Abstract
Despite the seeming simplicity of the theory, calculating (and even defining) entanglement entropy for the Maxwell theory of a U(1) gauge field in (3+1) dimensions has been the subject of controversy. It is generally accepted that the ground state entanglement entropy for a region of linear size L behaves as an area law with a subleading logarithm, S = αL2 − γ log L. While the logarithmic coefficient γ is believed to be universal, there has been disagreement about its precise value. After carefully accounting for subtle boundary corrections, multiple analyses in the high energy literature have converged on an answer related to the conformal trace anomaly, which is only sensitive to the local curvature of the partition. In contrast, a condensed matter treatment of the problem yielded a topological contribution which is not captured by the conformal field theory calculation. In this perspective piece, we review aspects of the various calculations and discuss the resolution of the discrepancy, emphasizing the important role played by charged states (the “extended Hilbert space”) in defining entanglement for a gauge theory. While the trace anomaly result is sufficient for a strictly pure gauge field, coupling the gauge field to dynamical charges of mass m gives a topological contribution to γ which survives even in the m → ∞ limit. For many situations, the topological contribution from dynamical charges is physically meaningful and should be taken into account. We also comment on other common issues of entanglement in gauge theories, such as entanglement distillation, algebraic definitions of entanglement, and gauge-fixing procedures.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
X.-G. Wen, Topological order: from long-range entangled quantum matter to an unification of light and electrons, ISRN Cond. Matt. Phys. 2013 (2013) 198710 [arXiv:1210.1281] [INSPIRE].
B. Swingle, Mutual information and the structure of entanglement in quantum field theory, arXiv:1010.4038 [INSPIRE].
P. Calabrese, J. Cardy and E. Tonni, Entanglement negativity in extended systems: A field theoretical approach, J. Stat. Mech. 1302 (2013) P02008 [arXiv:1210.5359] [INSPIRE].
V. Balasubramanian, M.B. McDermott and M. Van Raamsdonk, Momentum-space entanglement and renormalization in quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 045014 [arXiv:1108.3568] [INSPIRE].
C. Holzhey, F. Larsen and F. Wilczek, Geometric and renormalized entropy in conformal field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 424 (1994) 443 [hep-th/9403108] [INSPIRE].
P. Calabrese and J.L. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, J. Stat. Mech. 0406 (2004) P06002 [hep-th/0405152] [INSPIRE].
M.M. Wolf, Violation of the entropic area law for Fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 010404 [quant-ph/0503219] [INSPIRE].
D. Gioev and I. Klich, Entanglement Entropy of Fermions in Any Dimension and the Widom Conjecture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 100503 [INSPIRE].
B. Swingle, Entanglement Entropy and the Fermi Surface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 050502 [arXiv:0908.1724] [INSPIRE].
R. Movassagh and P.W. Shor, Supercritical entanglement in local systems: Counterexample to the area law for quantum matter, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 113 (2016) 13278 [arXiv:1408.1657].
J. Eisert, M. Cramer and M.B. Plenio, Area laws for the entanglement entropy — a review, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 277 [arXiv:0808.3773] [INSPIRE].
R. Nandkishore and D.A. Huse, Many body localization and thermalization in quantum statistical mechanics, Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys. 6 (2015) 15 [arXiv:1404.0686] [INSPIRE].
Y.-H. Zhang, Entanglement entropy of target functions for image classification and convolutional neural network, [arXiv:1710.05520].
A. Kitaev and J. Preskill, Topological entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 110404 [hep-th/0510092] [INSPIRE].
M. Levin and X.-G. Wen, Detecting Topological Order in a Ground State Wave Function, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 110405 [cond-mat/0510613] [INSPIRE].
T. Grover, A.M. Turner and A. Vishwanath, Entanglement Entropy of Gapped Phases and Topological Order in Three dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 84 (2011) 195120 [arXiv:1108.4038] [INSPIRE].
S.N. Solodukhin, Entanglement entropy, conformal invariance and extrinsic geometry, Phys. Lett. B 665 (2008) 305 [arXiv:0802.3117] [INSPIRE].
P.V. Buividovich and M.I. Polikarpov, Entanglement entropy in gauge theories and the holographic principle for electric strings, Phys. Lett. B 670 (2008) 141 [arXiv:0806.3376] [INSPIRE].
P.V. Buividovich and M.I. Polikarpov, Entanglement entropy in lattice gauge theories, PoS(CONFINEMENT8)039 (2008) [arXiv:0811.3824] [INSPIRE].
H. Casini, M. Huerta and R.C. Myers, Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 05 (2011) 036 [arXiv:1102.0440] [INSPIRE].
J.S. Dowker, Entanglement entropy for even spheres, arXiv:1009.3854 [INSPIRE].
H. Casini, M. Huerta and J.A. Rosabal, Remarks on entanglement entropy for gauge fields, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 085012 [arXiv:1312.1183] [INSPIRE].
C.A. Agon, M. Headrick, D.L. Jafferis and S. Kasko, Disk entanglement entropy for a Maxwell field, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 025018 [arXiv:1310.4886] [INSPIRE].
W. Donnelly, Entanglement entropy and nonabelian gauge symmetry, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 214003 [arXiv:1406.7304] [INSPIRE].
W. Donnelly and A.C. Wall, Entanglement entropy of electromagnetic edge modes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 111603 [arXiv:1412.1895] [INSPIRE].
K.-W. Huang, Central Charge and Entangled Gauge Fields, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 025010 [arXiv:1412.2730] [INSPIRE].
H. Casini and M. Huerta, Entanglement entropy for a Maxwell field: Numerical calculation on a two dimensional lattice, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 105013 [arXiv:1406.2991] [INSPIRE].
S. Ghosh, R.M. Soni and S.P. Trivedi, On The Entanglement Entropy For Gauge Theories, JHEP 09 (2015) 069 [arXiv:1501.02593] [INSPIRE].
S. Aoki, T. Iritani, M. Nozaki, T. Numasawa, N. Shiba and H. Tasaki, On the definition of entanglement entropy in lattice gauge theories, JHEP 06 (2015) 187 [arXiv:1502.04267] [INSPIRE].
W. Donnelly and A.C. Wall, Geometric entropy and edge modes of the electromagnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 104053 [arXiv:1506.05792] [INSPIRE].
D. Radičević, Entanglement in Weakly Coupled Lattice Gauge Theories, JHEP 04 (2016) 163 [arXiv:1509.08478] [INSPIRE].
M. Pretko and T. Senthil, Entanglement entropy of U(1) quantum spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B 94 (2016) 125112 [arXiv:1510.03863] [INSPIRE].
L.-Y. Hung and Y. Wan, Revisiting Entanglement Entropy of Lattice Gauge Theories, JHEP 04 (2015) 122 [arXiv:1501.04389] [INSPIRE].
R.M. Soni and S.P. Trivedi, Aspects of Entanglement Entropy for Gauge Theories, JHEP 01 (2016) 136 [arXiv:1510.07455] [INSPIRE].
H. Casini and M. Huerta, Entanglement entropy of a Maxwell field on the sphere, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 105031 [arXiv:1512.06182] [INSPIRE].
F. Zuo, A note on electromagnetic edge modes, arXiv:1601.06910 [INSPIRE].
M. Nozaki and N. Watamura, Quantum Entanglement of Locally Excited States in Maxwell Theory, JHEP 12 (2016) 069 [arXiv:1606.07076] [INSPIRE].
R.M. Soni and S.P. Trivedi, Entanglement entropy in (3 + 1)-d free U(1) gauge theory, JHEP 02 (2017) 101 [arXiv:1608.00353] [INSPIRE].
A. Agarwal, D. Karabali and V.P. Nair, Gauge-invariant Variables and Entanglement Entropy, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 125008 [arXiv:1701.00014] [INSPIRE].
J. Lin, Ryu-Takayanagi Area as an Entanglement Edge Term, arXiv:1704.07763 [INSPIRE].
A. Bhattacharyya, L.-Y. Hung and C.M. Melby-Thompson, Instantons and Entanglement Entropy, JHEP 10 (2017) 081 [arXiv:1703.01611] [INSPIRE].
Z. Yang and L.-Y. Hung, Gauge choices and entanglement entropy of two dimensional lattice gauge fields, JHEP 03 (2018) 073 [arXiv:1710.09528] [INSPIRE].
O.I. Motrunich and T. Senthil, Exotic Order in Simple Models of Bosonic Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 277004 [INSPIRE].
M. Hermele, M.P.A. Fisher and L. Balents, Pyrochlore photons: The U(1) spin liquid in a S=12 three-dimensional frustrated magnet, Phys. Rev. B 69 (2004) 064404 [INSPIRE].
R. Moessner and S.L. Sondhi, Three-dimensional resonating-valence-bond liquids and their excitations, Phys. Rev. B 68 (2003) 184512 [INSPIRE].
O. Motrunich and T. Senthil, On the Origin of Artificial Electrodynamics and Other Stories in Three-Dimensional Bosonic Models, Phys. Rev. B 71 (2005) 125102 [cond-mat/0407368].
A. Banerjee, S. Isakov, K. Damle and Y.B. Kim, Unusual Liquid State of Hard-Core Bosons on the Pyrochlore Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2007) 047208 [cond-mat/0702029].
M. Levin and X.-G. Wen, Quantum ether: photons and electrons from a rotor model, Phys. Rev. B 73 (2006) 035122 [hep-th/0507118] [INSPIRE].
K.A. Ross, L. Savary, B.D. Gaulin and L. Balents, Quantum Excitations in Quantum Spin Ice, Phys. Rev. X 1 (2011) 021002 [arXiv:1107.0761].
L. Wang et al., Constructing Gapless Spin Liquid State for the Spin-1/2 J 1 -J 2 Heisenberg Model on a Square Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 037202 [arXiv:1301.4492].
K. Van Acoleyen, N. Bultinck, J. Haegeman, M. Marien, V.B. Scholz and F. Verstraete, The entanglement of distillation for gauge theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 131602 [arXiv:1511.04369] [INSPIRE].
M.A. Levin and X.-G. Wen, String net condensation: A Physical mechanism for topological phases, Phys. Rev. B 71 (2005) 045110 [cond-mat/0404617] [INSPIRE].
D. Harlow, Wormholes, Emergent Gauge Fields and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP 01 (2016) 122 [arXiv:1510.07911] [INSPIRE].
S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy, JHEP 08 (2006) 045 [hep-th/0605073] [INSPIRE].
M.J. Duff, Observations on Conformal Anomalies, Nucl. Phys. B 125 (1977) 334 [INSPIRE].
E. D’Hoker and D.Z. Freedman, Supersymmetric gauge theories and the AdS/CFT correspondence, in Strings, Branes and Extra Dimensions: TASI 2001: Proceedings, pp. 3–158 (2002) [hep-th/0201253] [INSPIRE].
J.J. Bisognano and E.H. Wichmann, On the Duality Condition for Quantum Fields, J. Math. Phys. 17 (1976) 303 [INSPIRE].
E. Bianchi and R.C. Myers, On the Architecture of Spacetime Geometry, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 214002 [arXiv:1212.5183] [INSPIRE].
T. Faulkner and A. Lewkowycz, Bulk locality from modular flow, JHEP 07 (2017) 151 [arXiv:1704.05464] [INSPIRE].
G. Wong, I. Klich, L.A. Pando Zayas and D. Vaman, Entanglement Temperature and Entanglement Entropy of Excited States, JHEP 12 (2013) 020 [arXiv:1305.3291] [INSPIRE].
W. Witczak-Krempa, L.E. Hayward Sierens and R.G. Melko, Cornering gapless quantum states via their torus entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 077202 [arXiv:1603.02684] [INSPIRE].
E. Fradkin, Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics, Cambridge University Press (2013).
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1801.01158
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pretko, M. On the entanglement entropy of Maxwell theory: a condensed matter perspective. J. High Energ. Phys. 2018, 102 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2018)102
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2018)102