Skip to main content
Log in

3D finite element simulation for tool temperature distribution and chip formation during drilling of Ti6Al4V alloy

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comprehensive 3D finite element simulation study has been conducted to investigate the tool temperature distribution along cutting edge and chip formation during drilling of Ti6Al4V alloy by using commercial finite element software Abaqus/Explicit. The Johnson–Cook material constitutive model and material failure criterion were implemented across the formulations to achieve the tool temperature and chip formation in the drilling process. The effect of different mesh sizes on simulation results was also analyzed. To assess and verify the accuracy of the simulation model, the corresponding experiment studies were carried out by measuring the thrust force, tool temperature, and chip morphology. Compared results show that the predicted thrust force, temperature distribution, and chip morphology are in good agreement with those tested from experiments. According to the combination of both simulations and experiments, it can be not only found the whole varying pattern of the thrust force but also reveal that the temperature decreases from drill center to outer corner along the primary cutting edge. In addition, it can provide a more detailed and profound knowledge about chip formation. All these are assumed to be recommendations for the optimization of tool geometry and drilling processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also forms part of an ongoing study.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Rey PA, Ledref J, Senatore J, Landon Y (2016) Modelling of cutting forces in orbital drilling of titanium alloy Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 106:75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2016.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Han RD, Wu J (2010) Finite element simulation of drilling based on third wave systems AdvantEdge. Key Eng Mater 431–432:229–232. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.431-432.229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sorgato M, Bertolini R, Ghiotti A, Bruschi S (2021) Tool wear analysis in high-frequency vibration-assisted drilling of additive manufactured Ti6Al4V alloy. Wear 477:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2021.203814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhu ZJ, Sui SC, Sun J, Li JF, Li YL (2017) Investigation on performance characteristics in drilling of Ti6Al4V alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93:651–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0508-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhu ZJ, Guo K, Sun J, Li JF, Liu Y, Zheng YH, Chen L (2018) Evaluation of novel tool geometries in dry drilling aluminium 2024–T351/titanium Ti6Al4V stack. J Mater Process Technol 259:270–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.04.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Balaji M, Venkata RK, Mohan RN, Murthy BSN (2018) Optimization of drilling parameters for drilling of TI-6Al-4V based on surface roughness, flank wear and drill vibration. Measurement 114:332–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.09.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barman A, Adhikari R, Bolar G (2020) Evaluation of conventional drilling and helical milling for processing of holes in titanium alloy Ti6Al4V. Mater Today Proc 28:2295–3000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lotfi M, Amini S, Al-Awady IY (2018) 3D numerical analysis of drilling process: heat, wear, and built-up edge. Adv Manuf 6:204–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-018-0223-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hu F, Xie L, Xiang J, Umer U, Nan X (2018) Finite element modelling study on small-hole peck drilling of SiCp/Al composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96:3719–3728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1730-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nan X, Xie L, Zhao W (2015) On the application of 3D finite element modeling for small-diameter hole drilling of AISI 1045 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84:1927–1939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7782-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonnet C, Pottier T, Landon Y (2021) Development of a multi-scale and coupled cutting model for the drilling of Ti-6Al-4V. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 35:526–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Isbilir O, Elaheh G (2011) Finite element analysis of drilling of titanium alloy. Procedia Eng 10:1877–1882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Girinon M, Valiorgue F, Karaouni H, Feulvarch É (2018) 3D numerical simulation of drilling residual stresses. Comptes Rendus Mécanique 346:701–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2018.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Priest J, Ghadbeigi H, Avar-Soberanis S, Gerardis S (2021) 3D finite element modelling of drilling: the effect of modelling method. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 35:158–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yıldız A, Kurt A, Yağmur S (2020) Finite element simulation of drilling operation and theoretical analysis of drill stresses with the deform-3D. Simul Model Pract Theory 104:102153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2020.102153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Korkmaz ME (2020) Verification of Johnson-Cook parameters of ferritic stainless steel by drilling process: experimental and finite element simulations. J Market Res 9:6322–6330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.03.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsumura T, Tamura S (2015) Cutting simulation of titanium alloy drilling with energy analysis and FEM. Procedia CIRP 31:252–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.03.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lazoglu I, Poulachon G, Ramirez C, Akmal M, Marcon B, Rossi F, Outeiro JC, Krebs M (2017) Thermal analysis in Ti-6Al-4V drilling. CIRP Ann 66:105–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chatterjee S, Mahapatra SS, Abhishek K (2016) Simulation and optimization of machining parameters in drilling of titanium alloys. Simul Model Pract Theory 62:31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2015.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fan LY, Wang DZ (2021) Study on delamination inhibition and chip breakage mechanism in drilling metal laminated materials with double cone drill. J Manuf Process 64:81–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hao ZP, Li JN, Fan YH, Ji FF (2019) Study on constitutive model and deformation mechanism in high speed cutting Inconel718. Arch Civil Mech Eng 19:439–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2018.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang B, Liu ZQ (2016) Evaluation on fracture locus of serrated chip generation with stress triaxiality in high speed machining of Ti6Al4V. Mater Des 98:68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson GR (1983) A constitutive model and data for materials subjected to large strains, high strain rates, and high temperatures. Proc Inf Sympo Ballistics 541–547

    Google Scholar 

  24. Umbrello D (2008) Finite element simulation of conventional and high speed machining of Ti6Al4V alloy. J Mater Process Technol 196:79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. ABAQUS I (2004) ABAQUS analysis user’s manual: version 6–5. Rising Sun Mills, Providence 2

  26. Zhang YC, Mabrouki T, Nelias D, Gong YD (2011) Chip formation in orthogonal cutting considering interface limiting shear stress and damage evolution based on fracture energy approach. Finite Elem Anal Des 47:850–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2011.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang YC, Mabrouki T, Nelias D, Gong YD (2011) FE-model for titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) cutting based on the identification of limiting shear stress at tool-chip interface. IntJ Mater Form 4:11–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-0986-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Childs THC (2006) Friction modelling in metal cutting. Wear 260:310–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2005.01.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zorev NN (1963) Inter-relationship between shear processes occurring along tool face and shear plane in metal cutting. Int Res Prod Eng 49:143–152

    Google Scholar 

  30. Barrow G, Graham W, Kurimoto T, Leong YF (1982) Determination of rake face stress distribution in orthogonal machining. Int J Mach Tool Des Res 22:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7357(82)90022-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Barrow G, Graham W, Kurimoto T, Leong YF (1995) Determination of stress distribution on the tool rake face using a composite tool. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 35:373–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-6955(94)E0020-J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kato S, Yamaguchi K, Yamada M (1972) Stress Distribution at the Interface Between Tool and Chip in Machining. J Eng Ind 94:683–689. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3428229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen L, Tai BL, Chaudhari RG, Song XZ, Shih AJ (2017) Machined surface temperature in hard turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 121:10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bono M, Ni J (2002) A method for measuring the temperature distribution along the cutting edges of a drill. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 124(4):921–930. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1511525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhu ZJ, Guo K, Sun J, Li JF, Liu Y, Chen L, Zheng YH (2018) Evolution of 3D chip morphology and phase transformation in dry drilling Ti6Al4V alloys. J Manuf Process 34:531–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is financially supported by Natural and Science Foundation of Fujian Province under grant numbers 2021J01560 and Education and scientific research foundation for young teachers in Fujian Province under grant numbers JAT190006.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Zhaoju Zhu and Bingwei He worked on conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, and preparation of the original draft with input from all authors. Yunqi Zhu and Xinhui Sun developed the computational modal, design optimization, and conducted the experiments. Chuhang Gao and Maozhi Lin worked on data collection, processing, and segmentation. Zhaoju Zhu supervised the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhaoju Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, Z., Zhu, Y., Sun, X. et al. 3D finite element simulation for tool temperature distribution and chip formation during drilling of Ti6Al4V alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 121, 5155–5169 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09543-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09543-z

Keywords

Navigation