh H (2009) Forecast Vienna Mapping Functions 1 for real-time analysis of space geodetic observations. J Geod 83:397–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0216-y
Collins JP, Langley RB (1997) A tropospheric delay model for the user of the wide area augmentation system. University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering
Davis J, Herring T, Shapiro I, Rogers A, Elgered G (1985) Geodesy by radio interferometry: effects of atmospheric modeling errors on estimates of baseline length. Radio Sci 20(6):1593–1607. https://doi.org/10.1029/RS020i006p01593
Deng L, Jiang W, Li Z, Chen H, Wang K, Ma Y (2016) Assessment of second- and third-order ionospheric effects on regional networks: case study in China with longer CMONOC GPS coordinate time series. J Geod 91:207–227
Dousa J, Elias M (2014) An improved model for calculating tropospheric wet delay. Geophys Res Lett 41:4389–4397. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060271
Hersbach, H, Bell B, Berrisford P, Biavati G, Horányi A, Muñoz Sabater J, Nicolas J, Peubey C, Radu R, Rozum I, Schepers D, Simmons A, Soci C, Dee D, Thépaut J-N (2019) ERA5 monthly averaged data on pressure levels from 1979 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS). (Accessed on < 19-009-2019>). https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.6860a573
Kouba J (2008) Implementation and testing of the gridded Vienna mapping function 1 (VMF1). J Geod 82(4–5):193–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-007-0170-0
Lagler K, Schindelegger M, Boehm J, Krásná H, Nilsson T (2013) GPT2: empirical slant delay model for radio space geodetic techniques. Geophys Res Lett 40(6):1069–1073. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50288
Landskron D, Boehm J (2018) VMF3/GPT3: refined discrete and empirical troposphere mapping functions. J Geod 92(4):349–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1066-2
Lou Y, Huang J, Zhang W, Liang H, Zheng F, Liu J (2018) A new zenith tropospheric delay grid product for real-time PPP applications over China. Sensors 18:65. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18010065
Mahoney M (2005) A discussion of various measures of altitude. NASA Jet Propuls Lab. http://mtp.mjhoney.net/www/notes/altitude/altitude.html
Niell A (1996) Global mapping functions for the atmosphere delay at radio wavelengths. J Geophys Res 101(B2):3227–3246
Niell A (2000) Improved atmospheric mapping functions for VLBI and GPS. Earth Planets Space 52(10):699–702. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352267
Ning T, Wang J, Elgered G, Dick G, Wickert J, Bradke M, Sommer M, Querel R, Smale D (2016) The uncertainty of the atmospheric integrated water vapour estimated from GNSS observations. Atmos Meas Tech 9:79–92. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-79-2016
Qu X, Li Z, An J, Ding W (2015) Characteristics of second-order residual ionospheric errors in GNSS radio occultation and its impact on inversion of neutral atmospheric parameters. J Atmos Terr Phys 130–131:159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.05.016
Rüeger J M (2002) Refractive index formulae for radio waves. In: Proceedings of the FIG technical program; FIG XXII International Congress, Washington, DC
Urquhart L, Nievinski FG, Santos MC (2014) Assessment of troposphere mapping functions using three-dimensional ray-tracing. GPS Solut 18:345–354
World Meteorological Organization (2012) General Meteorological Standards and Recommended Practices. Basic Documents No. 2. WMO Technical Regulations, WMO-No. 49
Zhang H, Yuan Y, Li W (2021) An analysis of multisource tropospheric hydrostatic delays and their implications for GPS/GLONASS PPP-based zenith tropospheric delay and height estimations. J Geod 95:83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-021-01535-3
Zus F, Dick G, Dousa J, Wickert J (2015) Systematic errors of mapping functions which are based on the VMF1 concept. GPS Solut 19(2):277–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-014-0386-4
Acknowledgements
We thank the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) for providing numerical weather model (NWM) products and the Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation, TU Wien for providing the Vienna Mapping Function (VMF1/VMF3) data. This research is funded by the National Key Research Program of China ‘Collaborative Precision Positioning Project’ (No. 2016YFB0501900), the Key Research and Development Plan of Hubei Province (No. 2021EHB001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42171141, No. 42104019) and the Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment and Geodesy, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University (20-01-10). The corresponding author is supported by the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
WD proposed the idea, and wrote the manuscript; XQ developed the software, and designed the experiment; FT and YY contributed to discussion of the idea and helped with writing; TT, YZ and SL processed the data and analysed the results. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Qu, X., Ding, W., Teferle, F.N. et al. Improved height correction model for hydrostatic mapping functions in GNSS data processing. J Geod 96, 99 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-022-01677-y
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-022-01677-y