Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Experimental study on additive/subtractive hybrid manufacturing of 6511 steel: process optimization and machining characteristics

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The additive/subtractive hybrid manufacturing (ASHM) method, which takes the advantages of both additive manufacturing (AM) and precision subtractive machining (SM), is a promising technique for the surface quality improvement of an AMed part. However, machining characteristics and the residual stress evolution during the ASHM process have not been investigated in detail for the materials with phase transformation. In this study, an experimental study is conducted on manufacturing of a 6511 martensitic stainless steel with the ASHM method that combines selective laser melting (SLM) and end milling. The process window of SLM is determined in terms of the relative density. Milling forces, surface roughness, and residual stress of the ASHM samples with different cutting parameters are studied. The phase transformation of the martensitic steel is considered in the analysis of the residual stress. It is found that the surface residual stress state and distribution can be controlled by the milling parameters. This study provides guidance for the optimization of the process parameters for ASHM to manufacture martensitic stainless steel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Flynn JM, Shokrani A, Newman ST, Dhokia V (2016) Hybrid additive and subtractive machine tools–research and industrial developments. Int J Mach Tool Manu 101:79–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li L, Haghighi A, Yang Y (2018) A novel 6-axis hybrid additive-subtractive manufacturing process: design and case studies. J Manuf Process 33:150–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Du W, Bai Q, Zhang B (2016) A novel method for additive/subtractive hybrid manufacturing of metallic parts. Procedia Manuf 5:1018–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bikas H, Stavropoulos P, Chryssolouris G (2016) Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: a critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83:389–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu B, Pan Z, Ding D, Cuiuri D, Li H, Xu J, Norrish J (2018) A review of the wire arc additive manufacturing of metals: properties, defects and quality improvement. J Manuf Process 35:127–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. DebRoy T, Wei HL, Zuback JS, Mukherjee T, Elmer JW, Milewski JO, Beese AM, Wilson-Heid A, De A, Zhang W (2018) Additive manufacturing of metallic components – process, structure and properties. Prog Mater Sci 92:112–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. AlMangour B, Yang JM (2016) Improving the surface quality and mechanical properties by shot-peening of 17-4 stainless steel fabricated by additive manufacturing. Mater Des 110:914–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. AlMangour B, Yang JM (2017) Integration of heat treatment with shot peening of 17-4 stainless steel fabricated by direct metal laser sintering. JOM 69:2309–2313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Merklein M, Junker D, Schaub A, Neubauer F (2016) Hybrid additive manufacturing technologies – an analysis regarding potentials and applications. Phys Procedia 83:549–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li F, Chen S, Shi J, Tian H, Zhao Y (2017) Evaluation and optimization of a hybrid manufacturing process combining wire arc additive manufacturing with milling for the fabrication of stiffened panels. Appl Sci 7:1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ye Z, Zhang Z, Jin X, Xiao M, Su J (2017) Study of hybrid additive manufacturing based on pulse laser wire depositing and milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88:2237–2248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamazaki T (2016) Development of a hybrid multi-tasking machine tool: integration of additive manufacturing technology with CNC machining. Procedia CIRP 42:81–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Karunakaran KP, Suryakumar S, Pushpa V, Akula S (2010) Low cost integration of additive and subtractive processes for hybrid layered manufacturing. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 26:490–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Newman ST, Zhu Z, Dhokia V, Shokrani A (2015) Process planning for additive and subtractive manufacturing technologies. CIRP Ann 64:467–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen L, Xu K, Tang K (2018) Optimized sequence planning for multi-axis hybrid machining of complex geometries. Comput Graph 70:176–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aboutaleb AM, Mahtabi MJ, Tschopp MA, Bian L (2019) Multi-objective accelerated process optimization of mechanical properties in laser-based additive manufacturing: case study on selective laser melting (SLM) Ti-6Al-4V. J Manuf Process 38:432–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Read N, Wang W, Essa K, Attallah MM (2015) Selective laser melting of AlSi10Mg alloy: process optimisation and mechanical properties development. Mater. Design 65:417–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cherry JA, Davies HM, Mehmood S, Lavery NP, Brown SGR, Sienz J (2015) Investigation into the effect of process parameters on microstructural and physical properties of 316L stainless steel parts by selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76:869–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Öktem H (2009) An integrated study of surface roughness for modelling and optimization of cutting parameters during end milling operation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43:852–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mercelis P, Kruth JP (2006) Residual stresses in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting. Rapid Prototyp J 12:254–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Parry L, Ashcroft IA, Wildman RD (2016) Understanding the effect of laser scan strategy on residual stress in selective laser melting through thermo-mechanical simulation. Addit Manuf 12:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  22. Martina F, Roy MJ, Szost BA, Terzi S, Colegrove PA, Williams SW, Withers PJ, Meyer J, Hofmann M (2016) Residual stress of as-deposited and rolled wire+arc additive manufacturing Ti-6Al-4V components. Mater Sci Technol 32:1439–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zaeh MF, Branner G (2010) Investigations on residual stresses and deformations in selective laser melting. Prod Eng 4:35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Song J, Zhang L, Wu W, He B, Ni X, Xu J, Zhu G, Yang Q, Wang T, Lu L (2019) Understanding processing parameters affecting residual stress in selective laser melting of Inconel 718 through numerical modeling. J Mater Res 34:1395–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tan P, Shen F, Li B, Zhou K (2019) A thermo-metallurgical-mechanical model for selective laser melting of Ti6Al4V. Mater Des 168:107642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Deng D (2009) FEM prediction of welding residual stress and distortion in carbon steel considering phase transformation effects. Mater Des 30:359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tsuchiyama T, Tobata J, Tao T, Nakada N, Takaki S (2012) Quenching and partitioning treatment of a low-carbon martensitic stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 532:585–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mugwagwa L, Dimitrov D, Matope S, Yadroitsev I (2019) Evaluation of the impact of scanning strategies on residual stresses in selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102:2441–2450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fan R, Gao M, Ma Y, Zha X, Hao X, Liu K (2012) Effects of heat treatment and nitrogen on microstructure and mechanical properties of 1Cr12NiMo martensitic stainless steel. J Mater Sci Technol 28:1059–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang DW, Zhou YH, Shen J, Liu Y, Li DF, Zhou Q, Sha G, Xu P, Ebel T, Yan M (2019) Selective laser melting under the reactive atmosphere: a convenient and efficient approach to fabricate ultrahigh strength commercially pure titanium without sacrificing ductility. Mater Sci Eng A 762:138078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kasperovich G, Haubrich J, Gussone J, Requena G (2016) Correlation between porosity and processing parameters in TiAl6V4 produced by selective laser melting. Mater Des 105:160–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Khairallah SA, Anderson AT, Rubenchik A, King WE (2016) Laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing: physics of complex melt flow and formation mechanisms of pores, spatter, and denudation zones. Acta Mater 108:36–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bhaduri D, Penchev P, Essa K, Dimov S, Carter NL, Pruncu IC, Pullini D (2019) Evaluation of surface/interface quality, microstructure and mechanical properties of hybrid additive-subtractive aluminium parts. CIRP Ann 68:237–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhou X, Li K, Zhang D, Liu X, Ma J, Liu W, Shen Z (2015) Textures formed in a CoCrMo alloy by selective laser melting. J Alloys Compd 631:153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kajima Y, Takaichi A, Kittikundecha N, Nakamoto T, Kimura T, Nomura N, Kawasaki A, Hanawa T, Takahashi H, Wakabayashi N (2018) Effect of heat-treatment temperature on microstructures and mechanical properties of Co–Cr–Mo alloys fabricated by selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng A 726:21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bordin A, Ghiotti A, Bruschi S, Facchini L, Bucciotti F (2014) Machinability characteristics of wrought and EBM CoCrMo alloys. Procedia CIRP 14:89–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sutherland JW, Babin TS (1988) The geometry of surfaces generated by the bottom of an end mill. Trans NAMRC 16:202–208

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tönshoff HK, Arendt C, Amor RB (2000) Cutting of hardened steel. CIRP Ann 49:547–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Fang JX, Dong SY, Wang YJ, Xu BS, Zhang ZH, Xia D, He P (2015) The effects of solid-state phase transformation upon stress evolution in laser metal powder deposition. Mater Des 87:807–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Science Challenge Project (JCKY2016212A506-0101), National Nature Science Foundation of China (51605077), and the Shenzhen International Collaborative Research (GJHZ20180411143506667).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qian Bai.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bai, Q., Wu, B., Qiu, X. et al. Experimental study on additive/subtractive hybrid manufacturing of 6511 steel: process optimization and machining characteristics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108, 1389–1398 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05514-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05514-4

Keywords

Navigation