Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vibration recognition for peripheral milling thin-walled workpieces using sample entropy and energy entropy

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the poor rigidity of thin-walled parts, vibration (chatter) is extremely easy to occur during the cutting process, affecting the precision, surface quality, and efficiency of part processing. The chatter in milling thin-walled workpieces becomes a more complex, nonlinear, and unstable signal as the dynamics of thin-walled workpieces change with time and position. To realize chatter detection, a method using ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) and nonlinear dimensionless indicators is proposed in this paper. Firstly, the EEMD is adopted to decompose the raw signal because it is suited for nonlinear and nonstationary signal. Subsequently, the correlation analysis is used to obtain chatter-related intrinsic mode function (IMF) components. When chatter occurs in the milling, time series complexity is changed and energy is transferred to the chatter bands. Therefore, the nonlinear sample entropy (SE) and energy entropy (EE) of IMFs can be extracted as two indicators. Then, principal component analysis (PCA) is adopted to further reduce the feature vector dimension. After that, an improved support vector machine (SVM) is developed to identify the chatter. Among them, genetic algorithm (GA) and grid explore (GE) are used to explore the best parameters of the SVM. In addition, off-line chatter prediction is employed to determine the cutting status under different machining parameters used in the experiments. At last, the cutting force signals are performed to verify the proposed method. The results show the proposed method using SE and EE can effectively detect the chatter, which provides an option for chatter detection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SE:

Sample entropy

EE:

Energy entropy

EMD:

Empirical mode decomposition

EEMD:

Ensemble empirical mode decomposition

IMF:

Intrinsic mode function

PCA:

Principal component analysis

GA:

Genetic algorithm

GE:

Grid explore

SVM:

Support vector machine

IM:

Intelligent manufacturing

AI:

Artificial intelligence

ANN:

Artificial neural network

SLD:

Stability lobe diagram

KF:

Kernel function

RBKF:

Radial basis KF

R i :

Energy of IMFs

E i :

EE of IMFs

λ1, λ2 :

The SE, EE, of n IMFs

γ :

The threshold for selecting the related IMFs

ρ i :

The eigenvalues of principal components

x(t):

The original signal

ni(t):

The ith white noise

xi(t):

The new signal with noise

xi, xj :

The samples or vectors

σ :

The width of KF

c :

Penalty factor

g :

Core parameter

ri(t):

The residual at the ith trial

x0, x1, x2 :

Sinusoidal signals, sinusoidal low frequency, discontinuity high frequency

x, y :

Two directions of machine tool

Kt, Kr :

Tangential cutting force coefficient, radial cutting force coefficient

x(1), x(2), ⋯, x(N) :

A N point time series

Xm(i):

A m dimension vector

d[Xm(i), Xm(j)]:

The distance between Xm(i) and Xm(j)

r :

Tolerance

A i :

The number of d[Xm(i), Xm(j)] ≤ r

\( {B}_i^m(r),{B}^m(r) \) :

The ratio of Ai to N − m + 1, the average of \( {B}_i^m(r) \)

SampEn(m, r):

The theoretical SE of the time series

SampEn(m, r, N):

The estimated value of the SE

u1(t), u2(t), ⋯un(t):

The frequency bands (IMFs)

T i :

The percentage that energy of IMF counts for the whole signal’s energy R

μ i :

Correlation coefficients

v i :

The contribution rate of the ith principal component

Q :

The contribution rate of the previous kth principal components

m :

The number of ensample

c ij :

The jth IMF at the ith trial (EMD)

c j :

The jth IMF by EEMD

I :

The number of IMFs of each trial

References

  1. Altintas Y, Ber A (2001) Manufacturing automation: metal cutting mechanics, machine tool vibrations, and CNC design. Appl Mech Rev 54(5):B84–B84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Graham E, Mehrpouya M, Park S (2013) Robust prediction of chatter stability in milling based on the analytical chatter stability. J Manuf Process 15(4):508–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Siddhpura M, Paurobally R (2012) A review of chatter vibration research in turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 61(1):27–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang C, Li B, Chen B, Cao H, Zi Y, He Z (2015) Weak fault signature extraction of rotating machinery using flexible analytic wavelet transform. Mech Syst Signal Process 64(1):162–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gonzalez-Brambila O, Rubio E, Jáuregui JC, Herrera-Ruiz G (2006) Chattering detection in cylindrical grinding processes using the wavelet transform. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(15):1934–1938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang C, Zhang X, Liu Y, Cao H, Chen X (2018) Stiffness variation method for milling chatter suppression via piezoelectric stack actuators. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 124(1):53–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ding L, Sun Y, Xiong Z (2020) Adaptive removal of time-varying harmonics for chatter detection in thin-walled turning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106(1-2):519–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu C, Zhu L, Ni C (2017) The chatter identification in end milling based on combining EMD and WPD. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(9-12):3339–3348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dong X, Zhang W (2017) Chatter identification in milling of the thin-walled part based on complexity index. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(9-12):3327–3337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lamraoui M, Thomas M, El Badaoui M (2014) Cyclostationarity approach for monitoring chatter and tool wear in high speed milling. Mech Syst Signal Process 44(1-2):177–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang Y, Bo Q, Liu H, Hu L, Zhang H (2018) Mirror milling chatter identification using Q-factor and SVM. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(5-8):1163–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khasawneh FA, Munch E (2016) Chatter detection in turning using persistent homology. Mech Syst Signal Process 70(1):527–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hynynen KM, Ratava J, Lindh T, Rikkonen M, Ryynänen V, Lohtander M, Varis J (2014) Chatter detection in turning processes using coherence of acceleration and audio signals. J Manuf Sci Eng 136(4):5–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Thaler T, Potočnik P, Bric I, Govekar E (2014) Chatter detection in band sawing based on discriminant analysis of sound features. Appl Acoust 77(1):114–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Aslan D, Altintas Y (2018) On-line chatter detection in milling using drive motor current commands extracted from CNC. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 132(1):64–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Luo M, Luo H, Axinte D, Liu D, Mei J, Liao Z (2018) A wireless instrumented milling cutter system with embedded PVDF sensors. Mech Syst Signal Process 110(1):556–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Axinte DA, Gindy N, Fox K, Unanue I (2004) Process monitoring to assist the workpiece surface quality in machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(10):1091–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Quintana G, Ciurana J (2011) Chatter in machining processes: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(5):363–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ji Y, Wang X, Liu Z, Yan Z, Jiao L, Wang D, Wang J (2017) EEMD-based online milling chatter detection by fractal dimension and power spectral entropy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(1-4):1185–1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen Y, Li H, Hou L, Wang J, Bu X (2018) An intelligent chatter detection method based on EEMD and feature selection with multi-channel vibration signals. Measurement 127(1):356–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cao H, Zhou K, Chen X (2015) Chatter identification in end milling process based on EEMD and nonlinear dimensionless indicators. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 92(1):52–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pérez-Canales D, Vela-Martínez L, Jáuregui-Correa JC, Alvarez-Ramirez J (2012) Analysis of the entropy randomness index for machining chatter detection. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 62(1):39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang K, Wang G, Dong Y, Zhang Q, Sang L (2019) Early chatter identification based on an optimized variational mode decomposition. Mech Syst Signal Process 115(1):238–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu C, Zhu L, Ni C (2018) Chatter detection in milling process based on VMD and energy entropy. Mech Syst Signal Process 105(1):169–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Caliskan H, Kilic ZM, Altintas Y (2018) On-line energy-based milling chatter detection. J Manuf Sci Eng 140(11):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu Y, Wu B, Ma J, Zhang D (2017) Chatter identification of the milling process considering dynamics of the thin-walled workpiece. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(5-8):1765–1773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lamraoui M, Barakat M, Thomas M, Badaoui ME (2015) Chatter detection in milling machines by neural network classification and feature selection. J Vib Control 21(7):1251–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yao Z, Mei D, Chen Z (2010) On-line chatter detection and identification based on wavelet and support vector machine. J Mater Process Technol 210(5):713–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Peng C, Wang L, Liao TW (2015) A new method for the prediction of chatter stability lobes based on dynamic cutting force simulation model and support vector machine. J Sound Vib 354(1):118–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Abdoos AA, Mianaei PK, Ghadikolaei MR (2016) Combined VMD-SVM based feature selection method for classification of power quality events. Appl Soft Comput 38(1):637–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tuysuz O, Altintas Y (2017) Frequency domain updating of thin-walled workpiece dynamics using reduced order substructuring method in machining. J Manuf Sci Eng 139(7):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ye J, Feng P, Xu C, Ma Y, Huang S (2018) A novel approach for chatter online monitoring using coefficient of variation in machining process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(1-4):287–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gao J, Song Q, Liu Z (2018) Chatter detection and stability region acquisition in thin-walled workpiece milling based on CMWT. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(1-4):699–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu Z, Huang NE (2009) Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: a noise-assisted data analysis method. Adv Ada Data Analy 1(01):1–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yan B, Zhu L (2019) Research on milling stability of thin-walled parts based on improved multi-frequency solution. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102(1-4):431–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pincus SM (1991) Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 88(6):2297–2301

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Richman JS, Moorman JR (2000) Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. Int J Phy CirPhy 278(6):H2039–H2049

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51475087) and Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities (N170306005 and N180305032).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lida Zhu.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, L., Liu, C., Ju, C. et al. Vibration recognition for peripheral milling thin-walled workpieces using sample entropy and energy entropy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108, 3251–3266 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05476-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05476-7

Keywords

Navigation