Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Shape preserving design with structural topology optimization

  • RESEARCH PAPER
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate a shape preserving topology optimization design approach to suppress the warping deformation of local structural domains. As structural deformation consists of rigid body motion and warping deformation, we propose using the elastic strain energy of the local domain to measure the warping deformation. Constraint on the local strain energy is then introduced into a standard compliance based topology optimization to obtain the shape preserving effect. Moreover, in the cases of shape preserving for multiple key points and cavities, i.e. when the local strain energies are unavailable, the idea of Artificial Weak Element (AWE) is introduced to measure and constrain the local warping deformation. Several numerical examples are tested here. The optimized results indicate that the local strain energy constraints on the shape preserving domains can suppress the warping deformation effectively in both simple illustrative examples and complicated engineering examples. Further discussions on the failure of structural load carrying path and the influence of the shape preserving constraint is also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Figure 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett RT (1992) Fastener design manual. NASA Reference Publication 1228

  • Bendsøe MP (1989) Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Optim 1:193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausen A, Aage N, Sigmund O (2014) Topology optimization with flexible void area. Struct Multidiscip Optim 50:927–943

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton J, Grandhi R (2014) A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization: post 2000. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49:1–38. doi:10.1007/s00158-013-0956-z

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Grihon S, Krog L, Bassir D (2009) Numerical optimization applied to structure sizing at AIRBUS: a multi-step process. Int J Simul Multidiscip Des Optim 3:432–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest JK (2011) A projection-based topology optimization approach to distributing discrete features in structures and materials. 9th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Shizuoka, Japan, June, pp 13–17

  • Guest JK (2015) Optimizing the layout of discrete objects in structures and materials: a projection-based topology optimization approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 283:330–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo X, Cheng GD (2010) Recent development in structural design and optimization. Acta Mech Sin 26:807–823. doi:10.1007/s10409-010-0395-7

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ha SH, Guest JK (2014) Optimizing inclusion shapes and patterns in periodic materials using Discrete Object Projection. Struct Multidiscip Optim 50:65–80

  • Huang X, Xie YM (2009) Evolutionary topology optimization of continuum structures with an additional displacement constraint. Struct Multidiscip Optim 40:409–416. doi:10.1007/s00158-009-0382-4

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huff J (2002) Improving the service life of flight deck windshields. Boeing Aero Mag 17:3–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SI, Kim YY (2014) Topology optimization of planar linkage mechanisms. Int J Numer Methods Eng 98:265–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krog L, Tucker A, Rollema G (2002) Application of topology, sizing and shape optimization methods to optimal design of aircraft components. Proc. 3rd Altair UK HyperWorks Users Conf

  • Li Q, Steven GP, Xie YM (1999) Displacement minimization of thermoelastic structures by evolutionary thickness design. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 179:361–378

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lin HY, Rayasam M, Subbarayan G (2014) ISOCOMP: Unified geometric and material composition for optimal topology design. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51:687–703

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Maute K, Allen M (2004) Conceptual design of aeroelastic structures by topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 27:27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam SJ, Jang GW, Kim YY (2012) The spring-connected rigid block model based automatic synthesis of planar linkage mechanisms: numerical issues and remedies. J Mech Des 134:051002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu MCY (1988) Airframe structural design: practical design information and data on aircraft structures. Technical Book Co

  • Pedersen CB, Buhl T, Sigmund O (2001) Topology synthesis of large displacement compliant mechanisms. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50:2683–2705

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Qian Z, Ananthasuresh GK (2004) Optimal embedding of rigid objects in the topology design of structures. Mech Based Des Struct Mach 32:165–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiao HT, Liu ST (2013) Topology optimization by minimizing the geometric average displacement. Eng Optim 45:1–18

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Radovcic Y, Remouchamps A (2002) BOSS Quattro: an open system for parametric design. Struct Multidiscip Optim 23:140–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remouchamps A, Bruyneel M, Fleury C, Grihon S (2011) Application of a bi-level scheme including topology optimization to the design of an aircraft pylon. Struct Multidiscip Optim 44:739–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigmund O (1997) On the design of compliant mechanisms using topology optimization. Mech Struct Mach 25:493–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigmund O (2001) A 99 line topology optimization code written in Matlab. Struct Multidiscip Optim 21:120–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigmund O (2007) Morphology-based black and white filters for topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 33:401–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigmund O, Maute K (2013) Topology optimization approaches. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48:1031–1055

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sigmund O, Petersson J (1998) Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: a survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima. Struct Optimization 16:68–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford B, Beran P (2012) Optimal compliant flapping mechanism topologies with multiple load cases. J Mech Des 134:51007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford B, Beran P, Kobayashi M (2013) Simultaneous topology optimization of membrane wings and their compliant flapping mechanisms. AIAA J 51:1431–1441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svanberg K (2007) On a globally convergent version of MMA. 7th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. COEX Seoul , Korea

  • Wang BZ (2000) Aircraft design manual 10: structural design. Aviation Industry Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang MY, Chen S, Wang X, Mei Y (2005) Design of multimaterial compliant mechanisms using level-set methods. J Mech Des 127:941–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie YM, Steven GP (1993) A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization. Comput Struct 49:885–896. doi:10.1016/0045-7949(93)90035-C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou M, Rozvany GIN (1991) The COC algorithm, part II: topo- logical, geometry and generalized shape optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 89(1–3):309–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu JH, Zhang WH, Beckers P (2009) Integrated layout design of multi-component system. Int J Numer Methods Eng 78:631–651

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu JH, Li Y, Zhang WH (2014) Topology optimization with shape preserving design. the 5th International Conference on Computational Methods. 2014 28-30th July. Cambridge, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu JH, Zhang WH, Xia L (2015) Topology optimization in aircraft and aerospace structures design. Arch Comput Methods Eng. doi:10.1007/s11831-015-9151-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuo ZH, Xie YM (2014) Evolutionary topology optimization of continuum structures with a global displacement control. Comput Des 56:58–67. doi:10.1016/j.cad.2014.06.007

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (90916027, 51275424, 11172236), the 111 Project (B07050), Science and Technology Research and development projects in Shaanxi Province (2014KJXX-37), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (3102014JC02020505).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ji-Hong Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, JH., Li, Y., Zhang, WH. et al. Shape preserving design with structural topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 53, 893–906 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-015-1364-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-015-1364-3

Keywords

Navigation