Abstract
In this paper, issues concerning discharge concentration problem in the electrostatic field-induced electrolyte jet (E-Jet) electrical discharge machining (EDM) are discussed, and an improved electrostatic induced workpiece and assisted tool electrode-based electrostatic field-induced E-Jet EDM is proposed. In the comparative trials, the discharge phenomena and the machined caves and linear grooves with these two kinds of E-Jet EDM are observed and compared. The experimental results demonstrate that the new proposed method can improve the concentration of the plasma and enhance the continuous machining ability of E-Jet EDM.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zhang Y, Wilt K, Kang X et al (2016) The experimental investigation of electrostatic field-induced electrolyte jet (E-Jet) micro-electrical machining mechanism [J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1-10
Kunieda M, Hayasaka A, Yang XD et al (2007) Study on nano EDM using capacity coupled pulse generator [J]. CIRP Annals-manufacturing Technology 56(1):213–216
Li CJ, Li Y, Tong H et al (2016) An EDM pulse power generator and its feasible experiments for drilling film cooling holes [J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1-9
Paulo DJ, Jackson MJ (2009) Nano and micromachining [M], John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, USA
Zhang Y, Han N, Kang X et al (2016) An experimental study on the effect of parameters on the depth of crater machined by electrostatic field-induced electrolyte jet micro electrical discharge machining [J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering 8(4):1–7
Zhang Y, Han N, Kang X et al (2016) The tool electrode investigation of electrostatic field-induced electrolyte jet (E-jet) electrical discharge machining [J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82(5–8):1455–1461
Govindan P, Gupta A, Joshi SS et al (2013) Single-spark analysis of removal phenomenon in magnetic field assisted dry EDM [J]. J Mater Process Technol 213(7):1048–1058
Joshi S, Govindan P, Malshe A et al (2011) Experimental characterization of dry EDM performed in a pulsating magnetic field [J]. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(1):239–242
Kunieda M, Lauwers B, Rajurkar KP et al (2005) Advancing EDM through fundamental insight into the process [J]. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 54(2):64–87
Marginean I, Nemes P, Parvin L et al (2006) How much charge is there on a pulsating Taylor cone [J]. Appl Phys Lett 89(6):0641040–0641043
Sugimoto T, Asano K, Higashiyama Y (2001) Negative corona discharge at a tip of water cone deformed under dc field [J]. J Electrost 53(1):25–38
Benyoucef D, Yousfi M (2015) Improved fictitious charge method for calculations of electric potential and field generated by point-to-plane electrodes [J]. J Electrost 76:24–30
Mei J, Li L, Wilks S. (2012) Impact on the electrostatic field of electrostatic force microscope due to tip-sample distance and non-flat sample surface [C]//IECON 2012-38th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. 3966–3969.
Talaat M (2014) Electrostatic field calculation in air gaps with a transverse layer of dielectric barrier [J]. J Electrost 72(5):422–427
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Y., Kang, X. & Zhao, W. The contrastive experimental investigation of the discharge concentration problem in the E-Jet EDM. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91, 2359–2367 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9909-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9909-1