Skip to main content
Log in

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Research on tool change time and the dynamic reliability of the machining process based on sensitivity analysis

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article was retracted on 25 June 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Tool changing is on the basis of tool wear failure and breakage failure. Utilization rate of the tool is low, which cannot guarantee the reliability of the whole machining system. In machining process, as the number of parts produced increases, tool wear is constantly increasing, which will contribute to the reduction of the reliability of the cutting tool. That account for processing of substandard products. Combining the moment estimation with the maximum likelihood estimation with the dynamic reliability analysis method, the study builds a mathematical model of the dynamic reliability for machining process under the premise of regarding cutting parameters as random variables. The reliability of overall machining process is lower than a given target; the proposed model can identify the tool which has the biggest failure rate quickly and accurately. The failure rate formula of each tool involved in each operation is deduced as well. Based on failure rate, an algorithm for defining the critical tool and its corresponding tool change time is proposed. Beyond that, for maximizing the utilization of every tool, the given model can pick up the cutting parameter which has the largest sensitive degree to the reliability via sensitivity analysis method. Then, the selection of relevant stock removal should be changed so as to improve the reliability of cutting tool and the whole process system, as well as enabling the cutter continue to work and delaying tool change time finally. Ultimately, the manufacturing process can maximize the cutters’ potential and thus reduce the number of tool changes, as well as the production costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Ramalingam S, Watson JD (1977) Tool-life distributions—part 1: single-injury tool life model. J Eng Ind Trans ASME 99(3):519–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang KS, Lin WS, Hsu FS (2001) A new approach for determining the reliability of a cutting tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17:705–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Akturk MS, Ghosh JB, Gunes ED (2004) Scheduling with tool changes to minimize total completion time: basic results and SPT performance. Eur J Oper Res 157(3):784–790

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Akturk MS, Ghosh JB, Kayan RK (2007) Scheduling with tool changes to minimize total completion time under controllable machining conditions. Comput Oper Res 34(7):2130–2146

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Oral A, Cakir MC (2004) Automated cutting tool selection and cutting tool sequence optimization for rotational parts. Robot Com-Int Manuf 20(2):127–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carmen ER, Gilberto FM (2010) Reliability concepts applied to cutting tool change time. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95:866–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Astakhov VP (2004) The assessment of cutting tool wear. Int J Mach Tool Manu 44(6):637–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Salonitis K, Kolios A (2014) Reliability assessment of cutting tool life based on surrogate approximation methods. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71:1197–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen BJ, Chen XF, Li B, He ZJ, Cao HR, Cai GG (2011) Reliability estimation for cutting tools based on logistic regression model using vibration signals. Mech Syst Signal Pr 25(7):2526–2537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang SP, Wang ZM, Yang JG (2015) Tool reliability and life evaluation of machine tools. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 21(6):1579–1584

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ding F, He ZJ (2011) Cutting tool wear monitoring for reliability analysis using proportional hazards model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 57:565–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu HM, Makis V (1996) Cutting-tool reliability assessment in variable machining conditions. IEEE T Reliab 45(4):573–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. CG S, Zhang YM, Zhao QC (2011) Vibration reliability sensitivity analysis of general system with correlation failure modes. J Mech Sci Technol 25(12):3123–3133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang XG, Zhang YM, Wang BY (2014) Dynamic reliability sensitivity of cemented carbide cutting tool. Chin J Mech Eng-En 27(1):483–490

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li CY, Zhang YM, Wang YW (2012) Gradual reliability and its sensitivity analysis approach of cutting tool in invariant machining condition and periodical compensation. Chin J Mech Eng-En 48(12):162–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hua C, Zhang Q, Xu GH, Zhang YZ, Xu T (2013) Performance reliability estimation method based on adaptive failure threshold. Mech Syst Signal Pr 36(2):505–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baoyan Wang.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Wang, B., LV, C. et al. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Research on tool change time and the dynamic reliability of the machining process based on sensitivity analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89, 1535–1544 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9177-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9177-0

Keywords

Navigation