Abstract
In the context of boundary conformal field theory, we investigate whether the boundary trace anomaly can depend on marginal directions in the presence of supersymmetry. Recently, it was found that a graphene-like non-supersymmetric conformal field theory with a four-dimensional bulk photon and a three-dimensional boundary electron has two boundary central charges that depend on an exactly marginal direction, namely the gauge coupling. In this work, we supersymmetrize this theory, paying special attention to the boundary terms required by supersymmetry. We study models with 4, 8, and 16 Poincaré supercharges in the bulk, half of which are broken by the boundary. In all cases, we find that at all orders in perturbation theory, the gauge coupling is not renormalized, providing strong evidence that these theories are boundary conformal field theories. Moreover, the boundary central charges depend on the coupling. One possible exception to this dependence on marginal directions is that the difference between the two charges is coupling independent at one-loop in the maximally supersymmetric case. In our analysis, a possible boundary Chern-Simons term is incorporated by a bulk θ-term.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Z. Komargodski and A. Schwimmer, On renormalization group flows in four dimensions, JHEP 12 (2011) 099 [arXiv:1107.3987] [INSPIRE].
H. Osborn and A.C. Petkou, Implications of conformal invariance in field theories for general dimensions, Annals Phys. 231 (1994) 311 [hep-th/9307010] [INSPIRE].
C. Herzog, K.-W. Huang and K. Jensen, Universal entanglement and boundary geometry in conformal field theory, JHEP 01 (2016) 162 [arXiv:1510.00021] [INSPIRE].
C. Herzog and K.-W. Huang, Boundary fluctuations and a reduction entropy, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 021901 [arXiv:1610.08970] [INSPIRE].
C. Herzog, K.-W. Huang and K. Jensen, Displacement operators and constraints on boundary central charges, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 021601 [arXiv:1709.07431] [INSPIRE].
C. Herzog and K.-W. Huang, Boundary conformal field theory and a boundary central charge, JHEP 10 (2017) 189 [arXiv:1707.06224] [INSPIRE].
D. Fursaev, Conformal anomalies of CFT’s with boundaries, JHEP 12 (2015) 112 [arXiv:1510.01427] [INSPIRE].
D. Fursaev and S.N. Solodukhin, Anomalies, entropy and boundaries, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 084021 [arXiv:1601.06418] [INSPIRE].
J. Melmed, Conformal invariance and the regularised one-loop effective action, J. Phys. A 21 (1988) L1131.
I.G. Moss, Boundary terms in the heat kernel expansion, Class. Quant. Grav. 6 (1989) 759 [INSPIRE].
H. Osborn, Weyl consistency conditions and a local renormalization group equation for general renormalizable field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 363 (1991) 486 [INSPIRE].
D. Anselmi, D.Z. Freedman, M.T. Grisaru and A.A. Johansen, Nonperturbative formulas for central functions of supersymmetric gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 526 (1998) 543 [hep-th/9708042] [INSPIRE].
Y. Nakayama, Can we change c in four-dimensional CFTs by exactly marginal deformations?, JHEP 07 (2017) 004 [arXiv:1702.02324] [INSPIRE].
V. Bashmakov, M. Bertolini and H. Raj, On non-supersymmetric conformal manifolds: field theory and holography, JHEP 11 (2017) 167 [arXiv:1709.01749] [INSPIRE].
E.V. Gorbar, V.P. Gusynin and V.A. Miransky, Dynamical chiral symmetry breaking on a brane in reduced QED, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 105028 [hep-ph/0105059] [INSPIRE].
S.-J. Rey, Quantum phase transitions from string theory, talk given at Strings 2007, June 25–29, Madrid, Spain (2007).
D.B. Kaplan, J.-W. Lee, D.T. Son and M.A. Stephanov, Conformality lost, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 125005 [arXiv:0905.4752] [INSPIRE].
A.V. Kotikov and S. Teber, Two-loop fermion self-energy in reduced quantum electrodynamics and application to the ultrarelativistic limit of graphene, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 065038 [arXiv:1312.2430] [INSPIRE].
A.V. Kotikov and S. Teber, Critical behaviour of reduced QED 4,3 and dynamical fermion gap generation in graphene, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 114010 [arXiv:1610.00934] [INSPIRE].
W.-H. Hsiao and D.T. Son, Duality and universal transport in mixed-dimension electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. B 96 (2017) 075127 [arXiv:1705.01102] [INSPIRE].
D.T. Son, Quantum critical point in graphene approached in the limit of infinitely strong Coulomb interaction, Phys. Rev. B 75 (2007) 235423 [cond-mat/0701501] [INSPIRE].
M.A.H. Vozmediano, Renormalization group aspects of graphene, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 369 (2011) 2625 [arXiv:1010.5057] [INSPIRE].
D.V. Belyaev and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Rigid supersymmetry with boundaries, JHEP 04 (2008) 008 [arXiv:0801.2377] [INSPIRE].
L. Di Pietro, N. Klinghoffer and I. Shamir, On supersymmetry, boundary actions and brane charges, JHEP 02 (2016) 163 [arXiv:1502.05976] [INSPIRE].
N. Drukker, I. Shamir and C. Vergu, Defect multiplets of \( \mathcal{N}=1 \) supersymmetry in 4d, JHEP 01 (2018) 034 [arXiv:1711.03455] [INSPIRE].
N. Drukker, D. Martelli and I. Shamir, The energy-momentum multiplet of supersymmetric defect field theories, JHEP 08 (2017) 010 [arXiv:1701.04323] [INSPIRE].
D. Dudal, A.J. Mizher and P. Pais, Remarks on the Chern-Simons photon term in the QED description of graphene, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 065008 [arXiv:1801.08853] [INSPIRE].
M. Mulligan and F.J. Burnell, Topological insulators avoid the parity anomaly, Phys. Rev. B 88 (2013) 085104 [arXiv:1301.4230] [INSPIRE].
E.C. Marino, Quantum electrodynamics of particles on a plane and the Chern-Simons theory, Nucl. Phys. B 408 (1993) 551 [hep-th/9301034] [INSPIRE].
N. Seiberg, T. Senthil, C. Wang and E. Witten, A duality web in 2 + 1 dimensions and condensed matter physics, Annals Phys. 374 (2016) 395 [arXiv:1606.01989] [INSPIRE].
N. Seiberg and E. Witten, String theory and noncommutative geometry, JHEP 09 (1999) 032 [hep-th/9908142] [INSPIRE].
R.G. Leigh, Dirac-Born-Infeld action from Dirichlet σ-model, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4 (1989) 2767 [INSPIRE].
D.V. Belyaev, Boundary conditions in the Mirabelli and Peskin model, JHEP 01 (2006) 046 [hep-th/0509171] [INSPIRE].
D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, S-duality of boundary conditions in N = 4 super Yang-Mills theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 13 (2009) 721 [arXiv:0807.3720] [INSPIRE].
D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, Janus configurations, Chern-Simons couplings, and the theta-angle in N = 4 super Yang-Mills theory, JHEP 06 (2010) 097 [arXiv:0804.2907] [INSPIRE].
D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, Supersymmetric boundary conditions in N = 4 super Yang-Mills theory, J. Statist. Phys. 135 (2009) 789 [arXiv:0804.2902] [INSPIRE].
M. Srednicki, Quantum field theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2007).
J. Cardy, Conformal invariance and surface critical behavior, Nucl. Phys. B 240 (1984) 4.
D.M. McAvity and H. Osborn, Energy momentum tensor in conformal field theories near a boundary, Nucl. Phys. B 406 (1993) 655 [hep-th/9302068] [INSPIRE].
D.M. McAvity and H. Osborn, Conformal field theories near a boundary in general dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 455 (1995) 522 [cond-mat/9505127] [INSPIRE].
P. Liendo, L. Rastelli and B.C. van Rees, The bootstrap program for boundary CFT d, JHEP 07 (2013) 113 [arXiv:1210.4258] [INSPIRE].
P. Liendo and C. Meneghelli, Bootstrap equations for \( \mathcal{N}=4 \) SYM with defects, JHEP 01 (2017) 122 [arXiv:1608.05126] [INSPIRE].
C.R. Graham and E. Witten, Conformal anomaly of submanifold observables in AdS/CFT correspondence, Nucl. Phys. B 546 (1999) 52 [hep-th/9901021] [INSPIRE].
A.B. Zamolodchikov, Irreversibility of the flux of the renormalization group in a 2D field theory, JETP Lett. 43 (1986) 730 [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 43 (1986) 565] [INSPIRE].
E. Gerchkovitz, J. Gomis and Z. Komargodski, Sphere partition functions and the Zamolodchikov metric, JHEP 11 (2014) 001 [arXiv:1405.7271] [INSPIRE].
K. Aitken, A. Baumgartner, A. Karch and B. Robinson, 3d abelian dualities with boundaries, JHEP 03 (2018) 053 [arXiv:1712.02801] [INSPIRE].
K. Aitken, A. Karch and B. Robinson, Master 3d bosonization duality with boundaries, JHEP 05 (2018) 124 [arXiv:1803.08507] [INSPIRE].
T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto and N.M. Paquette, Dual boundary conditions in 3d SCFT’s, JHEP 05 (2018) 060 [arXiv:1712.07654] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1807.01700
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Herzog, C.P., Huang, KW., Shamir, I. et al. Superconformal models for graphene and boundary central charges. J. High Energ. Phys. 2018, 161 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2018)161
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2018)161