Abstract
An aggregate production–distribution (P-D) planning generates an aggregate plan for regular time, overtime, outsourcing, hiring, and firing that takes into account distributing, inventory holding, backordering, and machine capacity for a definite planning horizon. A large number of P-D problems require decisions to be made in the presence of uncertainty. Previous research on this topic mainly utilized either stochastic programming or fuzzy programming to cope with the uncertainty. This may lead into huge challenges for supply chain managers that use non-robust P-D planning in uncertain environments. Moreover, there has been little discussion about robust optimization approach in aggregate P-D problems so far.Therefore, the aim of this paper is to develop robust optimization in P-D planning in order to minimize the total cost of a three-level supply chain including multiple production facilities, multiple distribution centers, and multiple customer zones with uncertain parameters in terms of a limited set of discrete future economic scenarios. These scenarios are associated with probabilities in an industrial case study. In addition, a trade-off between solution robustness and model robustness using specified weight is studied, and a sensitivity analysis for this trade-off is implemented. Finally, the applicability of the proposed methodology is demonstrated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aliev RA, Fazlollahi B, Guirimov BG, Aliev RR (2007) Fuzzy-genetic approach to aggregate production–distribution planning in supply chain management. Inf Sci 177(20):4241–4255
Calvete H, Galé C (2010) A multiobjective bilevel program for production-distribution planning in a supply chain. Multiple criteria decision making for sustainable energy and transportation systems, lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems volume 634, pp. 155–165, Springer-Verlag
Chen C-L, Lee W-C (2004) Multi-objective optimization of multi-echelon supply chain networks with uncertain product demands and prices. Comput Chem Eng 28(6–7):1131–1144
Chen C, Li YP, Huang GH, Li YF (2012) A robust optimization method for planning regional-scale electric power systems and managing carbon dioxide. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 40(1):70–84
Das K, Sengupta S (2009) A hierarchical process industry production–distribution planning model. Int J Prod Econ 117(2):402–419
Dhaenens-Flipo C, Finke G (2001) An integrated model for an industrial production–distribution problem. IIE Trans 33(9):705–715
Dornier P-P, Ernst R, Fender M, Konvelis P (1998) Global operations and logistics. Text and cases, John Wiley and Sons Inc
Fahimnia B, Farahani RZ, Marian R, Luong L (2013) A review and critique on integrated production–distribution planning models and techniques. J Manuf Syst 32(1):1–19
Jang Y-J, Jang S-Y, Chang B-M, Park J (2002) A combined model of network design and production/distribution planning for a supply network. Comput Ind Eng 43(1–2):263–281
Kazemi A, Fazel Zarandi MH, Moattar Husseini SM (2009) A multi-agent system to solve the production–distribution planning problem for a supply chain: a genetic algorithm approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44(1–2):180–193
Leung SCH, Tsang SOS, Ng WL, Wu Y (2007) A robust optimization model for multi-site production planning problem in an uncertain environment. Eur J Oper Res 181(1):224–238
Liang T-F (2008) Fuzzy multi-objective production/distribution planning decisions with multi-product and multi-time period in a supply chain. Comput Ind Eng 55(3):676–694
Lim SJ, Jeong SJ, Kim KS, Park MW (2006) A simulation approach for production-distribution planning with consideration given to replenishment policies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27(5–6):593–603
List GF, Wood B, Nozick LK, Turnquist MA, Jones DA, Kjeldgaard EA, Lawton CR (2003) Robust optimization for fleet planning under uncertainty. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev 39(3):209–227
Min H, Zhou G (2002) Supply chain modeling: past, present and future. Comput Ind Eng 43(1–2):231–249
Mirzapour Al-e-hashem SMJ, Malekly H, Aryanezhad MB (2011) A multi-objective robust optimization model for multi-product multi-site aggregate production planning in a supply chain under uncertainty. Int J Prod Econ 134(1):28–42
Mulvey JM, Vanderbei RJ, Zenios SA (1995) Robust optimization of large-scale systems. Oper Res 43(2):264–281
Phadke MS (1989) Quality engineering using robust design. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Clifffs
Pishvaee MS, Rabbani M, Torabi SA (2011) A robust optimization approach to closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. Appl Math Model 35(2):637–649
Rezvan AT, Gharneh NS, Gharehpetian GB (2012) Robust optimization of distributed generation investment in buildings. Energy 48(1):455–463
Sahinidis NV (2004) Optimization under uncertainty: state-of-the-art and opportunities. Comput Chem Eng 28(6–7):971–983
Selim H, Araz C, Ozkarahan I (2008) Collaborative production–distribution planning in supply chain: a fuzzy goal programming approach. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev 44(3):396–419
Simchi-Levi D, Kaminsky P, Simchi-Levi E (2003) Managing the supply chain: the definitive guide for the business professional: the definitive guide for the business professional. Mcgraw-hill
Varthanan PA, Murugan N, Kumar GM (2012) A simulation based heuristic discrete particle swarm algorithm for generating integrated production–distribution plan. Appl Soft Comput 12(9):3034–3050
Yimer AD, Demirli K (2010) A genetic approach to two-phase optimization of dynamic supply chain scheduling. Comput Ind Eng 58(3):411–422
Yu CS, Li HL (2000) A robust optimization model for stochastic logistic problems. Int J Prod Econ 64(1–3):385–397
Zang C, Friswell MI, Mottershead JE (2005) A review of robust optimal design and its application in dynamics. Comput Struct 83(4–5):315–326
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Niknamfar, A.H., Niaki, S.T.A. & Pasandideh, S.H.R. Robust optimization approach for an aggregate production–distribution planning in a three-level supply chain. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76, 623–634 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6292-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6292-7