Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A comparative study on performance of cermet and coated carbide inserts in straight turning AISI 316L austenitic stainless steel

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this comparative study, response surface methodology (RSM) was utilized to predict the surface roughness (Ra) and cutting force (Fz) when dry turning of AISI 316L austenitic stainless steel using cermet (GC1525) and coated carbide (GC1125) inserts. A constitutive relationship was attained correlating the prediction responses with three input parameters including cutting speed (Vc), feed (f), and depth of cut (ap). The models were developed using twenty-seven experiments carried out based on Taguchi L27 orthogonal array. The formulated models’ accuracy was checked based on the coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and root mean square error (RMSE). Furthermore, three optimization methods, namely simulated annealing (SA), genetic algorithm (GA), and desirability function, were used to determine a set of optimal cutting parameters leading to minimize Ra and Fz separately and simultaneously. The results revealed that RSM models provided precise assessments of Ra and Fz. Regarding to the inserts’ performance, it was obtained that the coated carbide insert produced better surface quality and minimum cutting force than the cermet insert. On the other hand, the cermet insert was found to have higher tool life than that of coated carbide insert with a ratio (tool lifeGC1525/tool lifeGC1125) of 1.25. Finally, according to optimization analysis, it was referred that the GA method was indicated better capability to achieve the optimum solutions that lead to the minimum Ra and Fz values separately and faster than the SA method. Proceeding from that, it was utilized in the multi-objective optimization in order to minimize Ra and Fz simultaneously and then compared with desirability function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Uysal A, Demiren F, Altan E (2016) Investigation of surface roughness and chips forms in milling of stainless steel by MQL Method. Acta Phys Pol A 129(4):439–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaladhar M, Subbaiah KV, Rao CHS (2012) Machining of austenitic stainless steels- a review. Int J Mach Mach Mater 12(1/2):178–192

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kaladhar M (2019) Evolution of hard coating materilas performance on machinability issues and material removal rate during turning operations. Mesurement 135(1):493–502

    Google Scholar 

  4. Seid Ahmed Y, Youssef H, El-Hofy H et al (2018) Prediction and optimization of drilling parameters in drilling of AISI 304 and AISI 2205 steels with PVD monolayer and multilayer coated drills. J Manuf Mater Process 2(1):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nomani I, Pramanik A, Hilditch T et al (2013) Machinability study of first generation duplex (2205), second generation duplex (2507) and austenite stainless steel during drilling process. Wear 304:20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Patel US, Rawal SK, Arif AFM, Veldhuis SC (2020) Influence of secondary carbides on microstructure, wear mechanism, and tool performance for different cermet grades during high-speed dry finish turning of AISI 304 stainless steel. Wear (452–453):203285

  7. Nouioua M, Yallese M, Khettabi R, Belhadi S, Bouhalais M, Girardin F (2017) Investigation of the performance of the MQL, dry and wet turning by response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(5–8):2485–2504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Laouissi A, Yallese M, Belbah A, Belhadi S, Haddad A (2019) Investigation, modeling, and optimization of cutting parameters in turning of gray iron using coated and uncoated silicon nitride ceramic tools. Based on ANN, RSM, and GA optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 101:523–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tebassi H, Yallese MA, Meddour I, Girardin F, Mabrouki T (2017) On the modeling of surface roughness and cutting force when turning of Incol 718 using artificial neural network and response surface methodology: accuracy and benefit. Period Polytech Mech Eng 61(1):1–11

  10. Gupta AK (2010) Predicive modelling of turning operations using response surface methodolgy, artificial neural networks and support vector regression. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48:763–778

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mia M, Khan MA, Dhar NR (2017) Study of surface roughness and cutting forces using ANN, RSM and ANOVA in turning of Ti-6Al-4V under cryogenic jets applied at flank and rake feces of coated WC tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93:975–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bouziane A, Boulanouar L, Azizi MW, Keblouti O, Belhadi S (2018) Analysis of cutting forces and roughness during hard turning of bearing steel. Struct Eng Mech 66(3):285–294

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kaladhar M, Subbaiah KV, Rao CHS (2012) Determination of optimum process parameters during turning of AISI 304 Austenitic stainless steels using Taguchi method and ANOVA. Int J Lean Thinking 1(3):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bouzid L, Boutabba S, Yallese M, Belhadi S, Girardin F (2014) Simultaneous optimization of surface roughness and material removal rate for turning of X20Cr13 stainless steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74(5–8):879–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sarikaya M, Yilmaz V (2018) Optimization and predictive modeling using S/N, RSM, RA and ANNs for micro-electrical discharge drilling of AISI 304 stainless steel. Neural Comput Applic 30:1503–1517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Selaimia A, Yallese MA, Bensouilah H, Meddour IK, Khattabi R, Mabrouki T (2017) Modeling and optimization in dry face milling of X2CrNi18-9 austenitic stainless steel using RMS and desirability approach. Measurement 107(1):53–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mia M, Bashir MA, Khan MA, Dhar NR (2017) Optimization of MQL flow rate for minimum cutting force and surface roughness in end milling of hardened steel (HRC40). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89:675–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zain AM, Haron H, Sharif S (2011) Genetic algorithm and simulated annealing to estimate optimal process parameters of the abrasive waterjet machining. Eng Comput 27:251–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mia M, Dhar NR (2018) Modeling of surface roughness using RSM, FL and SA in dry hard turning. Arab J Sci Eng 43:1125–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mia M, Dhar NR (2019) Prediction and optimization by using SVR, RSM and GA in hard turning of tempered AISI 1060 steel under effective cooling condition. Neural Comput Applic 31:2349–2370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bagaber SA, Yousof AR (2017) Multi objective optimization of cutting parameters to minimize power consumption in dry turning of stainless steel 316. J Clean Prod 157:30–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Berkani S, Yallese MA, Boulanouar L, Mabrouki T (2015) Statistcal analysis of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel machining using Ti(C,N)/ Al2O3/IiN CVD coated carbide tool. Int J Ind Eng Comput 6:539–522

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zerti A, Yallese MA, Meddour I, Belhadi S, Haddad A, Mabrouki T (2019) Modeling and multi-objective optimization for minimizing surface roughness, cutting force, and power, and maximizing productivity for tempered stainless steel AISI 420 in turning operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102:135–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sofuoğlu MA, Çakir FH, Kuşhan MC, Orak S (2019) Optimization of different non-traditional turning processes using soft computing methods. Soft Comput 23:5213–5231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Caggioano A (2018) Tool wear prediction in Ti-6Al-4V machining through multiple sensor monitoring and PCA features pattern recognition. Sensors (Switzerland) 18:823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Alain Hertz DK (2000) A framework for the description of evolutionary algorithms. Eur J Oper Res 126(1):1–12

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Bouacha K, Yallese MA, Khamel S, Belhadi S (2014) Analysis and optimization of hard turning operation using cubic boron nitride tool. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 45:160–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Patil RA, Shinde VD (2013) Performance of high pressure coolant on tool wear. Int Res Eng Technol 2:61–65

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang J, Wan W (2009) Application of desirability function based on neural network for optimizing biohydrogen production process. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:1253–1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Saidi R, Ben Fathallah B, Mabrouki T, Belhadi S, Yallese MA (2019) Modeling and optimization of the turning parameters of cobalt alloy (Stellite 6) based on RSM and desirability function. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100:2945–2968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu D, Jennings C, Terpenny J, Gao R, Kumara S (2017) A comparative study on machine learning algorithms for smart manufacturing: tool wear prediction using random forests. J Manuf Sci Eng 139(7):071018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zerti O, Yallese MA, Khettabi R, Chaoui K, Mabrouki T (2016) Design optimization for minimum technological parameters when dry turning of AISI D3 steel using Taguchi method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89:1915–1934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stephension DA, Agaipou JS (2016) Metal cutting theory and practice, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1201/b19559

  34. Mia M, Dhar NR (2016) Prediction of surface roughness in hard turning under high pressure coolant using artificial neural network. Measurment 92:464–474

    Google Scholar 

  35. Oliveria AJ, Diniz AE, Ursolino DJ (2009) Hard turning in continuous and interrupted cut with PCBN and whisker reinforced cutting tools. J Master Process Technol 209(12):5262–5270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Karim RMD, Dilwar F, Siddique RA (2018) Predicitve modeling of surface roughness in MQL assisted turning of SiC-Al alloy composites using artificial neural network and adaptive neuro fuzzy interface system. J Adv Res Manuf Mater Sci Met Eng 5(3):12–28

  37. Rajeswari B, Amirthagadeswaran KS (2018) Study of machinability and parametric optimization of end milling on aluminium hybrid composites using multi-objective genetic algorithm. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 40:377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Aouici H, Yallese MA, Findes B, Chaoui K, Mabrouki T (2011) Modeling and optimization of hard turning of X38CrMoV5-1 steel with CBN tool:machining parameters effects on flank wear and surface roughnes. J Mech Sci Technol 25(11):2843–2851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yallese MA, Boulanour L, Chaoui K (2004) Machining of hardened 100Cr steel using a cubic boron nitride tool. Mec Ind 5:355–368

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yallese MA, Chaoui K, Zeghib N, Boulanour L, Rigal JF (2009) Hard machining of hardened bearing steel using cubic boron nitride tool. J Mater Process Technol 209(2):1092–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bouchelaghem H, Yallese MA, Mabrouki T, Amirat A, Rigal JF (2010) Experimental investigation and performance analyses of CBN insert in hard turning of cold work tool steel (D3). Mach Sci Technol 14(14):471–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Nur R, My N, Izman S, Kurniawn D (2017) Machining parameters effect in dry turning of AISI 316L stainless steel using coated carbide tools. J Process Mech Eng 231(1):676–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Singh R, Dureja JS, Dogra M, Randdhawa JS (2019) Optimization of machining parameters under MQL turning of Ti-6Al-4V alloy with textured tool using multi-attribute decision-making methods. World J Eng 16(5):648–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Krolczyk GM, Maruda RW, Nieslony P, Wieczornwski M (2016) Surface morphology analysis of Dublex stainless steel (DSS) in clean production using the power spectral density. Wear (452–453): 203285

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present study has been carried out by the “Metal Cutting Research Group” of the Structure and Mechanics Laboratory-LMS of the May 1945 University at Guelma, Algeria, in cooperation with Structures Research Laboratory (LS), University of Blida1. The authors are thankful to the General Directorate of Scientific Research and Technological Development (DGRSDT), Algeria, for their help and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Structures Research Laboratory (LS), University of Blida1, 9000 Blida, Algeria

    Youssef Touggui & Mustapha Temmar

  2. Mechanics and Structures Research Laboratory (LMS), May 8th 1945 University of Guelma, 24000 Guelma, Algeria

    Youssef Touggui, Salim Belhadi & Mohamed Athmane Yallese

  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, 34349 Beşiktaş, Istanbul, Turkey

    Youssef Touggui & Alper Uysal

Authors
  1. Youssef Touggui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Salim Belhadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alper Uysal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mustapha Temmar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mohamed Athmane Yallese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Youssef Touggui and Salim Belhadi carried out the cutting experiments. Youssef Touggui performed analysis researches and wrote the paper, Mohamed Yallese designed cutting experiments, Alper Uysal reviewed and edited the paper, and Mustaphe Temmar discussed the results.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youssef Touggui.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Touggui, Y., Belhadi, S., Uysal, A. et al. A comparative study on performance of cermet and coated carbide inserts in straight turning AISI 316L austenitic stainless steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 112, 241–260 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06385-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06385-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation