Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Structural sensitivity reanalysis formulations based on the polynomial-type extrapolation methods

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents new structural sensitivity reanalysis formulations based on the polynomial-type extrapolation methods. In these formulations, the displacement vector of the modified structure is expressed in the form of the vector sequences based on the fixed-point iteration method. By using these vector sequences, the minimal polynomial extrapolation (MPE) and the reduced rank extrapolation (RRE) methods calculate the approximate displacement vector of the modified structure by solving reduced linear least-square problems. Based on the definitions of the MPE and RRE methods, two sensitivity reanalysis formulations are derived, in which the first- and second-order sensitivities of the modified structure are obtained by solving a set of the over-determined least-square problems with much smaller size than the complete set of equations of the exact sensitivity analyses. The performance of the proposed sensitivity reanalysis formulations is evaluated by using four structural sensitivity reanalysis problems under multiple modifications in their initial designs. The results obtained from the numerical test problems indicate that the proposed sensitivity reanalysis formulations approximate the first- and second-order sensitivities of the modified structure with a high level of accuracy and they are able to converge to the exact solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelman HM, Haftka RT (1986) Sensitivity analysis of discrete structural systems. AIAA J 24(5):823–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthelemy J-F, Haftka RT (1993) Approximation concepts for optimum structural design—a review. Struct Multidiscip Optim 5(3):129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox R, Miura H (1971) An approximate analysis technique for design calculations. AIAA J 9(1):177–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haftka RT et al (1987) Two-point constraint approximation in structural optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 60(3):289–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noor AK (1994) Recent advances and applications of reduction methods. Appl Mech Rev 47(5):125–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo W et al (2012) A hybrid Fox and Kirsch’s reduced basis method for structural static reanalysis. Struct Multidiscip Optim 46(2):261–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu B, Li Z, Li S (2003) The implementation of a vector-valued rational approximate method in structural reanalysis problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192(13–14):1773–1784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch U (2003) A unified reanalysis approach for structural analysis, design, and optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 25(2):67–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amir O, Kirsch U, Sheinman I (2008) Efficient non-linear reanalysis of skeletal structures using combined approximations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 73(9):1328–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch U, Bogomolni M (2004) Procedures for approximate eigenproblem reanalysis of structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng 60(12):1969–1986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leu L.-J. and Huang C.-W. (2000) Reanalysis-based optimal design of trusses. International Journal for, (Numerical): p. 1007–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch U, Bogomolni M, Sheinman I (2006) Nonlinear dynamic reanalysis of structures by combined approximations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(33–36):4420–4432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch U (2010) Reanalysis and sensitivity reanalysis by combined approximations. Struct Multidiscip Optim 40(1–6):1

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch U, Bogomolni M, Sheinman I (2007) Efficient structural optimization using reanalysis and sensitivity reanalysis. Eng Comput 23(3):229–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo W et al (2017) Sensitivity reanalysis of vibration problem using combined approximations method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55(4):1399–1405

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sun R et al (2011) New adaptive technique of kirsch method for structural reanalysis. AIAA J 52(3):486–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo W et al (2011) Fast structural optimization with frequency constraints by genetic algorithm using adaptive eigenvalue reanalysis methods. Struct Multidiscip Optim 43(6):799–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu T et al (2010) An adaptive reanalysis method for genetic algorithm with application to fast truss optimization. Acta Mech Sinica 26(2):225–234

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo W, Fang J, Feng Z (2019) Reanalysis method for second derivatives of static displacement. Int J Comput Methods

  • Zuo W, Bai J, Yu J (2016) Sensitivity reanalysis of static displacement using Taylor series expansion and combined approximate method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53(5):953–959

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseinzadeh Y, Taghizadieh N, Jalili S (2018) A new structural reanalysis approach based on the polynomial-type extrapolation methods. Struct Multidiscip Optim 58(3):1033–1049

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch U (2000) Combined approximations–a general reanalysis approach for structural optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 20(2):97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidi A (2003) Practical extrapolation methods: Theory and applications. Vol. 10.: Cambridge University Press

  • Cabay S, Jackson L (1976) A polynomial extrapolation method for finding limits and antilimits of vector sequences. SIAM J Numer Anal 13(5):734–752

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kaniel S, Stein J (1974) Least-square acceleration of iterative methods for linear equations. J Optim Theory Appl 14(4):431–437

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Eddy R (1979) Extrapolating to the limit of a vector sequence, in Information linkage between applied mathematics and industry. Elsevier. p. 387–396

  • Mešina M (1977) Convergence acceleration for the iterative solution of the equations X= AX+ f. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 10(2):165–173

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bertelle R, Russo MR, Venturin M (2011) On the application of the minimum polynomial extrapolation method to incompressible flows with heat transfer. Calcolo 48(1):33–45

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Duminil S, Sadok H, Silvester D (2014) Fast solvers for discretized Navier-stokes problems using vector extrapolation. Numerical Algorithms 66(1):89–104

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Duminil S, Sadok H, Szyld DB (2015) Nonlinear Schwarz iterations with reduced rank extrapolation. Appl Numer Math 94:209–221

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Loisel S, Takane Y (2011) Generalized GIPSCAL re-revisited: a fast convergent algorithm with acceleration by the minimal polynomial extrapolation. ADAC 5(1):57–75

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sidi A (1986) Convergence and stability properties of minimal polynomial and reduced rank extrapolation algorithms. SIAM J Numer Anal 23(1):197–209

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sidi A (1994) Convergence of intermediate rows of minimal polynomial and reduced rank extrapolation tables. Numerical Algorithms 6(2):229–244

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sidi A (2012) Review of two vector extrapolation methods of polynomial type with applications to large-scale problems. J Comput Sci 3(3):92–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidi A, Ford WF, Smith DA (1986) Acceleration of convergence of vector sequences. SIAM J Numer Anal 23(1):178–196

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DA, Ford WF, Sidi A (1987) Extrapolation methods for vector sequences. SIAM Rev 29(2):199–233

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Süli E and Mayers DF (2003) An introduction to numerical analysis. Cambridge university press

Download references

Funding

This research is supported by a research grant of the University of Tabriz (grant No. 3500).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

    Yousef Hosseinzadeh & Shahin Jalili

Authors
  1. Yousef Hosseinzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shahin Jalili
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yousef Hosseinzadeh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Erdem Acar

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral withregard to jurisdictional claims in published mapsand institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hosseinzadeh, Y., Jalili, S. Structural sensitivity reanalysis formulations based on the polynomial-type extrapolation methods. Struct Multidisc Optim 61, 1027–1050 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02401-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02401-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation