Skip to main content
Log in

Importance analysis of different components in a multicomponent system under fuzzy inputs

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the structural system with multiple components under fuzzy inputs, the influence of each component on system failure needs to be considered, because it is of great significance to simplify the system model as well as improve the system’s performance. In this paper, the criticality fuzzy safety importance measure of the multicomponent system under fuzzy inputs is first defined to measure the contribution of each component to the system failure. The defined criticality fuzzy safety importance measure can be applied to fault diagnosis, i.e., when a system fails, the component with the largest importance is the most probable component causing failure, thus should be checked first. Then, a method combining the multivariate Gaussian process and fuzzy simulation is proposed to estimate the criticality fuzzy safety importance measure and rank the importance of components by taking the correlation of components into consideration. Finally, several examples are employed to analyze the component importance as well as to illustrate the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andsten RS, Vaurio JK (1992) Sensitivity, uncertainty and importance analysis of a risk assessment. Nucl Technol 98:160–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum ZW (1968) On the importance of different components in a multicomponent system. Washington Univ Seattle Lab of Statistical Research

  • Borgonovo E (2007) Differential, criticality and Birnbaum importance measures: an application to basic event, groups and SSCs in event trees and binary decision diagrams. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92:1458–1467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratley P, Fox BL (1988) Algorithm 659: implementing Sobol’s quasi random sequence generator. ACM Trans Math Softw 14(1):88–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheok MC, Parry GW, Sherry RR (1998) Use of importance measures in risk informed regulatory applications. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 60(3):213–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarich A, Marchi M, Rigoni E, Russo R (2013) Reliability-based design optimization applying polynomial chaos expansion: theory and Applications. In: 10th world congress on structural and multidisciplinary optimization, May 19–24, 2013, Orlando, FL

  • Duchateau L, Janssen P, Rowlands J (1998) Linear mixed models. An introduction with applications in veterinary research. ILRI (aka ILCA and ILRAD)

  • Dutuit Y, Rauzy A (2015) On the extension of importance measures to complex components. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 142:161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echard B, Gayton N, Lemaire M (2011) AK-MCS: an active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo simulation. Struct Saf 33:145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fauriat W, Gayton N (2014) AK-SYS: an adaptation of the AK-MCS method for system reliability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 123:137–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng KX, Lu ZZ (2019) Safety life analysis under required failure credibility constraint for unsteady thermal structure with fuzzy input parameters. Struct Multidisc Optim 59(1):43–59

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith WS, Govindarajulu Z (1985) Consecutive k-out-of-n failure systems: reliability, availability, component importance, and multi-state extensions. Am J Math Manag Sci 5:125–160

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • He LL, Lu ZZ, Li XY (2018) Failure-mode importance measures in structural system with multiple failure modes and its estimation using copula. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 174:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyland A, Rausand M (1994) System reliability theory. Wiley, Hoboken

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado JE (2004) An examination of methods for approximating implicit limit state functions from the viewpoint of statistical learning theory. Struct Saf 26(3):271–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang X, Lu ZZ, Wei N, Hu YS (2021) An efficient method for solving the system failure possibility of multi-mode structure by combining hierarchical fuzzy simulation with Kriging model. Struct Multidisc Optim 64(6):4025–4044

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijnen J, Mehdad E (2014) Multivariate versus univariate Kriging metamodels for multi-response simulation models. Eur J Oper Res 236(2):573–582

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo W, Zhu X (2012a) Importance measures in reliability, risk and optimization principles and applications. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo W, Zhu X (2012b) Some recent advances on importance measures in reliability. IEEE Trans Reliab 61(2):344–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo W, Zhu X (2012c) Relations and generalizations of importance measures in reliability. IEEE Trans Reliab 61(3):659–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling CY, Lu ZZ (2021a) Support vector machine-based importance sampling for rare event estimation. Struct Multidisc Optim 63(4):1609–1631

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ling CY, Lu ZZ (2021b) Compound kriging-based importance sampling for reliability analysis of systems with multiple failure modes. Eng Optim. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2021.1900837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling CY, Lu ZZ (2021c) Importance analysis on failure credibility of the fuzzy structure. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 40(6):12339–12359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling CY, Lu ZZ, Feng KX (2019) An efficient method combining adaptive Kriging and fuzzy simulation for estimating failure credibility. Aerosp Sci Technol 92:620–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling CY, Lu ZZ, Sun B, Wang MJ (2020) An efficient method combining active learning Kriging and Monte Carlo simulation for profust failure probability. Fuzzy Sets Syst 387:89–107

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu BD (2002) Uncertainty theory, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng FC (1995) Some further results on ranking the importance of system components. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 47(2):97–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng FC (2000) Relationships of Fussell-Vesely and Birnbaum importance to structural importance in coherent systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 67(1):55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller B, Graf W, Beer M (2000) Fuzzy structural analysis using α-level optimization. Comput Mech 26:547–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadoughi M, Li M, Hu C (2018) Multivariate system reliability analysis considering highly nonlinear and dependent safety events. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 180:189–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schöbi R, Sudret B, Marelli S (2017) Rare event estimation using polynomial-chaos kriging. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertain Eng Syst A 3(2):D4016002

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenson JD, Santner TJ (2010) Multiobjective optimization of expensive black-box functions via expected maximin improvement. Ohio State University, Columbus, p 32

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZQ, Wang PF (2015) An integrated performance measure approach for system reliability analysis. J Mech Des 137(2):021406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Liu Y, Gao Y, Zhang Y, Gao Z (2015) An active learning kriging model for hybrid reliability analysis with both random and interval variables. Struct Multidisc Optim 51:1–14

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yun WY, Lu ZZ, Jiang X (2019) AK-SYSi: an improved adaptive Kriging model for system reliability analysis with multiple failure modes by a refined U learning function. Struct Multidisc Optim 59(1):263–278

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1(1):3–28

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou YC, Lu ZZ (2019) Active polynomial chaos expansion for reliability-based design optimization. AIAA J 57(12):5431–5446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou CC, Lu ZZ, Ren B, Cheng BS (2014) Failure-mode importance measures in system reliability analysis. J Eng Mech 140(11):04014084

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work described in this paper was supported by the Hong Kong Institute for Advanced Study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ling Chunyan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. We would like to declare that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part.

Replication of results

The MATLAB codes used to generate the results are available in the supplementary material.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Helder C. Rodrigues

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (RAR 3 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chunyan, L., Lu, W. & Jingzhe, L. Importance analysis of different components in a multicomponent system under fuzzy inputs. Struct Multidisc Optim 65, 93 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-022-03189-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-022-03189-x

Keywords

Navigation