Skip to main content
Log in

Comprehensive error measurement and compensation method for equivalent cutting forces

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine the error compensation for cutting forces with a machine tool, this paper proposes a comprehensive error compensation method that determines an equivalent cutting force. The loading system that applies this equivalent cutting force was designed to load a constant force that imitates the actual cutting force of a machine tool. The equivalent cutting force, when applied to the working table of the machine tool, induces an error that can be directly measured by a laser interferometer. Moreover, a stable measurement environment suitable for laser interferometer is configured. A comprehensive error compensation model of a three-axis computer numerical control (CNC) machine tool was developed using multi-body systems theory and homogeneous transformation matrices. Solutions for the error compensation model and parametric equation were automatically found using MATLAB, based on this model. The effectiveness of this compensation method has been confirmed by machining experiments. The experimental results show that this comprehensive error compensation of the equivalent cutting force can greatly improve machining accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ramesh R, Mannan MA, Poo AN (2000) Error compensation in machine tools—a review Part I: geometric, cutting-force induced and fixture dependent errors. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40:1235–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rahman M, Heikkala J, Lappalainene K (2000) Modeling measurement and error compensation of multi-axis machine tools. Part I: theory. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40:1535–1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu H, Li B, Wang X, Tan G (2011) Characteristics of and measurement methods for geometric errors in CNC machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54:195–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tian W, Gao W, Zhang D, Huang T (2014) A general approach for error modeling of machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 79:17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhu S, Ding G, Qin S, Lei J (2012) Integrated geometric error modeling, identification and compensation of CNC machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 52:24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Srivastava AK, Veldhuis SC, Elbestawit MA (1995) Modelling geometric and thermal errors in a five-axis CNC machine tool. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 35(9):1321–1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahn KG, Cho DW (1999) Proposition for a volumetric error consideration backlash in machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 15:554–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin Y, Shen Y (2003) Modeling of five-axis machine tool metrology models using the matrix summation approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21:243–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Belforte G, Bona B, Canuto E, Donati F, Ferraris F, Gorini I (2003) Coordinate measuring machines and machine tools self-calibration and error correction. Ann CIRP 36(1):359–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zuo X, Li B, Yang J, Jiang X (2013) Integrated geometric error compensation of machining processes on CNC machine tool. 14th CIRP Conference on Modeling of Machining Operations 8:135–140

  11. Jung J-H, Choi J-P, Lee S-J (2006) Machining accuracy enhancement by compensating for volumetric errors of a machine tool and on-machine measurement. J Mater Process Technol 174:56–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Engin S, Altintas Y (2001) Mechanics and dynamics of general milling cutters, part 1. Helical end mill. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:2195–2212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Raksiri C, Parnichkun M (2004) Geometric and force errors compensation in a 3-axis CNC milling machine. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:1283–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ratchev S, Liu S, Huang W, Becher AA (2006) An advanced FEA based force induced error compensation strategy in milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:542–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang Y, Li X, Liang G, Shao X (2013) A new approach for predicting and collaborative evaluating the cutting force in face milling based on gene expression programming. J Netw Comput Appl 36:1540–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmitz TL, Ziegert JC, Canning JS, Zapata R (2008) Case study: a comparison of error sources in high-speed milling. Precis Eng 32:126–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ikua BW, Tanaka H, Obata F, Sakamoto S (2001) Prediction of cutting forces and machining error in ball end milling of curved surfaces I: theoretical analysis. Issue Ser Title: Precis Eng 25:266–273

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen Z (2008) Real-time compensation of cutting-force-induced error on CNC machine tools [D]. Shanghai Jiao Tong University (China)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huanlao Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, X., Liu, H., Li, H. et al. Comprehensive error measurement and compensation method for equivalent cutting forces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85, 149–156 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7789-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7789-4

Keywords

Navigation