Abstract
We study the stability of the electroweak vacuum in the supersymmetric (SUSY) standard model (SM), paying particular attention to its relation to the SUSY contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment aμ. If the SUSY contribution to aμ is sizable, the electroweak vacuum may become unstable because of enhanced trilinear scalar interactions. With aμ being fixed, larger slepton masses require more enhanced trilinear couplings, which make the electroweak vacuum more unstable. Thus, assuming SUSY contribution to aμ being sizable, an upper bound on the slepton masses is obtained. We give a detailed prescription to perform a full one-loop calculation of the decay rate of the electroweak vacuum for the case that the SUSY contribution to aμ is enhanced. We also give an upper bound on the slepton masses as a function of the SUSY contribution to aμ.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
G. Isidori, G. Ridolfi and A. Strumia, On the metastability of the standard model vacuum, Nucl. Phys. B 609 (2001) 387 [hep-ph/0104016] [INSPIRE].
G. Degrassi et al., Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the Standard Model at NNLO, JHEP 08 (2012) 098 [arXiv:1205.6497] [INSPIRE].
D. Buttazzo et al., Investigating the near-criticality of the Higgs boson, JHEP 12 (2013) 089 [arXiv:1307.3536] [INSPIRE].
A.V. Bednyakov, B.A. Kniehl, A.F. Pikelner and O.L. Veretin, Stability of the Electroweak Vacuum: Gauge Independence and Advanced Precision, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 201802 [arXiv:1507.08833] [INSPIRE].
A. Andreassen, W. Frost and M.D. Schwartz, Scale Invariant Instantons and the Complete Lifetime of the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 056006 [arXiv:1707.08124] [INSPIRE].
S. Chigusa, T. Moroi and Y. Shoji, State-of-the-Art Calculation of the Decay Rate of Electroweak Vacuum in the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 211801 [arXiv:1707.09301] [INSPIRE].
S. Chigusa, T. Moroi and Y. Shoji, Decay Rate of Electroweak Vacuum in the Standard Model and Beyond, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 116012 [arXiv:1803.03902] [INSPIRE].
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2020 (2020) 083C01 [INSPIRE].
T. Aoyama et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model, Phys. Rept. 887 (2020) 1 [arXiv:2006.04822] [INSPIRE].
M. Chakraborti, S. Heinemeyer and I. Saha, Improved (g − 2)μ measurements and wino/higgsino dark matter, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 1069 [arXiv:2103.13403] [INSPIRE].
M. Endo, K. Hamaguchi, S. Iwamoto and T. Kitahara, Supersymmetric interpretation of the muon g − 2 anomaly, JHEP 07 (2021) 075 [arXiv:2104.03217] [INSPIRE].
C. Han, Muon g − 2 and CP violation in MSSM, arXiv:2104.03292 [INSPIRE].
M. Van Beekveld, W. Beenakker, M. Schutten and J. De Wit, Dark matter, fine-tuning and (g − 2)μ in the pMSSM, SciPost Phys. 11 (2021) 049 [arXiv:2104.03245] [INSPIRE].
W. Ahmed et al., The natural explanation of the muon anomalous magnetic moment via the electroweak supersymmetry from the GmSUGRA in the MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 827 (2022) 136879 [arXiv:2104.03491] [INSPIRE].
P. Cox, C. Han and T.T. Yanagida, Muon g − 2 and coannihilating dark matter in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 075035 [arXiv:2104.03290] [INSPIRE].
F. Wang et al., GUT-scale constrained SUSY in light of new muon g − 2 measurement, Nucl. Phys. B 970 (2021) 115486 [arXiv:2104.03262] [INSPIRE].
S. Baum, M. Carena, N.R. Shah and C.E.M. Wagner, The tiny (g − 2) muon wobble from small-μ supersymmetry, JHEP 01 (2022) 025 [arXiv:2104.03302] [INSPIRE].
W. Yin, Muon g − 2 anomaly in anomaly mediation, JHEP 06 (2021) 029 [arXiv:2104.03259] [INSPIRE].
S. Iwamoto, T.T. Yanagida and N. Yokozaki, Wino-Higgsino dark matter in MSSM from the g − 2 anomaly, Phys. Lett. B 823 (2021) 136768 [arXiv:2104.03223] [INSPIRE].
P. Athron et al., New physics explanations of aμ in light of the FNAL muon g − 2 measurement, JHEP 09 (2021) 080 [arXiv:2104.03691] [INSPIRE].
Q. Shafi and C.S. Ün, Sparticle Spectroscopy at LHC-Run3 and LSP Dark Matter in light of Muon g − 2, arXiv:2107.04563 [INSPIRE].
A. Aboubrahim, M. Klasen and P. Nath, What the Fermilab muon g − 2 experiment tells us about discovering supersymmetry at high luminosity and high energy upgrades to the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 035039 [arXiv:2104.03839] [INSPIRE].
M. Chakraborti, L. Roszkowski and S. Trojanowski, GUT-constrained supersymmetry and dark matter in light of the new (g − 2)μ determination, JHEP 05 (2021) 252 [arXiv:2104.04458] [INSPIRE].
H. Baer, V. Barger and H. Serce, Anomalous muon magnetic moment, supersymmetry, naturalness, LHC search limits and the landscape, Phys. Lett. B 820 (2021) 136480 [arXiv:2104.07597] [INSPIRE].
A. Aboubrahim, P. Nath and R.M. Syed, Yukawa coupling unification in an SO(10) model consistent with Fermilab (g − 2)μ result, JHEP 06 (2021) 002 [arXiv:2104.10114] [INSPIRE].
Z. Li et al., Gluino-SUGRA scenarios in light of FNAL muon g − 2 anomaly, JHEP 12 (2021) 219 [arXiv:2106.04466] [INSPIRE].
K.S. Jeong, J. Kawamura and C.B. Park, Mixed modulus and anomaly mediation in light of the muon g − 2 anomaly, JHEP 10 (2021) 064 [arXiv:2106.04238] [INSPIRE].
J. Ellis et al., Flipped gμ − 2, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 1079 [arXiv:2107.03025] [INSPIRE].
Y. Nakai, M. Reece and M. Suzuki, Supersymmetric alignment models for (g − 2)μ, JHEP 10 (2021) 068 [arXiv:2107.10268] [INSPIRE].
A.K. Forster and S.F. King, Muon g − 2, dark matter and the Higgs mass in no-scale supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 976 (2022) 115700 [arXiv:2109.10802] [INSPIRE].
J. Ellis et al., Flipped SU(5) GUT phenomenology: proton decay and gμ − 2, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 1109 [arXiv:2110.06833] [INSPIRE].
M. Chakraborti, S. Heinemeyer, I. Saha and C. Schappacher, (g − 2)μ and SUSY dark matter: direct detection and collider search complementarity, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 483 [arXiv:2112.01389] [INSPIRE].
M.E. Gomez, Q. Shafi, A. Tiwari and C.S. Ün, Muon g − 2, neutralino dark matter and stau NLSP, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 561 [arXiv:2202.06419] [INSPIRE].
M. Chakraborti et al., Supersymmetric explanation of the muon g − 2 anomaly with and without stable neutralino, JHEP 08 (2022) 124 [arXiv:2202.12928] [INSPIRE].
K. Agashe, M. Ekhterachian, Z. Liu and R. Sundrum, Sleptonic SUSY: from UV framework to IR phenomenology, JHEP 09 (2022) 142 [arXiv:2203.01796] [INSPIRE].
L. Morrison, S. Profumo, N. Smyth and J. Tamanas, Simulation based inference for efficient theory space sampling: An application to supersymmetric explanations of the anomalous muon g-2, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 115016 [arXiv:2203.13403] [INSPIRE].
S. Li, Z. Li, F. Wang and J.M. Yang, Explanation of electron and muon g − 2 anomalies in AMSB, Nucl. Phys. B 983 (2022) 115927 [arXiv:2205.15153] [INSPIRE].
J. Zhao, J. Zhu, P. Zhu and R. Zhu, Light Higgsino scenario confronted with the muon g − 2, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 055030 [arXiv:2211.14587] [INSPIRE].
Y. He et al., Impact of recent measurement of (g − 2)μ, LHC search for supersymmetry, and LZ experiment on Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, arXiv:2303.02360 [INSPIRE].
M. Endo, K. Hamaguchi, T. Kitahara and T. Yoshinaga, Probing Bino contribution to muon g − 2, JHEP 11 (2013) 013 [arXiv:1309.3065] [INSPIRE].
M. Endo et al., Reconstructing Supersymmetric Contribution to Muon Anomalous Magnetic Dipole Moment at ILC, Phys. Lett. B 728 (2014) 274 [arXiv:1310.4496] [INSPIRE].
M. Endo et al., Stau study at the ILC and its implication for the muon g − 2 anomaly, in the proceedings of the Snowmass 2021, Seattle U.S.A., July 17–26 (2022) [arXiv:2203.07056] [INSPIRE].
S. Chigusa, T. Moroi and Y. Shoji, Upper bound on the smuon mass from vacuum stability in the light of muon g − 2 anomaly, Phys. Lett. B 831 (2022) 137163 [arXiv:2203.08062] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Frere, D.R.T. Jones and S. Raby, Fermion Masses and Induction of the Weak Scale by Supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 222 (1983) 11 [INSPIRE].
J.F. Gunion, H.E. Haber and M. Sher, Charge/Color Breaking Minima and a-Parameter Bounds in Supersymmetric Models, Nucl. Phys. B 306 (1988) 1 [INSPIRE].
J.A. Casas, A. Lleyda and C. Munoz, Strong constraints on the parameter space of the MSSM from charge and color breaking minima, Nucl. Phys. B 471 (1996) 3 [hep-ph/9507294] [INSPIRE].
A. Kusenko, P. Langacker and G. Segre, Phase transitions and vacuum tunneling into charge and color breaking minima in the MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 5824 [hep-ph/9602414] [INSPIRE].
D. Chowdhury, R.M. Godbole, K.A. Mohan and S.K. Vempati, Charge and Color Breaking Constraints in MSSM after the Higgs Discovery at LHC, JHEP 02 (2014) 110 [Erratum ibid. 03 (2018) 149] [arXiv:1310.1932] [INSPIRE].
M. Badziak et al., Upper bounds on sparticle masses from muon g − 2 and the Higgs mass and the complementarity of future colliders, JHEP 03 (2015) 003 [arXiv:1411.1450] [INSPIRE].
G.H. Duan et al., Vacuum stability in stau-neutralino coannihilation in MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 788 (2019) 475 [arXiv:1809.10061] [INSPIRE].
W.G. Hollik, G. Weiglein and J. Wittbrodt, Impact of Vacuum Stability Constraints on the Phenomenology of Supersymmetric Models, JHEP 03 (2019) 109 [arXiv:1812.04644] [INSPIRE].
M. Endo, T. Moroi, M.M. Nojiri and Y. Shoji, On the Gauge Invariance of the Decay Rate of False Vacuum, Phys. Lett. B 771 (2017) 281 [arXiv:1703.09304] [INSPIRE].
M. Endo, T. Moroi, M.M. Nojiri and Y. Shoji, False Vacuum Decay in Gauge Theory, JHEP 11 (2017) 074 [arXiv:1704.03492] [INSPIRE].
S. Chigusa, T. Moroi and Y. Shoji, Precise Calculation of the Decay Rate of False Vacuum with Multi-Field Bounce, JHEP 11 (2020) 006 [arXiv:2007.14124] [INSPIRE].
Muon g-2 collaboration, Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.7 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 101804 [Erratum ibid. 89 (2002) 129903] [hep-ex/0208001] [INSPIRE].
Muon g-2 collaboration, Measurement of the negative muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.7 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 161802 [hep-ex/0401008] [INSPIRE].
Muon g-2 collaboration, Final Report of the Muon E821 Anomalous Magnetic Moment Measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 072003 [hep-ex/0602035] [INSPIRE].
Muon g-2 collaboration, Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 141801 [arXiv:2104.03281] [INSPIRE].
T. Aoyama, M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, Complete Tenth-Order QED Contribution to the Muon g − 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 111808 [arXiv:1205.5370] [INSPIRE].
T. Aoyama, T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, Theory of the Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Electron, Atoms 7 (2019) 28 [INSPIRE].
A. Czarnecki, W.J. Marciano and A. Vainshtein, Refinements in electroweak contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 073006 [Erratum ibid. 73 (2006) 119901] [hep-ph/0212229] [INSPIRE].
C. Gnendiger, D. Stöckinger and H. Stöckinger-Kim, The electroweak contributions to (g − 2)μ after the Higgs boson mass measurement, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 053005 [arXiv:1306.5546] [INSPIRE].
M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, Reevaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the Standard Model predictions of the muon g − 2 and α(\( {m}_Z^2 \)) using newest hadronic cross-section data, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 827 [arXiv:1706.09436] [INSPIRE].
A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura and T. Teubner, Muon g − 2 and α(\( {M}_Z^2 \)): a new data-based analysis, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 114025 [arXiv:1802.02995] [INSPIRE].
G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter and P. Stoffer, Two-pion contribution to hadronic vacuum polarization, JHEP 02 (2019) 006 [arXiv:1810.00007] [INSPIRE].
M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid and B. Kubis, Three-pion contribution to hadronic vacuum polarization, JHEP 08 (2019) 137 [arXiv:1907.01556] [INSPIRE].
M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, A new evaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment and to α(\( {m}_Z^2 \)), Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 241 [Erratum ibid. 80 (2020) 410] [arXiv:1908.00921] [INSPIRE].
A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura and T. Teubner, g − 2 of charged leptons, α(\( {M}_Z^2 \)), and the hyperfine splitting of muonium, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 014029 [arXiv:1911.00367] [INSPIRE].
A. Kurz, T. Liu, P. Marquard and M. Steinhauser, Hadronic contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment to next-to-next-to-leading order, Phys. Lett. B 734 (2014) 144 [arXiv:1403.6400] [INSPIRE].
K. Melnikov and A. Vainshtein, Hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment revisited, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 113006 [hep-ph/0312226] [INSPIRE].
P. Masjuan and P. Sánchez-Puertas, Pseudoscalar-pole contribution to the (gμ − 2): a rational approach, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 054026 [arXiv:1701.05829] [INSPIRE].
G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, M. Procura and P. Stoffer, Dispersion relation for hadronic light-by-light scattering: two-pion contributions, JHEP 04 (2017) 161 [arXiv:1702.07347] [INSPIRE].
M. Hoferichter et al., Dispersion relation for hadronic light-by-light scattering: pion pole, JHEP 10 (2018) 141 [arXiv:1808.04823] [INSPIRE].
A. Gérardin, H.B. Meyer and A. Nyffeler, Lattice calculation of the pion transition form factor with Nf = 2 + 1 Wilson quarks, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 034520 [arXiv:1903.09471] [INSPIRE].
J. Bijnens, N. Hermansson-Truedsson and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, Short-distance constraints for the HLbL contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Lett. B 798 (2019) 134994 [arXiv:1908.03331] [INSPIRE].
G. Colangelo et al., Longitudinal short-distance constraints for the hadronic light-by-light contribution to (g − 2)μ with large-Nc Regge models, JHEP 03 (2020) 101 [arXiv:1910.13432] [INSPIRE].
T. Blum et al., Hadronic Light-by-Light Scattering Contribution to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 132002 [arXiv:1911.08123] [INSPIRE].
G. Colangelo et al., Remarks on higher-order hadronic corrections to the muon g − 2, Phys. Lett. B 735 (2014) 90 [arXiv:1403.7512] [INSPIRE].
S. Borsanyi et al., Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD, Nature 593 (2021) 51 [arXiv:2002.12347] [INSPIRE].
chiQCD collaboration, Muon g − 2 with overlap valence fermions, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 034513 [arXiv:2204.01280] [INSPIRE].
M. Cè et al., Window observable for the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g − 2 from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 114502 [arXiv:2206.06582] [INSPIRE].
Extended Twisted Mass collaboration, Lattice calculation of the short and intermediate time-distance hadronic vacuum polarization contributions to the muon magnetic moment using twisted-mass fermions, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 074506 [arXiv:2206.15084] [INSPIRE].
Fermilab Lattice et al. collaborations, Light-quark connected intermediate-window contributions to the muon g − 2 hadronic vacuum polarization from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 114514 [arXiv:2301.08274] [INSPIRE].
RBC and UKQCD collaborations, Update of Euclidean windows of the hadronic vacuum polarization, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 054507 [arXiv:2301.08696] [INSPIRE].
H. Wittig, Progress on (g − 2)μ from Lattice QCD, Presentation at the 57th Rencontres de Moriond EW 2023, 21 March, 2023.
CMD-3 collaboration, Measurement of the e+e− → π+π− cross section from threshold to 1.2 GeV with the CMD-3 detector, arXiv:2302.08834 [INSPIRE].
ATLAS and CMS collaborations, Combined Measurement of the Higgs Boson Mass in pp Collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS Experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 191803 [arXiv:1503.07589] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the Higgs boson mass in the H → ZZ* → 4ℓ and H → γγ channels with \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collisions using the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 784 (2018) 345 [arXiv:1806.00242] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, A measurement of the Higgs boson mass in the diphoton decay channel, Phys. Lett. B 805 (2020) 135425 [arXiv:2002.06398] [INSPIRE].
E. Bagnaschi, G.F. Giudice, P. Slavich and A. Strumia, Higgs Mass and Unnatural Supersymmetry, JHEP 09 (2014) 092 [arXiv:1407.4081] [INSPIRE].
S.G. Gorishnii, A.L. Kataev, S.A. Larin and L.R. Surguladze, Corrected Three Loop QCD Correction to the Correlator of the Quark Scalar Currents and ΓTot(H0 → Hadrons), Mod. Phys. Lett. A 5 (1990) 2703 [INSPIRE].
O.V. Tarasov, A.A. Vladimirov and A.Y. Zharkov, The Gell-Mann-Low Function of QCD in the Three Loop Approximation, Phys. Lett. B 93 (1980) 429 [INSPIRE].
S.G. Gorishnii, A.L. Kataev and S.A. Larin, Next Next-to-leading Perturbative QCD Corrections and Light Quark Masses, Phys. Lett. B 135 (1984) 457 [INSPIRE].
G. Passarino and M.J.G. Veltman, One Loop Corrections for e+e− Annihilation Into μ+μ− in the Weinberg Model, Nucl. Phys. B 160 (1979) 151 [INSPIRE].
M.-X. Luo and Y. Xiao, Two loop renormalization group equations in the standard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 011601 [hep-ph/0207271] [INSPIRE].
T. Moroi, The Muon anomalous magnetic dipole moment in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 6565 [Erratum ibid. 56 (1997) 4424] [hep-ph/9512396] [INSPIRE].
S. Marchetti, S. Mertens, U. Nierste and D. Stöckinger, tan β-enhanced supersymmetric corrections to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 013010 [arXiv:0808.1530] [INSPIRE].
J. Girrbach, S. Mertens, U. Nierste and S. Wiesenfeldt, Lepton flavour violation in the MSSM, JHEP 05 (2010) 026 [arXiv:0910.2663] [INSPIRE].
G. Degrassi and G.F. Giudice, QED logarithms in the electroweak corrections to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 053007 [hep-ph/9803384] [INSPIRE].
P. von Weitershausen, M. Schafer, H. Stöckinger-Kim and D. Stöckinger, Photonic SUSY Two-Loop Corrections to the Muon Magnetic Moment, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 093004 [arXiv:1003.5820] [INSPIRE].
S.R. Coleman, The Fate of the False Vacuum. I. Semiclassical Theory, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2929 [Erratum ibid. 16 (1977) 1248] [INSPIRE].
C.G. Callan Jr. and S.R. Coleman, The Fate of the False Vacuum. II. First Quantum Corrections, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1762 [INSPIRE].
S. Coleman, Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (1985) [https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511565045] [INSPIRE].
M. Endo, T. Moroi, M.M. Nojiri and Y. Shoji, Renormalization-Scale Uncertainty in the Decay Rate of False Vacuum, JHEP 01 (2016) 031 [arXiv:1511.04860] [INSPIRE].
S. Chigusa, T. Moroi and Y. Shoji, Bounce Configuration from Gradient Flow, Phys. Lett. B 800 (2020) 135115 [arXiv:1906.10829] [INSPIRE].
R. Sato, Simple Gradient Flow Equation for the Bounce Solution, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 016012 [arXiv:1907.02417] [INSPIRE].
I.M. Gelfand and A.M. Yaglom, Integration in functional spaces and it applications in quantum physics, J. Math. Phys. 1 (1960) 48 [INSPIRE].
R.F. Dashen, B. Hasslacher and A. Neveu, Nonperturbative Methods and Extended Hadron Models in Field Theory I. Semiclassical Functional Methods, Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974) 4114 [INSPIRE].
K. Kirsten and A.J. McKane, Functional determinants by contour integration methods, Annals Phys. 308 (2003) 502 [math-ph/0305010] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for long-lived charged particles in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 112004 [arXiv:1609.08382] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for heavy charged long-lived particles in the ATLAS detector in 36.1 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 092007 [arXiv:1902.01636] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, SUSY Summary Plots March 2022, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2022-013 (2022) [INSPIRE].
Muon g-2 collaboration, Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 161802 [arXiv:2308.06230] [INSPIRE].
S.R. Coleman, V. Glaser and A. Martin, Action Minima Among Solutions to a Class of Euclidean Scalar Field Equations, Commun. Math. Phys. 58 (1978) 211 [INSPIRE].
J. Avan and H.J. De Vega, Inverse scattering transform and instantons of four-dimensional Yukawa and ϕ4 theories, Nucl. Phys. B 269 (1986) 621 [INSPIRE].
Acknowledgments
S.C. is supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics of the U.S. Department of Energy under the Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH1123. T.M. is supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 22H01215. Y.S. is supported by I-CORE Program of the Israel Planning Budgeting Committee (grant No. 1937/12).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2306.16596
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Chigusa, S., Moroi, T. & Shoji, Y. Stability of electroweak vacuum and supersymmetric contribution to muon g − 2. J. High Energ. Phys. 2023, 27 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2023)027
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2023)027