Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing pain reduction following kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty

A meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials

Vergleich der Schmerzreduktion nach Kypho- und Vertebroplastie

Eine Metaanalyse randomisierter und nichtrandomisierter kontrollierter Studien

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Der Orthopäde Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study was to compare the extent of pain reduction with kyphoplasty (KP) and vertebroplasty (VP) in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) using a visual analog scale (VAS).

Methods

A computerized database search was performed to compare pain relief from VP and KP in OVCF. The available literature was analysed to quantify the amount of pain reduction using VAS as the primary outcome.

Results

A total of 10 studies encompassing 902 patients met the inclusion criteria. Subgroup meta-analyses were performed according to the study design. VAS for the KP group was not significant compared with the VP group at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months. Pain relief in the KP group was greater than that in the VP group at 12 months and 2 years.

Conclusion

KP is superior to VP in patients requiring pain relief. More large-scale, double-blinded controlled trials are necessary in order to quantify the pain relief afforded by VP more precisely.

Zusammenfassung

Analyseziel

Ziel der Analyse war ein Vergleich der Schmerzreduktion nach Behandlung osteoporotischer Wirbelkompressionsfrakturen (OVCF, „osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture“) mit Kyphoplastie (KP) und mit Vertebroplastie (VP) unter Nutzung der visuellen Analogskala (VAS).

Methoden

Die Autoren durchsuchten computerunterstützt Datenbanken bezüglich Arbeiten zur Schmerzreduktion nach mittels VP bzw. KP behandelten OVCF. Die verfügbare Literatur wurde auf Nutzung der VAS zur Bestimmung der Schmerzreduktion als primären Endpunkt überprüft.

Ergebnisse

Insgesamt 10 Arbeiten mit 902 Patienten erfüllten die Einschlusskriterien. Subgruppenanalysen erfolgten entsprechend dem Studiendesign. Die VAS-Ergebnisse nach KP zeigten zu den Zeitpunkten 1 Woche, 1 Monat und 6 Monate keine signifikanten Unterschiede im Vergleich zu den mit VP behandelten Patienten. Nach 12 Monaten und 2 Jahren war die Schmerzreduktion bei den mit KP vs. mit VP behandelten Patienten ausgeprägter.

Schlussfolgerung

Die KP ist der VP bezüglich der Schmerzreduktion überlegen. Um die Schmerzverminderung nach VP genauer bestimmen zu können, sind mehr Daten aus größer angelegten, kontrollierten Doppelblindstudien nötig.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

CPGS:

Chronic pain grade scale

KP:

Kyphoplasty

MD:

Mean difference

MPQ:

McGill pain questionnaire

NRS:

Numeric rating scale

OVCF:

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

RCT:

Randomized controlled trials

RR:

Risk ratio

VAS:

Visual analog scale

VP:

Vertebroplasty

References

  1. Guan HQ, Yang HL, Mei X, Liu T, Guo J (2012) Early or delayed operation, which is more optimal for kyphoplasty? A retrospective study on cement leakage during kyphoplasty. Injury 43:1698–1703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hall SE, Criddle RA, Comito TL, Prince RL (1999) A case-control study of quality of life and functional impairment in women with long-standing vertebral osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 9(6):508–515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Leidig-Bruckner G, Minne HW, Schlaich C, Wagner G, Scheidt-Nave C, Bruckner T, Ziegler R (1997) Clinical grading of spinal osteoporosis: quality of life components and spinal deformity in women with chronic low back pain and women with vertebral osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 12(4):663–675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lieberman IH, Dudeney S, Reinhardt MK, Bell G (2001) Initial outcome and efficacy of “kyphoplasty” in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine 26(14):1631–1638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lukert BP (1994) Vertebral compression fractures: how to manage pain, avoid disability. Geriatrics 49(2):22–26

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Meunier PJ, Delmas PD, Eastell R, McClung MR, Papapoulos S, Rizzoli R, Wasnich RD (1999) Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: clinical guidelines. Clin Ther 21(6):1025–1044

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Phillips FM, Pfeifer BA, Lieberman IH, Kerr EJ III, Choi IS, Pazianos AG (2002) Minimally invasive treatments of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Instr Course Lect 52:559–567

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rapado A (1996) General management of vertebral fractures. Bone 18(3):S191–S196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Garfin SR, Yuan HA, Reilley MA (2001) Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine 26(14):1511–1555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pradhan BP, Hyun WB, Kropf MA, Patel VV, Delamarter RB (2006) Kyphoplasty reduction of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: correction of local kyphosis versus overall sagittal alignment. Spine 31(4):435–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Deramond H, Depriester C, Galimbert P, Le Gars D (1998) Percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate technique, indications and results. Radiol Clin North Am 36:533–546

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, Le Gars D (1986) Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty. Neurochirurgie 33(2):166–168

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lavelle WF, Cheney R (2006) Recurrent fracture after vertebral kyphoplasty. Spine J 6(5):488–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Calmels V, Vallée JN, Rose M, Chiras J (2007) Osteoblastic and mixed spinal metastases: evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:570–574

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang HL, Zhao L, Liu J, Sanford CG Jr, Chen L, Tang T, Ebraheim NA (2007) Changes of pulmonary function for patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures after kyphoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 20(3):221–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dong RB, Chen L, Gu Y, Han G, Yang H, Tang T, Xiaoqing C (2009) Improvement in respiratory function after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Int Orthop 33(6):1689–1694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu JT, Liao WJ, Tan WC, Lee JK, Liu CH, Chen YH, Lin TB (2009) Balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a prospective, comparative, and randomized clinical study. Osteoporos Int 21(2):359–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Robinson Y, Olerud C (2012) Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty – a systematic review of cement augmentation techniques for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures compared to standard medical therapy. Maturitas 72:42–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang CH, Ma JZ, Zhang CC, Nie L (2015) Comparison of high-viscosity cement vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Pain Physician 18(2):E187–E194

    Google Scholar 

  20. Evans AJ, Kip KE, Brinjikji W, Layton KF, Jensen ML, Gaughen JR, Kallmes DF (2016) Randomized controlled trial of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. J Neurointerv Surg 8(7):756–763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yan D, Duan L, Li J, Soo C, Zhu H, Zhang Z (2011) Comparative study of percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(5):645–650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Grohs JG, Matzner M, Trieb K, Krepler P (2005) Minimal invasive stabilization of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a prospective nonrandomized comparison of vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty. Clin Spine Surg 18(3):238–242

    Google Scholar 

  23. Röllinghoff M, Siewe J, Zarghooni K, Sobottke R, Alparslan Y, Eysel P, Delank KS (2009) Effectiveness, security and height restoration on fresh compression fractures – a comparative prospective study of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 52(05/06):233–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Li X, Yang H, Tang T, Qian Z, Chen L, Zhang Z (2012) Comparison of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: twelve-month follow-up in a prospective nonrandomized comparative study. Clin Spine Surg 25(3):142–149

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schofer MD, Efe T, Timmesfeld N, Kortmann HR, Quante M (2009) Comparison of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in the treatment of fresh vertebral compression fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 29(10):1391–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Omidi-Kashani F, Samini F, Hasankhani EG, Kachooei AR, Toosi KZ, Golhasani-Keshtan F (2013) Does percutaneous kyphoplasty have better functional outcome than vertebroplasty in single level osteoporotic compression fractures? A comparative prospective study. J Osteoporos 2013(6):690329. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/690329

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Folman Y, Shabat S (2011) A comparison of two new technologies for percutaneous vertebral augmentation: confidence vertebroplasty vs. sky kyphoplasty. Isr Med Assoc J 13(7):394–397

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Barr JD, Barr MS, Lemley TJ, McCann RM (2000) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization. Spine 25:923–928

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen L, Ni CF, Liu YZ, Yang HL, Tang TS, Jin YH, Wang YJ (2005) Experimental and clinical study on barium used to increase radiopacity of bone cement for vertebroplasty. Chin J Med Imaging Technol 21(7):1085–1088

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Brown DB, Glaiberman CB, Gilula LA, Shimony JS (2005) Correlation between preprocedural MRI findings and clinical outcomes in the treatment of chronic symptomatic vertebral compression fractures with percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(6):1951–1955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Santiago FR, Abela AP, Alvarez LG, Osuna RMÁ, García MDMC (2010) Pain and functional outcome after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. A comparative study. Eur J Radiol 75(2):e108–e113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yeh JH, Yang SC, Kao YH, Ma CH, Yu SW, Tu YK (2011) Clinical and radiographic evaluation of balloon kyphoplasty using VCFX for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Formos J Musculoskelet Disord 2(3):94–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shah RV (2012) Sacral kyphoplasty for the treatment of painful sacral insufficiency fractures and metastases. Spine J 12:113–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang CT, Hou SM, Hou CH, Lin FL, Lin CC, Yang RS (2011) Does the complication rate and treatment effect of balloon kyphoplasty and vertebra-plasty differ in countries or specialties of operators? Formos J Musculoskelet Disord 2(3):79–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Jasper LE, Deramond H (2001) The biomechanics of vertebroplasty: the effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior. Spine 26(14):1537–1541

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Togawa D, Bauer TW, Lieberman IH, Takikawa S (2003) Histologic evaluation of human vertebral bodies after vertebral augmentation with polymethyl methacrylate. Spine 28(14):1521–1527

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Han S, Wan S, Ning L, Tong Y, Zhang J, Fan S (2011) Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials. Int Orthop 35(9):1349–1358

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Jia X, Yang F, Tan Z (2007) Comparing pain reduction following kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Pain Physician 10(4):583–590

    Google Scholar 

  39. Eck JC, Nachtigall D, Humphreys SC, Hodges SD (2008) Comparison of vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of the literature. Spine J 8(3):488–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hua Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

C. Chen, X. Shen, J. Wang, Z. Zhang, Y. Li and H. Chen declare that they have no competing interests.

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. For the studies discussed here the ethical guidelines are declared in the respective papers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, C., Shen, X., Wang, J. et al. Comparing pain reduction following kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty. Orthopäde 46, 855–863 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-017-3455-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-017-3455-x

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation