Abstract
As a low energy effective field theory, classical General Relativity receives an infrared relevant modification from the conformal trace anomaly of the energy-momentum tensor of massless, or nearly massless, quantum fields. The local form of the effective action associated with the trace anomaly is expressed in terms of a dynamical scalar field that couples to the conformal factor of the spacetime metric, allowing it to propagate over macroscopic distances. Linearized around flat spacetime, this semi-classical EFT admits scalar gravitational wave solutions in addition to the transversely polarized tensor waves of the classical Einstein theory. The amplitude of the scalar wave modes, as well as their energy and energy flux which are positive and contain a monopole moment, are computed. Astrophysical sources for scalar gravitational waves are considered, with the excited gluonic condensates in the interiors of neutron stars in merger events with other compact objects likely to provide the strongest burst signals.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
22 September 2017
An erratum to this article has been published.
References
A. Einstein, Approximative integration of the field equations of gravitation, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) (1916) 688 [INSPIRE].
A. Einstein, Über Gravitationswellen (in German), Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) (1918) 154 [INSPIRE].
B. S. Sathyaprakash and B. F. Schutz, Physics, astrophysics and cosmology with gravitational waves, Living Rev. Rel. 12 (2009) 2.
Virgo and LIGO Scientific collaborations, B.P. Abbott et al., Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 061102 [arXiv:1602.03837] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
N.D. Birrell and P.C.W. Davies, Quantum fields in curved space, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge U.K., (1982) [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, Effective gauge theories, Phys. Lett. 91B (1980) 51 [INSPIRE].
J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Chiral perturbation theory to one loop, Annals Phys. 158 (1984) 142 [INSPIRE].
J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Chiral perturbation theory: expansions in the mass of the strange quark, Nucl. Phys. B 250 (1985) 465 [INSPIRE].
H. Leutwyler, On the foundations of chiral perturbation theory, Annals Phys. 235 (1994) 165 [hep-ph/9311274] [INSPIRE].
A.V. Manohar, Effective field theories, Lect. Notes Phys. 479 (1997) 311 [hep-ph/9606222] [INSPIRE].
A. Pich, Effective field theory: course, hep-ph/9806303 [INSPIRE].
C.P. Burgess, Introduction to effective field theory, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57 (2007) 329 [hep-th/0701053] [INSPIRE].
A.M.J. Schakel, Boulevard of broken symmetries: effective field theories of condensed matter, World Scientific, Singapore, (2008) [INSPIRE].
J.F. Donoghue, E. Golowich and B.R. Holstein, Dynamics of the Standard Model, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge U.K., (1992) [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, The quantum theory of fields, vol. II, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge U.K., (1996) [INSPIRE].
T. Appelquist and J. Carazzone, Infrared singularities and massive fields, Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 2856.
J.F. Donoghue, General relativity as an effective field theory: the leading quantum corrections, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 3874.
C.P. Burgess, Quantum gravity in everyday life: general relativity as an effective field theory, Living Rev. Rel. 7 (2004) 5.
B.S. DeWitt, Dynamic theory of groups and fields, Gordon & Breach, New York U.S.A., (1965).
G. ’t Hooft, An algorithm for the poles at dimension four in the dimensional regularization procedure, Nucl. Phys. B 62 (1973) 444 [INSPIRE].
G. ’t Hooft and M.J.G. Veltman, One loop divergencies in the theory of gravitation, Ann. Poincaré Phys. Theor. A 20 (1974) 69 [INSPIRE].
D.G. Boulware, Gauge dependence of the effective action, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 389.
L.F. Abbott, Introduction to the background field method, Acta Phys. Polon. B 13 (1982) 33 [INSPIRE].
S.L. Adler, Axial-vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2426.
R. Jackiw, Field theoretic investigations in current algebra, in Lectures on current algebra and its applications, S.B. Treiman, R. Jackiw and D.J. Gross eds., Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton U.S.A., (1972).
M. Giannotti and E. Mottola, Trace anomaly and massless scalar degrees of freedom in gravity, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 045014.
R. Armillis, C. Corianò and L. Delle Rose, Anomaly poles as common signatures of chiral and conformal anomalies, Phys. Lett. B 682 (2009) 322 [arXiv:0909.4522] [INSPIRE].
R. Armillis, C. Corianò and L. Delle Rose, Conformal anomalies and the gravitational effective action: the TJJ correlator for a Dirac fermion, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 085001 [arXiv:0910.3381] [INSPIRE].
G ’t Hooft et al. eds., Recent developments in gauge theories, Plenum, New York U.S.A., (1980) reprinted in E. Farhi and R. Jackiw eds., Dynamical gauge symmetry breaking, World Scientific, Singapore, (1982) [INSPIRE].
P.O. Mazur and E. Mottola, Weyl cohomology and the effective action for conformal anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 104022.
D.M. Capper and M.J. Duff, Trace anomalies in dimensional regularization, Nuovo Cim. A 23 (1974) 173 [INSPIRE].
D.M. Capper and M.J. Duff, Conformal anomalies and the renormalizability problem in quantum gravity, Phys. Lett. A 53 (1975) 361 [INSPIRE].
S. Deser, M.J. Duff and C.J. Isham, Nonlocal conformal anomalies, Nucl. Phys. B 111 (1976) 45 [INSPIRE].
M.J. Duff, Observations on conformal anomalies, Nucl. Phys. B 125 (1977) 334 [INSPIRE].
L. Álvarez-Gaumé and E. Witten, Gravitational anomalies, Nucl. Phys. B 234 (1984) 269 [INSPIRE].
M.J. Duff, Twenty years of the Weyl anomaly, Class. Quant. Grav. 11 (1994) 1387 [hep-th/9308075] [INSPIRE].
E. Mottola and R. Vaulin, Macroscopic effects of the quantum trace anomaly, Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 064004.
E. Mottola, New horizons in gravity: the trace anomaly, dark energy and condensate stars, Acta Phys. Polon. B 41 (2010) 2031 [arXiv:1008.5006] [INSPIRE].
R.J. Riegert, A nonlocal action for the trace anomaly, Phys. Lett. 134B (1984) 56 [INSPIRE].
S. Paneitz, A quartic conformally covariant differential operator for arbitrary pseudo-Riemannian manifolds, MIT preprint, U.S.A., (1983).
R.B. Mann and D.E. Vincent, Radiation and five-dimensional cosmology, Phys. Lett. A 107 (1985) 75 [INSPIRE].
T.P. Branson, Differential operators cononically associated to a conformal structure, Math. Scand. 57 (1985) 293.
I. Antoniadis and E. Mottola, Four-dimensional quantum gravity in the conformal sector, Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 2013.
J. Wess and B. Zumino, Consequences of anomalous Ward identities, Phys. Lett. 37B (1971) 95 [INSPIRE].
I. Antoniadis, P.O. Mazur and E. Mottola, Conformal symmetry and central charges in four-dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 388 (1992) 627 [hep-th/9205015] [INSPIRE].
I.L. Shapiro and A.G. Zheksenaev, Gauge dependence in higher derivative quantum gravity and the conformal anomaly problem, Phys. Lett. B 324 (1994) 286 [INSPIRE].
C. Corianò, M.M. Maglio and E. Mottola, TTT in CFT: trace identities and the conformal anomaly effective action, submitted to JHEP [arXiv:1703.08860] [INSPIRE].
D.N. Blaschke, R. Carballo-Rubio and E. Mottola, Fermion pairing and the scalar boson of the 2D conformal anomaly, JHEP 12 (2014) 153 [arXiv:1407.8523] [INSPIRE].
P. Jordan, Schmerkruft und Weltall (in German), F. Vieweg and Sohn, Brannschweig Germany, (1955).
P. Jordan, Zum gegenwärtigen Stand der Diracschen kosmologischen Hypothesen (in German), Z. Physik 157 (1959) 112.
M. Fierz, On the physical interpretation of P. Jordan’s extended theory of gravitation, Helv. Phys. Acta 29 (1956) 128 [INSPIRE].
C. Brans and R.H. Dicke, Mach’s principle and a relativistic theory of gravitation, Phys. Rev. 124 (1961) 925.
C.M. Will, The confrontation between general relativity and experiment, Living Rev. Rel. 17 (2014) 4.
I. Antoniadis, P.O. Mazur and E. Mottola, Quantum diffeomorphisms and conformal symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 4756.
I. Antoniadis, P.O. Mazur and E. Mottola, Physical states of the quantum conformal factor, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 4770.
P.R. Anderson, C. Molina-París and E. Mottola, Cosmological horizon modes and linear response in de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 084005.
M. Le Bellac, Thermal field theory, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge U.K., (1996).
J.M. Bardeen, Gauge-invariant cosmological perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 1882.
I.S. Gradshteyn and I.M. Ryzhik eds., Table of integrals, series, and products, Academic Press, New York U.S.A., (1980).
D.R. Brill and J.B. Hartle, Method of the self-consistent field in general relativity and its application to the gravitational geon, Phys. Rev. B 135 (1964) 271.
R.A. Isaacson, Gravitational radiation in the limit of high frequency I. The linear approximation and geometrical optics, Phys. Rev. 166 (1968) 1263.
R.A. Isaacson, Gravitational radiation in the limit of high frequency II. Nonlinear terms and the effective stress tensor, Phys. Rev. 166 (1968) 1272.
C.W. Misner, K.S. Thorne and J.A. Wheeler, Gravitation, W.H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco U.S.A., (1973).
C. Kouveliotou, R.C. Duncan and C. Thompson, Magnetars, Sci. Am. 288N2 (2003) 24 [INSPIRE].
A.G. Lyne et al., A double-pulsar system — a rare laboratory for relativistic gravity and plasma physics, Science 303 (2004) 1153 [astro-ph/0401086] [INSPIRE].
E.S. Shuryak, The QCD vacuum, hadrons and the superdense matter, World Scientific, Singapore, (1988) [INSPIRE].
E.S. Fraga, A. Kurkela and A. Vuorinen, Neutron star structure from QCD, Eur. Phys. J. A 52 (2016) 49 [arXiv:1508.05019] [INSPIRE].
P.O. Mazur and E. Mottola, Gravitational condensate stars: an alternative to black holes, gr-qc/0109035 [INSPIRE].
P.O. Mazur and E. Mottola, Gravitational vacuum condensate stars, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 101 (2004) 9545 [gr-qc/0407075] [INSPIRE].
N. Cornish, L. Sampson, N. Yunes and F. Pretorius, Gravitational wave tests of general relativity with the parameterized post-Einsteinian framework, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 062003.
M. Maggiore and A. Nicolis, Detection strategies for scalar gravitational waves with interferometers and resonant spheres, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 024004.
S. Capozziello and C. Corda, Scalar gravitational waves from scalar-tensor gravity: production and response of interferometers, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15 (2006) 1119 [INSPIRE].
J.Z. Simon, Higher-derivative Lagrangians, nonlocality, problems, and solutions, Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 3720.
J.Z. Simon, Stability of flat space, semiclassical gravity, and higher derivatives, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 3308.
P.O. Mazur and E. Mottola, The gravitational measure, solution of the conformal factor problem and stability of the ground state of quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 341 (1990) 187 [INSPIRE].
P.R. Anderson, C. Molina-París and E. Mottola, Linear response, validity of semiclassical gravity, and the stability of flat space, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 024026.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1606.09220
An erratum to this article is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2017)107.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Mottola, E. Scalar gravitational waves in the effective theory of gravity. J. High Energ. Phys. 2017, 43 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2017)043
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2017)043