Abstract
The pathological advancement of osteoporosis is caused by the uneven development of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) in terms of osteogenesis and adipogenesis. While the role of EEF1B2 in intellectual disability and tumorigenesis is well established, its function in the bone-fat switch of BMSCs is still largely unexplored. During the process of osteogenic differentiation, we observed an increase in the expression of EEF1B2, while a decrease in its expression was noted during adipogenesis. Suppression of EEF1B2 hindered the process of osteogenic differentiation and mineralization while promoting adipogenic differentiation. On the contrary, overexpression of EEF1B2 enhanced osteogenesis and strongly inhibited adipogenesis. Furthermore, the excessive expression of EEF1B2 in the tibias has the potential to mitigate bone loss and decrease marrow adiposity in mice with osteoporosis. In terms of mechanism, the suppression of β-catenin activity occurred when EEF1B2 function was suppressed during osteogenesis. Our collective findings indicate that EEF1B2 functions as a regulator, influencing the differentiation of BMSCs and maintaining a balance between bone and fat. Our finding highlights its potential as a therapeutic target for diseases related to bone metabolism.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Osteoporosis is a condition that affects the bones as people age, causing them to become weaker and more prone to fractures, even from minor injuries [1, 2]. The pathological changes of osteoporosis mainly include decreased mineralization and accumulation of marrow adiposity [3,4,5]. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) are progenitors that have the ability to self-renew and differentiate into osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes [6,7,8,9]. The uneven differentiation of BMSCs into either osteoblasts or adipocytes plays a role in the development of osteoporosis [10, 11].
Protein synthesis requires the participation of eukaryotic elongation factor 1 (eEF1) [12]. The eEF1 family comprises eEF1A and eEF1B complex [12]. EEF1B2 encodes the eEF1B proteins, which consist of the α, β, and γ subunits [13, 14]. Extensive research has been conducted on the role of EEF1B2 as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for eEF1A [15,16,17]. In addition to its role in translation elongation, previous research has demonstrated that EEF1B2 is expressed in various tissues and cell lines and at different developmental stages [18]. Moreover, EEF1B2 has been implicated in intellectual disability and tumorigenesis. EEF1B2 was found to be overexpressed in lung cancer in humans [19]. Conversely, intellectual disability is caused by the loss of function in the EEF1B2 gene [20, 21]. Nevertheless, the expression of EEF1B2 in BMSCs and its function and underlying molecular mechanisms in the modulation of BMSCs differentiation are still poorly understood.
BMSCs exhibit a high degree of plasticity, allowing them to differentiate into various cell lineages. In vitro, the differentiation of BMSCs can be manipulated by adjusting the composition of the culture medium. For instance, exposure to an osteogenic induction medium containing factors β-glycerophosphate and ascorbic acid prompts BMSCs to differentiate into osteoblasts. Conversely, treatment with adipogenic components, including insulin, rosiglitazone, and IBMX, induces BMSCs to differentiate into adipocytes [22,23,24]. The differentiation of BMSCs is regulated by a complex network influenced by various factors, such as changes in the microenvironment, chemical factors, and non-coding RNAs like miRNA-128 and ANCR, which act through different molecular signaling pathways [25, 26]. The Wnt/β-catenin pathway has been identified as a key regulator of BMSCs differentiation [27, 28], with factors like Foxf1, Piezo1, Stat3 and CDC20 facilitating osteogenesis and adipogenesis of BMSCs by modulating β-catenin activity [29,30,31,32]. So far, the investigation of the regulator of β-catenin during BMSCs differentiation is still required.
This study shows that during osteogenic differentiation, the expression of EEF1B2 is increased in BMSCs, whereas it is decreased during adipogenic differentiation. In vitro, the suppression of EEF1B2 in BMSCs resulted in decreased osteogenic function and enhanced adipogenic specialization. Consistently overexpressing EEF1B2 in the BMSC cell line resulted in enhanced osteogenesis and suppressed adipogenesis. In vivo, the excessive expression of EEF1B2 can mitigate bone loss and decrease the amount of fat in the bone marrow of mice with osteoporosis. Mechanically, EEF1B2 controlled the transition from bone formation to fat formation in BMSCs by influencing the function of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Our data identified EEF1B2 as a regulator of BMSCs in maintaining bone-fat equilibrium.
Materials and methods
Mice
The C57BL/6 mice were purchased from the Laboratory Animal Center of Southern Medical University. All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University (IACUC-LAC-20230620-003) and were following the guidelines of the National Institute of Health. All animals were maintained in the animal facility of the Nanfang Hospital and housed under standard conditions of constant temperature and humidity on a 12/12 h light/dark cycle.
Cell isolation, culture and differentiation
BMSCs were isolated from 6 weeks old C57BL/6 mice femurs and tibias bone marrow and cultured in α-minimum essential medium (α-MEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin and streptomycin (P/S, all from Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) in a 37 °C incubator with a 5% CO2 atmosphere. The adherent cells were digested and cultured until 80% confluence. Cells between passages 3 and 5 were utilized for the experiments, and all in-vitro experiments were repeated in triplicate.
The C3H10T1/2 cell line (#CL-0325) was purchased from Procell Life Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). The C3H10T1/2 cells were cultured in α-MEM containing 10% FBS, 2mM L-glutamine and 1% P/S (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA).
For osteogenic induction, BMSCs were cultured in osteogenic medium containing 50 µg/ml ascorbic acid and 10 mM β-glycerophosphate [24]. C3H10T1/2 cells were cultured in osteogenic medium containing 50 µg/ml ascorbic acid, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, and 100 nM dexamethasone (all from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The culture medium change was performed every 3 days [33, 34].
For adipogenic induction, adipogenic medium consists of adipogenic medium A (AM-A) and adipogenic medium B (AM-B). AM-A consist of αMEM, 20%FBS, 1%P/S, 1µmol/mL dexamethasone, 10 µg/mL insulin, 1µM rosiglitazone and 0.5mM 3-Isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX). AM-B consist of αMEM, 20%FBS, 1%P/S, 1µM rosiglitazone and 10 µg/ml insulin. BMSCs and C3H10T1/2 cells were cultured in AM-A for 2 days, followed by AM-B for 4 days with culture medium changed every 2 days, to induce differentiation into adipocytes [24].
siRNA-mediated knockdown and cell transfection
Eef1b2-specific siRNAs and negative control siRNA (NC) (RiboBio, Guangzhou, China) were used to cell transfection. Transfection of siRNA oligonucleotides was performed using Lipofectamine RNAimax (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Eef1b2 expression was determined by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). Transfected cells were passaged and used for downstream analyses.
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining
For ALP staining, Differentiated BMSCs were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Solarbio, China) for 15 min. The cells were washed three times with PBS and stained with 1-Step nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT)/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (BCIP) (Thermo Fisher, MA, USA) for 30 min and washed by PBS. ALP-positive cells were visualized by light microscopy or scanning.
For ARS staining, Differentiated BMSCs were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. The cells were washed three times with distilled water and stained with ARS staining solution for 15 min. The staining solution was removed, and the cells were washed three times in distilled water. The mineralized part was visualized by scanning.
Oil Red O staining
To detect the lipid droplet formation of BMSCs after adipogenic differentiation, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature, washed with PBS, and stained with an Oil red O staining kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China) for 20 min.
Lentiviral construction and cells transfection
EEF1B2 overexpression lentiviruses were generated by Tsingke Biotech Co., Ltd (Beijing, China). The lentiviruses were then transfected into C3H10T1/2 (MOI:20) and screened with puromycin.
Small molecule treatment
WAY-262,611 (Selleck, TX, USA) and ICG-001 (Selleck, TX, USA) were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and administrated at a concentration of 3µM. Control groups received equivalent volumes of DMSO.
RNA isolation and quantification of mRNA expression
TRIzol™ reagent (Thermo Fisher, MA, USA) was used to extract the total RNA from the cells. PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (Takara, Otsu, Japan) was used to synthesize complementary DNA (cDNA). A qRT-PCR was performed by using an SYBR Green PCR Kit (Takara, Otsu, Japan) as directed by the manufacturer. Gene expression levels were analyzed relative to β-actin or GAPDH. The primer sequences are shown in Table S1.
Western blot
Cells were lysed using radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (Solarbio, Beijing, China) with protease inhibitor mixture (Roche, Swiss). Total cell lysates were analyzed using Western blotting. Western blotting analyses were conducted using standard procedures. The details of the antibodies used are provided in Table S2.
OVX animal model and AAV injection
Bilateral surgical ovariectomy (OVX) was performed to create a mouse model of osteoporosis in postmenopausal condition [35]. Briefly, 8 weeks old female mice were anesthetized. Then, the mice were subjected to Sham surgery or bilateral surgical ovariectomy by the dorsal approach. In the Sham operation group, the anesthesia, fixation, and selected incision were the same as those in the model group.
For AAV injection, 4 weeks after surgery, OVX mice were anesthetized. AAV-eGFP and AAV-EEF1B2 (Tsingke, Beijing, China) were injected into OVX mice tibias. In the Sham operation group, mice tibias were injected with PBS. µCT scanning analyses µCT scanning of mice tibias was conducted using a SkyScan1276 according to standard procedures and data were analyzed using software from the manufacturer.
Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunofluorescent (IF) analysis
Tibias were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C shaker overnight. Then they were decalcified by using EDTA solution at 4 °C shaker for 14 days. Those tissues were processed for either cryostat or paraffin sections. For H&E staining, paraffin sections were used with standard protocol. For IF staining, cryosections were rehydrated, washed with PBST (PBS + 0.05% Triton), and were blocked in 3% BSA (Bovine Serum Albumin) in PBST. IF staining were performed using standard methods. The details of the antibodies used are provided in Table S2. Sections were mounted in DAPI mounting medium (Vector laboratories). The staining was photographed with Zeiss Axio Imager D2 (Zeiss, German).
RNA-seq and bioinformatics analysis
Total RNA of negative control siRNA (NC) or Eef1b2-targeted siRNA (siEef1b2) treated- BMSCs were extracted by SteadyPure Quick RNA Extraction Kit (Accurate Biology) following the manufacturer’s instructions 7 days after osteogenesis induction. Four biological replicates of each group were tested. Total RNAs were delivered to a facility core for quality proof, cDNA library construction, and RNA sequencing. High-throughput sequencing was performed using the Illumina Novaseq 6000 (USA). The RNA-seq reads were aligned to the mouse genome (GRCm39) using HISAT2 [36]. StringTie was subsequently used to count reads in features [37]. Genes of less than ten counts among all groups were filtered out using DESeq2 in R prior to the downstream analyses. Regularized logarithm (rlog) was applied to transform the read counts for Principal component analysis (PCA) and plotting [38]. Genes with Benjamini-Hochberg’s false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 and fold change > 2 were defined as significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between conditions. The volcano plot was generated by the ggplot2 package in R [39]. Heatmaps were generated by the pheatmap package in R. Gene ontology (GO) analysis was performed using the R package clusterProfiler [40, 41], input with the down regulated genes in the siEef1b2 group. Enriched pathways were ranked based on the adjusted p-value calculated by the software. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was performed using GSEA software (version 4.3.2) following the manufacturer’s instructions, input with normalized count matrix generated by the DESeq2 package in R [42].
Statistical analysis
Data were shown as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). GraphPad Prism was used to conduct the analysis. To evaluate statistical significance, a two-tailed Student t-test was used to compare two groups, while one-way ANOVA analysis was employed for multiple comparisons. A statistically significant difference was indicated for all experiments when P < 0.05.
Result
EEF1B2 is increasingly expressed in BMSCs over osteogenic differentiation while decreasingly over adipogenic differentiation
To identify the role of EEF1B2 in BMSCs differentiation, we first investigated the EEF1B2 expression in mouse BMSCs. The expression of EEF1B2 in BMSCs is indicated by the results of qRT-PCR and western blot. The mRNA levels of Eef1b2 and osteoblast markers Runx2, Sp7, Bglap (Fig. 1A) are increased in BMSCs during osteogenic differentiation, along with higher protein levels of EEF1B2, Osteocalcin (OCN)(Fig. 1B) and ALP (Fig. 1C). It was verified that the EEF1B2 expression is elevated throughout the process of osteogenic differentiation (Fig. 1A, B). Afterwards, we investigated the expression of EEF1B2 in BMSCs throughout the process of adipogenic differentiation. The expression of adipocyte markers in both mRNA and protein levels was enhanced when mice BMSCs were cultured in adipogenic medium (Fig. 1D, E). Oil O Red staining showed increased lipid droplet formation during the adipogenic differentiation process (Fig. 1F). Concurrently, the expression of EEF1B2 is reduced during the adipogenic differentiation of BMSCs (Fig. 1D, E). These results indicate that EEF1B2 might play an opposite role in osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of BMSCs. EEF1B2 is potentially involved in the regulation of osteogenic-adipogenic differentiation balance of BMSCs.
Suppression of EEF1B2 in BMSCs hampers the process of osteogenic differentiation and mineralization
In order to comprehend the function of EEF1B2 in the process of osteogenic differentiation, we reduce the expression of EEF1B2 in primary mice BMSCs as well as in the murine BMSC cell line C3H10T1/2 cells. The inhibition of Eef1b2 mRNA by 3 distinct siRNAs was confirmed through qRT-PCR analysis (Fig. 2A). Afterwards, we investigated the potential impact of suppressing EEF1B2 on the process of osteogenic differentiation and mineralization in BMSCs. In the EEF1B2 knockdown (KD) groups, ALP activity significantly decreased after culturing the cells in osteogenic medium (OM) for 7 days (Fig. 2B). Mineralized nodule formation was abolished in EEF1B2 KD groups as shown by Alizarin Red S staining (ARS) (Fig. 2B). In the EEF1B2 KD groups, the expression of Sp7, Col1a1, Alpl, and Bglap mRNA was consistently decreased (Fig. 2C). Furthermore, the western blotting analysis demonstrated a reduction in the protein levels of RUNX2 and OCN in the groups with EEF1B2 knockdown (Fig. 2D). Confirming the impairment of osteogenic differentiation, the results were duplicated with C3H10T1/2 cell lines due to the silencing of EEF1B2 (Fig. 2E-G). These data shows that knockdown EEF1B2 expression in BMSCs suppresses osteogenic differentiation.
Knock down EEF1B2 in BMSCs promote adipogenic differentiation
Since osteoblast and adipocyte have a shared ancestry, our investigation focuses on determining if reducing EEF1B2 can promote adipogenesis. EEF1B2 silencing led to an augmentation in lipid droplet formation, as evidenced by the intensified staining with Oil Red O (Fig. 3C). Consistently, elevated levels of adipocyte marker gene Adipoq, Lpl, and Fabp4 were observed in EEF1B2 KD groups (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, the western blot analysis revealed an elevation in the protein expression of FABP4 in the EEF1B2 KD groups (Fig. 3B). Similarly, knockdown EEF1B2 in C3H10T1/2 cell line under adipogenic medium also showed increased adipogenesis activity (Fig. 3D-F). Our finding indicates that suppressing EEF1B2 expression in BMSCs leads to enhanced adipogenesis.
EEF1B2 overexpression in C3H10T1/2 cell line promotes osteogenic differentiation and inhibits adipogenic differentiation
In order to validate the impact of EEF1B2 on the cellular destiny of BMSCs, lentivirus was utilized to overexpress EEF1B2 in the C3H10T1/2 cell line. The Western blot analysis revealed a significant increase in the expression of EEF1B2 (Fig. 4A, B). By contrast, ALP activity was enhanced when EEF1B2 was overexpressed (Fig. 4C).
To explore the impact of EEF1B2 overexpression on the adipogenic differentiation of C3H10T1/2, we investigated its potential contrary effect on osteogenesis and adipogenesis caused by EEF1B2 knockdown. EEF1B2 overexpression groups exhibited a decrease in lipid droplet formation, as evidenced by the reduced staining of Oil Red O (Fig. 4F). Furthermore, the mRNA expression of the adipogenic marker genes were reduced when EEF1B2 was overexpressed (Fig. 4D), and down-regulated of FABP4 in LV-Eef1b2 group was shown by western blot analysis (Fig. 4E). In summary, our results indicate that increased expression of EEF1B2 promotes osteogenic differentiation while inhibiting adipogenic differentiation in the C3H10T1/2 cell line.
EEF1B2 overexpression mitigates bone loss and diminishes marrow adiposity in mice afflicted with osteoporosis
In order to elucidate the function of EEF1B2 in the determination of BMSCs cell destiny in vivo, a model of osteoporosis was generated through the removal of ovaries in mice (OVX mice). AAV was administered into the marrow cavities of both tibias in OVX mice (Fig. 5A). After 4 weeks of injection, the microtomography analysis (micro-CT) revealed a rise in BV/TV, BMD, Tb.N, and a decrease in Tb.Sp in the OVX + AAV-Eef1b2 group when compared to the OVX + AAV-eGFP group (Fig. 5B, C). This suggests that the overexpression of EEF1B2 in the bone marrow cavities of OVX mice can alleviate bone loss. Furthermore, the H&E staining results indicate that OVX mice treated with AAV-Eef1b2 exhibited a decrease in adipocytes in comparison to the OVX + AAV-eGFP groups (Fig. 5C). These findings highlight the importance of EEF1B2 overexpression in bone marrow in mitigating bone loss and decreasing marrow fat in mice that have undergone ovariectomy.
EEF1B2 controls the transition from adipogenic to osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs through the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway
To investigate the underlying mechanism by which EEF1B2 controls the cell destiny of BMSCs, bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis was performed on BMSCs treated with or without siRNA targeted to Eef1b2 during osteogenic induction. Four biological repeated experiments were carried out in each group. Principal component analysis (PCA) exhibited well distinguished gene expression features between negative control (NC) and siEef1b2 group(Fig. 6A). Normalized counts of the gene Eef1b2 verified the significant knock down efficiency of the siRNA treated group in the RNA-seq data (Fig. 6B). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were defined as genes with Benjamini-Hochberg’s false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 and fold change > 2 between two groups and visualized via volcano plot (Fig. 6C). Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis using downregulated DEGs in siEef1b2 group as input showed the enriched biological processed including ossification and osteoblast differentiation (Fig. 6D). The gene expression values of the most enriched Wnt pathway correlated gene set and the osteoblast gene set from NC BMSC RNA-seq data were extracted and displayed in the heatmaps (Fig. 6E). Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed the significantly enriched gene set to be Wnt signaling pathway and pluripotency (p < 0.01) and Wnt signaling pathway (p < 0.05) in NC group compared to siEef1b2 group (Fig. 6F). Consistently, the results of qRT-PCR demonstrated a decrease in the expression of the Tcf7 gene, which is a readout gene for β-catenin. The Western blot analysis demonstrated that the expression of β-catenin was reduced in groups where EEF1B2 was knocked down (Fig. 6H) and increased in the group with overexpression of EEF1B2 (Figs. 4A and E and 6I). Furthermore, the tibias of OVX + AAV-eGFP mice exhibited a decrease in β-catenin expression when compared to the Sham + PBS groups. The overexpression of EEF1B2 led to a significant increase in the β-catenin level within the tibia cavities (Fig. 5D). These data support that EEF1B2 regulates BMSCs osteogenesis and adipogenesis by modulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling activity.
To further investigate the role of β-catenin in mediating EEF1B2-regulated BMSCs differentiation, we treated EEF1B2 KD BMSCs and the control group with WAY-262,611, a β-catenin agonist. β-catenin activation could partially rescue the inhibition of osteogenesis and promotion of adipogenesis by EEF1B2 silencing (Fig. 7A, B, D, E). In contrast, β-catenin inhibition eliminates the positive role of overexpression of EEF1B2 in osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of C3H10T1/2 cells (Fig. 7C, F). Taken together, these data show that EEF1B2 regulates β-catenin activity to restore the equilibrium between osteogenesis and adipogenesis, suggesting the involvement of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in the osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of BMSCs during the progression of osteoporosis.
Discussion
Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells have the ability to transform into various types of cells, such as bone-forming cells and fat cells. Therefore, the differentiation direction of BMSCs is deemed crucial for the study and treatment of osteoporosis. Adipocytes accumulation and osteoblasts reduction are of high relevance to osteoporosis [43]. Currently, a significant body of research has examined the regulatory mechanisms governing the unidirectional differentiation of BMSCs towards osteogenic or adipogenic lineages. Some studies have also explored the involvement of BMSCs in maintaining the balance between bone and fat. Nevertheless, there is a lack of publicly available reports on the effects and underlying mechanisms of EEF1B2 on the directional differentiation of BMSCs. In our present investigation, we have shown that the involvement of EEF1B2 in the transition from osteogenesis to adipogenesis in BMSCs is evident as the inhibition of EEF1B2 suppresses BMSCs’ ability to form bone but promotes the formation of fat cells. In terms of mechanism, we discovered that EEF1B2 facilitated β-catenin activity, thereby regulating the differentiation of BMSCs. These results demonstrated the integral role of EEF1B2 in BMSCs differentiation.
The process of protein synthesis in eukaryotes is dependent on a tightly controlled mechanism that involves initiation, elongation, and termination [44]. To ensure the precise production of the protein at the correct time and location, every stage of this procedure is meticulously regulated [45]. The regulation of gene expression in transcriptional control is widely acknowledged, although there remain numerous unresolved aspects regarding the regulation at the translation level [46]. Lately, there has been an increasing amount of proof regarding further regulation during the elongation stage. There are three types of supramolecular complexes involved in elongation in eukaryotes: the ribosome, the complex of elongation factors, and the multienzyme aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complex [47]. The aminoacyl-tRNA delivery step is catalyzed by the eEF1 complex. The eEF1 family includes eEF1A and eEF1B [48]. The canonical role of eEF1B is to ensure guanine nucleotide exchange on eEF1A during the elongation process [49]. In addition to its role in translation elongation, eEF1B has also been associated with overexpression in lung cancer, indicating its involvement in tumorigenesis [19]. Furthermore, according to the report, eEF1B is extensively expressed in various cell lines and tissues, indicating its crucial involvement in gene expression [18]. According to our data, EEF1B2 is detected in mouse primary BMSCs and the C3H10T1/2 cell line. It was found to be increased during osteogenic differentiation but decreased during adipogenic differentiation, suggesting a possible involvement in the regulation of cell fate. Further experiments involving knocking down and overexpressing EEF1B2 provided additional clarification on its role in regulating the differentiation of BMSCs, specifically in the opposite directions of osteogenesis and adipogenesis.
Cell differentiation, proliferation, and migration are crucial functions regulated by the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway [50]. The regulation of osteogenesis and adipogenesis by Wnt/β-catenin is widely recognized as crucial for maintaining bone equilibrium. The activation of the Canonical Wnt signaling pathway relies on the activity of the transcription factor β-catenin [51]. When β-catenin accumulates in the nucleus, it forms complexes with LEF/TCF transcription factors to initiate the transcription of downstream target genes, such as Sp7 and Runx2. Conversely, suppression of β-catenin leads to the upregulation of the critical adipogenic transcription factors C/EBPα and PPARγ to promote adipogenesis [27, 52]. Previous research has indicated that, in addition to the Wnt family members, various elements such as ANKRD1, SFRPs, and PTTG1 have the ability to regulate the activation of β-catenin [53,54,55]. During the osteogenic differentiation condition, we conducted bulk RNA sequencing on BMSCs with EEF1B2 knockdown and a negative control group in the present investigation. The GSEA examination revealed a modification in the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway between the aforementioned groups. Our study explored the influence of decreased EEF1B2 expression on the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway during the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs, considering the associations uncovered through RNA sequencing analysis. The downregulation of EEF1B2 inhibited osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs through modulation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. As the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway acts as a switch in BMSCs cell fate choice, we wondered whether adipocytes accumulation in EEF1B2 knock down BMSCs is caused by β-catenin suppression. The results showed a reduced β-catenin activity in BMSCs undergoing adipogenic differentiation upon EEF1B2 knockdown. Notably, the expression of EEF1B2 remained unaltered following treatment with either a Wnt agonist or antagonist. These findings suggest that EEF1B2 is one of the regulators of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway during BMSCs differentiation. It is important to note that this study solely demonstrates the ability of EEF1B2 to regulate β-catenin activity during BMSCs osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation, and therefore it remains to be determined how EEF1B2 modulates Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.
Discovering an alternative method to promote osteogenic differentiation and suppress adipogenic differentiation of BMSCs proves to be a successful approach in the treatment of osteoporosis [56, 57]. This study has provided confirmation that the overexpression of EEF1B2 has the potential to enhance bone formation and decrease the accumulation of fat in the bone marrow of OVX mice, offering valuable insights for the treatment of osteoporosis.
To summarize, this research discovered that EEF1B2 functions as a toggle to regulate the fate determination of BMSCs and maintain a balance between bone and fat by controlling the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. It shows immense potential as a possible treatment approach for bone metabolic disorders.
Data availability
The bulk RNA-Seq data in this study have been deposited Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) under accession number PRJCA026878.
Abbreviations
- BMSCs:
-
Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells
- EEF1B2:
-
Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 beta 2
- OCN:
-
Osteocalcin
- IBMX:
-
3-Isobutyl-1-methylxanthine
- BSA:
-
Bovine serum albumin
- siRNA:
-
Small interfering RNA
- OM:
-
Osteogenic medium
- ALP:
-
Alkaline phosphatase
- ARS:
-
Alizarin Red S
- KD:
-
Knock down
- OVX:
-
Ovariectomy
- LV:
-
Lentivirus
- AAV:
-
Adeno-associated virus
- DAPI:
-
4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
- PCA:
-
Principal component analysis
- DEGs:
-
Differentially expressed genes
- GO:
-
Gene ontology
- GSEA:
-
Gene set enrichment analysis
- BV/TV:
-
Trabecular bone volume to total volume
- BMD:
-
Bone mineral density
- Tb.N:
-
Trabecular number
- Tb.Sp:
-
Trabecular separation
References
Liu Z, Lee HL, Suh JS et al (2022) The ERalpha/KDM6B regulatory axis modulates osteogenic differentiation in human mesenchymal stem cells. Bone Res 10(1):3
Rahmani P, Morin S (2009) Prevention of osteoporosis-related fractures among postmenopausal women and older men. CMAJ 181(11):815–820
Eastell R, Szulc P (2017) Use of bone turnover markers in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 5(11):908–923
Chen Q, Shou P, Zheng C et al (2016) Fate decision of mesenchymal stem cells: adipocytes or osteoblasts? Cell Death Differ 23(7):1128–1139
Hu L, Yin C, Zhao F et al (2018) Mesenchymal stem cells: cell fate decision to osteoblast or adipocyte and application in osteoporosis treatment. Int J Mol Sci. ;19(2)
Sivaraj KK, Jeong HW, Dharmalingam B et al (2021) Regional specialization and fate specification of bone stromal cells in skeletal development. Cell Rep 36(2):109352
Yang L, Ren Z, Yan S et al (2022) Nsun4 and Mettl3 mediated translational reprogramming of Sox9 promotes BMSC chondrogenic differentiation. Commun Biol 5(1):495
Guo Y, Chi X, Wang Y et al (2020) Mitochondria transfer enhances proliferation, migration, and osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell and promotes bone defect healing. Stem Cell Res Ther 11(1):245
Noel D, Gazit D, Bouquet C et al (2004) Short-term BMP-2 expression is sufficient for in vivo osteochondral differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 22(1):74–85
Lin Z, He H, Wang M et al (2019) MicroRNA-130a controls bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell differentiation towards the osteoblastic and adipogenic fate. Cell Prolif 52(6):e12688
Ouyang Z, Kang D, Li K et al (2022) DEPTOR exacerbates bone-fat imbalance in osteoporosis by transcriptionally modulating BMSC differentiation. Biomed Pharmacother 151:113164
Sasikumar AN, Perez WB, Kinzy TG (2012 Jul-Aug) The many roles of the eukaryotic elongation factor 1 complex. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 3(4):543–555
Bondarchuk TV, Shalak VF, Lozhko DM et al (2022) Quaternary organization of the human eEF1B complex reveals unique multi-GEF domain assembly. Nucleic Acids Res 50(16):9490–9504
Negrutskii BS, Shalak VF, Novosylna OV et al (2023) The eEF1 family of mammalian translation elongation factors. BBA Adv 3:100067
Peters HI, Chang YW, Traugh JA (1995) Phosphorylation of elongation factor 1 (EF-1) by protein kinase C stimulates GDP/GTP-exchange activity. Eur J Biochem 234(2):550–556
Mansilla F, Friis I, Jadidi M et al (2002) Mapping the human translation elongation factor eEF1H complex using the yeast two-hybrid system. Biochem J 365(Pt 3):669–676
Bondarchuk TV, Lozhko DM, Shalak VF et al (2019) The protein-binding N-terminal domain of human translation elongation factor 1Bbeta possesses a dynamic alpha-helical structural organization. Int J Biol Macromol 126:899–907
Cao Y, Portela M, Janikiewicz J et al (2014) Characterisation of translation elongation factor eEF1B subunit expression in mammalian cells and tissues and co-localisation with eEF1A2. PLoS ONE 9(12):e114117
Veremieva M, Kapustian L, Khoruzhenko A et al (2014) Independent overexpression of the subunits of translation elongation factor complex eEF1H in human lung cancer. BMC Cancer 14:913
Larcher L, Buratti J, Heron-Longe B et al (2020) New evidence that biallelic loss of function in EEF1B2 gene leads to intellectual disability. Clin Genet 97(4):639–643
Gong P, Liu J, Jiao X et al (2022) Novel biallelic loss of EEF1B2 function links to autosomal recessive intellectual disability. Hum Mutat 43(3):299–304
Ninomiya Y, Sugahara-Yamashita Y, Nakachi Y et al (2010) Development of a rapid culture method to induce adipocyte differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 394(2):303–308
Orriss IR, Hajjawi MO, Huesa C et al (2014) Optimisation of the differing conditions required for bone formation in vitro by primary osteoblasts from mice and rats. Int J Mol Med 34(5):1201–1208
Fan Y, Hanai JI, Le PT et al (2017) Parathyroid hormone directs bone marrow mesenchymal cell fate. Cell Metab 25(3):661–672
Jia Q, Jiang W, Ni L (2015) Down-regulated non-coding RNA (lncRNA-ANCR) promotes osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cells. Arch Oral Biol 60(2):234–241
Wang C, Qiao X, Zhang Z et al (2020) MiR-128 promotes osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in rat by targeting DKK2. Biosci Rep. ;40(2)
Kang S, Bennett CN, Gerin I et al (2007) Wnt signaling stimulates osteoblastogenesis of mesenchymal precursors by suppressing CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. J Biol Chem 282(19):14515–14524
Kawai M, Mushiake S, Bessho K et al (2007) Wnt/Lrp/beta-catenin signaling suppresses adipogenesis by inhibiting mutual activation of PPARgamma and C/EBPalpha. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 363(2):276–282
Shen G, Ren H, Shang Q et al (2020) Foxf1 knockdown promotes BMSC osteogenesis in part by activating the Wnt/beta-catenin signalling pathway and prevents ovariectomy-induced bone loss. EBioMedicine 52:102626
Zhou T, Gao B, Fan Y et al (2020) Piezo1/2 mediate mechanotransduction essential for bone formation through concerted activation of NFAT-YAP1-ss-catenin. Elife. ;9
Yadav PS, Feng S, Cong Q et al (2021) Stat3 loss in mesenchymal progenitors causes Job syndrome-like skeletal defects by reducing Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118:26
Du Y, Liu Y, Zhou Y et al (2022) Knockdown of CDC20 promotes adipogenesis of bone marrow-derived stem cells by modulating beta-catenin. Stem Cell Res Ther 13(1):443
Bakkalci D, Jay A, Rezaei A et al (2021) Bioengineering the ameloblastoma tumour to study its effect on bone nodule formation. Sci Rep 11(1):24088
Huang X, Liang J, Gao Y et al (2021) Ckip-1 regulates C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation via Lrp5. Exp Ther Med 21(4):342
Kalu DN, Chen C (1999) Ovariectomized murine model of postmenopausal calcium malabsorption. J Bone Min Res 14(4):593–601
Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C et al (2019) Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol 37(8):907–915
Pertea M, Pertea GM, Antonescu CM et al (2015) StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat Biotechnol 33(3):290–295
Love MI, Huber W, Anders S (2014) Moderated estimation of Fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15(12):550
Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer, Cham
Wu T, Hu E, Xu S et al (2021) clusterProfiler 4.0: a universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innov (Camb) 2(3):100141
Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y et al (2012) clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 16(5):284–287
Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK et al (2005) Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(43):15545–15550
Ning K, Liu S, Yang B et al (2022) Update on the effects of energy metabolism in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells differentiation. Mol Metab 58:101450
Andersen GR, Nissen P, Nyborg J (2003) Elongation factors in protein biosynthesis. Trends Biochem Sci 28(8):434–441
Merrick WC, Pavitt GD (2018) Protein synthesis initiation in eukaryotic cells. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. ;10(12)
Liu Y, Beyer A, Aebersold R (2016) On the Dependency of Cellular protein levels on mRNA abundance. Cell 165(3):535–550
Negrutskii B (2020) Non-translational connections of eEF1B in the cytoplasm and nucleus of Cancer cells. Front Mol Biosci 7:56
Ejiri S (2002) Moonlighting functions of polypeptide elongation factor 1: from actin bundling to zinc finger protein R1-associated nuclear localization. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 66(1):1–21
Le Sourd F, Boulben S, Le Bouffant R et al eEF1B: at the dawn of the 21st century. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006 Jan-Feb ;1759(1–2):13–31
Clevers H (2006) Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in development and disease. Cell 127(3):469–480
Canalis E (2013) Wnt signalling in osteoporosis: mechanisms and novel therapeutic approaches. Nat Rev Endocrinol 9(10):575–583
Muruganandan S, Roman AA, Sinal CJ (2009) Adipocyte differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: cross talk with the osteoblastogenic program. Cell Mol Life Sci 66(2):236–253
Zhang Y, Zhou L, Fu Q et al (2023) ANKRD1 activates the wnt signaling pathway by modulating CAV3 expression and thus promotes BMSC osteogenic differentiation and bone formation in ovariectomized mice. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 1869(5):166693
Liang CJ, Wang ZW, Chang YW et al (2019) SFRPs are biphasic modulators of wnt-signaling-elicited Cancer Stem Cell Properties beyond Extracellular Control. Cell Rep 28(6):1511–1525 e5
Zhang X, Wu N, Huang H et al (2023) Phosphorylated PTTG1 switches its subcellular distribution and promotes beta-catenin stabilization and subsequent transcription activity. Oncogene. Jul 3
Li M, Xie Z, Li J et al (2020) GAS5 protects against osteoporosis by targeting UPF1/SMAD7 axis in osteoblast differentiation. Elife. ;9
Yu W, Zhong L, Yao L et al (2021) Bone marrow adipogenic lineage precursors promote osteoclastogenesis in bone remodeling and pathologic bone loss. J Clin Invest. ;131(2)
Acknowledgements
We thank the Zhao lab members for stimulating discussions.
Funding
The work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2018B030311041.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.Z., S.F., Z.F. designed the study. S.F., Z.F., Y.W., X.Z. performed experiments. S.F., Z.F., Z.D. performed statistical analysis. L.Z., S.F., Z.F., Y.W., X.Z., Z.D., Z.L., Y.J., R.C. did investigation. L.Z., S.F. wrote the manuscript. L.Z. supervised this study. All authors contributed to the data interpretation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University (IACUC-LAC-20230620-003) and were following the guidelines of the National Institute of Health.
Competing interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Feng, S., Feng, Z., Wei, Y. et al. EEF1B2 regulates bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells bone-fat balance via Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 81, 260 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-024-05297-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-024-05297-x