Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Retrieval analysis of contemporary antioxidant polyethylene: multiple material and design changes may decrease implant performance

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

A Correction to this article was published on 31 August 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

With the introduction of the Attune Knee System (DePuy) in March 2013, a new polyethylene formulation incorporating anti-oxidants was used. Although several in vitro studies have demonstrated the positive effects of antioxidants on UHMWPE, no retrieval study has looked at polyethylene damage of this system yet. It was the aim of this study to investigate the in vivo performance of this new design, by comparing it with its predecessors in retrieval analysis.

Methods

24 PFC (18 fixed bearing and 6 rotating platform designs) and 17 Attune (8 fixed bearing and 9 rotating platform designs) implants were retrieved. For retrieval analysis, a macroscopic analysis of polyethylene components, using a peer-reviewed damage grading method was used. Medio-lateral polyethylene thickness difference was measured with a peer-reviewed micro-CT based method. The roughness of metal components was measured. All findings were compared between the two designs.

Results

Attune tibial inserts with fixed bearings showed significantly higher hood scores on the backside surface when compared with their PFC counterparts (p = 0.01), no other significant differences were found in the polyethylene damage of all the other surfaces analysed, in the surface roughness of metal components and in medio-lateral linear deformations.

Conclusion

A significant difference between PFC and Attune fixed bearing designs was found in terms of backside surface damage: multiple changes in material and design features could lead to a potential decrease of implant performance. Results from the present study may help to understand how the new Attune Knee System performs in vivo, impacting over 600,000 patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 31 August 2019

    Unfortunately, figure 1 caption was incorrectly updated in the original publication and correct Fig. 1 version is updated here.

References

  1. Affatato S, Bracco P, Costa L, Villa T, Quaglini V, Toni A (2012) In vitro wear performance of standard, crosslinked, and vitamin-E-blended UHMWPE. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 100 A:554–560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Berry DJ, Currier JH, Mayor MB, Collier JP (2012) Knee wear measured in retrievals: a polished tray reduces insert wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:1860–1868

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bracco P, Oral E (2011) Vitamin E-stabilized UHMWPE for total joint implants: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:2286–2293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cerquiglini A, Henckel J, Hothi HS, Dall’Ava L, Shearing P, Hirschmann MT, Hart AJ (2018) Computed tomography techniques help understand wear patterns in retrieved total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33:3030-3037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chakrabarty G, Vashishtha M, Leeder D (2015) Polyethylene in knee arthroplasty: a review. J Clin Orthop Trauma Elsevier Ltd 6:108–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen Y, Hallab NJ, Liao YS, Narayan V, Schwarz EM, Xie C (2016) Antioxidant impregnated ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear debris particles display increased bone remodeling and a superior osteogenic:osteolytic profile vs. conventional UHMWPE particles in a murine calvaria model. J Orthop Res 34:845–851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Currier BH, Currier JH, Holdcroft LA, Van Citters DW (2018) Effectiveness of anti-oxidant polyethylene: what early retrievals can tell us. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 106:353–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Currier BH, Currier JH, Mayor MB, Lyford KA, Van Citters DW, Collier JP (2007) In vivo oxidation of gamma-barrier-sterilized ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene bearings. J Arthroplasty 22:721–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Depuysynthes.com (2019) SIGMA® Total Knee System. DePuy Synthes Companies. https://www.depuysynthes.com/hcp/knee/products/qs/SIGMA-Total-Knee-System#tab1. Accessed 6 Feb 2019

  10. Dumbleton JH, D’Antonio JA, Manley MT, Capello WN, Wang A (2006) The basis for a second-generation highly cross-linked UHMWPE. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453:265–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grupp TM, Fritz B, Kutzner I, Schilling C, Bergmann G, Schwiesau J (2017) Vitamin E stabilised polyethylene for total knee arthroplasty evaluated under highly demanding activities wear simulation. Acta Biomater Acta Materialia Inc 48:415–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Haider H, Weisenburger JN, Kurtz SM, Rimnac CM, Freedman J, Schroeder DW, Garvin KL (2012) Does vitamin e-stabilized ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene address concerns of cross-linked polyethylene in total knee. Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 27:461–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hood RW, Wright TM, Burstein AH (1983) Retrieval analysis of total knee prostheses: a method and its application to 48 total condylar prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res 17:829–842

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jahan MS, King MC, Haggard WO, Sevo KL, Parr JE (2001) A study of long-lived free radicals in gamma-irradiated medical grade polyethylene. Radiat Phys Chem 62:141–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kashiwabara H, Shimada S, Hori Y (1991) Free radicals and crosslinking in irradiated polyethylene. Int J Radiat Appl Instrum Part 37:43–46

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Knowlton CB, Bhutani P, Wimmer MA (2017) Relationship of surface damage appearance and volumetric wear in retrieved TKR polyethylene liners. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 105:2053–2059

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kurtz SM, Dumbleton J, Siskey RS, Wang A, Manley M (2009) Trace concentrations of vitamin E protect radiation crosslinked UHMWPE from oxidative degradation. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 90:549–563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Chess DG, Charron KD (2009) Wear rate of highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 91:773–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McKellop H, Shen F, Lu B, Campbell P, Salovey R (1999) Development of an extremely wear-resistant ultra high molecular weight polythylene for total hip replacements. J Orthop Res 17:157–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Medel FJ, Peña P, Cegoñino J, Gomez-Barrena E, Puértolas JA (2007) Comparative fatigue behavior and toughness of remelted and annealed highly crosslinked polyethylenes. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 83:380–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Micheli BR, Wannomae KK, Lozynsky AJ, Christensen SD, Muratoglu OK (2012) Knee Simulator wear of vitamin e stabilized irradiated ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. J Arthroplasty 27:95–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. National Joint Registry (2017) 2017 14th annual report—national joint registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man, vol. 1821, pp 1–202

  23. Rao AR, Engh GA, Collier MB, Lounici S (2002) Tibial interface wear in retrieved total knee components and correlations with modular insert motion. J Bone Jt Surg Ser A 84:1849–1855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sakellariou VI, Sculco P, Poultsides L, Wright T, Sculco TP (2013) Highly cross-linked polyethylene may not have an advantage in total knee arthroplasty. HSS J 9:264–269

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Wright T, Goodman S (2000) What material properties and manufacturing procedures influence wear mechanisms? Implant Wear Total Jt Replace Clin Biol Issues Mater Des Considerations :186–192

  26. Wu JJ, Augustine A, Holland JP, Deehan DJ (2012) Oxidation and fusion defects synergistically accelerate polyethylene failure in knee replacement. Knee 19:124–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no direct funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arianna Cerquiglini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research and that institutional approval of the human protocol for this investigation was obtained.

Informed consent

Informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cerquiglini, A., Henckel, J., Hothi, H. et al. Retrieval analysis of contemporary antioxidant polyethylene: multiple material and design changes may decrease implant performance. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27, 2111–2119 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05387-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05387-5

Keywords

Navigation