Skip to main content

From Peacekeeping to Responsibility to Protect: Unpacking the Genealogy and History of the RtoP Doctrine in the International Humanitarian System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Africa's Engagement with the Responsibility to Protect in the 21st Century

Abstract

While the emergence and popularity of the responsibility to protect (RtoP) doctrine as a lexicon in international humanitarian system and literature have gained traction within the last decade, humanitarian intervention have however metamorphosed through a checkered history. This chapter examines the emergence and development of the RtoP by interrogating the genealogy and history of the doctrine that is hinged on the notion of a ‘never again’ approach to curtailing mass atrocities in the world. There is no gainsaying the fact that the continent of Africa have had a two-pronged impact on the RtoP. First, Africa was the epicentre of the ideological and operational shift from peacekeeping to RtoP; second, the continent have provided a litmus test for the implementation of the doctrine as evident by the backlash that followed NATO’S overreach in Libya in 2011. A plethora of inter-state and intra-state wars in Africa between the period of the end of the Cold War to the post-911 era have necessitated the deployment of over thirty peacekeeping missions on the continent by the United Nations (UN). However, the failure of UN peacekeeping missions to prevent mass atrocities such as the 1994 Rwandan genocide and the subsequent 1995 Srebrenica massacre birthed an ideological and operational shift from peacekeeping to a responsibility to protect that is geared towards ensuring a concerted global effort at acting to preventing mass atrocities. By using Africa as a prism, this study presents an in-depth analyses of the RtoP doctrine as an international statute by tracing the origin of peacekeeping and the history of its metamorphosis into the R2P doctrine. It further examines the norms of RtoP that breaks with the idea of peacekeeping. Lastly, this chapter interrogates the debates on the subject matter of the RtoP and makes a prognosis on the new directions—responsibility while protecting (RwP)—to which the doctrine may take in light of criticisms that followed its 2011 implementation Libya.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amneus, D. (2013). Responsibility to Protect and the Prevention of Genocide. A Right to Humanitarian Intervention? (p. 33).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. J. (2009). Realizing the Responsibility to Protect. International Studies Perspectives, 10(2), 111–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boisson de Chazournes, L., & Condorelli, L. (2006). De la ‘responsabilité de protéger’, ou d’une nouvelleparure pour une notion déjà bien établie. Révue générale de droit international public, 110(1), 11–18. http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:6162

  • Brahimi, L. (2000). Report of the Panel on UN Peace Operations, A/44/305-S/2000/809 (pp. 8–9, 21).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosig, M. (2012) Responsibility to Protect: The GIBSA Perspective. In M. Brosig (Ed.), The Responsibility to Protect 2 from Evasive to Reluctant Action? The Role of Global Middle Powers, HSF, ISS, KAS & SAIIA, Johannesburg (pp. 1–8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (2008). The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and for All. Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. J., & Sahnoun, M. (2001). The responsibility to protect : Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. International Development Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, C. (2013). Normative Developments in the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflicts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortna, P. (2008). Does Peacekeeping Work? Shaping Belligerents’ Choices after Civil War (Chapter 7). Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francioni, F., & Bakker, C. (2013). Responsibility to Protect, Humanitarian Intervention and Human Rights: Lessons from Libya to Mali. The Transatlantic Relationship and the Future Global Governance. Working Paper. ISSN 2281-5252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, A., Popovski, V., & Sampford, C. (2012). Norms of Protection: Responsibility to Protect, Protection of Civilians and Their Interaction (p. xiii).

    Google Scholar 

  • Franck, T. M. (2006). Interpretation and Change in the Law of Humanitarian Intervention. In J. L. Holzgrefe & R. O. Keohane (Eds.), Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal and Political Dilemmas (p. 204 at pp. 220–226). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederic, M. (2012). From Peacekeeping to R2P: The Protection of Civilians as the UN's New Raison d'être? Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2154968

  • Gierycz, D. (2008). The Responsibility to Protect: A Legal and Rights-Based Perspective. NUPI Report, 5, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. (2018). Peacekeeping, Civilian Protection and the Responsibility to Protect: A Handbook for Trainers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, E. P. (2013). Implementing the Responsibility to Protect: New Directions for International Peace and Security? Igarape Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, V., Taylor, G., & Kelly, M. (2009). Protecting Civilians in the Context of UN Peacekeeping Operations: Successes, Setbacks and Remaining Challenges (p. 19).

    Google Scholar 

  • ICISS Report. (2001). International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Published December 2001. Retrieved http://www.iciss-ciise.gc.ca/report2-en.asp

  • International Crisis Group. (2012). Côte d’Ivoire: Defusing Tensions. www.crisisgroup.org/en/publication-type/media-releases/2012/africa/cote-d-ivoire-defusin-tensions.aspx

  • Kelly, M. (2013). Fighting for Their Lives: R2P, RwP and the Utility of Force to Protect Civilians. Igarape Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malan, M. (1998). Peacekeeping in Africa—Trends and Responses. Institute for Security Studies. Occasional Paper No. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muggah, R. (2013) (eds). Stabilization Operations, Security and Development. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omorogbe, E. Y. (2012). The African Union, Responsibility to Protect and the Libyan Crisis. Netherlands International Law Review, LIX, 141–163, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, D. (2013). Responsibility to Protect and the Military. Igarape Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, S. (2009). Responsibility to Protect: A Framework for Prevention. Global Responsibility to Protect, 1, 448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryniker, A. (2001). The ICRC’s Position on ‘Humanitarian Intervention.’ International Review of the Red Cross, 482, 527–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkin, J. (2009). The Role of the United Nations, the African Union and Africa’s Sub-Regional Organizations in Dealing with Africa’s Human Rights Problems: Connecting Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect. Journal of African Law, 53, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkin, J., & Paterson, M. (2010). Introduction. 2 Global Responsibility to Protect (p. 339 at p. 344).

    Google Scholar 

  • Security Council Report. (2014). Possible Vote on Syria Draft Humanitarian Resolution. What's in Blue. Available at: http://www.whatsinblue.org/2014/02/possible-vote-onsyria-draft-humanitarian-resolutiontomorrow.php. Accessed 5 Sept 2014.

  • Sihvo, O. (2012). The Responsibility to Protect and Protection of Civilians: Enhancing the Protection Capacity through Interaction. Master’s Thesis in Public International Law, Master’s Programme in International Human Rights Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simma, B. (1999). NATO, the UN and the Use of Force: Legal Aspects. European Journal of International Law, 10(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (2015). R2P and the Protection of Civilians: South Africa’s Perspective on Conflict Resolution. Policy Brief 113. Global Public Policy Initiative

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M., Whalan, J., & Thomson, P. (2011). The Protection of Civilians in UN Peacekeeping Operations: Recent Developments. Security Challenges, 7, 30–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahn, C. (2007). Responsibility to Protect: Political Rhetoric or Emerging Legal Norm? The American Journal of International Law, 101(1), 99 at pp. 111–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockburger, P. (2010). The Responsibility to Protect Doctrine: Customary International Law, an Emerging Legal Norm, or Just Wishful Thinking? Intercultural Human Rights Law Review, 5, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuenkel, O. (2013). Brazil as a Norm Entrepreneur: The Responsibility While Protecting. Igarape Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tardy, T. (2012). The Dangerous Liaisons of the Responsibility to Protect and the Protection of Civilians in Peacekeeping Operations. Global Responsibility to Protect, 4(4), 424–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, R. (2006). The United Nations. From Collective Security to the Responsibility to Protect. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Fall of Srebrenica. Report of the UNSG Pursuant to General Assembly Resolution 53/55, 15 November 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNSC Res. 941, S/RES/941, 23 September 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNSC Res. 1004, S/1004, 12 July 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. D. (2011). The Road to Humanitarian War in Libya. Global Responsibility to Protect, 3, 248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Inalegwu Awodi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Awodi, P.I., Wapmuk, S. (2024). From Peacekeeping to Responsibility to Protect: Unpacking the Genealogy and History of the RtoP Doctrine in the International Humanitarian System. In: Erameh, N.I., Ojakorotu, V. (eds) Africa's Engagement with the Responsibility to Protect in the 21st Century. Africa's Global Engagement: Perspectives from Emerging Countries. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8163-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics