Skip to main content

What Capability Is Not

  • Conference paper
Perspectives in Business Informatics Research (BIR 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 194))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

There is no broad agreement of the nature of capability in management, planning, engineering, and enterprise architecture literature. Definitions of the concept of capability ranges from being equal to the concept of process to be loosely defined as a collection of resources. This paper presents intensional aspects that are argued to be non-essential for the general concept of capability. Thus, this paper explores the concept of capability with a focus on what capability is not. By making non-essential aspects and distinctions visible we aim to making the concept of capability easier to understand and integrate for practitioners and researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English Online

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ogden Basic English, http://ogden.basic-english.org/

  3. Dosi, G., Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G.: Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities, pp. 1–404 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sanchez, R.: A scientific critique of the resource-base view (RBV) in strategy theory, with competence-based remedies for the RBV’s conceptual deficiencies and logic problems. Elsevier (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Group, O.M., Inc: UnifiedProfile for DoDAF and MODAF (UPDM) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. McKeen, J.D., Smith, H.: IT Strategy, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. OASIS: Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture 1.0. OASIS (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Robeyns, I.: The Capability Approach: An Interdisciplinary Introduction, pp. 1–57 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. ISO, IEC, IEEE: ISO/IEC 42010 Systems and software engineering—Architecture description (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sutton, R.I., Staw, B.M.: Whattheory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 371–384 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baskerville, R.: What design science is not. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17, 441–443 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ulrich, W.: Defining the Business Capability - A CheatSheet, http://www.bainstitute.org/resources/articles/defining-business-capability-cheat-sheet

  13. Ginzburg, J.: How to resolve how to. In: Bengson, J., Moffet, M.A. (eds.) Knowing How: Essays on Knowledge, Mind, and Action, pp. 1–36. Oxford University Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Prahalad, C.K., Hamel, G.: The core competence of the corporation. Harward Business Review

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cardeal, N., António, N.: Valuable, rare, inimitable resources and organization (VRIO) resources or valuable, rare, inimitable resources (VRI) capabilities: What leads to competitive advantage? Afr. J. Bus. Manage. 6 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Information Technology (IT) Discipline Management Capability, http://www.if4it.com/

  17. Smith, B., Grenon, P.: Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/bfo

  18. Business Function, http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/business-function.html

  19. McCarthy, J.: A Logical AI Approach to Context (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nussbaum, M.C.: Women and Human Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bergholtz, M., Johannesson, P., Andersson, B.: Towards a model of services based on co-creation, abstraction and restriction. Presented at the 6th International Workshop on Value Modeling and Business Ontology (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Process, http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/process.html

  23. Harmon, P.: Capabiliites and Processes, http://www.bptrends.com/publicationfiles/advisor20110712.pdf

  24. Dutta, S., Zbaracki, M.J., Bergen, M.: Pricing process as a capability: a resource-basedperspective. Strat. Mgmt. J. 24, 615–630 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McCawley, P.F.: The Logic Model for Program Planning and Evaluation, pp. 1–5 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ontologies and terminologies: Continuum or dichotomy? 1–12 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sowa, J.F.: Language Games: A Foundation for Semantics and Ontology. Game Theory and Linguistic Meaning, edited by Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen, pp. 17–37. Elsevier (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tell, A.W. (2014). What Capability Is Not. In: Johansson, B., Andersson, B., Holmberg, N. (eds) Perspectives in Business Informatics Research. BIR 2014. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 194. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11370-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11370-8_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11369-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11370-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics