Abstract
We investigate the Yukawa coupling unification for the third generation in a class of SO(10) unified models which are consistent with the 4.2 σ deviation from the standard model of the muon g − 2 seen by the Fermilab experiment E989. A recent analysis in supergravity grand unified models shows that such an effect can arise from supersymmetric loops correction. Using a neural network, we further analyze regions of the parameter space where Yukawa coupling unification consistent with the Fermilab result can appear. In the analysis we take into account the contributions to Yukawas from the cubic and the quartic interactions. We test the model at the high luminosity and high energy LHC and estimate the integrated luminosities needed to discover sparticles predicted by the model.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Muon g-2 collaboration, Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 141801 [arXiv:2104.03281] [INSPIRE].
Muon g-2 collaboration, Final Report of the Muon E821 Anomalous Magnetic Moment Measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 072003 [hep-ex/0602035] [INSPIRE].
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 030001 [INSPIRE].
T. Aoyama et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model, Phys. Rept. 887 (2020) 1 [arXiv:2006.04822] [INSPIRE].
S. Borsanyi et al., Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD, Nature 593 (2021) 51 [arXiv:2002.12347] [INSPIRE].
A. Aboubrahim, M. Klasen and P. Nath, What Fermilab (g − 2)μ experiment tells us about discovering SUSY at HL-LHC and HE-LHC, arXiv:2104.03839 [INSPIRE].
S. Akula and P. Nath, Gluino-driven radiative breaking, Higgs boson mass, muon g-2, and the Higgs diphoton decay in supergravity unification, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 115022 [arXiv:1304.5526] [INSPIRE].
A. Aboubrahim and P. Nath, Mixed hidden sector-visible sector dark matter and observation of a CP odd Higgs boson at HL-LHC and HE-LHC, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 015042 [arXiv:1905.04601] [INSPIRE].
A. Aboubrahim, P. Nath and R.M. Syed, Corrections to Yukawa couplings from higher dimensional operators in a natural SUSY SO(10) and HL-LHC implications, JHEP 01 (2021) 047 [arXiv:2005.00867] [INSPIRE].
K.S. Babu, I. Gogoladze and Z. Tavartkiladze, Missing Partner Mechanism in SO(10) Grand Unification, Phys. Lett. B 650 (2007) 49 [hep-ph/0612315] [INSPIRE].
K.S. Babu, I. Gogoladze, P. Nath and R.M. Syed, Variety of SO(10) GUTs with Natural Doublet-Triplet Splitting via the Missing Partner Mechanism, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 075002 [arXiv:1112.5387] [INSPIRE].
A. Masiero, D.V. Nanopoulos, K. Tamvakis and T. Yanagida, Naturally Massless Higgs Doublets in Supersymmetric SU(5), Phys. Lett. B 115 (1982) 380 [INSPIRE].
B. Grinstein, A Supersymmetric SU(5) Gauge Theory with No Gauge Hierarchy Problem, Nucl. Phys. B 206 (1982) 387 [INSPIRE].
T.E. Clark, T.-K. Kuo and N. Nakagawa, A SO(10) supersymmetric grand unified theory, Phys. Lett. B 115 (1982) 26 [INSPIRE].
C.S. Aulakh and R.N. Mohapatra, Implications of Supersymmetric SO(10) Grand Unification, Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983) 217 [INSPIRE].
K.S. Babu and R.N. Mohapatra, Predictive neutrino spectrum in minimal SO(10) grand unification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 2845 [hep-ph/9209215] [INSPIRE].
P. Nath and R.M. Syed, Analysis of couplings with large tensor representations in SO(2N) and proton decay, Phys. Lett. B 506 (2001) 68 [Erratum ibid. 508 (2001) 216] [hep-ph/0103165] [INSPIRE].
P. Nath and R.M. Syed, Complete cubic and quartic couplings of 16 and bar-16 in SO(10) unification, Nucl. Phys. B 618 (2001) 138 [hep-th/0109116] [INSPIRE].
P. Nath and R.M. Syed, Coupling the supersymmetric 210 vector multiplet to matter in SO(10), Nucl. Phys. B 676 (2004) 64 [hep-th/0310178] [INSPIRE].
C.S. Aulakh, B. Bajc, A. Melfo, G. Senjanović and F. Vissani, The Minimal supersymmetric grand unified theory, Phys. Lett. B 588 (2004) 196 [hep-ph/0306242] [INSPIRE].
B. Bajc, A. Melfo, G. Senjanović and F. Vissani, The Minimal supersymmetric grand unified theory. 1. Symmetry breaking and the particle spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 035007 [hep-ph/0402122] [INSPIRE].
C.S. Aulakh and A. Girdhar, SO(10) MSGUT: Spectra, couplings and threshold effects, Nucl. Phys. B 711 (2005) 275 [hep-ph/0405074] [INSPIRE].
C.S. Aulakh and S.K. Garg, The New Minimal Supersymmetric GUT: Spectra, RG analysis and Fermion Fits, Nucl. Phys. B 857 (2012) 101 [arXiv:0807.0917] [INSPIRE].
P. Nath and P. Fileviez Perez, Proton stability in grand unified theories, in strings and in branes, Phys. Rept. 441 (2007) 191 [hep-ph/0601023] [INSPIRE].
D.A. Kosower, L.M. Krauss and N. Sakai, Low-Energy Supergravity and the Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Muon, Phys. Lett. B 133 (1983) 305 [INSPIRE].
T.C. Yuan, R.L. Arnowitt, A.H. Chamseddine and P. Nath, Supersymmetric Electroweak Effects on G-2 (mu), Z. Phys. C 26 (1984) 407 [INSPIRE].
J.L. Lopez, D.V. Nanopoulos and X. Wang, Large (g-2)-mu in SU(5) × U(1) supergravity models, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 366 [hep-ph/9308336] [INSPIRE].
U. Chattopadhyay and P. Nath, Probing supergravity grand unification in the Brookhaven g-2 experiment, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 1648 [hep-ph/9507386] [INSPIRE].
T. Moroi, The Muon anomalous magnetic dipole moment in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 6565 [Erratum ibid. 56 (1997) 4424] [hep-ph/9512396] [INSPIRE].
M. Carena, G.F. Giudice and C.E.M. Wagner, Constraints on supersymmetric models from the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Lett. B 390 (1997) 234 [hep-ph/9610233] [INSPIRE].
A. Czarnecki and W.J. Marciano, The Muon anomalous magnetic moment: A Harbinger for ’new physics’, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 013014 [hep-ph/0102122] [INSPIRE].
U. Chattopadhyay and P. Nath, Upper limits on sparticle masses from g-2 and the possibility for discovery of SUSY at colliders and in dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 5854 [hep-ph/0102157] [INSPIRE].
L.L. Everett, G.L. Kane, S. Rigolin and L.-T. Wang, Implications of muon g-2 for supersymmetry and for discovering superpartners directly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 3484 [hep-ph/0102145] [INSPIRE].
J.L. Feng and K.T. Matchev, Supersymmetry and the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 3480 [hep-ph/0102146] [INSPIRE].
E.A. Baltz and P. Gondolo, Implications of muon anomalous magnetic moment for supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 5004 [hep-ph/0102147] [INSPIRE].
D. Sabatta, A.S. Cornell, A. Goyal, M. Kumar, B. Mellado and X. Ruan, Connecting muon anomalous magnetic moment and multi-lepton anomalies at LHC, Chin. Phys. C 44 (2020) 063103 [arXiv:1909.03969] [INSPIRE].
S. Buddenbrock et al., The emergence of multi-lepton anomalies at the LHC and their compatibility with new physics at the EW scale, JHEP 10 (2019) 157 [arXiv:1901.05300] [INSPIRE].
N. Chen, B. Wang and C.-Y. Yao, The collider tests of a leptophilic scalar for the anomalous magnetic moments, arXiv:2102.05619 [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter, Consequences of chirally enhanced explanations of (g − 2)μ for h → μμ and Z → μμ, arXiv:2104.03202 [INSPIRE].
E. Coluccio Leskow, A. Crivellin, G. D’Ambrosio and D. Müller, (g − 2)μ, Lepton Flavour Violation and Z Decays with Leptoquarks: Correlations and Future Prospects, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 055018 [arXiv:1612.06858] [INSPIRE].
S. Akula, B. Altunkaynak, D. Feldman, P. Nath and G. Peim, Higgs Boson Mass Predictions in SUGRA Unification, Recent LHC-7 Results, and Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 075001 [arXiv:1112.3645] [INSPIRE].
A. Arbey, M. Battaglia, A. Djouadi, F. Mahmoudi and J. Quevillon, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs for supersymmetric models, Phys. Lett. B 708 (2012) 162 [arXiv:1112.3028] [INSPIRE].
H. Baer, V. Barger and A. Mustafayev, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs scalar for LHC SUSY and neutralino dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 075010 [arXiv:1112.3017] [INSPIRE].
J. Ellis and K.A. Olive, Revisiting the Higgs Mass and Dark Matter in the CMSSM, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2005 [arXiv:1202.3262] [INSPIRE].
S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal and G. Weiglein, Interpreting the LHC Higgs Search Results in the MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 201 [arXiv:1112.3026] [INSPIRE].
B. Ananthanarayan, G. Lazarides and Q. Shafi, Radiative electroweak breaking and sparticle spectroscopy with tan Beta approximately = m(t) / m(b), Phys. Lett. B 300 (1993) 245 [INSPIRE].
U. Chattopadhyay, A. Corsetti and P. Nath, Supersymmetric dark matter and Yukawa unification, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 035003 [hep-ph/0201001] [INSPIRE].
J. Hollingsworth, M. Ratz, P. Tanedo and D. Whiteson, Efficient sampling of constrained high-dimensional theoretical spaces with machine learning, arXiv:2103.06957 [INSPIRE].
DarkMachines High Dimensional Sampling Group collaboration, A comparison of optimisation algorithms for high-dimensional particle and astrophysics applications, JHEP 05 (2021) 108 [arXiv:2101.04525] [INSPIRE].
A.H. Chamseddine, R.L. Arnowitt and P. Nath, Locally Supersymmetric Grand Unification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 970 [INSPIRE].
P. Nath, R.L. Arnowitt and A.H. Chamseddine, Gauge Hierarchy In Supergravity Guts, Nucl. Phys. B 227 (1983) 121 [INSPIRE].
L.J. Hall, J.D. Lykken and S. Weinberg, Supergravity as the Messenger of Supersymmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. D 27 (1983) 2359 [INSPIRE].
P. Nath, R.L. Arnowitt and A.H. Chamseddine, Model independent analysis of low-energy phenomena in supergravity unified theories, HUTP-83/A077.
J.R. Ellis, K. Enqvist, D.V. Nanopoulos and K. Tamvakis, Gaugino Masses and Grand Unification, Phys. Lett. B 155 (1985) 381 [INSPIRE].
A. Corsetti and P. Nath, Gaugino mass nonuniversality and dark matter in SUGRA, strings and D-brane models, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 125010 [hep-ph/0003186] [INSPIRE].
A. Birkedal-Hansen and B.D. Nelson, Relic neutralino densities and detection rates with nonuniversal gaugino masses, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 095006 [hep-ph/0211071] [INSPIRE].
G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Cottrant, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, WMAP constraints on SUGRA models with non-universal gaugino masses and prospects for direct detection, Nucl. Phys. B 706 (2005) 411 [hep-ph/0407218] [INSPIRE].
H. Baer, A. Mustafayev, E.-K. Park, S. Profumo and X. Tata, Mixed Higgsino dark matter from a reduced SU(3) gaugino mass: Consequences for dark matter and collider searches, JHEP 04 (2006) 041 [hep-ph/0603197] [INSPIRE].
I. Gogoladze, F. Nasir, Q. Shafi and C.S. Un, Nonuniversal Gaugino Masses and Muon g-2, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 035008 [arXiv:1403.2337] [INSPIRE].
S.P. Martin, Non-universal gaugino masses from non-singlet F-terms in non-minimal unified models, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 095019 [arXiv:0903.3568] [INSPIRE].
D. Feldman, Z. Liu and P. Nath, Gluino NLSP, Dark Matter via Gluino Coannihilation, and LHC Signatures, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 015007 [arXiv:0905.1148] [INSPIRE].
A.S. Belyaev, S.F. King and P.B. Schaefers, Muon g-2 and dark matter suggest nonuniversal gaugino masses: SU(5) × A4 case study at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 115002 [arXiv:1801.00514] [INSPIRE].
F. Staub, xBIT: an easy to use scanning tool with machine learning abilities, arXiv:1906.03277 [INSPIRE].
W. Porod, SPheno, a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, SUSY particle decays and SUSY particle production at e+e− colliders, Comput. Phys. Commun. 153 (2003) 275 [hep-ph/0301101] [INSPIRE].
W. Porod and F. Staub, SPheno 3.1: Extensions including flavour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 2458 [arXiv:1104.1573] [INSPIRE].
F. Staub and W. Porod, Improved predictions for intermediate and heavy Supersymmetry in the MSSM and beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 338 [arXiv:1703.03267] [INSPIRE].
J. Bernon and B. Dumont, Lilith: a tool for constraining new physics from Higgs measurements, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 440 [arXiv:1502.04138] [INSPIRE].
S. Kraml, T.Q. Loc, D.T. Nhung and L.D. Ninh, Constraining new physics from Higgs measurements with Lilith: update to LHC Run 2 results, SciPost Phys. 7 (2019) 052 [arXiv:1908.03952] [INSPIRE].
P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stål, T. Stefaniak and G. Weiglein, HiggsSignals: Confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with measurements at the Tevatron and the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2711 [arXiv:1305.1933] [INSPIRE].
P. Bechtle et al., HiggsBounds-5: Testing Higgs Sectors in the LHC 13 TeV Era, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 1211 [arXiv:2006.06007] [INSPIRE].
C.K. Khosa, S. Kraml, A. Lessa, P. Neuhuber and W. Waltenberger, SModelS database update v1.2.3, arXiv:2005.00555 [INSPIRE].
S. Kraml et al., SModelS: a tool for interpreting simplified-model results from the LHC and its application to supersymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2868 [arXiv:1312.4175] [INSPIRE].
S. Kraml et al., SModelS v1.0: a short user guide, arXiv:1412.1745 [INSPIRE].
D. Barducci et al., Collider limits on new physics within MicrOMEGAs_4.3, Comput. Phys. Commun. 222 (2018) 327 [arXiv:1606.03834] [INSPIRE].
D. Feldman, Z. Liu, P. Nath and G. Peim, Multicomponent Dark Matter in Supersymmetric Hidden Sector Extensions, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 095017 [arXiv:1004.0649] [INSPIRE].
D. Feldman, P. Fileviez Perez and P. Nath, R-parity Conservation via the Stueckelberg Mechanism: LHC and Dark Matter Signals, JHEP 01 (2012) 038 [arXiv:1109.2901] [INSPIRE].
A. Aboubrahim and P. Nath, LHC phenomenology with hidden sector dark matter: a long-lived stau and heavy Higgs in an observable range, in Meeting of the Division of Particles and Fields of the American Physical Society, Boston U.S.A. (2019) [arXiv:1909.08684] [INSPIRE].
A. Aboubrahim, W.-Z. Feng, P. Nath and Z.-Y. Wang, A multi-temperature universe can allow a sub-MeV dark photon dark matter, arXiv:2103.15769 [INSPIRE].
H. Baer, V. Barger, D. Sengupta and X. Tata, Is natural higgsino-only dark matter excluded?, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 838 [arXiv:1803.11210] [INSPIRE].
J. Halverson, C. Long and P. Nath, Ultralight axion in supersymmetry and strings and cosmology at small scales, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 056025 [arXiv:1703.07779] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for electroweak production of charginos and sleptons decaying into final states with two leptons and missing transverse momentum in \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collisions using the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 123 [arXiv:1908.08215] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Searches for electroweak production of supersymmetric particles with compressed mass spectra in \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 052005 [arXiv:1911.12606] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetric partners of electrons and muons in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 790 (2019) 140 [arXiv:1806.05264] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in final states with two oppositely charged same-flavor leptons and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 04 (2021) 123 [arXiv:2012.08600] [INSPIRE].
A. Aboubrahim and P. Nath, Supersymmetry at a 28 TeV hadron collider: HE-LHC, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 015009 [arXiv:1804.08642] [INSPIRE].
A. Aboubrahim and P. Nath, Naturalness, the hyperbolic branch, and prospects for the observation of charged Higgs bosons at high luminosity LHC and 27 TeV LHC, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 095024 [arXiv:1810.12868] [INSPIRE].
M. Cepeda et al., Report from Working Group 2: Higgs Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 7 (2019) 221 [arXiv:1902.00134] [INSPIRE].
X. Cid Vidal et al., Report from Working Group 3 : Beyond the Standard Model physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 7 (2019) 585 [arXiv:1812.07831] [INSPIRE].
A. Buckley, PySLHA: a Pythonic interface to SUSY Les Houches Accord data, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 467 [arXiv:1305.4194] [INSPIRE].
J. Debove, B. Fuks and M. Klasen, Joint Resummation for Gaugino Pair Production at Hadron Colliders, Nucl. Phys. B 849 (2011) 64 [arXiv:1102.4422] [INSPIRE].
B. Fuks, M. Klasen, D.R. Lamprea and M. Rothering, Precision predictions for electroweak superpartner production at hadron colliders with Resummino, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2480 [arXiv:1304.0790] [INSPIRE].
A. Buckley et al., LHAPDF6: parton density access in the LHC precision era, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 132 [arXiv:1412.7420] [INSPIRE].
T. Sjöstrand et al., An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 [arXiv:1410.3012] [INSPIRE].
M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, FastJet User Manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1896 [arXiv:1111.6097] [INSPIRE].
M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, The anti-kt jet clustering algorithm, JHEP 04 (2008) 063 [arXiv:0802.1189] [INSPIRE].
DELPHES 3 collaboration, DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, JHEP 02 (2014) 057 [arXiv:1307.6346] [INSPIRE].
C.G. Lester and D.J. Summers, Measuring masses of semiinvisibly decaying particles pair produced at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B 463 (1999) 99 [hep-ph/9906349] [INSPIRE].
A. Barr, C. Lester and P. Stephens, m(T2): The Truth behind the glamour, J. Phys. G 29 (2003) 2343 [hep-ph/0304226] [INSPIRE].
C.G. Lester and B. Nachman, Bisection-based asymmetric MT2 computation: a higher precision calculator than existing symmetric methods, JHEP 03 (2015) 100 [arXiv:1411.4312] [INSPIRE].
P. Speckmayer, A. Hocker, J. Stelzer and H. Voss, The toolkit for multivariate data analysis, TMVA 4, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 219 (2010) 032057 [INSPIRE].
I. Antcheva et al., ROOT: A C++ framework for petabyte data storage, statistical analysis and visualization, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 1384 [INSPIRE].
S. Iwamoto, T.T. Yanagida and N. Yokozaki, Wino-Higgsino dark matter in the MSSM from the g − 2 anomaly, arXiv:2104.03223 [INSPIRE].
Y. Gu, N. Liu, L. Su and D. Wang, Heavy Bino and Slepton for Muon g-2 Anomaly, arXiv:2104.03239 [INSPIRE].
M. Van Beekveld, W. Beenakker, M. Schutten and J. De Wit, Dark matter, fine-tuning and (g − 2)μ in the pMSSM, arXiv:2104.03245 [INSPIRE].
W. Yin, Muon g − 2 Anomaly in Anomaly Mediation, arXiv:2104.03259 [INSPIRE].
F. Wang, L. Wu, Y. Xiao, J.M. Yang and Y. Zhang, GUT-scale constrained SUSY in light of E989 muon g-2 measurement, arXiv:2104.03262 [INSPIRE].
J. Cao, J. Lian, Y. Pan, D. Zhang and P. Zhu, Improved (g − 2)μ Measurement and Singlino dark matter in the general NMSSM, arXiv:2104.03284 [INSPIRE].
M. Chakraborti, S. Heinemeyer and I. Saha, The new “MUON G-2” Result and Supersymmetry, arXiv:2104.03287 [INSPIRE].
P. Cox, C. Han and T.T. Yanagida, Muon g − 2 and Co-annihilating Dark Matter in the MSSM, arXiv:2104.03290 [INSPIRE].
C. Han, Muon g-2 and CP-violation in MSSM, arXiv:2104.03292 [INSPIRE].
S. Baum, M. Carena, N.R. Shah and C.E.M. Wagner, The Tiny (g-2) Muon Wobble from Small-μ Supersymmetry, arXiv:2104.03302 [INSPIRE].
W. Ahmed, I. Khan, J. Li, T. Li, S. Raza and W. Zhang, The Natural Explanation of the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment via the Electroweak Supersymmetry from the GmSUGRA in the MSSM, arXiv:2104.03491 [INSPIRE].
H. Baer, V. Barger and H. Serce, Anomalous muon magnetic moment, supersymmetry, naturalness, LHC search limits and the landscape, arXiv:2104.07597 [INSPIRE].
M. Endo, K. Hamaguchi, S. Iwamoto and T. Kitahara, Supersymmetric Interpretation of the Muon g − 2 Anomaly, arXiv:2104.03217 [INSPIRE].
M. Ibe, S. Kobayashi, Y. Nakayama and S. Shirai, Muon g − 2 in Gauge Mediation without SUSY CP Problem, arXiv:2104.03289 [INSPIRE].
M. Chakraborti, L. Roszkowski and S. Trojanowski, GUT-constrained supersymmetry and dark matter in light of the new (g − 2)μ determination, arXiv:2104.04458 [INSPIRE].
W. Altmannshofer, S. Aditya Gadam, S. Gori and N. Hamer, Explaining (g − 2)μ with Multi-TeV Sleptons, arXiv:2104.08293 [INSPIRE].
P. Athron, C. Balazs, D.H.J. Jacob, W. Kotlarski, D. Stockinger and H. Stockinger-Kim, New physics explanations of aμ in light of the FNAL muon g − 2 measurement, arXiv:2104.03691 [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2104.10114
Permanent address. (Department of Physics, American University of Sharjah, P.O. Box 26666, Sharjah, U.A.E.
)
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Aboubrahim, A., Nath, P. & Syed, R.M. Yukawa coupling unification in an SO(10) model consistent with Fermilab (g − 2)μ result. J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2021)002
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2021)002