Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On some subtle misconceptions about process capability indices

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes some of the misconceptions about existing process capability indices (PCIs). Attention has been drawn to their drawbacks. It is shown that the indices have failed to guide the users in the right direction. This is perhaps due to the lack of consistency between the observed index value and the non-conformance levels. We give different examples to elucidate this point. It is also shown that the indices have failed to distinguish between on-target and off-target processes. Such a critical study of process capability analysis has to the best of our knowledge has not been attempted before. The basic argument of the paper is that capability indices are powerful tools, but can inflict heavy damage if used incorrectly. The paper will be welcomed by practitioners and users in the industry and management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kane VE (1986) Process capability indices. J Qual Technol 18:41–52

    Google Scholar 

  2. Juran JM, Gryna FM (eds) (1988) Juran’s quality control handbook, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tsui KL (1997) Interpretation of process capability indices and some alternatives. Qual Eng 9(4):587–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Spiring F, Leung B, Cheng SW, Yeung A (2003) A bibliography of process capability papers. Qual Reliab Eng Int 19:445–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yum BJ, Kim KW (2011) A bibliography of the literature on process capability indices: 2000–2009. Qual Reliab Eng Int 27:251–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ganji ZA and Gildeh BS (2015) A modified multivariate process capability vector. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1–9. First online: 08 August 2015

  7. Cao Y, Wu Z, Liu T, Gao Z and Yang J (2015) Multivariate process capability evaluation of cloud manufacturing resource based on intuitionistic fuzzy set. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1–11. First online: 15 September 2015

  8. Dianda DF, Quaglino MB, Pagura JA (2015) Performance of multivariate process capability indices under normal and non-normal distributions. Qual Reliab Eng Int. doi:10.1002/qre.1939

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pan JN, Li CI, Shih WC (2015) New multivariate process capability indices for measuring the performance of multivariate processes subject to non-normal distributions. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 33(1):42–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pan JN, Huang WKC (2015) Developing new multivariate process capability indices for autocorrelated data. Qual Reliab Eng Int 31:431–444

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Dharmasena LS, Zeephongsekul P (2015) A new process capability index for multiple quality characteristics based on principal components. Int J Prod Res. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1091520

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kanichukattu JK, Luke JA (2013) Comparison between two process capability indices using generalized confidence intervals. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(9):2793–2798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ebadi M, Shahriari H (2013) A process capability index for simple linear profile. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64(5):857–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guevara R, Vargas JA (2015) Process capability analysis for non linear profiles using depth functions. Qual Reliab Eng Int 31:465–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Charkhi MRA, Aminnayeria M, Amiri A (2015) Process capability indices for logistic regression profile. Qual Reliab Eng Int. doi:10.1002/qre.1897

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gasparin S, Tosello G, Hansen HN, Islam A (2013) Quality control and process capability assessment for injection-moulded micro mechanical parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(9):1295–1303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khodaygan S, Movahhedy MR (2014) Functional process capability analysis in mechanical systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(5):899–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lupo T (2013) The new Nino capability index for dynamic process capability analysis. Qual Reliab Eng Int. doi:10.1002/qre.1589

    Google Scholar 

  19. Parchami A and Sadeghpour-Gildeh B (2016). Trends on process capability indices in fuzzy environment. In: Kahraman C and Yanık S (eds) Intelligent decision making in quality management. Springer International Publishing, p 127–140

  20. Dalah D, Hani DB (2016) On the actual and observed process capability indices: a signal-to-noise ratio model. Measurement 81:241–250, March 2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pina- Monarrez MR, Ortz-Yanez JF, Rodriguez-Borbon MI (2015) Non-normal capability indices for the Weibull and lognormal distributions. Qual Reliab Eng Int. doi:10.1002/qre.1832

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gunter BH (1989) The use and abuse of Cpk. Qual Prog 22(3):108–109

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Anis MZ (2015) Process capability indices: some subtle misconceptions. Presentation made at the 32nd Quality & Productivity Research Conference. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. June 10–12

  24. Anis MZ (2008) Basic process capability indices: an expository review. Int Stat Rev 76:347–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kotz S, Johnson NL (1993) Process capability indices. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Porter LJ, Oakland JS (1991) Process capability indices—an overview of theory and practice. Qual Reliab Eng Int 7:437–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chan LK, Cheng SW, Spiring FA (1988) A new measure of process capability: C pm . J Qual Technol 30:162–175

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pearn WL, Kotz S, Johnson NL (1992) Distributional and inferential properties of process capability indices. J Qual Technol 24:216–231

    Google Scholar 

  29. Herman JT (1989) Capability indices – enough for process industries. ASQC Qual Congr Trans 670–675

  30. Boyles RA (1991) The Taguchi capability index. J Qual Technol 23:17–26

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bothe DR (2002) Discussion. J Qual Technol 34:32–37

    Google Scholar 

  32. Melloy BJ, Chandra NJ (1992) Consequences of using the C pk index to estimate the proportion of non-conforming items. Int J Prod Res 30:2253–2263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Taguchi G (1986) Introduction to quality engineering. Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  34. Spiring FA (1991) The C pm index. Qual Prog 24:57–61

  35. Spiring FA (1991) Assessing process capability in the presence of systematic assignable cause. J Qual Technol 23(2):125–134

  36. Kotz S, Johnson NL (2002) Process capability indices—a review, 1992–2000 (with discussion). J Qual Technol 34:2–53

    Google Scholar 

  37. Perakis M, Xekalaki E (2015) Assessing the proportion of conformance of a process from a Bayesian perspective. Qual Reliab Eng Int 31:381–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sullivan LP (1984) Reducing variability: a new approach to quality. Qual Prog 17(7):15–21

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kaminsky FC, Dovich RA, Burke RJ (1998) Process capability indices: now and in future. Qual Eng 10(3):445–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Dovich RA (1992) It’s not safe yet, C pk is out there. Qual Manuf 3(1)

  41. Dovich RA (1991)Statistical terrorists. Qual Manuf 2(2)

  42. Burke RJ, Kaminsky FC, and Davis RD (1991) Responding to statistical terrorism in Quality Control. In: Proceedings of the 47th Annual Conference of the American Society for Quality Control, Rochester Section, March 12

  43. Montgomery DC (2009) Introduction to statistical quality control, 6th edn. John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Kotz S, Johnson NL (1999) Delicate relations among the basic process capability indices C p , C pk and C pm and their modifications. Commun Stat Simul Comput 28(3):849–866

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. (1993) Tooling and equipment supplier quality assurance (TESQA). Chrysler Corporation Procurement and Supply Office. Detroit

  46. Bothe DR (2001) Measuring process capability. Landmark Publishing, Cedarburg, WI

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hsiang TC and Taguchi G (1985) A tutorial on quality control and assurance. Annual Meeting on the American Statistical Association, Las Vegas, NV (unpublished presentation)

  48. Sullivan LP (1985) Letters. Qual Prog 18(4):7–8

    Google Scholar 

  49. Chatterjee M, Chakraborty AK (2015) A superstructure of process capability indices for circular specification region. Commun Stat Theory Methods 44:1158–1181

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SQC and OR Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, 203, B. T. Road, Calcutta, 700108, India

    M. Z. Anis & Md. Tahir

Authors
  1. M. Z. Anis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Md. Tahir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Z. Anis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anis, M.Z., Tahir, M. On some subtle misconceptions about process capability indices. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87, 3019–3029 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8622-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8622-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation