Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Are exports a reliable source of economic growth in MENA countries? New evidence from the rolling Granger causality method

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Earlier investigations have concentrated on the effect of export expansion on economic growth while ignoring the importance of the stability of such relationship. This paper re-investigates empirically the export-led growth (ELG) hypothesis for five countries in the MENA region: Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, Tunisia, and Turkey, using the Granger causality technique. This study covers the sample period from 1980:Q1 to 2012:Q4. With the full sample, we find evidence supporting the ELG hypothesis only in Jordan, Morocco, and Turkey. Nonetheless, our time-varying Granger causality results have significantly validated the evidence of instability of the ELG hypothesis in these MENA countries. Therefore, changes in policies and regulations to improve the export sector of these countries will not ultimately pay off in terms of achieving high rates of stable economic growth in these countries. Policymakers in these countries should search for the alternative catalyst of growth to continuously as well as to effectively promote long-term economic growth in these countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. To shed some more light on the selection of appropriate lag, we also use another system-wide information criterion such as Final Prediction Error (FPE), Schwarz Information Criterion (SIC), and Hannan–Quinn Information Criterion (HQ) to affirm the best lag structure for our VAR models. The SIC statistic suggests that VAR models with 2 lags should be the best model, but FPE and HQ consistently suggest that VAR models with 6 lags should be the best structure for all countries under investigation. Owing to such inconsistent suggestion, we follow Hatemi-J and Hacker’s (2009) recommendation to use the likelihood ratio (LR) test to pick the most appropriate lag structure for our VAR systems. We find that the LR test consistently rejects the null hypothesis of 2 lags at the 1% significant level for all countries, implying that VAR system with 6 lags is more appropriate in the context of our study.

References

  • Abual-Foul B (2004) Testing the export-led growth hypothesis: evidence from Jordan. Appl Econ Lett 11(6):393–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Qarn AS, Abu-Bader S (2004) The validity of the ELG hypothesis in the MENA region: cointegration and error correction model analysis. Appl Econ 36(15):1685–1695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed QM, Butt MS, Alam S (2000) Economic growth, export and external debt causality: the case of Asian countries. Pak Dev Rev 39(4):591–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akbar M, Naqvi ZF (2000) Export diversification and the structural dynamics in the growth process: the case of Pakistan. Pak Dev Rev 39(4):573–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Mamun KA, Nath HK (2005) Export-led growth in Bangladesh: a time series analysis. Appl Econ Lett 12(6):361–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balassa B (1978a) Exports and economic growth: further evidence. J Dev Econ 5(2):181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balassa B (1978b) Export incentives and export performance in developing countries: a comparative analysis. Rev World Econ 114(1):24–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balassa B (1982) Development Strategies in Semi-Industrial Economies. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Balassa B (1984) Adjustment to external shocks in developing economies. In: Csikós-Nagy B, Hague D, Hall G (eds) The economics of relative prices: proceedings of a conference held by the International Economic Association in Athens, Greece. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 352–390

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dodaro S (1991) Comparative advantage, trade and growth: export-led growth revisited. World Dev 19(9):1153–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodaro S (1993) Exports and growth: a reconsideration of causality. J Dev Areas 27(2):227–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolado JJ, Lütkepohl H (1996) Making Wald tests work for cointegrated VAR system. Econom Rev 15(4):369–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollar D (1992) Outward-oriented developing economies really do grow more rapidly: evidence from 95 LDCs, 1976–1985. Econ Dev Cult Change 40(3):523–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feder G (1983) On exports and economic growth. J Dev Econ 12(1–2):59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles JA, Williams CL (2000a) Export-led growth: a survey of the empirical literature and some non-causality results, part 1. J Int Trade Econ Dev 9(3):261–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles JA, Williams CL (2000b) Export-led growth: a survey of the empirical literature and some non-causality results, part 2. J Int Trade Econ Dev 9(4):445–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokmenoglu KK, Sehnaz Z, Taspinar N (2015) The export-led growth: A case study of Costa Rica. Procedia Economics and Finance 25:471–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatemi-J A, Hacker RS (2009) Can the LR test be helpful in choosing the optimal lag order in the VAR model when information criteria suggest different lag order? Appl Econ 41(9):1121–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques I, Sadorsky P (1996) Export-led growth or growth-driven exports? The Canadian case. Can J Econ 29(3):540–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrerias MJ, Orts V (2010) Is the export-led growth hypothesis is enough to account for China’s growth? China World Econ 18(4):34–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husein J (2009) Export-led growth hypothesis: a multivariate cointegration and causality evidence for Jordan. J Dev Areas 42(2):253–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison M, Singh N (1992) Exports, non-exports and externalities: a Granger causality approach. Int Econ J 6(2):79–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung WS, Marshall PJ (1985) Exports, growth and causality in developing countries. J Dev Econ 18(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lütkepohl H (2013) Vector autoregressive models. In: Hashimzade N, Thornton MA (eds) Handbook of research methods and applications in empirical macroeconomics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Maneschiöld PO (2008) A note on the export-led growth hypothesis: a time series approach. Cuadernos de Economía 45(132):293–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson CR, Plosser CI (1982) Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series: some evidence and implications. J Monetary Econ 10(2):139–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxley L (1993) Cointegration, causality and export-led growth in Portugal, 1865–1985. Econ Lett 43(2):163–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panas E, Vamvoukas G (2002) Further evidence on the export-led growth hypothesis. Appl Econ Lett 9(11):731–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parikh A, Stirbu C (2004) Relationship between trade liberalisation, economic growth and trade balance: an econometric investigation. HWWA discussion paper 282, Hamburg Institute of International Economics

  • Perron P (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57(6):1361–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomponio XZ (1996) A causality analysis of growth and export performance. Atl Econ J 24(2):168–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riezman RG, Summers PM, Whiteman CH (1996) The engine of growth or its handmaiden? A time-series assessment of export-led growth. Empir Econ 21(1):77–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta JK, España JR (1994) Exports and economic growth in Asian NICs: an econometric analysis for Korea. Appl Econ 26(1):41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang CF (2010) The money-prices nexus for Malaysia: new empirical evidence from the time-varying cointegration and causality tests. Global Econ Rev 39(4):383–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang CF (2013) A revisitation of the export-led growth hypothesis in Malaysia using the leveraged bootstrap simulation and rolling causality techniques. J Appl Stat 40(11):2332–2340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang CF, Chua SY (2012) The savings-growth nexus for the Malaysian economy: a view through rolling sub-samples. Appl Econ 44(32):4173–4185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang CF, Lai YW, Ozturk I (2015) How stable is the export-led growth hypothesis? Evidence from Asia’s four little dragons. Econ Model 44:229–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmermann A (2008) Elusive return predictability. Int J Forecast 24(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toda HY, Yamamoto T (1995) Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. J Econom 66(1–2):225–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler WG (1981) Growth and export expansion of developing countries: some empirical evidence. J Dev Econ 9(1):121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestion given on the earlier draft of this paper. Any flaws and omissions that remain in this paper are of our own responsibility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salah Abosedra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abosedra, S., Tang, C.F. Are exports a reliable source of economic growth in MENA countries? New evidence from the rolling Granger causality method. Empir Econ 56, 831–841 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-017-1374-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-017-1374-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation