Skip to main content
Log in

Thermal analysis during turning of AZ31 magnesium alloy under dry and cryogenic conditions

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the effect of both cryogenic and dry machining of AZ31 magnesium alloy on temperature and surface roughness was examined. Cryogenic machining experiments were conducted by applying liquid nitrogen at the cutting zone. The cutting parameters (cutting speed, depth of cut, and feed rate) were varied, and their effect on the results was identified. It was found that the cryogenic machining was able to reduce the maximum temperature at the machined surface to about 60% as compared with dry machining. A finite element model was developed to predict the temperature distribution at the machined surface. The simulated results showed good agreement with the experimental data. After analyzing the temperature distribution, the model also suggested that the cryogenic-assisted machining removes heat at a faster rate as to that of the dry machining. An arithmetic model using the response surface method was also developed to predict the maximum temperature at the surface during cryogenic and dry machining. The analysis pointed out that the maximum temperature was greatly affected by the cutting speed followed by feed rate and depth of cut. Cryogenic machining leads to better surface finish with up to 56% reduction in surface roughness compared with dry machining.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Majumdar P, Jayaramachandran R, Ganesan S (2005) Finite element analysis of temperature rise in metal cutting processes. Appl Therm Eng 25(14–15):2152–2168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brito RF, Carvalho SR, Lima SMM, Silva E (2015) Experimental investigation of thermal aspects in a cutting tool using comsol and inverse problem. Appl Therm Eng 86:60–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fang FZ, Lee LC, Liu XD (2005) Mean flank temperature measurement in high speed dry cutting of magnesium alloy. J Mater Process Technol 167:1119–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hornberger H, Virtanen S, Boccaccini R (2012) Biomedical coatings on magnesium alloys - a review. Acta Biomater 8(7):2442–2455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang J, Tang J, Zhang P, Li Y, Wang J, Lai Y, Qin L (2012) Surface modification of magnesium alloys developed for bioabsorbable orthopedic implants: a general review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 100:1691–1701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lietaert K, Weber L, Van Humbeeck J, Mortensen A, Luyten J, Schrooten J (2013) Open cellular magnesium alloys for biodegradable orthopaedic implants. J Magnes Alloy 1(4):303–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carou D, Rubio EM, Davim JP (2015) Analysis of ignition risk in intermittent turning of UNS M11917 magnesium alloy at low cutting speeds based on the chip morphology. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 229(2):365–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Weinert K, Inasaki I, Sutherland JW, Wakabayashi T (2004) Dry machining and minimum quantity lubrication. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol 53(2):511–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Newman ST (2012) Environmentally conscious machining of difficult-to-machine materials with regard to cutting fluids. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 57:83–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Polmear IJ (1994) Magnesium alloys and applications. Mater Sci Technol 10(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yildiz Y, Nalbant M (2008) A review of cryogenic cooling in machining processes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(9):947–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaynak Y, Karaca HE, Noebe RD, Jawahir IS (2013) Analysis of tool-wear and cutting force components in dry, preheated, and cryogenic machining of NiTi shape memory alloys. Procedia CIRP 8:498–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaynak Y (2014) Evaluation of machining performance in cryogenic machining of Inconel 718 and comparison with dry and MQL machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 72(5–8):919–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee I, Bajpai V, Moon S (2015) Tool life improvement in cryogenic cooled milling of the preheated Ti – 6Al – 4 V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79(1):665–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhuang K, Zhang X, Zhu D, Ding H (2015) Employing preheating- and cooling-assisted technologies in machining of Inconel 718 with ceramic cutting tools : towards reducing tool wear and improving surface integrity. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(9):1815–1822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jawahir IS, Attia H, Biermann D, Duflou J, Klocke F, Meyer D, Newman ST, Pusavec F, Putz M, Rech J, Schulze V, Umbrello D (2016) Cryogenic manufacturing processes. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol 65(2):713–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang ZY, Rajurkar KP (1997) Wear of CBN tool in turning of silicon nitride with cryogenic cooling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 37(3):319–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hong SY, Ding Y (2001) Micro-temperature manipulation in cryogenic machining of low carbon steel. J Mater Process Technol 116(1):22–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hong SY, Ding Y (2001) Cooling approaches and cutting temperatures in cryogenic machining of Ti-6Al-4 V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41(10):1417–1437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dhar NR, Paul S, Chattopadhyay AB (2002) The influence of cryogenic cooling on tool wear, dimensional accuracy and surface finish in turning AISI 1040 and E4340C steels. Wear 249:932–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dhar NR, Kamruzzaman M (2007) Cutting temperature, tool wear, surface roughness and dimensional deviation in turning AISI-4037 steel under cryogenic condition. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(5):754–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bermingham MJ, Kirsch J, Sun S, Palanisamy S, Dargusch MS (2011) New observations on tool life, cutting forces and chip morphology in cryogenic machining Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(6):500–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jerold BD, Kumar MP (2012) Experimental comparison of carbon-dioxide and liquid nitrogen cryogenic coolants in turning of AISI 1045 steel. Cryogenics 52(10):569–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kurihara K, Tozawa T, Kato H (1981) Cutting temperature of magnesium alloy at extreme high speeds. J J I L M31(4):255–260

    Google Scholar 

  25. Carou D, Rubio EM, Lauro CH, Davim JP (2014) Experimental investigation on finish intermittent turning of UNS M11917 magnesium alloy under dry machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75(9–12):1417–1429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rubio EM, Valencia JL, Saa AJ, Carou D (2013) Experimental study of the dry facing of magnesium pieces based on the surface roughness. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 14(6):995–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dinesh S, Senthilkumar V, Asokan P, Arulkirubakaran D (2015) Effect of cryogenic cooling on machinability and surface quality of bio-degradable ZK60 Mg alloy. Mater Des 87:1030–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pu Z, Outeiro JC, Batista AC, Dillon OW, Puleo DA, Jawahir IS (2012) Enhanced surface integrity of AZ31B Mg alloy by cryogenic machining towards improved functional performance of machined components. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 56:17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sun Y, Huang B, Puleo DA, Jawahir IS (2015) Enhanced machinability of Ti-5553 alloy from cryogenic machining: comparison with MQL and flood-cooled machining and modeling. Procedia CIRP 31:477–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ulacia I, Salisbury CP, Hurtado I, Worswick MJ (2011) Tensile characterization and constitutive modeling of AZ31B magnesium alloy sheet over wide range of strain rates and temperatures. J Mater Process Technol 211(5):830–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Carou D, Rubio EM, Lauro CH, Davim JP (2014) Experimental investigation on surface finish during intermittent turning of UNS M11917 magnesium alloy under dry and near dry machining conditions. Measurement 56:136–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ahn JW, Woo WS, Lee CM (2016) A study on the energy efficiency of specific cutting energy in laser-assisted machining. Appl Therm Eng 94:748–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee S, Ham HJ, Kwon SY, Kim SW, Suh CM (2013) Thermal conductivity of magnesium alloys in the temperature range from −125 °C to 400 °C. Int J Thermophys 34(12):2343–2350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nasr MNA, Outeiro JC (2015) Sensitivity analysis of cryogenic cooling on machining of magnesium alloy AZ31B-O. Procedia CIRP 31:264–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hong SY, Ding Y, Jeong W (2001) Friction and cutting forces in cryogenic machining of Ti-Al-4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41(15):2271–2285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pu Z, Song GL, Yang S, Outeiro JC, Dillon OW, Puleo DA, Jawahir IS (2012) Grain refined and basal textured surface produced by burnishing for improved corrosion performance of AZ31B Mg alloy. Corros Sci 57:192–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sarikaya M, Gullu A (2014) Taguchi design and response surface methodology based analysis of machining parameters in CNC turning under MQL. J Clean Prod 65:604–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Makadia AJ, Nanavati JI (2013) Optimisation of machining parameters for turning operations based on response surface methodology. Measurement 46(4):1521–1529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Aggarwal A, Singh H, Kumar P, Singh M (2008) Optimizing power consumption for CNC turned parts using response surface methodology and Taguchi’s technique—a comparative analysis. J Mater Process Technol 200(1–3):373–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kim DH, Lee CM (2014) A study of cutting force and preheating-temperature prediction for laser-assisted milling of Inconel 718 and AISI 1045 steel. Int J Heat Mass Transf 71:264–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diego Carou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Danish, M., Ginta, T.L., Habib, K. et al. Thermal analysis during turning of AZ31 magnesium alloy under dry and cryogenic conditions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91, 2855–2868 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9893-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9893-5

Keywords

Navigation