Skip to main content
Log in

Vision-based melt pool monitoring for wire-arc additive manufacturing using deep learning method

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wire-arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) technology has been widely recognized as a promising alternative for fabricating large-scale components, due to its advantages of high deposition rate and high material utilization rate. However, some anomalies may occur during the deposition process, such as humping, spattering, robot suspend, pores, cracking and so on. This study proposed to apply deep learning in the visual monitoring to diagnose different anomalies during WAAM process. The melt pool images of different anomalies were collected for training and validation by a visual monitoring system. The classification performance of several representative CNN (convolutional neural network) architectures, including ResNet, EfficientNet, VGG-16 and GoogLeNet, were investigated and compared. The classification accuracy of 97.62%, 97.45%, 97.15% and 97.25% was achieved by each model. The results proved that the CNN models are effective in classifying different types of melt pool images of WAAM. Our study is applicable beyond WAAM and should benefit other additive manufacturing or arc welding techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zeng ZB, Cong J, Oliveira et al (2020) Wire and arc additive manufacturing of a Ni-rich NiTi shape memory alloy: microstructure and mechanical properties 32:101051

  2. Rodrigues TA, Bairrão N,  Farias FWC et al (2022) Steel-copper functionally graded material produced by twin-wire and arc additive manufacturing (T-WAAM) 213:110270

  3. Ke W, Oliveira J, Cong B et al (2022) Multi-layer deposition mechanism in ultra high-frequency pulsed wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) of NiTi shape memory alloys 50:102513

  4. Suryakumar S, Karunakaran K, Chandrasekhar U, Somashekara M (2013) A study of the mechanical properties of objects built through weld-deposition. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 227(8):1138–1147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405413482122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lopes J, Machado CM, Duarte VR et al (2020) Effect of milling parameters on HSLA steel parts produced by wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) 59:739–749

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rodrigues TA, Duarte V, Miranda R et al (2019) Current status and perspectives on wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) 12(7):1121

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li Y, Su C, Zhu J (2021) Comprehensive review of wire arc additive manufacturing: Hardware system, physical process, monitoring, property characterization, application and future prospects

  8. Ya W, Hamilton K (2017) On-demand spare parts for the marine industry with directed energy deposition: propeller use case. International Conference on Additive Manufacturing in Products and Applications. Springer, pp 70–81

    Google Scholar 

  9. Williams SW, Martina F, Addison AC et al (2016) Wire+ arc additive manufacturing. Mater Sci Technol 32(7):641–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Greer C, Nycz A, Noakes M et al (2019) Introduction to the design rules for metal big area additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 27:159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xia C, Pan Z, Zhang S et al (2020) Model predictive control of layer width in wire arc additive manufacturing. J Manuf Process 58:179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.07.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chabot A, Rauch M, Hascoët J-Y (2019) Towards a multi-sensor monitoring methodology for AM metallic processes. Welding in the World 1–11

  13. Zhan Q, Liang Y, Ding J, Williams S (2017) A wire deflection detection method based on image processing in wire+ arc additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(1–4):755–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao Z, Guo Y, Bai L et al (2019) Quality monitoring in wire-arc additive manufacturing based on cooperative awareness of spectrum and vision. Optik 181:351–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Aminzadeh M, Kurfess TR (2019) Online quality inspection using Bayesian classification in powder-bed additive manufacturing from high-resolution visual camera images. J Intell Manuf 30(6):2505–2523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1412-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Scime L, Beuth J (2018) A multi-scale convolutional neural network for autonomous anomaly detection and classification in a laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process. Addit Manuf 24:273–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.09.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Caggiano A, Zhang J, Alfieri V et al (2019) Machine learning-based image processing for on-line defect recognition in additive manufacturing. CIRP Ann 68(1):451–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2019.03.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kwon O, Kim HG, Ham MJ et al (2020) A deep neural network for classification of melt-pool images in metal additive manufacturing. J Intell Manuf 31(2):375–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1451-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu T, Bao J, Wang J, Zhang Y (2018) A hybrid CNN–LSTM algorithm for online defect recognition of CO2 welding. Sensors 18(12):4369. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18124369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xia C, Pan Z, Fei Z et al (2020) Vision based defects detection for Keyhole TIG welding using deep learning with visual explanation. J Manuf Process 56:845–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Feng Y, Chen Z, Wang D et al (2019) DeepWelding: a deep learning enhanced approach to GTAW using multisource sensing images. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 16(1):465–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bradstreet B (1968) Effect of surface tension and metal flow on weld bead formation. Weld J 47(7):314s–322s

    Google Scholar 

  23. Perez L, Wang J (2017) The effectiveness of data augmentation in image classification using deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.04621

  24. Deng J, Dong W, Socher R et al (2009) Imagenet: a large-scale hierarchicalimage database in 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition 248–255

  25. Ren S, He K, Girshick R, Sun J (2015) Faster r-cnn: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks in Adv neural inf proces syst 91–99

  26. Schmidhuber J (2015) Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw 61:85–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y et al (2015) Going deeper with convolutions. in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition 1–9

  28. Liu Z, Fang Y, Cui S et al (2016) Stable keyhole welding process with K-TIG. J Mater Process Technol 238:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yuan L, Pan Z, Ding D et al (2020) Investigation of humping phenomenon for the multi-directional robotic wire and arc additive manufacturing. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 63:101916

  30. Carneiro T, Da Nóbrega RVM, Nepomuceno T et al (2018) Performance analysis of google colaboratory as a tool for accelerating deep learning applications. IEEE Access 6:61677–61685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Congalton RG (1991) A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ 37(1):35–46. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2249.2000.01137.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Simonyan K, Zisserman A (2014) Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556

  33. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition 770–778

  34. Tan M, Le QV (2019) Efficientnet: rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.11946

Download references

Funding

China Scholarship Council (NO. 201704910782) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51775313) provided financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Chunyang Xia, Zengxi Pan and Yuxing Li. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Chunyang Xia, and all the authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. Ji Chen helped improve the language and figures when revising the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunyang Xia.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, C., Pan, Z., Li, Y. et al. Vision-based melt pool monitoring for wire-arc additive manufacturing using deep learning method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 120, 551–562 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08811-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08811-2

Keywords

Navigation