Abstract
We compiled the main results of a second diagnosis of Brazilian ornithological collections. Our starting point was the survey by A. Aleixo and F. Straube, with data up to 2005 and published in 2007. Ten years later, in 2015, curators or managers from 35 collections of birds (out of 59) answered 12 questions related to the status of the collection they curate. These collections cover all regions of the country, and many have grown in number of specimens, especially in northeastern Brazil. As verified by Aleixo & Straube, most ornithological Brazilian collections are concentrated in southeastern and southern Brazil (66%). Also, some basic shortcomings persist, such as the lack of specialized curators, taxidermists, and access to digitalized information. The three oldest and biggest collections (Museu Nacional da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - MN, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi - MPEG and Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo -MZUSP) together continue to hold more than half of all Brazilian ornithological specimens and 83% of all type specimen. Some collections, (especially new ones) have been actively collecting and preparing specimens in a much-diversified way, saving different body parts of a single individual as distinct types of materials. Government and other online data information systems (e.g., Brazilian Biodiversity Information System -SiBBr and Center for Reference in Environmental Information -CRIA) have been developed, and now provide digital data from some relevant collections. Brazilian ornithological collections are completely or partially digitized (85%), although for most specimens and collections, data are not freely available and is mostly accessed between researchers. Despite the efforts of some researchers and institutions, improvements in the maintenance and protection of the collections are still necessary. Nevertheless, we conclude that the situation of Brazilian ornithological collections has improved in the past 10 years. Finally, herein we propose a rank for Brazilian ornithological collections classifying them according their role for both research and education activities, which are considered in the current bibliography as key roles of natural history collections.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aleixo A. & Straube F. C. 2007. Coleções de aves brasileiras: breve histórico, diagnóstico atual e perspectivas para o futuro. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 15:315–324.
Allmon W. D. 1994. The value of natural history collections. Curator 37:83–89.
Assembleia Legislativa do Estado de Goiás. 2017a. Comissão mista, projetos aprovados. https://portal.al.go.leg.br/noticias/ver/id/155472/comissao+mista (access on 04 December 2017).
Assembleia Legislativa do Estado de Goiás. 2017b. Projeto de lei — construção do Museu de Zoologia da PUC Goiás. https://portal.al.go.leg.br/noticias/ver/id/154033/projeto+ de+lei+do+executivo+viabiliza+a+construcao+do+museu+de+ zoologia+da+puc+goias (access on 21 November 2017).
Bencke G. A., Fontana C. S., Dias R. A., Maurício G. N. & Mähler- Jr. J.K.F. 2003. Aves, p. 1–50. In: Fontana C. S., Bencke G. A. & Reis R. E. (eds.). Livro vermelho da fauna ameaçada de extinção no Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS.
Brooke M. L. 2000. Why museums matter. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:136–137.
Cavarzere V., Silveira L. F., Tonetti V. R., Develey P., Ubaid F. K., Regalado L. B. & Figueiredo L. F.A. 2017. Museum collections indicate Bird defaunation in a biodiversity hotspot. Biota Neotropica 17:e20170404.
Claridge M. F. 1995. Introducing Systematics Agenda 2000. Biodiversity and Conservation 4:451–454.
Cracraft J. 2002. The seven great questions of systematic biology: an essential foundation for conservation and the sustainable use of biodiversity. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 89:127–144.
CRIA. 2017. Projeto CRIA. http://www.cria.org.br/projetos (access on 04 October 2017).
Dance A. 2017. Collate, curate and animate: curatorial work provides an ideal opportunity to combine research with public engagement. Nature 552:279–281.
Fernandes G. W., Vale M. M., Overbeck G. E., Bustamante M. M.C., Grelle C. E.V., Bergallo H. G., Magnusson W. E., Akama A., Alves S. S., Amorim A., Araújo J., Barros C. F., Bravo F., Carim M. J.V., Cerqueira R., Collevatti R. G., Colli G. R., da Cunha C. N., D’Andrea P. S., Dianese J. C., Diniz S., Estrela P. C., Fernandes M. R.M., Fontana C. S., Giacomin L. L., Gusmão L. F.P., Juncá F.A., Lins-e-Silva A. C. B., Lopes C. R.A.S., Lorini M. L., de Queiroz L. P., Malabarba L. R., Marimon B. S., Marimon-Junior B. H., Marques M. C.M., Martinelli B. M., Martins M. B., de Medeiros H. F., Menin M., de Morais P. B., Muniz F. H., Neckel-Oliveira S., de Oliveira J. A., Oliveira R. P., Pedroni F., Penha J., Podgaiski L. R., Rodrigues D. J., Scariot A., Silveira L. F., Silveira M., Tomas W. M., Vital M. J.S. & Pillar V. D. 2017. Dismantling Brazil’s science threatens global biodiversity heritage. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation 15:239–243.
Joseph L. 2011. Museum collections in ornithology: today’s record of avian biodiversity for tomorrow’s world. Emu 111:i–xii.
Lane M. A. 1996. Roles of natural history collections. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 83:536–545.
Prefeitura de Guarapuava. 2015. Museu de Ciências Naturais de Guarapuava é reinaugurado. http://www.guarapuava.pr.gov.br/noticias/museu-de-ciencias-naturais-de-guarapuava-ereinaugurado/ (access on 07 December 2017).
Rouhan G., Dorr L. J., Gautier L., Clerc P., Muller S. & Gaudeul M. 2017. The time has come for natural history collections to claim co-authorship of research articles. Taxon 66:1014–1016.
Shaffera H. B., Fisherb R. N. & Davidsona C. 1998. The role of natural history collections in documenting species declines. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:27–30.
SiBBr. 2017. Pesquisa SiBBr. http://www.sibbr.gov.br/internal/index.php?area=osibbr&subarea=resultados (access on 29 November 2017).
Systematics Agenda. 2000. Systematics agenda 2000: charting the biosphere. New York: Technical Report.
Suarez A. V. & Tsutsui N. D. 2004. The value of museum collections for research and society. BioScience 54:66–74.
Winker K. 2004. Natural history museums in a postbiodiversity era. BioScience 54:455–459.
Zaher H. & Young P. S. 2003. As coleções zoológicas brasileiras: panorama e desafios. Ciência e Cultura 55:24–26.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Fontana, C.S., da Silva, T.W. & de Souza, J.P. Brazilian bird collections: a decade after Aleixo & Straube (2007). Rev. Bras. Ornitol. 25, 254–268 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03544405
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03544405