Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty versus percutaneous kyphoplasty treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with kyphosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) with kyphosis.

Methods

The clinical data included 63 patients in the PVP group and 70 in the PKP group. The study assessed the pain visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), wedge angle (WA), local kyphotic angle (LKA), and vertebral height.

Results

The operative time was significantly less in the PVP group (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, more bone cement was injected into the PKP group (p < 0.05), with significantly higher surgical costs (p > 0.05). Post-operative VAS, ODI, WA, LKA, and vertebral height were significantly improved in PVP and PKP groups compared with pre-operative measurements (p < 0.05). The results revealed insignificant VAS and ODI improvement differences between the two groups at each follow-up time (p > 0.05). Vertebral height, WA, and LKA improved more significantly in the PKP group at day 1 and 3 months post-operatively (p < 0.05), with insignificant group differences at subsequent time points (p > 0.05). The improvements in VAS were unrelated to those in WA, LKA, or vertebral height in either group (p > 0.05). The improvement in VAS was unrelated to the amount of bone cement injected (p > 0.05); the PKP group demonstrated a lower incidence of cement leakage (12.9%; p < 0.05).

Conclusion

PVP and PKP can restore partial vertebral height and improve kyphosis with similar clinical outcomes. PVP has a shorter operating time, is more economical, and can represent a therapeutic choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Guan H, Yang H, Mei X, Liu T, Guo J. Early or delayed operation, which is more optimal for kyphoplasty? A retrospective study on cement leakage during kyphoplasty. Injury. 2012;43:1698–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen P, Li Z, Hu Y. Prevalence of osteoporosis in China: a meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:1039.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Farrokhi MR, Alibai E, Maghami Z. Randomized controlled trial of percutaneous vertebroplasty versus optimal medical management for the relief of pain and disability in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14:561–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Longo UG, Loppini M, Denaro L, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Conservative management of patients with an osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a review of the literature. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2012;94:152–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, Le Gars D. Le Gars D Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty. Neurochirurgie. 1987;33:166–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mathis JM, Ortiz AO, Zoarski GH. Vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty: a comparison and contrast. Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25:840–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Patel N, Jacobs D, John J, et al. Balloon kyphoplasty vs vertebroplasty: a systematic review of height restoration in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. J Pain Res. 2022;15:1233–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang L, Liu Z, Wang J, et al. Unipedicular versus bipedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a prospective randomized study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974;2:1127–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980;66:271–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ha KY, Lee JS, Kim KW, Chon JS. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures with and without intravertebral clefts. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2006;88:629–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun G, Jin P, Li M, Liu XW, Li FD. Height restoration and wedge angle correction effects of percutaneous vertebroplasty: association with intraosseous clefts. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:2597–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Phillips FM, Ho E, Campbell-Hupp M, McNally T, Todd Wetzel F, Gupta P. Early radiographic and clinical results of balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine. 2003;28:2260–5 (discussion 5-7).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wardlaw D, Cummings SR, Van Meirhaeghe J, et al. Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373:1016–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Klazen CA, Lohle PN, de Vries J, et al. Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;376:1085–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang L, Wang J, Feng X, et al. A comparison of high viscosity bone cement and low viscosity bone cement vertebroplasty for severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;129:10–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen C, Wei H, Zhang W, et al. Comparative study of kyphoplasty for chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures via unipedicular versus bipedicular approach. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011;24:E62–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cai-fang N. Experimental and clinical study on barium used to increase radiopacity of bone cement for vertebroplasty. Chin J Med Imaging Technol. 2005;21:1085–8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liu JT, Li CS, Chang CS, Liao WJ. Long-term follow-up study of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture treated using balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;23:94–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang CH, Ma JZ, Zhang CC, Nie L. Comparison of high-viscosity cement vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Pain Physician. 2015;18:E187–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Firanescu CE, de Vries J, Lodder P, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty is no risk factor for new vertebral fractures and protects against further height loss (VERTOS IV). Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2019;42:991–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Blasco J, Martinez-Ferrer A, Macho J, et al. Effect of vertebroplasty on pain relief, quality of life, and the incidence of new vertebral fractures: a 12-month randomized follow-up, controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27:1159–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dublin AB, Hartman J, Latchaw RE, Hald JK, Reid MH. The vertebral body fracture in osteoporosis: restoration of height using percutaneous vertebroplasty. Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:489–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang J, Fan Y, He X, et al. Is percutaneous kyphoplasty the better choice for minimally invasive treatment of neurologically intact osteoporotic Kümmell’s disease? A comparison of two minimally invasive procedures. Int Orthop. 2018;42:1321–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yu HM, Li YZ, Yao XD, et al. Surgical options for delayed osteoporotic vertebral collapse. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2016;29:606–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yeom JS, Kim WJ, Choy WS, Lee CK, Chang BS, Kang JW. Leakage of cement in percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic compression fractures. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2003;85:83–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DL contributed significantly to the analysis and wrote the manuscript; JP and RP performed the data analyses; XZ and XZ helped perform the analysis with constructive discussions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaohui Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the medical Ethics Committee of the Luoyang Orthopedic-Traumatological Hospital Of Henan Province (Henan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital) institution.

Consent to publish

Manuscript is approved by all authors for publication.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liang, D., Pei, J., Pei, R. et al. Clinical efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty versus percutaneous kyphoplasty treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with kyphosis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02416-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02416-4

Keywords

Navigation