Abstract
Two levelling-based vertical datums have been used in North America, namely CGVD28 in Canada and NAVD88 in the USA and Mexico. Although the two datums will be replaced by a common and continent-wide vertical datum in a few years, their connection and unification are of great interest to the scientific and user communities. In this paper, the geodetic boundary value problem (GBVP) approach is studied as a rigorous method for connecting two or more vertical datums through computed datum offsets from a global equipotential surface defined by a GOCE-based geoid. The so-called indirect bias term, the effect of the GOCE geoid omission error, the effect of the systematic levelling datum errors and distortions, and the effect of the geodetic data errors on the datum unification are four important factors affecting the practical implementation of this approach. These factors are investigated numerically using the GNSS-levelling and tide gauge stations in Canada, the USA, Alaska, and Mexico. The results show that the indirect bias term can be omitted if a GOCE-based global geopotential model is used in gravimetric geoid computations. The omission of the indirect bias term simplifies the linear system of equations for the estimation of the datum offset(s). Because of the existing systematic levelling errors and distortions in the Canadian and US levelling networks, the datum offsets are investigated in eight smaller regions along the Canadian and US coastal areas. Using GNSS-levelling stations in the US coastal regions, the mean datum offset can be estimated with a 1 cm standard deviation if the GOCE geoid omission error is taken into account by means of the local gravity and topographic information. In the Canadian Atlantic and Pacific regions, the datum offsets can be estimated with 2.3 and 3.5 cm standard deviation, respectively, using GNSS-levelling stations. However, due to the low number of tide gauge stations, the standard deviation of the CGVD28 and NAVD88 datum offsets can reach one decimetre in the Pacific regions. With the available GNSS-levelling stations in Alaska and Mexico, the NAVD88 datum offset can be estimated with a standard deviation below 3 cm. The numerical investigations of this study provide, for the first time, the datum offsets between North American vertical datums and their associated standard deviations with which the offsets can be estimated. The results of this study demonstrate the importance of the aforementioned four factors in the practical implementation of the GBVP approach for the unification of the levelling-based vertical datums.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amjadiparvar B, Rangelova E, Sideris MG, Véronneau M (2013a) North American height datums and their offsets: the effect of GOCE omission errors and systematic levelling effects. J Appl Geod 7(1):39–50
Amjadiparvar B, Rangelova E, Sideris MG (2013b) North American height datums and their offsets: evaluation of the GOCE-based global geopotential models in Canada and the USA. J Appl Geod 7(3):191–203
Amos MJ, Featherstone WE (2009) Unification of New Zealand’s local vertical datums: iterative gravimetric quasigeoid computations. J Geod 83:57–68
Ardalan AA, Safari A (2005) Global height datum unification: a new approach in gravity potential space. J Geod 79:512–523
Ardalan AA, Karimi R, Poutanen M (2010) A bias-free geodetic boundary value problem approach to height datum unification. J Geod 84:123–134
Ardalan AA, Grafarend EW (2004) High-resolution regional geoid computation without applying Stokes’s formula: a case study of the Iranian geoid. J Geod 78:138–156
Balasubramania N (1994) Definition and realization of a global vertical datum. The Ohio State University, OSU Report No. 427, Columbus
Bessel FW (1837) Über den Einfluss der Unregelmässigkeiten der Figur der Erde auf geodätische Arbeiten und ihre Vergleichung mit den Astronomischen Bestimmungen. Astronomische Nachrichten 14:269
Bruinsma SL, Förste C, Abrikosov O, Marty J-C, Rio M-H, Mulet S, Bonvalot S (2013) The new ESA satellite-only gravity field model via the direct approach. Geophys Res Lett 40:3607–3612
Cannon JB (1929) Adjustment of the precise level net of Canada 1928. Publication no. 28, Geodetic Survey Division, Earth Sciences Sector, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa
Cannon JB (1935) Recent adjustments of the precise level net of Canada. Publication no. 56, Geodetic Survey Division, Earth Sciences Sector, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, Canada
Colombo O (1980) A world vertical network. The Ohio State University, OSU report no. 296, Columbus
Craymer MR, Lapelle E (1997) The GPS supernet: an integration of GPS projects across Canada. Internal report, Geodetic Survey Division, Geomatics Canada, Ottawa
Denker H (2001) On the effect of datum inconsistencies of gravity and position on the European geoid computations. In: Proceedings IAG scientific assembly, Budapest, Hungary, 2–7 Sep., on CD-ROM
Denker H (2013) Regional gravity field modeling: theory and practical results. In: Xu G (ed) Sciences of geodesy—II. Springer, Berlin, pp 185–291
ESA (1999) Gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation mission. In: Report for mission selection of the four candidate Earth Explorer missions, ESA SP-1233(1)
Filmer MS, Featherstone WE (2012) Three viable options for a new Australian vertical datum. J Spat Sci 57(1):19–36
Forsberg R (1984) A study of terrain reductions, density anomalies and geophysical inversion methods in gravity field modeling. The Ohio State University, OSU report no. 355, Columbus
Gatti A, Reguzzoni M, Venuti G (2013) The height datum problem and the role of satellite gravity models. J Geod 87:15–22
Gauss CF (1828) Bestimmung des Breitenunterschiedes zwischen den Sternwarten von Göttingen und Altona. Vandenhoek und Ruprech, Göttingen
Gerlach C, Fecher T (2012) Approximations of the GOCE error variance-covariance matrix for least-squares estimation of height datum offsets. J Geod Sci 2(4):247–256
Gerlach C, Rummel R (2013) Global height system unification with GOCE: a simulation study on the indirect bias term in the GBVP approach. J Geod 87:57–67
Gruber T, Gerlach C, Haagmans R (2012) Intercontinental height datum connection with GOCE and GPS-levelling data. J Geod Sci 2(4):270–280
Hayden T, Amjadiparvar B, Rangelova E, Sideris MG (2012) Estimating Canadian vertical datum offsets using GNSS/levelling benchmark information and GOCE global geopotential models. J Geod Sci 2(4):257–269
Hayden T, Rangelova E, Sideris MG, Véronneau M (2014) Contribution of tide gauges for the determination of W0 in Canada. In: Marti U (ed) Gravity, geoid and height systems, IAG symposia series, vol 141. Springer, Berlin. pp 241–248
Hayden T (2013) Geopotential of the geoid-based North American vertical datum. University of Calgary, MSc thesis, UCGE report no. 20381, Department of Geomatics Engineering, Calgary
Heck B (1989) A contribution to the scalar free boundary value problem of physical geodesy. Manu Geod 14:87–99
Heck B (1990) An evaluation of some systematic error sources affecting terrestrial gravity anomalies. Bull Geod 64:88–108
Heck B, Rummel R (1990) Strategies for solving the vertical datum problem using terrestrial and satellite geodetic data. In: Sünkel H, Baker T (eds) Sea surface topography and the geoid, IAG symposia series, vol 104. Springer, Berlin, pp 116–128
Helmert FR (1884) Die mathematischen und physikalischen Theorieen der höheren Geodäsie, v. 2. BG Teubner, Leipzig. Reprinted (1962) BG Teubner, Leipzig. Also (1962) Minerva GMBH, Frankfurt-Main
Hirt C, Featherstone W, Marti U (2010) Combining EGM2008 and SRTM/DTM2006.0 residual terrain model data to improve quasigeoid computations in mountainous areas devoid of gravity data. J Geod 84:557–567
Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Moritz H (2006) Physical geodesy, 2nd edn. Springer, Wien. ISBN 10 3-211-33544-7
Huang J, Véronneau M (2013) Canadian gravimetric geoid model 2010. J Geod 87:771–790
Ihde J, Adam J, Gurtner W, Harsson BG, Sacher M, Schlüter W, Wöppelmann G (2000) The height solution of the European vertical reference network (EUVN). In: Veröffentlichungen der Bayerischen Kommission fur die Internationale Erdmessung, Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Nr. 61, 132–145, München
Jekeli C (2000) Heights, the geopotential, and vertical datums. The Ohio State University, OSU report no. 459, Columbus
Kotsakis C, Katsambalos K, Ampatzidis D (2012) Estimation of the zero-height geopotential level WoLVD in a local vertical datum from inversion of co-located GPS, leveling and geoid heights: a case study in the Hellenic islands. J Geod 86:423–439
Lamothe P, Véronneau M, Goadsby M, Berg R (2013) Canada’s new vertical datum. Ontario Professional Surveyor, vol 56. No 4 Fall 2013. http://www.aols.org/sites/default/files/OPS%20Fall2013WebVersion.pdf
Listing JB (1873) Über unsere jetzige Kenntnis der Gestalt und Größe der Erde. Dietrichsche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Göttingen
LP DAAC (2004) Global 30 arc-second elevation data set GTOPO30. Land Process Distributed Active Archive Center, Sioux Falls. http://edcdaac.usgs.gov/gtopo30/gtopo30.asp
Mäkinen J, Ihde J (2008) The permanent tide in height systems. In: Sideris MG (ed) Observing our changing earth, IAG symposia series, vol 133. Springer, Berlin, pp 81–87
Mikhail EM, Ackermann F (1976) Observations and lease squares. IEP-A Dun-Donnelley Publisher, New York
Moritz H (2000) Geodetic reference system 1980. J Geod 7:128–133
Pail R, Bruinsma S, Migliaccio F, Foerste C, Goiginger H, Schuh WD, Hoeck E, Reguzzoni M, Brockmann JM, Abrikosov O, Veicherts M, Fecher T, Mayrhofer R, Krasbutter I, Sanso F, Tscherning CC (2011) First GOCE gravity field models derived by three different approaches. J Geod 85:819–843
Pavlis NK, Holmes SA, Kenyon SC, Factor JK (2012) The development of the earth gravitational model 2008 (EGM2008). J Geophys Res 117:B04406
Petit G, Luzum B (eds) (2010) IERS conventions 2010. IERS technical note 36. Verlag des Bundesamtes für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt a.M
Prasanna HMI, Chen W (2012) Geoid modeling using a high resolution geopotential model and terrain data: a case study in Canadian Rockies. J Appl Geod 6(2):89–101
Rangelova E, van der Wal W, Sideris MG (2012) How significant is the dynamic component of the North American vertical datum? J Geod Sci 2(4):281–289
Rapp RH, Balasubramania N (1992) A conceptual formulation of a world height system. The Ohio State University, OSU report no. 421, Columbus
Rapp RH (1997) Use of potential coefficient models for geoid undulation determinations using a spherical harmonic representation of the height anomaly/geoid undulation difference. J Geod 71:282–289
Roman D, Weston ND (2012) Beyond GEOID12: implementing a new vertical datum for North America. In: FIG proceedings 2012, Rome, Italy, 6–10 May 2012. http://www.fig.net/pub/fig2012/papers/ts04b/TS04B_weston_5691.pdf
Rummel R (2000) Global integrated geodetic and geodynamic observing system (GIGGOS). In: Rummel R, Drewes H, Bosch W, Hornik H (eds) Towards an integrated global geodetic observing system (IGGOS), IAG symposia series, vol 120. Springer, Berlin, pp 253-260
Rummel R, Teunissen P (1988) Height datum definition, height datum connection and the role of the geodetic boundary value problem. Bull Geod 62:477–498
Rummel R, Ilk KH (1995) Height datum connection-the ocean part. Allgemeine Vermessungsnachrichten 8–9:321–330
Rülke A, Liebsch G, Sacher M, Schäfer U, Schirmer U, Ihde J (2012) Unification of European height system realizations. J Geod Sci 2(4):343–354
Sansò F, Venuti G (2002) The height datum/geodetic datum problem. Geophys J Int 149(3):768–775
Sanso F, Sideris MG Eds (2013) Geoid determination. In: Lecture notes in earth system science, vol 110. Springer, Berlin
Sánchez L (2007) Definition and realization of the SIRGAS vertical reference system within a globally unified height system. In: Tregoning P, Rizos C (eds) Dynamic planet, IAG symposia series, vol 130. Springer, Berlin, pp 638–645
Sánchez L (2008) Approach for the establishment of a global vertical reference level. In: Xu P, Liu J, Dermanis A (eds) VI Hotine-Marussi symposium on theoretical and computational geodesy, IAG symposia series, vol 132. Springer, Berlin, pp 119–125
Sánchez L (2009) Strategy to establish a global vertical reference system. In: Drewes H (ed) Geodetic reference systems, IAG symposia series, vol 134. Springer, Berlin, pp 273–278
Sánchez L, Bosch W (2009) The role of the TIGA project in the unification of classical height systems. In: Drewes H (ed) Geodetic reference systems, IAG symposia series, vol 134. Springer, Berlin, pp 285–290
Sánchez L, Brunini C (2009) Achievements and challenges of SIRGAS. In: Drewes H (ed) Geodetic reference systems, IAG symposia series, vol 134. Springer, Berlin, pp 161–166
Sideris MG, Rangelova E, Amjadiparvar B (2014) First results on height systems unification in North America using GOCE. In: Marti U (ed) Gravity, geoid and height systems, IAG symposia series, vol 141. Springer, Berlin, pp 221–227
Sideris MG, Amjadiparvar B, Rangelova E, Huang J, Véronneau M (2015) Evaluation of release-3, 4 and 5 GOCE-based global geopotential models in North America, In Proc of 5th International GOCE user workshop, (CD-ROM). ESA Publications Division, European Space Agency, Noordwijk
Thompson KR, Huang J, Véronneau M, Wright DG, Lu Y (2009) Mean surface topography of the northwest Atlantic: comparison of estimates based on satellite, terrestrial gravity, and oceanographic observations. J Geophys Res 114:C07015
Véronneau M, Héroux P (2006) Canadian height reference system modernization: rational, status and plans. Report natural resources of Canada. http://www.geod.nrcan.gc.ca/hm/pdf/geocongres_e.pdf
Véronneau M, Huang J, Smith DA, Roman DR (2014a) Canada’s new vertical datum: CGVD2013 (Part 1). XYHT magazine, October 2014, pp 43–45. http://e-ditionsbyfry.com/Olive/ODE/XYHT/Default.aspx?href=XYHT/2014/10/01
Véronneau M, Huang J, Smith DA, Roman DR (2014b) Canada’s new vertical datum: CGVD2013 (Part 2). XYHT magazine, November 2014, pp 41–43. http://e-ditionsbyfry.com/Olive/ODE/XYHT/Default.aspx?href=XYHT/2014/11/01
Wang YM, Saleh J, Li X, Roman D (2012) The US gravimetric geoid of 2009 (USGG 2009): model development and evaluation. J Geod 86:165–180
Woodworth PL, Hughes CW, Bingham RJ, Gruber T (2012) Towards worldwide height system unification using ocean information. J Geod Sci 2(4):302–318
Xu P (1990) Monitoring the sea level rise. Delft Rep (New Ser) 90:1
Xu P (1992) A quality investigation of global vertical datum connection. Geophys J Int 110(2):361–370
Xu P, Rummel R (1991) A quality investigation of global vertical datum connection, Netherlands Geodetic Commission
Zhang L, Li F, Chen W, Zhang C (2009) Height datum unification between Shenzhen and Hong Kong using the solution of the linearized fixed-gravimetric boundary value problem. J Geod 83:411–417
Zilkoski D, Richards J, Young G (1992) Results of the general adjustment of the North American vertical datum of 1988. Surv Land Inf Syst 52(3):133–149
Acknowledgments
This work is a contribution to the ESA STSE—GOCE+ Height System Unification with GOCE project. This work has been partially supported by a grant to the third author from Canada’s Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC). We thank the Canadian Geodetic Survey of NRCan and the National Geodetic Survey, NOAA, USA for providing the GNSS-levelling data sets in Canada and the USA, as well as the gravity data and their errors and David Avalos (INEGI, Mexico) for providing the GNSS-levellign data for Mexico. Also, within the frame of the GOCE+ project, Philip Woodwoth provided the data for the North American tide gauge stations, and Christian Gerlach provided the block-diagonal variance–covariance matrix of the GOCE DIR5 model and the software for error propagation. Finally, Marc Véronneau and Jianliang Huang from the Canadian Geodetic Survey are thanked especially for the invaluable consultation work related to the North American investigations in the GOCE+ project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amjadiparvar, B., Rangelova, E. & Sideris, M.G. The GBVP approach for vertical datum unification: recent results in North America. J Geod 90, 45–63 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-015-0855-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-015-0855-8