Skip to main content
Log in

Nonlinear vibratory properties of additive manufactured continuous carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Often, the responses of additive manufactured parts are studied only in the context of static loads, since most consumer-grade additive manufactured parts are not capable of supporting dynamic loads. Here, the effects of fabrication parameters on the vibratory properties of 3D-printed polymer composite beams were studied. A total of 420 vibratory system identification experiments were conducted on 70 additive manufactured cantilever beams. In addition, Euler-Bernoulli beam theory and the finite element method were used to estimate the first natural frequency of the beams. It was found that build parameters change not only the stiffness of the beam, but these build parameters also affect the damping ratio. Furthermore, the frequency response of the beams is amplitude-dependent; this nonlinear effect is important in predicting the behavior of 3D printed structures. The complex relationship between the build parameters and the nonlinear vibratory response points to the possibility of creating tailored vibratory responses of 3D-printed structures. Since vibrations can cause accelerated wear, this work could also be important in determining accurate life cycle predictions of additive manufactured parts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Matlack K H, Bauhofer A, Krödel S, Palermo A, Daraio C (2016) Composite 3d-printed metastructures for low-frequency and broadband vibration absorption. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113(30):8386–8390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Babamiri B B, Askari H, Hazeli K (2020) Deformation mechanisms and post-yielding behavior of additively manufactured lattice structures. Mater Des 188:108,443

  3. Zou R, Xia Y, Liu S, Hu P, Hou W, Hu Q, Shan C (2016) Isotropic and anisotropic elasticity and yielding of 3d printed material. Compos Part B: Eng 99:506–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tian X, Liu T, Yang C, Wang Q, Li D (2016) Interface and performance of 3d printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced pla composites. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 88:198–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Matsuzaki R, Ueda M, Namiki M, Jeong T K, Asahara H, Horiguchi K, Nakamura T, Todoroki A, Hirano Y (2016) Three-dimensional printing of continuous-fiber composites by in-nozzle impregnation. Sci Rep 6:23,058

  6. Love L J, Kunc V, Rios O, Duty C E, Elliott A M, Post B K, Smith R J, Blue C A (2014) The importance of carbon fiber to polymer additive manufacturing. J Mater Res 29(17):1893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tymrak B, Kreiger M, Pearce J M (2014) Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-d printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater Des 58:242–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahn S H, Montero M, Odell D, Roundy S, Wright PK (2002) Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling abs. Rapid Prototyping Journal

  9. Sood A K, Ohdar R K, Mahapatra S S (2010) Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts. Mater Des 31(1):287–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta A, Fidan I, Hasanov S, Nasirov A (2020) Processing, mechanical characterization, and micrography of 3d-printed short carbon fiber reinforced polycarbonate polymer matrix composite material. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107(7):3185–3205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Compton BG, Lewis JA (2014) 3d-printing of lightweight cellular composites. Adv Mater 26(34):5930–5935

  12. Araya-Calvo M, López-Gómez I, Chamberlain-Simon N, León-Salazar J L, Guillén-Girón T, Corrales-Cordero J S, Sánchez-Brenes O (2018) Evaluation of compressive and flexural properties of continuous fiber fabrication additive manufacturing technology. Addit Manuf 22:157–164

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brenken B, Barocio E, Favaloro A, Kunc V, Pipes R B (2018) Fused filament fabrication of fiber-reinforced polymers: a review. Addit Manuf 21:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mohammadizadeh M, Fidan I, Allen M, Imeri A (2018) Creep behavior analysis of additively manufactured fiber-reinforced components. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99(5):1225–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barbosa L C M, Gomes G, Junior A C A (2019) Prediction of temperature-frequency-dependent mechanical properties of composites based on thermoplastic liquid resin reinforced with carbon fibers using artificial neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105(5):2543–2556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Naranjo-Lozada J, Ahuett-Garza H, Orta-Castañón P, Verbeeten W M, Sáiz-González D (2019) Tensile properties and failure behavior of chopped and continuous carbon fiber composites produced by additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 26:227–241

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grammatikopoulos A, Banks J, Temarel P (2020) Prediction of the vibratory properties of ship models with realistic structural configurations produced using additive manufacturing. Mar Struct 73:102,801

  18. Zhu W, Zhao X, Zhang W, Ren K, Zhang Z, Li D (2014) Design and evaluation of fully configured models built by additive manufacturing. AIAA J 52(7):1441–1451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pankonien AM, Reich GW, Lindsley N, Smyers B (2017) 3d-printed wind tunnel flutter model. In: 58th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, pp 0411

  20. Zhang X, Zhou H, Shi W, Zeng F, Zeng H, Chen G (2018) Vibration tests of 3d printed satellite structure made of lattice sandwich panels. AIAA J 56(10):4213–4217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gerard N J, Cui H, Shen C, Xie Y, Cummer S, Zheng X, Jing Y (2019) Fabrication and experimental demonstration of a hybrid resonant acoustic gradient index metasurface at 40 khz. Appl Phys Let 114(23):231,902

  22. Zhang F, Perkins E, Wang S, Flowers G T, Dean R N (2019) Compact acoustic metalens with sinusoidal sub-channels for directional far-field sound beams. Appl Phys Express 12(8):087,002

  23. Umetani N, Panotopoulou A, Schmidt R, Whiting E (2016) Printone: interactive resonance simulation for free-form print-wind instrument design. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 35(6):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Piovan M, Diaco F, Nacud C, Di Giorgio L (2020) Elastic properties of 3d printed pieces determined with dynamic methods: applications to assembled 3d printed structures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109 (1):411–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Singh KV, Khan F, Veta J, Singh AK (2017) Influence of printing orientation on the dynamic characteristics and vibration behavior of 3d printed structures. In: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, vol 58110, pp V001T02A032

  26. Khan S U, Li C Y, Siddiqui N A, Kim J K (2011) Vibration damping characteristics of carbon fiber-reinforced composites containing multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Compos Sci Technol 71(12):1486–1494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Crifasi D, Ergle M, Özdeş H, Perkins E (2018) Vibratory system identification of 3d printed cantilever. In: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, vol 52040, pp V04BT06A036

  28. Mansour M, Tsongas K, Tzetzis D (2019) Measurement of the mechanical and dynamic properties of 3d printed polylactic acid reinforced with graphene. Polymer-Plast Technol Mater 58(11):1234–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Baqasah H, He F, Zai B A, Asif M, Khan K A, Thakur V K, Khan M A (2019) In-situ dynamic response measurement for damage quantification of 3d printed abs cantilever beam under thermomechanical load. Polymers 11(12):2079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Markforged (2019) Material datasheet composites. Rev 3:2

    Google Scholar 

  31. Balachandran B, Magrab EB (2008) Vibrations. Cengage Learning

  32. Thomson WTT (1993) Theory of vibration with applications. Prentice hall

  33. Young WC, Budynas RG, Sadegh AM et al (2002) Roark’s formulas for stress and strain, vol 7. McGraw-Hill, New York

  34. ASTM Standard (2000) D3039 standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. D3039 Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials

Download references

Funding

This material is based upon research supported by the Office of Naval Research Young Investigator Award Number N00014-19-1-2413.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Author contribution

All authors contributed significantly to the work in the order provided.

Availability of data and material

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and available from the corresponding author.

Code availability

The code for data analysis in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, J., Perkins, E., Li, X. et al. Nonlinear vibratory properties of additive manufactured continuous carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 117, 1077–1089 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07456-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07456-x

Keywords

Navigation