Abstract
Microplastics (MPs) accumulate in sediments, yet guidelines for evaluating MP risks in dredged sediments are lacking. The objective of this study was to review existing literature on MPs in sediments to improve fundamental knowledge of MP exposures and develop a publicly available database of MPs in sediments. Twelve percent of the reviewed papers (nine studies) included sediment core samples with MP concentrations generally decreasing with depth, peaking in the top 15 cm. The remaining papers evaluated surficial grab samples (0 to 15 cm depth) from various water bodies with MPs detected in almost every sample. Median MP concentrations (items/kg dry sediment) increased in this order: lakes and reservoirs (184), estuarine (263), Great Lakes nearshore areas and tributaries (290), riverine (410), nearshore marine areas (487), dredge activities (817), and harbors (948). Dredging of recurrent shoaling sediments could be expected to contain MPs at various depths with concentrations influenced by the time elapsed since the last dredging event. These results offer key insights into the presence and variability of MPs in dredged sediments, informing environmental monitoring and risk assessment strategies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Microplastics (MPs), ranging from 0.01 to 5 mm (Frias and Nash 2019), are ubiquitous in sediments, serving as environmental sinks with potential for bioaccumulation in ecosystems and possibly in humans (Darabi et al. 2021). Their small size and ability to degrade into nanoplastics is cause for concern about ingestion by wildlife and the resultant ecological risks, which has gained international (UN 2022) and national attention (USEPA 2016). The US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) confronts this directly, annually dredging several hundred million cubic yards of sediment each year, often without data on MPs abundance in shoaled channel beds requiring dredging. The International Maritime Organization, a United Nations (UN) specialized agency, and the Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection, a UN advisory body, both recognize that plastics are in shoaled sediments destined for dredging and the challenges associated with separating plastic from dredged sediment (IMO 2016; GESAMP 2021). Recognizing the need for informed decision-making in the management of dredged sediments, the primary objective of this study is to synthesize existing peer-reviewed research to provide a comprehensive understanding of the presence, concentration, and characteristics of MPs in sediments, especially those that may be relevant to national and international navigation channels requiring periodic dredging. By presenting MP concentrations, morphologies, size ranges, colors, and polymer types, we aim to provide project managers a foundational reference that serves as a starting point for a risk-informed response strategy for dredged sediments that balances environmental risks and operational demands.
Methods and Materials
In March 2023, we systematically searched Web of Science and Google Scholar for studies on MPs in dredged sediments, focusing on sediment collected during dredge sediment evaluations or sediment collected from disposal areas (search “microplastics dredging dredge”). The scarcity of research specifically on dredged sediments broadened our scope to similar environments, such as harbors, nearshore marine and estuarine areas (subtidal), as well as riverine and lacustrine systems including the Great Lakes (search “microplastics sediments”). These areas were likely to share similar plastic inputs and physical processes as would take place for shoaled sediment destined for dredging. We refined the collected literature against minimum data quality objectives, prioritizing studies that detailed their MP detection methods, utilized visual and/or spectrometric identification, and reported MP concentration per kilogram of dry sediment. When necessary (n = 4 studies), MP quantities reported as MP per liter were standardized to MP per kilogram dry sediment following the methodology of Claessens et al. (2011), to allow for more direct comparison across studies. In this paper, MP concentrations are reported as “items/kg” used to encompasses a variety of MP morphologies (fibers, films, foams, fragments, spheres or beads) and polymer types.
For each study, data was disaggregated by specific test areas within larger water bodies when such information was available. Our exploratory analysis focused on presenting median MP concentrations, a metric robust against skewed distributions, along with the full range of MP concentrations (minimum to maximum) to encapsulate the heterogeneity in environmental conditions as well as sampling and laboratory methodologies. To offer a more granular perspective, we categorized sample locations into systems including lakes, rivers, the Great Lakes, estuarine and marine environments, harbors and ports, and studies specifically addressing dredging. For instances of notably high or low MP abundances, additional contextual information is provided to elucidate possible environmental or methodological factors contributing to these extremes.
Results and Discussion
The review identified 122 papers, with 73 meeting our priorities based on their relevance and methodological clarity. Data from this review was collated in an online microplastic database for sediments (MP-SED 2023) which contains a searchable database of MP concentrations, sizes, shapes, and polymer data for sediments across diverse geographic locations. These reviewed papers, spanning 2004 to 2023 and retrieved from 31 journals, predominantly featured MP concentrations in sediment cores and in the top 0–15 cm of sediments collected in North America (30%), Europe (31%), and Asia (32%), with minor contributions from Africa and Oceania. In our review, data extraction from the papers directly yielded MP data from tables in 63% of the of the papers reviewed. For the remainder of the papers reviewed, MP data required interpolation from figures using image analysis software (ImageJ, version 1.54c, NIH, Bethesda, MD). Overall, MPs less than 1–2 mm in size were the most abundant. Fibers and fragments were the dominant morphologies, and occasionally spheres and foams, and to a much lesser extent, films. Commonly observed colors included black, blue, brown, white, gray, red, yellow, green, pink, purple, orange, and transparent. Plastics consisting of polypropylene, polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate, Rayon, Nylon, polystyrene, and tire wear particles were most identified. The focus on MPs themselves often leads researchers to overlook sediment characteristics, such as sand, silt, and clay, which are not reported in many papers cited here. Although some research has explored the correlation between sediment types and MP concentrations, the results have varied (Alomar et al. 2016; Corcoran et al. 2020). Data from sediment cores are presented below to understand the potential presence and concentration of MPs at various depths. For grab samples, MPs in the top 0–15 cm of sediments are presented for each previously listed system (e.g., Great Lakes, riverine, harbors and ports). Further, contextual information is provided to understand potential MP contamination during capital dredging which entails deeper excavation (i.e., several meters) of bottom sediments and during maintenance dredging (~ top meter of sediment), the most common form of dredging.
Nine studies collected sediment cores to depths of 95 cm to investigate the temporal variation of MPs. Most cores taken from marine (Matsuguma et al. 2017; Chen et al. 2020; Zheng et al. 2020; Simon-Sánchez et al. 2022), estuarine (Matsuguma et al. 2017; Culligan et al. 2022), and lake (Turner et al. 2019; Welsh et al. 2022b; Li et al. 2023) sites demonstrated a decrease in MP concentration from surface to bottom, punctuated by sporadic peaks (Fig. 1). Irrespective of the type of water body, the uppermost 15 cm displayed the highest concentrations of MPs, showing recent accumulation or continuous inputs at these depths. In contrast, a study examining a river sediment core (0–50 cm depth; Niu et al. 2021) did not follow this trend, showing smaller and more numerous MPs in deeper layers which the authors contributed to bacterial degradation, indicating potentially different fate and deposition dynamics in fluvial systems. Niu et al. (2021) noted that the study river undergoes dredging approximately every five years, with the last event in 2015. Although the authors contribute smaller MPs in deeper layers to degradation, the dredging history highlights a potential interplay between the removal of MPs during dredging and their reintroduction from upstream sources and redistribution into the active shoaling processes. Thus, while the studies indicate a general decrease in MP concentration with depth, the process of recurrent shoaling, combined with the time scales at which it occurs, should be considered because it could result in the presence of MPs at various depths.
Four studies were identified that collected 15 sediment samples across 15 dredged sediment disposal sites and one study that collected 9 samples from sediments collected for routine evaluation prior to being dredged. The median MP concentration was 817 items/kg, ranging from 36 to 29,031 items/kg (Fig. 2). At upland dredged sediment disposal sites, Constant et al. (2021) collected sediment samples from disposal sites located along the bank of the Aa River in France, reporting MP concentrations that ranged from 1 to 2,800 items/kg which was 1 to 4 orders of magnitude lower than those in many European riverbeds. Whereas Ji et al. (2021) reported a mean of 18,911 (9,400) items/kg in dredged sediments stored in stockpiles on farmlands in China and showed that some MPs were remobilized from the piles back into surrounding soil and waters downstream. Wilkens et al. (2020) extracted MPs from sediments obtained for dredged sediment evaluations and reported a mean concentration of 1,636 items/kg for harbor sites located in the Gulf of Mexico, Atlantic Ocean, and Great Lakes. Notably, the highest MP reported in that study came from the Cleveland Harbor (5,019 items/kg) which is an area that experienced severe industrial pollution in the past (e.g., fires on the Cuyahoga River).
Eight studies collected 42 surficial sediment samples across14 lakes where MPs were omnipresent. The median MP concentration was 184 items/kg, ranging from 9 to 5450 items/kg. The rural headwater lakes in Muskoka–Haliburton, Ontario, recorded the highest concentrations, where fibers were the most prevalent type, suggesting atmospheric deposition as a significant source, as supported by Welsh et al. (2022a, 2022b). Conversely, Vaughan et al. (2017) collected sediment from an urban lake, which might be expected to have higher concentrations due to greater local human activity but exhibited some of the lowest MP concentrations. In another context, Wilkens et al. (2020) reported 1114 items/kg in an oxbow lake along the Mississippi River which is annually inundated by the river estimated to contribute more than five quadrillion MPs into the Gulf of Mexico annually (Martin 2018). The data reveal a substantial range in MP concentrations across rural and urban lakes, suggesting that their complex presence and distribution are influenced by varied factors like atmospheric deposition and river connectivity, pointing to multiple sources and transport mechanisms beyond human proximity.
Four studies that collected surficial sediment samples from tributaries and nearshore areas in the Great Lakes, covering Lake Michigan (n = 9), Lake Erie (n = 15), Lake Huron (n = 7), and Lake Ontario (n = 26), all found microplastics (MPs). Across these studies, the median MP concentration was 290 items/kg, with a range from 10 to 27,830 items/kg. Breaking this down further, tributaries had a median MP concentration of 370 items/kg, ranging from 10 to 27,830 items/kg, while nearshore areas had a median of 285 items/kg, with a range from 24 to 5,530 items/kg. Urban tributaries, in particular, showed elevated MP concentrations. For instance, Ballent et al. (2016) found a mean MP concentration of 4,500 (± 10,308) items/kg in Lake Ontario tributaries passing through urban areas, which was substantially higher than the 567 (± 459) items/kg found in nearshore samples. Likewise, Lenaker et al. (2019) reported a mean MP concentration of 2,034 (± 2,492) items/kg in Lake Michigan tributaries through urban areas, which exceeded the mean of 197 (± 116) items/kg for nearshore samples. These findings underscore the significant role of urban tributaries as contributors to MPs in the Great Lakes system, aligning with observations that rivers and streams are key pathways for MP contamination (Talbot and Chang 2022).
Thirty papers collecting 429 surficial sediment samples across 75 rivers, all contained MPs except for three samples. The median MP concentration was 410, ranging from 0 to 74,800 items/kg. Notably, Wang et al. (2018) found the highest concentration of 32,947 (range 18,690 to 74,800) items/kg in the Wen-Rui Tang River in China, an area with high levels of industrial activity. Hurley et al. (2018) also reported elevated mean MP concentrations of 31,950 (range 1,700 to 62,200) items/kg in River Glossop Brook and 21,300 (range 500 to 72,400) items/kg in River Tame in the UK. Additionally, in the same study Hurley et al. (2018) noted a decline in MP concentrations in 28 out of 40 river sites following a major flood event (mean pre-flood 7,036 items/kg; post-flood 889 items/kg), showing that MP contamination can substantially change following flooding. Eppehimer et al. (2021) found similar results for MP concentrations after a flood in the Santa Cruz River near Tucson, Arizona.
Twelve studies collecting surficial sediment samples from 12 nearshore marine areas (n = 106 samples) and 15 studies collecting surficial sediments from 17 estuarine areas (n = 72 samples) environments, all contained MPs except for one marine site. The overall median MP concentrations within marine environments was 487 items/kg, ranging from 0 to 15,326 items/kg and within estuarine environments was 263 items/kg, ranging from 13 to 205,859. In marine nearshore areas, concentrations were reported with a mean of 9,510 (± 3,209) items/kg in the Arabian Sea along the Indian coast by Gurjar et al. (2023), and 2,866 and 3,359 items/kg in the Celtic and North Seas, respectively, by Bakir et al. (2023). In estuarine systems, Haave et al. (2019) reported 79,301 items/kg in a Norwegian fjord near a wastewater facility. A standout report from Cashman et al. (2022) documented an extreme mean concentration exceeding 5.26 million items/kg, dominated by cellulose acetate fibers, in Narragansett Bay, USA, but was excluded from the data set since the MP concentrations were at least two orders of magnitude higher than other locations.
Seven studies collecting 68 surficial sediment samples across 18 harbor locations, all contained MPs. The median MP concentration was 948 items/kg, ranging from 44 to 111,933 items/kg. The results were skewed by the highest concentrations (n = 22) all reported by Preston-Whyte et al. (2021) for sediments collected from the Port of Durban with a mean MP concentration of 21,067 (range 2,400 to 111,933) items/kg. The authors suggested that sewage overflow, stormwater drains, port operations, and rivers were primary MP contributors. Excluding the Port of Durban, the median MP concentration for the remaining samples (n = 46) decreased to 237 items/kg. The data reveal a substantial range in MP concentrations across harbor areas, suggesting again that their complex presence and distribution are influenced by varied factors like atmospheric deposition, river inputs, and harbor activities.
Regulatory agencies, public health officials, scientists, and the public are increasingly concerned with MPs in the environment due to their potential implications on human health, regulatory frameworks, and environmental ecosystems. Researchers have begun to explore complex toxicological datasets to formulate risk-based MP thresholds for ecological receptors in sediment. These risk-based thresholds, reflective of an evolving confidence (Mehinto et al. 2022), are specific to two anticipated mechanisms of action observed during laboratory toxicity evaluations: 1) food dilution, where MPs are mistakenly ingested in place of more nutritive food items (Straub et al. 2017; de Ruijter et al. 2020; Rauchschwalbe et al. 2021); and 2) the translocation of MPs into tissue, resulting in inflammation and oxidative stress (Limonta et al. 2019; Xia et al. 2020). In sediment, risk-based thresholds for food dilution range from 6.6 × 107 items/kg to 1.9 × 1011 items/kg, and for the translocation of MPs in tissues, 3.2 × 108 to 4.0 × 1011 items/kg (Redondo-Hasselerharm et al. 2023). As such, current reported MP concentrations in sediments typically fall below these threshold values. However, ongoing research is crucial for refining these thresholds, including incorporating the complexity of MPs and considering them alongside natural particles in the environment (Koelmans et al. 2022), to fully understand the implications.
This review presents initial findings on the presence of MPs in sediments that may be relevant to dredging programs, with the highest median concentration found in harbor sediments. Notably, MPs are less prevalent in deeper, undisturbed sediment layers targeted by capital dredging compared to the recurrent shoaling sediment of maintenance dredging. The high variability at different depths and environments highlights the ubiquitous nature of MPs–both in areas where dredging occurs and in places where it does not. This variation highlights the critical need for proactive measures at the source to prevent plastic contamination from entering sediments. These preventative strategies could include improved wastewater treatment, stormwater controls, and supply chain modifications. Monitoring MPs in sediments, including prospective dredged sediments, is a potentially important tool for assessing the effectiveness of preventative strategies. Since the 1970s, in the United States, dredged sediment proposed for open water disposal undergoes rigorous evaluation and testing to ensure it does not adversely affect human health or the environment (USEPA and USACE 1991). This often involves bioassays capable of detecting the cumulative toxicity of chemical mixtures, both known and unknown, compared to a reference sediment. Although the recognition of MPs in dredged sediments is relatively recent, their potential contribution to cumulative toxicity continues to be assessed through these thorough evaluations. Despite the number of manuscripts pertaining to MPs in sediment, key data gaps remain. Research is needed to better understand ecotoxicological effects of environmentally relevant MP exposures. A critical component toward improving this understanding involves comprehensively documenting MP characteristics such as size, morphology, polymer type, and toxicity. Collating this information in resources like the MP-SED and ToMEx (Thornton Hampton et al. 2022) databases is important to help inform future risk assessments for plastics in sediments.
References
Abidli S, Toumi H, Lahbib Y, Menif NTE (2017) The first evaluation of microplastics in sediments from the complex lagoon-channel of Bizerte (Northern Tunisia). Water Air Soil Pollut 228:262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-017-3439-9
Alomar C, Estarellas F, Deudero S (2016) Microplastics in the Mediterranean Sea: deposition in coastal shallow sediments, spatial variation and preferential grain size. Mar Environ Res 115:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2016.01.005
Bakir A, Doran D, Silburn B, Russell J, Archer-Rand S, Barry J, Maes T, Limpenny C, Mason C, Barber J, Nicolaus EEM (2023) A spatial and temporal assessment of microplastics in seafloor sediments: a case study for the UK. Front Mar Sci 9:1093815. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.1093815
Baldwin AK, Spanjer AR, Rosen MR, Thom T (2020) Microplastics in lake mead national recreation area, USA: occurrence and biological uptake. PLoS ONE 15:e0228896. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228896
Ballent A, Corcoran PL, Madden O, Helm PA, Longstaffe FJ (2016) Sources and sinks of microplastics in Canadian Lake Ontario nearshore, tributary and beach sediments. Mar Pollut Bull 110:383–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.037
Bauerlein PS, Erich MW, van Loon WMGM, Mintenig SM, Koelmans AA (2023) A monitoring and data analysis method for microplastics in marine sediments. Mar Environ Res 183:105804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2022.105804
Belontz SL, Corcoran PL, de Haan-Ward J, Helm PA, Marvin C (2022) Factors driving the spatial distribution of microplastics in nearshore and offshore sediment of Lake Huron. North America Mar Pollut Bull 179:113709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113709
Cashman MA, Langknecht T, Khatib ED, Burgess RM, Boving TB, Robinson S, Ho KT (2022) Quantification of microplastics in sediments from Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island USA using a novel isolation and extraction method. Mar Pollut Bull 174:113254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.113254
Castaneda RA, Avlijas S, Simard MA, Ricciardi A (2014) Microplastic pollution in St. Lawrence River sediments. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 71:1767–1771. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2014-0281
Chen M, Du M, Jin A, Chen S, Dasgupta S, Li J, Xu H, Ta K, Peng X (2020) Forty-year pollution history of microplastics in the largest marginal sea of the Western Pacific. Geochemical Perspectives Lett 13:42–47. https://doi.org/10.7185/geochemlet.2012
Christensen ND, Wisinger CE, Maynard LA, Chauhan N, Schubert JT, Czuba JA, Barone JR (2020) Transport and characterization of microplastics in inland waterways. J Water Process Eng 38:101640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101640
Claessens M, De Meester S, Van Landuyt L, De Clerck K, Janssen CR (2011) Occurrence and distribution of microplastics in marine sediments along the Belgian coast. Mar Pollut Bull 62:2199–2204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.06.030
Constant M, Alary C, De Waele I, Dumoulin D, Breton N, Billon G (2021) To what extent can micro-and macroplastics be trapped in sedimentary particles? A case study investigating dredged sediments. Environ Sci Tech 55:5898–5905. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c08386
Corcoran PL, Norris T, Ceccanese T, Walzak MJ, Helm PA, Marvin CH (2015) Hidden plastics of Lake Ontario, Canada and their potential preservation in the sediment record. Environ Pollut 204:17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.04.009
Corcoran PL, Belontz SL, Ryan K, Walzak MJ (2020) Factors controlling the distribution of microplastic particles in benthic sediment of the Thames River, Canada. Environ Sci Technol 54:818–825. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04896
Crew A, Gregory-Eaves I, Ricciardi A (2020) Distribution, abundance, and diversity of microplastics in the upper St Lawrence River. Environ Pollut 260:113994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.113994
Culligan N, Liu KB, Ribble K, Ryu J, Dietz M (2022) Sedimentary records of microplastic pollution from coastal Louisiana and their environmental implications. J Coast Conserv 26:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-021-00847-y
Darabi M, Majeed H, Diehl A, Norton J, Zhang Y (2021) A review of microplastics in aquatic sediments: occurrence, fate, transport, and ecological impact. Cur Pollut Rep 7:40–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-020-00171-3
de Ruijter VN, Redondo-Hasselerharm PE, Gouin T, Koelmans AA (2020) Quality criteria for microplastic effect studies in the context of risk assessment: a critical review. Environ Sci Technol 54(19):11692–11705. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c03057
Dean BY, Corcoran PL, Helm PA (2018) Factors influencing microplastic abundances in nearshore, tributary and beach sediments along the Ontario shoreline of Lake Erie. J Great Lakes Res 44:1002–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2018.07.014
Deng H, Wei R, Luo WY, Hu LL, Li BW, Di YN, Shi HH (2020) Microplastic pollution in water and sediment in a textile industrial area. Environ Pollut 258:113658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113658
Dikareva N, Simon KS (2019) Microplastic pollution in streams spanning an urbanisation gradient. Environ Pollut 250:292–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.105
Eppehimer DE, Hamdhani H, Hollien KD, Nemec ZC, Lee LN, Quanrud DM, Bogan MT (2021) Impacts of baseflow and flooding on microplastic pollution in an effluent-dependent arid land river in the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:45375–45389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13724-w
Felismino MEL, Helm PA, Rochman CM (2021) Microplastic and other anthropogenic microparticles in water and sediments of Lake Simcoe. J Great Lakes Res 47:180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2020.10.007
Frias JP, Nash R (2019) Microplastics: finding a consensus on the definition. Mar Pollut Bull 138:145–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.11.022
Graca B, Szewc K, Zakrzewska D, Dolega A, Szczerbowska-Boruchowska M (2017) Sources and fate of microplastics in marine and beach sediments of the Southern Baltic Sea-a preliminary study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:7650–7661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8419-5
Graham ER, Thompson JT (2009) Deposit- and suspension-feeding sea cucumbers (Echinodermata) ingest plastic fragments. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 368:22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2008.09.007
Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection (GESAMP) (2021) Sea based sources of marine litter. Report of the GESAMP Working Group 43. In: Gilardi, K. (ed.), IMO/UNESCO6EOC/UNEP Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection. Reports and Studied GESAMP xx, p. 144. https://www.gesamp.org/work/groups/wg‐43‐on‐sea‐based‐sources‐of‐marine‐litter
Guerranti C, Cannas S, Scopetani C, Fastelli P, Cincinelli A, Renzi M (2017) Plastic litter in aquatic environments of Maremma Regional Park (Tyrrhenian Sea, Italy): Contribution by the Ombrone river and levels in marine sediments. Mar Pollut Bull 117:366–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.02.021
Gurjar UR, Xavier KM, Shukla SP, Takar S, Jaiswar AK, Deshmukhe G, Nayak BB (2023) Seasonal distribution and abundance of microplastics in the coastal sediments of north eastern Arabian Sea. Mar Pollut Bull 187:114545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.114545
Haave M, Lorenz C, Primpke S, Gerdts G (2019) Different stories told by small and large microplastics in sediment - first report of microplastic concentrations in an urban recipient in Norway. Mar Pollut Bull 141:501–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.02.015
Hampton LM, Lowman H, Coffin S et al (2022) A living tool for the continued exploration of microplastic toxicity. Micropl Nanopl. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-022-00032-4
Haque MR, Ali MM, Ahmed W, Siddique MA, Akbor MA, Islam MS, Rahman MM (2023) Assessment of microplastics pollution in aquatic species (fish, crab, and snail), water, and sediment from the Buriganga River, Bangladesh: An ecological risk appraisals. Sci Total Environ 857:159344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159344
Horton AA, Svendsen C, Williams RJ, Spurgeon DJ, Lahive E (2017) Large microplastic particles in sediments of tributaries of the River Thames, UK-Abundance, sources and methods for effective quantification. Mar Pollut Bull 114:218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.09.004
Hurley R, Woodward J, Rothwell JJ (2018) Microplastic contamination of river beds significantly reduced by catchment-wide flooding. Nature Geosci 11:251–257. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0080-1
International Maritime Organization (IMO) (2016) Review of the Current State of Knowledge Regarding Marine Litter in Wastes Dumped at Sea under the London Convention and Protocol. Office for the London Convention/Protocol and Ocean Affairs. Retrieved from https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/OurWork/Environment/Documents/Marine%20litter%20review%20for%20publication%20April%202016_final_ebook_version.pdf
Ji X, Ma Y, Zeng G, Xu X, Mei K, Wang Z, Chen Z, Dahlgren R, Zhang M, Shang X (2021) Transport and fate of microplastics from riverine sediment dredge piles: implications for disposal. J Hazard Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124132
Kallenbach EMF, Friberg N, Lusher A, Jacobsen D, Hurley RR (2022) Anthropogenically impacted lake catchments in Denmark reveal low microplastic pollution. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:47726–47739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19001-8
Kiss T, Forian S, Szatmari G, Sipos G (2021) Spatial distribution of microplastics in the fluvial sediments of a transboundary river-A case study of the Tisza River in Central Europe. Sci Total Environ 785:147306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147306
Klein S, Worch E, Knepper TP (2015) Occurrence and spatial distribution of microplastics in river shore sediments of the Rhine-Main area in Germany. Environ Sci Tech 49:6070–6076. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00492
Koelmans AA, Redondo-Hasselerharm PE, Nor NHM, de Ruijter VN, Mintenig SM, Kooi M (2022) Risk assessment of microplastic particles. Nat Rev Mater 7:138–152. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00411-y
Kor K, Ghazilou A, Ershadifar H (2020) Microplastic pollution in the littoral sediments of the northern part of the Oman Sea. Mar Pollut Bull 155:111166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111166
Laermanns H, Reifferscheid G, Kruse J, Foeldi C, Dierkes G, Schaefer D, Scherer C, Bogner C, Stock F (2021) Microplastic in water and sediments at the confluence of the Elbe and Mulde Rivers in Germany. Front Environ Sci 9:794895. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.794895
Leads RR, Weinstein JE (2019) Occurrence of tire wear particles and other microplastics within the tributaries of the Charleston Harbor Estuary, South Carolina, USA. Mar Pollut Bull 145:569–582
Lenaker PL, Baldwin AK, Corsi SR, Mason SA, Reneau PC, Scott JW (2019) Vertical distribution of microplastics in the water column and surficial sediment from the Milwaukee River basin to Lake Michigan. Environ Sci Technol 53:12227–12237. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03850
Leslie HA, Brandsma SH, Van Velzen MJM, Vethaak AD (2017) Microplastics en route: Field measurements in the Dutch river delta and Amsterdam canals, wastewater treatment plants, North Sea sediments and biota. Environ Int 101:133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.01.018
Li X, Yu QG, Li B, Wang H, Zhang YF, Liu HH, Xie XY (2023) Long-term deposition records of microplastics in a plateau lake under the influence of multiple natural and anthropogenic factors. Sci Total Environ 856:159071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159071
Limonta G, Mancia A, Benkhalqui A, Bertolucci C, Abelli L, Fossi MC (2019) Microplastics induce transcriptional changes, immune response and behavioral alterations in adult zebrafish. Sci Rep 9(1):15775. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52292-5
Martin MK (2018) Quantifying and characterizing the Mississippi River's contribution of microplastic debris to the Gulf of Mexico. Master´s Thesis report submitted in Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi pp.1–47. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/quantifying-characterizing-mississippi-rivers/docview/2112399896/se-2?accountid=26153
Matsuguma Y, Takada H, Kumata H, Kanke H, Sakurai S, Suzuki T, Itoh M, Okazaki Y, Boonyatumanond R, Zakaria MP, Weerts S (2017) Microplastics in sediment cores from Asia and Africa as indicators of temporal trends in plastic pollution. Arch Environ Con Tox 73:230–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-017-0414-9
McEachern K, Alegria H, Kalagher AL, Hansen C, Morrison S, Hastings D (2019) Microplastics in Tampa Bay, Florida: Abundance and variability in estuarine waters and sediments. Mar Pollut Bull 148:97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.07.068
Mehinto AC, Coffin S, Koelmans AA, Brander SM, Wagner M, Thornton Hampton LM, Burton AG Jr, Miller E, Gouin T, Weisberg SB, Rochman CM (2022) Risk-based management framework for microplastics in aquatic ecosystems. Micropl Nanopl 2:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-022-00033-3
MP-SED: A microplastics database for sediments (2023) Environmental Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Retrieved 30 October 2023 from https://doer.el.erdc.dren.mil/.
Nel HA, Dalu T, Wasserman RJ (2018) Sinks and sources: assessing microplastic abundance in river sediment and deposit feeders in an Austral temperate Urban River system. Sci Total Environ 612:950–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.298
Niu L, Li Y, Li Y, Hu Q, Wang C, Hu J, Wenlong Z, Longfei W, Chi Z, Huanjun Z (2021) New insights into the vertical distribution and microbial degradation of microplastics in urban river sediments. Water Res 188:116449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116449
Peng G, Zhu B, Yang D, Su L, Shi H, Li D (2017) Microplastics in sediments of the Changjiang Estuary, China. Environ Pollut 225:283–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.12.064
Peng GY, Xu P, Zhu BS, Bai MY, Li DJ (2018) Microplastics in freshwater river sediments in Shanghai, China: a case study of risk assessment in mega-cities. Environ Pollut 234:448–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.034
Preston-Whyte F, Silburn B, Meakins B, Bakir A, Pillay K, Worship M, Paruk S, Mdazuka Y, Mooi G, Harmer R, Doran D (2021) Meso-and microplastics monitoring in harbour environments: a case study for the Port of Durban. South Africa Mar Pollut Bull 163:111948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111948
Rauchschwalbe M-T, Fueser H, Traunspurger W, Höss S (2021) Bacterial consumption by nematodes is disturbed by the presence of polystyrene beads: the roles of food dilution and pharyngeal pumping. Environ Pollut 273:116471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116471
Redondo-Hasselerharm PE, Rico A, Koelmans AA (2023) Risk assessment of microplastics in freshwater sediments guided by strict quality criteria and data alignment methods. J Hazard Mater 441:129814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129814
Sekudewicz I, Dabrowska AM, Syczewski MD (2021) Microplastic pollution in surface water and sediments in the urban section of the Vistula River (Poland). Sci Total Environ 762:143111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143111
Shen JC, Gu X, Liu R, Feng HY, Li DP, Liu Y, Jiang XF, Qin G, An SQ, Li N, Leng X (2023) Damming has changed the migration process of microplastics and increased the pollution risk in the reservoirs in the Shaying River Basin. J Hazard Mater 443:130067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130067
Simon-Sánchez L, Grelaud M, Lorenz C, Garcia-Orellana J, Vianello A, Liu F, Vollertsen J, Ziveri P (2022) Can a sediment core reveal the plastic age? Microplastic preservation in a coastal sedimentary record”. Environ Sci Tech 56:16780–16788. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c04264
Straub S, Hirsch PE, Burkhardt-Holm P (2017) Biodegradable and petroleum-based microplastics do not differ in their ingestion and excretion but in their biological effects in a freshwater invertebrate Gammarus fossarum. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14(7):774. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070774
Su L, Xue Y, Li L, Yang D, Kolandhasamy P, Li D, Shi H (2016) Microplastics in Taihu Lake, China. Environ Pollut 216:711–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.06.036
Su L, Sharp SM, Pettigrove VJ, Craig NJ, Nan BX, Du FN, Shi HH (2020) Superimposed microplastic pollution in a coastal metropolis. Water Res 168:115140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.115140
Talbot R, Chang H (2022) Microplastics in freshwater: a global review of factors affecting spatial and temporal variations. Environ Pollut 292:118393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118393
Talley TS, Venuti N, Whelan R (2020) Natural history matters: plastics in estuarine fish and sediments at the mouth of an urban watershed. PLoS ONE 15:e0229777. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229777
Tang GW, Liu MY, Zhou Q, He HX, Chen K, Zhang HB, Hu JH, Huang QH, Luo YM, Ke HW, Chen B, Xu XR, Cai MG (2018) Microplastics and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Xiamen coastal areas: implications for anthropogenic impacts. Sci Total Environ 634:811–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.336
Thompson RC, Olsen Y, Mitchell RP, Davis A, Rowland SJ, John AWG, McGonigle D, Russell AE (2004) Lost at Sea: Where is all the plastic? Science 304:838. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1094559
Thornton Hampton LM, Lowman H, Coffin S et al (2022) A living tool for the continued exploration of microplastic toxicity. Micropl Nanopl. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-022-00032-4
Tibbetts J, Krause S, Lynch I, Smith GHS (2018) Abundance, distribution, and drivers of microplastic contamination in urban river environments. Water 10:1597. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111597
Tsang YY, Mak CW, Liebich C, Lam SW, Sze ETP, Chan KM (2017) Microplastic pollution in the marine waters and sediments of Hong Kong. Mar Pollut Bull 115:20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.11.003
Turner S, Horton AA, Rose NL, Hall C (2019) A temporal sediment record of microplastics in an urban lake, London, UK. J Paleolimn 61:449–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-019-00071-7
United Nations Environment Assembly (UN) 2022 End plastic pollution: Towards an international legally binding instrument – Resolution adopted by the United Nations Environment Assembly on 2 March 2022 [UNEP/EA.5/Res.14]. https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/40597.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) 2016 State of the science white paper: A summary of literature on the chemical toxicity of plastics pollution to aquatic life and aquatic-dependent wildlife. EPA-822-R-16–009. chrome- https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-12/documents/plastics-aquatic-life-report.pdf. Accessed 28 February 2023.
United States Environmental Protection Agency and United States Army Corps of Engineers (USEPA and USACE) 1991 Evaluation of Dredged Material Proposed for Ocean Disposal: Testing Manual. EPA/503R-91/001, Washington, DC
Vaughan R, Turner SD, Rose NL (2017) Microplastics in the sediments of a UK urban lake. Environ Pollut 229:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.05.057
Vermaire JC, Pomeroy C, Herczegh SM, Haggart O, Murphy M (2017) Microplastic abundance and distribution in the open water and sediment of the Ottawa River, Canada, and its tributaries. Facets 2:301–314. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2016-0070
Vianello A, Boldrin A, Guerriero P, Moschino V, Rella R, Sturaro A, Da Ros L (2013) Microplastic particles in sediments of Lagoon of Venice, Italy: First observations on occurrence, spatial patterns and identification. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 130:54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2013.03.022
Wang J, Peng J, Tan Z, Gao Y, Zhan Z, Chen Q, Cai L (2017) Microplastics in the surface sediments from the Beijiang River littoral zone: Composition, abundance, surface textures and interaction with heavy metals. Chemosphere 171:248–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.12.074
Wang ZF, Su BB, Xu XQ, Di D, Huang H, Mei K, Dahlgren RA, Zhang MH, Shang X (2018) Preferential accumulation of small (<300 mu m) microplastics in the sediments of a coastal plain river network in Eastern China. Water Res 144:393–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.07.050
Wang Y, Zou XQ, Peng C, Qiao SQ, Wang T, Yu WW, Khokiattiwong OA, Kornkanitnan NRM (2020) Occurrence and distribution of microplastics in surface sediments from the Gulf of Thailand. Mar Pollut Bull 152:110916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.110916
Watkins L, McGrattan S, Sullivan PJ, Walter MT (2019) The effect of dams on river transport of microplastic pollution. Sci Total Environ 664:834–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.028
Welsh B, Aherne J, Paterson AM, Yao H, McConnell C (2022a) Atmospheric deposition of anthropogenic particles and microplastics in South-Central Ontario. Canada Sci Total Environ 835:155426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155426
Welsh B, Aherne J, Paterson AM, Yao H, McConnell C (2022b) Spatiotemporal variability of microplastics in Muskoka-Haliburton headwater lakes, Ontario. Canada Environ Earth Sci 81:551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10670-9
Wilkens JL, McQueen AD, LeMonte JJ, Suedel BC (2020) Initial survey of microplastics in bottom sediments from United States waterways”. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 104:15–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-019-02762-3
Xia X, Sun M, Zhou M, Chang Z, Li L (2020) Polyvinyl chloride microplastics induce growth inhibition and oxidative stress in Cyprinus carpio var larvae. Sci Total Environ 716:136479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136479
Xu QJ, Xing RL, Sun MD, Gao YY, An LH (2020) Microplastics in sediments from an interconnected river-estuary region. Sci Total Environ 729:139025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139025
Yi Y, Kong L, Wang X, Li Y, Cheng J, Han J, Chen H, Zhang N (2023) Distribution and characteristics of microplastics in sediment at representative dredged material ocean dumping sites China. Mar Pollut Bull 193:115201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115201
Zhao XL, Liu ZH, Cai L, Han JQ (2023) Occurrence and distribution of microplastics in surface sediments of a typical river with a highly eroded catchment, a case of the Yan River, a tributary of the Yellow River. Sci Total Environ 863:160932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160932
Zheng Y, Li J, Cao W, Jiang F, Zhao C, Ding H, Wang M, Gao F, Sun C (2020) Vertical distribution of microplastics in bay sediment reflecting effects of sedimentation dynamics and anthropogenic activities. Mar Pollut Bull 152:110885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.110885
Zhu XP, Ran W, Teng J, Zhang C, Zhang WJ, Hou CW, Zhao JM, Qi XT, Wang Q (2021) Microplastic pollution in nearshore sediment from the Bohai Sea Coastline. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 107:665–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-020-02866-1
Zobkov M, Esiukova E (2017) Microplastics in Baltic bottom sediments: Quantification procedures and first results. Mar Pollut Bull 114:724–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.10.060
Funding
This study was funded by the US Army Engineer Research and Development Center Dredging Operations and Environmental Research Program (Risk Management Project 23–08).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wilkens, J.L., Calomeni-Eck, A.J., Boyda, J. et al. Microplastic in Dredged Sediments: From Databases to Strategic Responses. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 112, 72 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-024-03878-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-024-03878-x