Skip to main content
Log in

A single camera unit-based three-dimensional surface imaging technique

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper introduces a simple three-dimensional (3D) stereoscopic method using a single unit of an imaging device consisting of a charge-coupled device (CCD) and a zoom lens. Unlike conventional stereoscopy, which requires a pair of imaging devices, 3D surface imaging is achieved by 3D image reconstruction of two images obtained from two different camera positions by scanning. The experiments were performed by obtaining two images of the measurement target in two different ways: (1) by moving the object while the imaging device is stationary, and (2) by moving the imaging device while the object is stationary. Conventional stereoscopy is limited by disparity errors in 3D image reconstruction because a pair of imaging devices is not ideally identical and alignment errors are always present in the imaging system setup. The proposed method significantly reduced the disparity error in 3D image reconstruction, and the calibration process of the imaging system became simple and convenient. The proposed imaging system showed a disparity error of 0.26 in the camera pixel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that supports the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Varda, K., Zaimović-Uzunović, N., Softić, A., & Bešlagić, E. Dimensional and Shape Control of the Part Using Cmm and 3d Scanner. Available at SSRN 4298597.

  2. Ito S, Tsutsumi D, Kamiya K, Matsumoto K, Kawasegi N (2020) Measurement of form error of a probe tip ball for coordinate measuring machine (CMM) using a rotating reference sphere. Precis Eng 61:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fan KC, Li RJ, Xu P (2019) Design and verification of micro/nano-probes for coordinate measuring machines. Nanomanuf Metrol 2(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li S, Zeng L, Feng P, Yu D (2020) An accurate probe pre-travel error compensation model for five-axis on-machine inspection system. Precis Eng 62:256–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Edmondson V, Woodward J, Lim M, Kane M, Martin J, Shyha I (2019) Improved non-contact 3D field and processing techniques to achieve macrotexture characterization of pavements. Constr Build Mater 227:116693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Virtanen JP, Daniel S, Turppa T, Zhu L, Julin A, Hyyppä H, Hyyppä J (2020) Interactive dense point clouds in a game engine. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 163:375–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lozano A, Hayes JC, Compton LM, Azarnoosh J, Hassanipour F (2020) Determining the thermal characteristics of breast cancer based on high-resolution infrared imaging, 3D breast scans, and magnetic resonance imaging. Sci Rep 10(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kolose S, Stewart T, Hume P, Tomkinson GR (2021) Prediction of military combat clothing size using decision trees and 3D body scan data. Appl Ergon 95:103435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang C, Wang G, Song H, Li R, Zhang H (2022) Rapid surface defects detection in wire and arc additive manufacturing based on laser profilometer. Measurement 189:110503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cui B, Tao W, Zhao H (2021) High-precision 3d reconstruction for small-to-medium-sized objects utilizing line-structured light scanning: A review. Remote Sens 13(21):4457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang SP, Seo YH, Kim JB, Kim H, Jeong KH (2019) Optical MEMS devices for compact 3D surface imaging cameras. Micro Nano Syst Lett 7:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Song Z, Song Z, Zhao J, Gu F (2020) Micrometer-level 3D measurement techniques in complex scenes based on stripe-structured light and photometric stereo. Opt Express 28(22):32978–33001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li C, Yu L, Fei S (2019) Real-time 3D motion tracking and reconstruction system using camera and IMU sensors. IEEE Sens J 19(15):6460–6466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee CB, Guo X (2022) Spatially Resolved Stereoscopic Surface Profiling by using a Feature-Selective Segmentation and Merging Technique. Surf Topogr: Metrol Prop 10:014002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xiangyu Guo and ChaBum Lee (2022) Fluorescence Strobo-Stereoscopy for Specular Reflection-Suppressed Full Field of View Imaging. Measurement 192:11090

    Google Scholar 

  16. Guo X, Lee CB (2021) Preliminary study of phase-shifting strobo-stereoscopy for cutting tool monitoring. J Manuf Process 64:1214–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. He K, Sui C, Lyu C, Wang Z, Liu Y (2020) 3D reconstruction of objects with occlusion and surface reflection using a dual monocular structured light system. Appl Opt 59(29):9259–9271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lyu C, Li P, Wang D, Yang S, Lai Y, Sui C (2020) High-speed optical 3D measurement sensor for industrial application. IEEE Sens J 21(10):11253–11261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ye J, Zhou C (2021) Time-resolved coded structured light for 3D measurement. Microw Opt Technol Lett 63(1):5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bao Y, Tang L, Srinivasan S, Schnable PS (2019) Field-based architectural traits characterisation of maize plant using time-of-flight 3D imaging. Biosyst Eng 178:86–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Altuntas C (2021) Triangulation and time-of-flight based 3D digitisation techniques of cultural heritage structures. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 43:825–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang Y, Karpf S, Jalali B (2020) Time-stretch LiDAR as a spectrally scanned time-of-flight ranging camera. Nat Photonics 14(1):14–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pahl T, Hagemeier S, Künne M, Yang D, Lehmann P (2020) 3D modeling of coherence scanning interferometry on 2D surfaces using FEM. Opt Express 28(26):39807–39826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu Y, Luo Y, Chaudhari G, Rivenson Y, Calis A, de Haan K, Ozcan A (2019) Bright-field holography: cross-modality deep learning enables snapshot 3D imaging with bright-field contrast using a single hologram. Light: Sci Appl 8(1):25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Henseler H, Khambay BS, Bowman A, Smith J, Siebert JP, Oehler S et al (2011) Investigation into accuracy and reproducibility of a 3D breast imaging system using multiple stereo cameras. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64(5):577–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cadena C, Gálvez-López D, Ramos F, Tardós JD, Neira J (2010) Robust place recognition with stereo cameras. In: 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, pp 5182–5189

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang S, Gao Y, Liu Z, Zhang G (2020) A calibration method for binocular stereo vision sensor with short-baseline based on 3D flexible control field. Opt Lasers Eng 124:105817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim BH, Khan D, Choi W, Kim MY (2019) Real-time counter-UAV system for long distance small drones using double pan-tilt scan laser radar. In: Laser radar technology and applications XXIV, vol 11005. SPIE, pp 80–86

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rapp J, Tachella J, Altmann Y, McLaughlin S, Goyal VK (2020) Advances in single-photon lidar for autonomous vehicles: Working principles, challenges, and recent advances. IEEE Signal Process Mag 37(4):62–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fan M, Liu Y (2022) Image processing technology based on computer vision algorithm. In: 2022 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Manufacturing (AIAM). IEEE, pp 847–850

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Burger W (2016) Zhang’s camera calibration algorithm: in-depth tutorial and implementation, vol HGB16-05. University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Hagenberg, Austria, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research team thanks Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies LLC for the project (DE-NA0002839) and National Science Foundation for the project (CMMI #2124999).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ChaBum Lee.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Guo, X., Kim, J. et al. A single camera unit-based three-dimensional surface imaging technique. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 127, 4833–4843 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11866-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11866-4

Keywords

Navigation