Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-objective vibro-acoustic optimization of stiffened panels

  • RESEARCH PAPER
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A multi-objective vibro-acoustic design optimization of straight or curvilinearly stiffened panels excited by an acoustic diffuse field is performed. During design optimization, the panel mass and the radiated acoustic power are the two objectives to be minimized while satisfying constraints on buckling, von Mises stress and crippling. Based on the concept of plane wave propagation, a diffuse acoustic field is developed for use along with a finite element model. To represent the panel’s structural behavior, the dynamic analysis of the panel is performed for the developed diffuse acoustic excitation and the radiated acoustic power is calculated using the velocities obtained from the dynamic analysis. A baseline design is obtained by optimization study with mass as an objective to be minimized while constraints are put on buckling, von Mises stress and crippling. The obtained baseline grid stiffened panel is used for a comparative study of a panel with curvilinear stiffeners in vibro-acoustics with diffuse sound field as the source of the excitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Graham WR (1996) Boundary layer induced noise in aircraft, Part I: The flat plate model. J Sound Vib 192 (1):101–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham WR (1996) Boundary layer induced noise in aircraft, Part II: The trimmed flat plate model. J Sound Vib 192 (1):121–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmann GH, Fahnline JB (1997) Designing Quiet Structures: A Sound Power Minimization Approach. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Denli H, Frangakis S, Sun JQ (2005) Normalization in acoustic optimization with rayleigh integral. J Sound Vib 284:1229–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeon JY, Okuma M (2004) Acoustic radiation optimization using the particle swarm optimization algorithm. JSME Int J Series C 47 (2):560–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belegundu AD, Salagame RR, Koopmann GH (1994) A General optimization strategy for sound power minimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 8:113–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu-yun C, De-yu W (2007) Structural-acoustic optimization of stiffened panels based on a genetic algorithm. J Mar Sci Appl 6 (4):55–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fourie PC, Groenwold AA (2002) The particle swarm optimization algorithm in size and shape optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 23:259–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. Pierre RL, Koopmann GH (1993) Minimization of Radiated Sound Power From Plates Using Distributed Point Masses, presented at the ASME Winter Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, November 28 - December 3, 1993, Paper no. 93-WA/NCA-11

  • Cunefare KA (1990) The Design Sensitivity and Control of Acoustic Power Radiation by Three-dimensional Structures, PhD Dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  • Naghshineh K, Koopmann G, Belegundu A (1992) Material tailoring of structures to achieve a minimum radiation condition. J Acoust Soc Am 92 (2,Pt.1):841–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce AD (1989) Acoustics: An Introduction to its Physical Principles and Applications, Acoustical Society of America, New York, 1989, pp 159–166

  • Hekamati A, Ricot D, Druault P (2010) Vibroacoustic Behavior of a Plate Excited by Synthesized Aeroacoustic Pressure Fields, AIAA 2010-3950, 16th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 7-9 June 2010, Stockholm, Sweden

  • Maury C, Gardonio P, Elliott S J (2002) A wavenumbre approach to modelling the response of a randomly excited panel, Part I: General Theory. J Sound Vib 252 (1):83–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi P, Mulani SB, Gurav SP, Kapania RK (2010a) Design optimization for minimum sound radiation from point-excited curvilinearly stiffened panel. J Aircr 47 (4):1100–1110. doi:10.2514/1.44778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi P, Mulani SB, Kapania RK, Slemp WCH (2010b) Minimization of Acoustic Radiation from a Turbulent Boundary Layer Excited Panel with Curvilinear Stiffeners, AIAA 2010-2541, 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 12–15 April 2010, Orlando, Florida

  • Faust M, Piret G (1996) Vibro-acoustic Payload Effect Tests of the Ariane 5 Fairing with Olympus Satellite in ESTEC-LEAF, Proceedings of the Conference on Spacecraft Structures, Materials and Mechanical Testing, 27–29 March 1996, Noordwijk, Netherlands

  • Buehrle RD, Gibbs GP, Klos J, Mazur M (2003) Modelling and Validation of Damped Plexiglass Windows for Noise Control, AIAA 2003-1870, 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 7–10 April 2003, Norfolk, Virginia

  • Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulani SB, Slemp WCH, Kapania RK (2013) EBF3PanelOpt: an optimization framework for curvilinear blade-stiffened panels. Thin-Walled Struct 63:13–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafaely B (2000) Spatial-temporal correlation of a diffuse sound field. J Acoust Soc Am 107 (6):3254–3258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constans EW, Belegundu AD, Koopman GH (1998) Design approach for minimizing sound power from vibrating shell structures. AIAA J 36 (2):134–139

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • MD. NASTRAN R2.1 (1999) MSC Software Corporation, Santa Ana, California, USA

  • Wallace CE (1972) Radiation resistance of a rectangular panel. J Acoust Soc Am 51:946–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahy F. (1985) Sound and structural vibration. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • VisualDOC 6.2.2 (2010) Vanderplaats Research and Development, Inc. Colorado Springs, CO 80906, USA

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work presented here is funded under NASA Subsonic Fixed Wing Hybrid Body Technologies NRA (NASA NN L08AA02C) with Ms. Karen Taminger as the Program Manager (PM) and Mr. Keith Bird as Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COTR). We are thankful to both Ms. Taminger and Mr. Bird for their suggestions. The authors would like to thank Mr. Dan Palumbo and the E B F3 team at NASA Langley Research Center for technical discussions. The authors would also like to thank our partners in the NRA project, Mr. Bob Olliffe, Mr. David Havens and Dr. Steve Englestadt all of Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company of Marietta, GA, for technical discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pankaj Joshi.

Additional information

Pankaj Joshi is a Former Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering; Currently Acoustic Engineer at Heinkel Engineering GmbH Co. KG (Airbus subcontractor for cabin acoustics in Germany).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joshi, P., Mulani, S.B. & Kapania, R.K. Multi-objective vibro-acoustic optimization of stiffened panels. Struct Multidisc Optim 51, 835–848 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1177-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1177-9

Keywords

Navigation