Abstract
A new mathematical model for evaluation of the third-order (disturbing) gravitational tensor is formulated in this article. Firstly, we construct corresponding differential operators for the components of the third-order (disturbing) gravitational tensor in a spherical local north-oriented frame. We show that the differential operators may efficiently be decomposed into an azimuthal and an isotropic part. The differential operators are even more simplified for a certain class of isotropic kernels. Secondly, the differential operators are applied to the well-known integrals of Newton, Abel-Poisson, Pizzetti and Hotine. In this way, 40 new integral formulas are derived. The new integral formulas allow for evaluation of the components of the third-order (disturbing) gravitational tensor from density distribution, disturbing gravitational potential, gravity anomalies and gravity disturbances. Thirdly, we investigate the behaviour of the corresponding integral kernels in the spatial domain. The new mathematical formulas extend the theoretical apparatus of geodesy, i.e. the well-known Meissl scheme, and reveal important properties of the third-order gravitational tensor. They may be exploited in geophysical studies, continuation of gravitational field quantities and analysing the gradiometric-geodynamic boundary value problem.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdelrahman E-SM, El-Araby HM, El-Araby TM, Abo-Ezz ER (2003) A least-squares derivatives analysis of gravity anomalies due to faulted thin slabs. Geophysics 68:535–543
Albertella A, Migliaccio F, Sansó F, Tscherning CC (2000) The space-wise approach—overall scientific data strategy. In: Sünkel H (ed) From Eötvös to Milligal, Final Report, ESA Study, ESA/ESTEC Contract No 13329/98/NL/GD, pp 267–298
Ardalan AA, Grafarend EW (2001) Ellipsoidal geoidal undulations (ellipsoidal Bruns formula). J Geod 75:544–552
Arfken G (1968) Mathematical methods for physicists. Academic Press, New York
Balakin AB, Daishev RA, Murzakhanov ZG, Skochilov AF (1997) Laser-interferometric detector of the first, second and third derivatives of the potential of the Earth gravitational field. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii, seriya Geologiya i Razvedka 1:101–107
Beiki M (2010) Analytic signals of gravity gradient tensor and their application to estimate source location. Geophysics 75:159–174
Bölling C, Grafarend EW (2005) Ellipsoidal spectral properties of the Earth’s gravitational potential and its first and second derivatives. J Geod 79:300–330
Brieden P, Müller J, Flury J, Heinzel G (2010) The mission OPTIMA—novelties and benefit. Geotechnologien, Science Report, No 17, Potsdam, Germany, pp 134–139
Casotto S, Fantino E (2009) Gravitational gradients by tensor analysis with application to spherical coordinates. J Geod 83:621–634
Chelton DB, Ries JC, Haines BJ, Fu L-L, Callahan PS (2001) Satellite altimetry. In: Fu L-L, Cazenave A (eds) Satellite altimetry and earth sciences: a handbook of techniques and applications. International geophysics series, vol 69. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 1–131
Csapó G, Égetö C, Laky S, Tóth G, Ultmann Z, Völgyesi L (2009) Test measurements by Eötvös torsion balance and gravimeters. Civ Eng 53(2):75–80
Cunningham L (1970) On the computation of the spherical harmonic terms needed during the numerical integration of the orbital motion of an artificial satellite. Celest Mech 2:207–216
Eppelbaum LV (2011) Review of environmental and geological microgravity applications and feasibility of its employment at archaeological sites in Israel. Int J Geophys 2011:1–9
ESA (1999) Gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation mission. ESA SP-1233(1), Report for Mission Selection of the Four Candidate Earth Explorer Missions, ESA Publication Division
Fantino E, Casotto S (2009) Methods of harmonic synthesis for global geopotential models and their first-, second- and third-order gradients. J Geod 83:595–619
Fedi M, Florio G (2001) Detection of potential field source boundaries by enhanced horizontal derivative method. Geophys Prospect 49:40–58
Forsberg R, Olesen AV (2010) Airborne gravity field determination. In: Xu G (ed) Sciences of geodesy-I: advances and future directions. Springer, Berlin, pp 83–104
Freeden W, Schreiner M (2009) Spherical functions of mathematical geosciences. A scalar, vectorial, and tensorial setup. Advances in geophysical and environmental mechanics and mathematics. Springer, Berlin
Fukushima T (2012) Numerical computation of spherical harmonics of arbitrary degree and order by extending exponent of floating point numbers: II first-, second-, and third-order derivatives. J Geod 86:1019–1028
Fukushima T (2013) Recursive computation of oblate spheroidal harmonics of the second kind and their first-, second-, and third-order derivatives. J Geod 87:303–309
Grafarend EW (1997) Field lines of gravity, their curvature and torsion, the Lagrangian and the Hamilton equations of the plumbline. Annali di Geofisica 40:1233–1247
Grafarend EW (2001) The spherical horizontal and spherical vertical boundary value problem—vertical deflections and geoid undulations—the completed Meissl diagram. J Geod 75:363–390
Hafez M, El-Qady G, Awad S, Elsayed E-S (2006) Higher derivative analysis for the interpretation of self-potential profiles at southern part of Nile delta, Egypt. Arab J Sci Eng 31:129–145
Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967) Physical geodesy. Freeman and Co., San Francisco
Hotine M (1969) Mathematical geodesy. ESSA Monograph No 2, US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, USA
Jacoby W, Smilde PL (2009) Gravity interpretation: fundamentals and application of gravity inversion. Springer, Berlin
Jordan MJT, Thompson KC, Collins MA (1995) The utility of higher order derivatives in constructing molecular potential energy surfaces by interpolation. J Chem Phys 103:9669–9675
Keller W, Sharifi MA (2005) Satellite gradiometry using a satellite pair. J Geod 78:544–557
Kellogg OD (1929) Foundations of potential theory. Dover Publications, New York
Klees R (1996) Numerical calculation of weakly singular surface integrals. J Geod 70:781–797
Klees R, Lehmann R (1998) Calculation of strongly singular and hypersingular surface integrals. J Geod 72:530–546
Klokočník J, Kostelecký J, Pešek I, Novák P, Wagner CA, Sebera J (2010) Candidates for multiple impact craters: popigai and chicxulub as seen by EGM08, a global 5’ \(\times \) 5’ gravitational model. Solid Earth Discuss 2:69–103
Koop R (1993) Global gravity field modelling using satellite gravity gradiometry. Publications on Geodesy, Netherlands Geodetic Commission, No 38, Delft, The Netherlands
Martinec Z (1998) Boundary value problems for gravimetric determination of a precise geoid. Lecture notes in earth sciences, vol 73. Springer, Berlin
Martinec Z (2003) Green’s function solution to spherical gradiometric boundary-value problems. J Geod 77:41–49
Marussi A (1985) Intrinsic geodesy. Springer, Berlin
Meissl P (1971) A study of covariance functions related to the Earth’s disturbing potential. Report No 151, Department of Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
Metris G, Xu J, Wytrzyszczak (1999) Derivatives of the gravity potential with respect to rectangular coordinates. Celest Mech Dyn Astron 71:137–151
Moritz H (1967) Kinematical geodesy. Report No 92, Department of Geodetic Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
Moritz H (1980) Advanced physical geodesy. Herbert Wichmann Verlag, Karlsruhe
Nagy D, Papp G, Benedek J (2000) The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism. J Geod 74:552–560
Pajot G, de Viron O, Diament M, Lequentrec-Lalancette M-F, Mikhailov V (2008) Noise reduction through joint processing of gravity and gravity gradient data. Geophysics 73:123–134
Petrovskaya MS, Vershkov AN (2010) Construction of spherical harmonic series for the potential derivatives of arbitrary orders in the geocentric Earth-fixed reference frame. J Geod 84:165–178
Pick M, Pícha J, Vyskočil V (1973) Theory of the Earth’s gravity field. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Pizzetti P (1911) Sopra il calcolo teorico delle deviazioni del geoide dall’ ellissoide. Atti della Reale Accademia della Scienze di Torino 46:331
Reed GB (1973) Application of kinematical geodesy for determining the short wavelength components of the gravity field by satellite gradiometry. Report No 201, Department of Geodetic Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
Rummel R (1986) Satellite gradiometry. In: Sünkel H (ed) Mathematical and numerical techniques in physical geodesy. Lecture notes in earth sciences, vol 7. Springer, Berlin, pp 317–363
Rummel R (1997) Spherical spectral properties of the Earth’s gravitational potential and its first and second derivatives. In: Sansó F, Rummel R (eds) Geodetic boundary value problems in view of the one centimeter geoid. Lecture notes in earth sciences, vol 65. Springer, Berlin, pp 359–404
Rummel R (2010) GOCE: Gravitational gradiometry in a satellite. In: Freeden W, Nashed MZ, Sonar T (eds) Handbook of Geomathematics. Springer, Berlin, pp 93–103
Rummel R, van Gelderen M (1995) Meissl scheme—spectral characteristics of physical geodesy. Manuscripta Geodaetica 20:379–385
Sali WB (2009) Removing noise due to aircraft motion from gravity gradient data. MSc Thesis, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Schwarz KP, Li Z (1997) An introduction to airborne gravimetry and its boundary value problems. In: Sansó F, Rummel R (eds) Geodetic boundary value problems in view of the one centimeter geoid. Lecture notes in earth sciences, vol 65. Springer, Berlin, pp 312–358
Seeber G (2003) Satellite geodesy, 2nd edn. De Gruyter, Berlin
Smith RS, Thurston JB, Dai TF, MacLeod IN (1998) \(iSPI^{TM}\)-the improved source parameter imaging method. Geophys Prospect 46:141–151
Sun W, Wu X, Huang G-Q (2011) Symplectic integrators with potential derivatives to third order. Res Astron Astrophys 11:353–368
Šprlák M, Novák P (2014) Integral transformations of gradiometric data onto a GRACE type of observable. J Geod 88:377–390
Šprlák M, Sebera J, Vaľko M, Novák P (2014) Spherical integral formulas for upward/downward continuation of gravitational gradients onto gravitational gradients. J Geod 88:179–197
Thurston JB, Smith RS, Guillon JC (2002) A multimodel method for depth estimation from magnetic data. Geophysics 67:555–561
Timmen L (2010) Absolute and relative gravimetry. In: Xu G (ed) Sciences of geodesy-I: advances and future directions. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–48
Torge W (1989) Gravimetry. De Gruyter, Berlin
Torge W, Müller J (2012) Geodesy, 4th edn. De Gruyter Inc., Berlin
Tóth G (2005) The gradiometric-geodynamic boundary value problem. In: Jekeli C, Bastos L, Fernandes L (eds) Gravity, geoid and space missions, IAG symposia, vol 129. Springer, Berlin, pp 352–357
Tóth G, Földváry L (2005) Effect of geopotential model errors on the projection of GOCE gradiometer observables. In: Jekeli C, Bastos L, Fernandes L (eds) Gravity, geoid and space missions, IAG symposia, vol 129. Springer, Berlin, pp 72–76
Troshkov GA, Shalaev SV (1968) Application of the Fourier transform to the solution of the reverse problem of gravity and magnetic surveys. Can J Explor Geophys 4:46–62
Velkoborský P (1982) Use of Poisson’s integral in calculating higher vertical derivatives of harmonic functions—Part 1. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 26:3–11
Veryaskin A, McRae W (2008) On the combined gravity gradient components modeling for applied geophysics. J Geophys Eng 5:348–356
Wang YM (1989) Determination of the gravity disturbance by processing the gravity gradiometer surveying system—processing procedure and results. Scientific Report No 8, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
Winch DE, Roberts PH (1995) Derivatives of addition theorem for Legendre functions. J Aust Math Soc Ser B Appl Math 37:212–234
Wolf KI (2007) Kombination globaler Potentialmodelle mit terrestrische Schweredaten für die Berechnung der zweiten Ableitungen des Gravitationspotentials in Satelitenbahnhöhe. Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Reihe C, No 603, München, Germany
Acknowledgments
Michal Šprlák was supported by the Project EXLIZ-CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0013, which is co-financed by the European Social Fund and the state budget of the Czech Republic. Pavel Novák was supported by the Project 209/12/1929 of the Czech Science Foundation. Thoughtful and constructive comments of Dr. Stefano Casotto and two anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are also extended to the editor-in-chief Prof. Roland Klees and the responsible editor Prof. Christopher Jekeli for handling our manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A: Differential operators for the second-order gravitational gradients
In Sect. 3, we construct the differential operators for the third-order (disturbing) gravitational gradients. For this purpose, we exploit also the differential operators for the second-order gravitational gradients. The six second-order differential operators in terms of angular spherical geocentric coordinates \((r, \Omega )\) read as follows (Reed 1973; Koop 1993):
Alternatively, the second-order differential operators of Eqs. (71)–(76) may be expressed in terms of the spherical polar coordinates \((r, \psi , \alpha )\), see, e.g. (Wolf 2007; Šprlák et al. 2014):
where
Note that the subscript in Eqs. (78)–(81) refers to the order of the gravitational gradients.
Appendix B: Explicit decomposition of degree-dependent terms
To arrive at the new isotropic kernels \({\mathcal {K}}^{i*, j}\); \(i \in \{0, 1, 2, 3\}\); \(j \in \{{\mathcal {N}}, {\mathcal {P}}, {\mathcal {S}}, {\mathcal {H}}\}\) in the closed form, see Sect. 4, an explicit decomposition of some degree-dependent terms is required. Such a decomposition is completely defined by the following equations:
Note that the symbols \(h_n^{j}\); \(j \in \{{\mathcal {N}}, {\mathcal {P}}, {\mathcal {S}}, {\mathcal {H}}\}\) stand for the eigenvalues of the Newton, Abel-Poisson, Pizzetti and Hotine kernels. These are defined by Eqs. (39)–(42).
Appendix C: Sums of infinite series
To derive the new isotropic kernels \({\mathcal {K}}^{i*, j}\); \(i \in \{0, 1, 2, 3\}\); \(j \in \{{\mathcal {N}}, {\mathcal {P}}, {\mathcal {S}}, {\mathcal {H}}\}\) in closed form, see Sect. 4, we also need closed form expressions for some infinite series. Complete set of these summation rules reads as follows:
Note that some of the summation rules may be found, e.g. in (Pick et al. 1973; Moritz 1980; Martinec 2003; Šprlák and Novák 2014).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Šprlák, M., Novák, P. Integral formulas for computing a third-order gravitational tensor from volumetric mass density, disturbing gravitational potential, gravity anomaly and gravity disturbance. J Geod 89, 141–157 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-014-0767-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-014-0767-z