Skip to main content
Log in

Surface roughness and surface crack length prediction using supervised machine learning–based approach of electrical discharge machining of deep cryogenically treated NiTi, NiCu, and BeCu alloys

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the impact of various input variables in electrical discharge machining (EDM) on specific responses, including surface crack length (SCL) and surface roughness (SR). The variables under scrutiny are the electrical conductivity of the workpiece tool, pulse-on time, gap voltage, pulse-off time, and gap current. The study focuses on generating a mesoscale square blind hole in both cryo-treated and untreated workpieces using electrolytic oxygen-free copper. Experimental design and statistical software were employed to facilitate the analysis, following Taguchi’s L18 (61 × 34) orthogonal array. Through heat map, it was determined that pulse on time, pulse off time, and gap voltage significantly influence surface roughness. On the other hand, workpiece electrical conductivity, gap current, gap voltage, and pulse on time were found to impact surface crack length. It can be seen from the study that the formation of surface cracks exhibited a decreasing trend at the initial level of conductivity of the workpiece, while SCL increased as the WEC was raised. Additionally, lower values of gap current were associated with greater crack length, whereas increasing the gap current reduced crack length. Furthermore, an increase in gap voltage corresponded to an increase in crack length, whereas crack length decreased with an increase in pulse on time. Machine learning regression methods employed in the study could predict surface roughness and surface crack length values with R-squared values more than 0.90.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ming W et al (2022) Progress in modeling of electrical discharge machining process. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 187:122563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.122563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shastri RK, Mohanty CP, Dash S, Gopal KMP, Annamalai AR, Jen C-P (2022) Reviewing performance measures of the die-sinking electrical discharge machining process: challenges and future scopes. Nanomaterials 12(3):384. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12030384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boopathi S (2022) An extensive review on sustainable developments of dry and near-dry electrical discharge machining processes. J Manuf Sci Eng 144:5. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baroi BK, Jagadish, Patowari PK (2022) A review on sustainability, health, and safety issues of electrical discharge machining. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 44(2):59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-03351-4

  5. Kannan E, Trabelsi Y, Boopathi S, Alagesan S (2022) Influences of cryogenically treated work material on near-dry wire-cut electrical discharge machining process”. Surf Topogr: Metrol Prop 10(1):015027. https://doi.org/10.1088/2051-672X/ac53e1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jatti VS, Sefene EM, Jatti AV, Mishra A, Dhabale RD (2023) Synthesis and characterization of diamond-like carbon coatings for drill bits using plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11794-3. (2023/06/22 2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chaudhari R, Prajapati P, Khanna S, Vora J, Patel VK, Pimenov DY, Giasin K (2022) Multi-response optimization of Al2O3 nanopowder-mixed wire electrical discharge machining process parameters of nitinol shape memory alloy. Materials 15(6):2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15062018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. KarthikPandiyan G, Prabaharan T, Jafrey Daniel James D, Sivalingam V (2022) Machinability analysis and optimization of electrical discharge machining in AA6061-T6/15wt.% SiC composite by the multi-criteria decision-making approach. J Mater Eng Perform 31(5):3741–3752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06511-8. (2022/05/01 2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vora J et al (2022) Machining parameter optimization and experimental investigations of nano-graphene mixed electrical discharge machining of nitinol shape memory alloy. J Mater Res Technol 19:653–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.05.076. (2022/07/01/ 2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Akıncıoğlu S (2022) Taguchi optimization of multiple performance characteristics in the electrical discharge machining of the TiGr2”. Facta Univ, Ser Mech Eng 20(2):237–253. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME201230028A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Danish M et al (2023) Optimization of hydroxyapatite powder mixed electric discharge machining process to improve modified surface features of 316L stainless steel. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part E: J Process Mech Eng 237(3):881–895. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089221111584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kam M, İpekçi A, Argun K (2022) Experimental investigation and optimization of machining parameters of deep cryogenically treated and tempered steels in electrical discharge machining process. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part E: J Process Mech Eng 236(5):1927–1935. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089221078133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gautam N, Goyal A, Sharma SS, Oza AD, Kumar R (2022) Study of various optimization techniques for electric discharge machining and electrochemical machining processes”. Mater Today: Proc 57:615–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.005. (2022/01/01/ 2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu H, Tieu AK, Lu C, Godbole A (2014) Investigation of closure of internal cracks during rolling by FE model considering crack surface roughness. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75(9):1633–1640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6234-4. (2014/12/01 2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang X et al (2022) Mechanism analysis and modeling of surface roughness for CeO2 slurry-enhanced grinding BK7 optics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10554-z. (2022/12/03 2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shukla SK, Priyadarshini A (2019) Application of machine learning techniques for multi objective optimization of response variables in wire cut electro discharge machining operation. Mater Sci Forum, Trans Tech Publ 969:800–806. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.969.800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghosh I, Sanyal MK, Jana RK, Dan PK (2016) Machine learning for predictive modeling in management of operations of EDM equipment product,” in 2016 Second International Conference on Research in Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (ICRCICN), 23-25 Sept. 2016 2016, pp. 169-174, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRCICN.2016.7813651

  18. Ulas M, Aydur O, Gurgenc T, Ozel C (2020) Surface roughness prediction of machined aluminum alloy with wire electrical discharge machining by different machine learning algorithms. J Mater Res Technol 9(6):12512–12524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.08.098. (2020/11/01/ 2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ali M et al (2013) The effect of EDM die-sinking parameters on material removal rate of beryllium copper using full factorial method. Middle-East J Sci Res 16(1):44–50. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.16.01.2249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Selvakumar G, Sarkar S, Mitra S (2012) Experimental analysis on WEDM of monel 400 alloys in a range of thicknesses. Int J Mod Manuf Technol 4:113–120

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kumar V, Kumar V, Jangra KK (2015) An experimental analysis and optimization of machining rate and surface characteristics in WEDM of Monel-400 using RSM and desirability approach. J Ind Eng Int 11(3):297–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-015-0103-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar NA, Babu AS (2018) Influence of input parameters on the near-dry WEDM of Monel alloy. Mater Manuf Processes 33(1):85–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2017.1279297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Daneshmand S, Kahrizi EF, Abedi E, Abdolhosseini MM (2013) Influence of machining parameters on electro discharge machining of NiTi shape memory alloys. Int J Electrochem Sci 8(3):3095–3104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gangele A, Mishra A (2020) Surface roughness optimization during machining of Niti shape memory alloy by EDM through Taguchi’s technique. Mater Today: Proc 29:343–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Daneshmand S, Monfared V, LotfiNeyestanak AA (2017) Effect of tool rotational and al2o3 powder in electro discharge machining characteristics of NiTi-60 shape memory alloy”. Silicon 9(2):273–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-016-9412-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pogrebnjak A, Bratushka S, Beresnev VM, Levintant-Zayonts N (2013) Shape memory effect and superelasticity of titanium nickelide alloys implanted with high ion doses. Russ Chem Rev 82(12):1135. https://doi.org/10.1070/RC2013v082n12ABEH004344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tharian BK, Dhanish PB, Manu R (2021) Enhancement of material removal rate in Electric Discharge Machining of Inconel 718 using cryo-treated graphite electrodes. Mater Today: Proc 47:5172–5176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Singh J, Singh G, Pandey PM (2021) Electric discharge machining using rapid manufactured complex shape copper electrode with cryogenic cooling channel. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part B: J Eng Manuf 235(1–2):173–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405420949102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Prakash D, Tariq M, Davis R, Singh A, Debnath K (2021) Influence of cryogenic treatment on the performance of micro-EDM tool electrode in machining of magnesium alloy AZ31B”. Mater Today: Proc 39:1198–1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumar P, Meenu M, Kumar V (2018) Optimization of process parameters for WEDM of Inconel 825 using grey relational analysis. Decis Sci Lett 7(4):405–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kumar P, Gupta M, Kumar V (2019) Experimental analysis of WEDM machined surface of Inconel 825 using single objective PSO. J Physics: Conf Ser 1240(1):012053 (IOP Publishing)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kumar P, Gupta M, Kumar V (2019) Microstructural analysis and multi response optimization of WEDM of Inconel 825 using RSM based desirability approach. J Mech Behav Mater 28(1):39–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Garg M, Kumar A, Sahu C (2017) Mathematical modeling and analysis of WEDM machining parameters of nickel-based super alloy using response surface methodology. Sādhanā 42:981–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Thellaputta GR, Chandra PS, Rao C (2017) Machinability of nickel based superalloys: a review. Mater Today: Proc 4(2):3712–3721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Goswami A, Kumar J (2017) Trim cut machining and surface integrity analysis of Nimonic 80A alloy using wire cut EDM. Eng Sci Technol, Int J 20(1):175–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2016.09.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shen Y et al (2017) Surface integrity of Inconel 718 in high-speed electrical discharge machining milling using air dielectric. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90:691–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mishra D, Rizvi SAH (2017) Influence of EDM parameters on MRR, TWR and surface integrity of AISI 4340. Int J Tech Res Appl 42:95–98

    Google Scholar 

  38. Razeghiyadaki A, Molardi C, Talamona D, Perveen A (2019) Modeling of material removal rate and surface roughness generated during electro-discharge machining. Machines 7(2):47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kansal H, Singh S, Kumar P (2005) Application of Taguchi method for optimisation of powder mixed electrical discharge machining. Int J Manuf Technol Manage 7(2–4):329–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DAS, VSJ, AM, EMS, AVJ: conceptualization, methodology, writing an original draft, software, reviewing, and editing the paper. All the authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eyob Messele Sefene.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sawant, D.A., Jatti, V.S., Mishra, A. et al. Surface roughness and surface crack length prediction using supervised machine learning–based approach of electrical discharge machining of deep cryogenically treated NiTi, NiCu, and BeCu alloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 128, 5595–5612 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12269-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12269-1

Keywords

Navigation