Skip to main content
Log in

Gravitational gradients by tensor analysis with application to spherical coordinates

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This contribution deals with the derivation of explicit expressions of the gradients of first, second and third order of the gravitational potential. This is accomplished in the framework of tensor analysis which naturally allows to apply general formulae to the specific coordinate systems in use in geodesy. In particular it is recalled here that when the potential field is expressed in general coordinates on a 3D manifold, the gradient operation leads to the definition of the covariant derivative and that the covariant derivative of a tensor can be obtained by application of a simple rule. When applied to the gravitational potential or to any of its gradients, the rule straightforwardly provides the expressions of the higher-order gradients. It is also shown that the tensor approach offers a clear distinction between natural and physical components of the gradients. Two fundamental reference systems—a global, bodycentric system and a local, topocentric system, both body-fixed—are introduced and transformation rules are derived to convert quantities between the two systems. The results include explicit expressions for the gradients of the first three orders in both reference systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albertella A, Migliaccio F, Sansò F, Tscherning CC (2000) The space-wise approach—overall scientific data strategy. In: Suenkel (ed) From Eötvös to Milligal, Final Report, ESA Study, ESA/ESTEC Contract No. 3329/98/NL/GD, 267–298

  • Albertella A, Migliaccio F, Sansò F (2002) GOCE: The earth gravity field by space gradiometry. Celest Mech Dyn Astron 81: 1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borisenko AI, Tarapov IE (1979) Vector and tensor analysis with applications, revised english edition. Dover Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Caola MJ (1978) Solid harmonics and their addition theorems. J Phys A Math Gen 11: L23–L25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham LE (1970) On the computation of the spherical harmonic terms needed during the numerical integration of the orbital motion of an artificial satellite. Celest Mech 2: 207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fantino E, Casotto S (2008) Methods of harmonic synthesis for global geopotential models and their first-, second- and third-order gradients. J Geod. doi:10.1007/s00190-008-0275-0

  • Garmier R, Barriot J-P (2001) Ellipsoidal Harmonic Expansions of the Gravitational Potential: Theory and Application. Celest Mech Dyn Astron 79: 235–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand IM (1989) Lectures on Linear Algebra. Dover Publ, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafarend EW (1986) Differential geometry of the gravity field. Manuscr Geod 11: 29–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassani S (1999) Mathematical Physics – A Modern Introduction to its Foundations. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins J (1973) Mathematical models of geopotential gradients. In: Proceedings of the symposium on Earth’s gravitational field & secular variations in position, pp 93–105

  • Hotine M (1969) Mathematical geodesy, environmental science services administration (ESSA) monograph no. 2, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC

  • Ilk KH (1983) Ein Beitrag zur Dynamik ausgedhenter Körper, Deutsche Geodaetische Kommission, Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Heft Nr. 288, München

  • Keller W, Sharifi MA (2005) Satellite gradiometry using a satellite pair. J Geod 78: 544–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koop R (1993) Global Gravity Field Modeling Using Satellite Gravity Gradiometry, Netherlands Geodetic Comission, Publications on Geodesy, New Series, Number 38, Delft, The Netherlands

  • Koop R, Stelpstra D (1989) On the computation of the gravitational potential and its first and second order derivatives. Manuscr Geod 14: 373–382

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan WD (1930) Theory of the potential. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Marussi A (1951) Fondamenti di Geodesia Intrinseca. Pubbl Comm Geodet Ital Terza Ser Mem 7. (1985) Intrinsic geodesy (trans: Marussi A). Springer, Berlin

  • Moritz H (1967) Kinematical geodesy. Report no. 92, Department of Geodetic Science, Ohio State University, Columbus

  • Moritz H (1971) Kinematical geodesy II. Report no. 165, Department of Geodetic Science, Ohio State University, Columbus

  • Moritz H, Hoffman-Wellenhof B (1993) Geometry, relativity, geodesy. Wichmann, Karlsruhe

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnus JR, Neudecker H (1988) Matrix differential calculus, with applications in statistics and econometrics. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostro SJ, Hudson RS, Nolan MC, Margot J-L, Scheeres DJ, Campbell DB, Magri C, Giorgini JD, Yeomans DK (2000) Radar observations of asteroid 216 Kleopatra. Science 288(5467): 836–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed GB (1973) Application of kinematical geodesy for determining the short wave length components of the gravity field by satellite gradiometry. Report no. 201, Department of Geodetic Science, Ohio State University, Columbus

  • Rummel R (1986) Satellite gradiometry. In: Sünkel (1986) Mathematical and numerical techniques in physical geodesy. Springer, Berlin, pp 317–363

  • Rummel R, Van Gelderen M, Koop R, Schrama E, Sansò F, Brovelli M, Migliaccio F, Sacerdote F (1993) Spherical harmonic analysis of satellite gradiometry. Publications on Geodesy, New Series, No. 39, Netherlands Geodetic Commission

  • Schutz B (1980) Geometrical methods of mathematical physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Spain B (1960) Tensor calculus. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh. Reprinted (2003) Dover, Mineola

  • Thong NC, Grafarend EW (1989) A spheroidal harmonic model of the terrestrial gravitational field. Manuscr Geod 14: 285–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Tóth Gy, Földvàry L (2005) Effect of geopotential model errors on the projection of GOCE gradiometer observables. In: Jekeli C, Bastos L, Fernandes J (eds) Gravity, Geoid and space missions, IAG symposia 129, Springer, Berlin

  • Tscherning CC (1976) Computation of the second-order derivatives of the normal potential based on the representation by a legendre series. Manuscr Geod 1: 71–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrede RC (1972) Introduction to vector and tensor analysis. Dover Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zund J (1989) A mathematical appreciation of Antonio Marussi’s contributions to geodesy. In: Sacerdote F, Sansò F (eds) Proc. II Hotine-Marussi symposium on mathematical geodesy, Pisa, 5–8 June 1989, 1–18

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Casotto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Casotto, S., Fantino, E. Gravitational gradients by tensor analysis with application to spherical coordinates. J Geod 83, 621–634 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0276-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0276-z

Keywords

Navigation